The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Atheist Creep Lawrence Krauss Becomes a Pariah in the Scientific Community

Posted on | February 28, 2018 | Comments Off on Atheist Creep Lawrence Krauss Becomes a Pariah in the Scientific Community

“When women come to me to warn me about what speakers to avoid at conferences or confide in me sexual harassment they’ve experienced, Lawrence Krauss is by far the most common name I hear.”
— Jen McCreight

Almost every prominent man in the atheist movement is a lecherous creep, according to women in the movement, who began publicly complaining about five years ago how they were constantly harassed and groped by the vile perverts who attend atheist conferences.

In 2013, I wrote about the notorious Lawrence Krauss, and figured that anyone who Googled his name would know what a creep he is, but it took years — and the #MeToo movement — before other journalists decided to investigate the accusations against Professor Krauss. Peter Aldhous, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes of BuzzFeed spent months working on their very detailed article about Professor Krauss, who teaches physics at Arizona State University. It turns out he may have left his previous job under duress:

Case Western Reserve University restricted star physicist Lawrence Krauss’s access to campus in 2009 because of a sexual harassment complaint, according to a report in BuzzFeed News.
But by the time the sanctions were put in place, Krauss had left for Arizona State University, BuzzFeed said. He was permitted to return to CWRU in 2009 for a colloquium.
The allegation at CWRU was among several reported by BuzzFeed News against Krauss in the last decade. . . .
Krauss came to CWRU in 1993 as chair of the Physics Department and hired some of the current physics faculty before stepping down as the chair in 2005.

In other words, Professor Krauss’s departure from Case Western may not have been entirely voluntary, but the accusations against him there were kept hush-hush and he made the move to Arizona State without any public scandal. Yet his reputation was very bad, even by the disreputable standards of the atheist community, and Rebecca Watson calls Professor Krauss “someone I’ve always known was extremely shady.”

 

Watson recommends the BuzzFeed article as “painstakingly researched,” including multiple women “reporting the same kind of sexual harassment from Lawrence Krauss over and over, all over the world.” Yet she says even this has not convinced the, uh, “denialists”:

Despite how well-researched it is, of course there are people falling over themselves to defend Krauss. These people have taken Occam’s Razor and thrown it in the garbage, because they think it’s more likely that all of these separate women decided independently to lie about Lawrence Krauss sexually harassing and assaulting them, than that Krauss did it.

Nevertheless, Professor Krauss is beginning to suffer consequences:

Several talks by Lawrence Krauss, a professor of physics at Arizona State University and a well-known skeptic, were canceled after BuzzFeed reported on allegations of sexual harassment against him. Krauss, who denies the claims, will not speak at the American Physical Society’s meeting in April, it announced Friday. The society “deplores harassment in all its forms and remains committed to ensuring a respectful and safe environment at its meetings,” it said in a statement. Among other appearances, Krauss’s book talk at Massachusetts Institute of Technology next month has been canceled.

 

Professor Krauss had been scheduled to appear last Friday with fellow atheists Sam Harris and Matt Dillahunty at a “Celebration of Science and Reason” in Phoenix, but after the BuzzFeed article was published, Professor Krauss was scratched from the agenda. How many more events will be cancelled before Professor Krauss becomes persona non grata? Hasn’t this exposure already irreparably damaged his reputation? He was once what passed for a “celebrity” in the atheist community — his books were popular and he got a good bit of media publicity — but those days are clearly over, and what does Professor Krauss have left now, except a teaching job in Arizona? He’s a washed-up has-been, and he probably won’t be invited to many conferences in the future.

Live by the “science,” die by the “science.”

 

Category: Science

‘You Sent Me to Whore School!’

Posted on | February 28, 2018 | Comments Off on ‘You Sent Me to Whore School!’

 

That’s a line from Red Sparrow, the latest “strong woman” tale from Hollywood, a genuinely wretched movie starring Jennifer Lawrence. After watching the trailer for that and other recent films, Professor Ann Althouse has seen enough of this toxic cultural sludge:

Notice how they all have strong female characters at the center but everything is paranoid, violent, and sexual. . . . Hollywood is sick. Evil. Corrupting our soul.

Well, it’s not corrupting my soul, because I ignore 99% of it. Except for news and documentaries, I seldom watch TV at all. Movies? My tastes run to classics, like old film noir. Basically, something from the 1940s where guys wear fedoras, smoke cigarettes and talk about “dames.”

(Hat-tip: Instapundit.)

 

Category: Hollywood, Movies

Google Uses SPLC to Censor YouTube

Posted on | February 28, 2018 | 1 Comment

 

Peter Hasson of the Daily Caller reports:

The Southern Poverty Law Center is assisting YouTube in policing content on their platform, The Daily Caller has learned.
The left-wing nonprofit — which has more recently come under fire for labeling legitimate conservative organizations as “hate groups” — is one of the more than 100 nongovernment organizations (NGOs) and government agencies in YouTube’s “Trusted Flaggers” program . . .
The SPLC’s close involvement in policing content on YouTube is likely to cause consternation among conservatives who worry that they may not be treated fairly. The left-wing group has consistently labeled pedestrian conservative organizations as “hate groups” and has been directly tied to violence against conservatives in the past. Floyd Lee Corkins, who opened fire at the Family Research Center in 2012, said he chose the FRC for his act of violence because the SPLC listed them as a “hate group.” . . .
The SPLC has faced criticism for its cavalier definitions of “hate group” and “extremist.” The organization stoked controversy in 2015 by labeling Dr. Ben Carson, now the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), an anti-gay “extremist.” After a backlash, the SPLC reversed its ruling and apologized to Carson.
The organization faced a similarly intense backlash in 2016 for labeling Maajid Nawaz, a respected counter-extremism activist, an “anti-Muslim extremist.” . . .
The Washington Examiner’s Emily Jashinsky noted last year that “the SPLC’s claim to objectivity is nothing less than fraudulent, a reality that informed observers of its practices from both the Left and Right accept.”

YouTube and its parent company Google, like Twitter and Facebook, are now controlled by left-wing political operatives who use their authority to suppress conservative dissent. This was a point I made last weekend in a CPAC interview with Debra Heine of PJMedia:

“YouTube accounts are being demonetized, people are being denied Google Adsense revenue,” McCain explained. “In many different ways, the left is now using its power within social media to deprive conservatives of what we think of as free speech.” . . .
[S]tudents indoctrinated with left-wing biases in the nation’s colleges and universities are being imported into for-profit companies.
“They bring these biases with them into the company and this is how you end up with James Damore being fired at Google, sites being shadowbanned on Twitter, my own account R.S. McCain being banned from Twitter, people’s Facebook losing the opportunity to promote their content on Facebook,” McCain told PJ Media. “It’s happening every day, and like they said at the panel, people need to wake up.”

You can read the whole thing at PJMedia.

Our readers are always invited to help support free speech by heeding the Five Most Important Words in the English Language:

HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!



 

 

RECENTLY:

 

Category: Media Bias

Get Woke, Go Broke: ‘Social Justice’ Agenda Leads Oberlin College Into Crisis

Posted on | February 27, 2018 | 4 Comments

 

Meredith Raimondo is vice president and dean of students at Oberlin College, an elite liberal arts school in Ohio where the annual cost of attendance (tuition, room and board) is $68,672. Dean Raimondo is also named as a defendant in two lawsuits against Oberlin:

Oberlin College faces two serious lawsuits arising out of social justice activism on campus.
One suit, by a local bakery boycotted by Oberlin students and administration based on apparently false claims the bakery racially profiled students, has been permitted to move forward. . . .
[T]hree Oberlin students were arrested for shoplifting at Gibson’s bakery. Oberlin students claimed racial profiling, and mounted protests and a boycott supported by college student groups, administrators and faculty. The boycott continued even after police released data showing there was no racial profiling in shoplifting arrests at the bakery, and the three students pled guilty. . . . Gibson’s sued the college and its Dean of Students, Meredith Raimondo, for defamation and multiple other claims.
The Gibson’s lawsuit has caused a town-gown split that pits the privileged college and students against ordinary community members. . . .
In another lawsuit, an expelled Oberlin College male student sued claiming the hearing process was biased and stacked against men. . . .
A male student who was expelled from campus in October 2016 for alleged sexual assault has filed a federal lawsuit against Oberlin. . . . [T]he lawsuit contains allegations which, if proven, reflect that Oberlin’s system for adjudicating sexual assault accusations was fundamentally biased against males, at least during the 2015-2016 academic year.
As in the Gibson’s lawsuit, the alleged conduct of Dean of Students Raimondo was at issue.
[T]he student sought to file an Amended Complaint, after discovering a YouTube video in which Raimondo allegedly made statement evidencing bias against males.

Dean Raimondo is allegedly complicit both in the false accusation of racism against Gibson’s Bakery and an anti-male policy under which 100% of students accused of sexual misconduct were found guilty.

Meanwhile, declining enrollment has provoked a budget crisis at Oberlin:

President Carmen Ambar and other senior administrators have launched an 11-day presentation campaign in which all College and Conservatory faculty, administrative and professional staff, Student Senate, student media, and other constituencies will see the largest overview of Oberlin’s financial situation to date, along with Ambar’s proposed plan to rectify Oberlin’s ever-worsening deficit

Because the only thing taught at Oberlin is radical ideology (see “The Cult of Social Justice,” The American Spectator, Dec. 15, 2015), the students are constantly protesting against “imperialism, white supremacy, capitalism, ableism, and a cissexist heteropatriarchy.” Oberlin’s enrollment is declining because no intelligent parent would pay $68,672 a year for this kind of left-wing indoctrination. And yet the only reason Dean Raimondo has her job is because she is a feminist who has dedicated her career to promoting “progressive” ideology.

Everybody knows that academics seeking faculty tenure must pursue the “publish or perish” principle. What kind of research Meredith Raimondo has published? The only thing I could find was an article (“Intensifications: Representing Gender and Sexuality at the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS”) included in a 2005 anthology, Just Advocacy: Women’s Human Rights, Transnational Feminisms, and the Politics of Representation. Feminist advocacy was the sole rationale of Dean Raimondo’s teaching career, as she explained in 2014 when Oberlin bestowed an “Excellence in Teaching Award” on her. She declared that “social justice principles . . . are a key intellectual component of our work,” and described her “research interests” as “gender and sexuality, health inequalities, and social movements.”

Because feminism is the raison d’être of Dean Raimondo’s career, it was therefore a clear indication of Oberlin’s agenda in July 2014 when she was appointed special assistant to the president for diversity, equity, and inclusion and Title IX coordinator:

Raimondo’s position was developed as a result of conversations that happened on campus over the past 18 months about how best to meet the college’s obligation to respond to allegations of gender? and sex-based discrimination and harassment in compliance with Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, the Clery Act, and the Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act of 2013 (SaVE). . . .
“The current national conversation about addressing sexual misconduct on college campuses is one example of the ways in which equity issues are deeply connected to educational opportunity,” says Raimondo. “I’m proud to be at a campus taking responsible and proactive steps on these issues.”

What this means, in practice, is that Oberlin is committed to abolishing heterosexuality on campus. If you are a male student at Oberlin, you can be expelled for engaging in any heterosexuality activity, because Meredith Raimondo’s policy is that the only thing necessary to prove a male student guilty of rape is to accuse him. All students at Oberlin are indoctrinated with hatred of “heteropatriarchy,” but there are probably no girls on campus that a boy would find sexually attractive, even if it weren’t for the administration’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual agenda. The typical Oberlin girl is a “queer feminist” like Kaela Elias, whose entire worldview is based on fear and loathing of “cishet white males.”

“I recently learned that the guy who lives next to me and literally never even makes eye contact with me is a REPUBLICAN. I am scared.”
— Kaela Elias, Dec. 14, 2015

A Republican at Oberlin? Why would any Republican go to such a school? Would any Republican expect his parents to pay $68,672 a year for him to attend Oberlin, where everybody on campus hates Republicans, and all the girls are “queer feminists” who would probably accuse him of rape if he ever made eye contact with them? The appointment of Meredith Raimondo as dean of students in November 2016 signified that hostility to “cishet white males” is now the official ideology at Oberlin.

“Get woke, go broke.” Social justice is bad for business, and the financial woes at Oberlin — which is now facing multimillion-dollar deficits, in addition to two lawsuits — demonstrate that promoting an ideology hostile to capitalism has harmful consequences even in the taxpayer-subsidized cocoon of elite academia. “Falling enrollment at Oberlin is a key driver of the financial problems,” William Jacobson writes. “At some point Oberlin will have to confront whether the over-the-top social activism on campus, which dominates national media coverage of Oberlin, has reached the tipping point.”




 

Category: Education, Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 02.27.18

Posted on | February 27, 2018 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 02.27.18

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Trump 2020 – Brad Parscale Will be His Campaign Manager
Twitchy: Dem Rep Carolyn Maloney’s Bold Proposal Shows You CAN’T Parody Democrats On Guns
Louder With Crowder: Video Montage Exposes Democrat & Media Ignorance On Guns
Axios: The United States Of Corporate America (h/t NeoWayland)

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Deadbeat Single Mothers
American Power: James Damore At Portland State U., also, Martin Meredith, Diamonds, Gold, And War
American Thinker: The Left Is Going For Broke This Year. Good.
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Extended Queue News
BattleSwarm: Twitter Decides You Shouldn’t Be Able To Type www.FireScottIsrael.com
BLACKFIVE: Mark Greaney, Agent In Place
Da Tech Guy: U.S. vs. Microsoft, also, Attention Corporate America – Georgia Is The Rule Not The Exception On The NRA
Don Surber: Raise The Voting Age To 21
Dustbury: Whoever He Was
Fausta: Immigration – The Extracontinentales
The Geller Report: Turkish President Makes Child Abuse Video – Tells Little Girl To “Die A Martyr”
Hogewash: A Stupid Way To Virtue Signal
Joe For America: President Trump To Have His Pick Of Eight Different Walls
JustOneMinute: House Democrat Offers “Assault Weapon” Ban
Legal Insurrection: University Study – Schools Safer Than In 1990s, School Shootings Not More Common, also, Antifa At UT Austin Hosts Program For Mentally Ill Students
Power Line: Churchill In Five Minutes, also, Chai Feldblum’s EEOC
Shark Tank: “Safety Net” Hospitals Want More Government Handouts
Shot In The Dark: The DFL Is Actually Coming For Your Guns
STUMP: Taxing Tuesday – We’re Number 50!
The Jawa Report: Find Your Center, also, Free Free Heather Locklear!
This Ain’t Hell: Battle Of Norfolk – 27 Years Ago Today
Victory Girls: And Right On Schedule, Assault Weapons Ban Introduced
Weasel Zippers: Rosie O’Donnell Tells NRA Chief “We’ve Begged For An Assault Weapon Ban Since Columbine!” Just One Problem…, also, Lawsuit Claims 100K Non-Citizens Registered To Vote In Pennsylvania
Mark Steyn: The Abolition Of The Sexes


Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery

Man With AR-15 Stops Man With Knife

Posted on | February 27, 2018 | 1 Comment

 

News from Illinois:

A man armed with an AR-15 rifle stopped an attack by one of his neighbors and held him until police arrived.
It happened Monday at an apartment building on Harbor Drive in Oswego Township.
Police say it all began when someone with a knife attacked another person during an argument.
Neighbor Dave Thomas, who witnessed the attack, went into his home, got his rifle and ordered the suspect to stop.
“I poked my head out the door. There was a pool of blood, blood was everywhere in the hall. There was still a confrontation going on, there were about three or four people involved at this point,” Thomas said. “So I ran back into my house and grabbed my AR-15. I grabbed the AR-15 over my handgun — bigger gun, I think a little more of an intimidation factor. Definitely played a part in him actually stopping.”
The suspect was able to get away briefly, before he was captured by police.
The stabbing victim was taken to the hospital. No word yet on that person’s condition.
Police say Thomas has a valid firearm owner’s identification card and a concealed carry permit.
“The AR-15 is my weapon of choice for home protection,” Thomas said. “It’s light, it’s maneuverable. If you train and know how to use it properly, it’s not dangerous. And this is just a perfect example of good guy with an AR-15 stopped a bad guy with a knife. And there were no lives taken, so all in all it was a good day.”

The “intimidation factor” — the fact that the weapon is scary-looking — is also, unfortunately, part of the psychology involved in media distortions about so-called “assault rifles.” The phrase itself is misleading. An actual assault rifle is fully automatic, and such weapons have been strictly licensed by federal law for more than 80 years. What we are talking about are semi-automatic weapons, and I got my first semi-automatic rifle (a .22-caliber Winchester) for Christmas when I was 12 years old.

The ordinary 9-mm pistol is also semi-automatic, but as Dave Thomas says, the military-style rifle has more of a visible “intimidation factor.” Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) exploit this factor to mislead ignorant people (i.e., likely Democrat voters) into believing that laws prohibiting “assault rifles” will protect the public from these scary-looking weapons. (Democrats in Congress have proposed legislation that would ban “205 specific firearms . . . including the AK-47 and AR-15.”) However, history has shown that such legislation accomplishes nothing in terms of public safety. A study by the National Institute of Justice found “no discernible reduction” as a result of a ban passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress in 1994, which expired in 2004.

Advocates of gun control nowadays use the poll-tested phrase “common-sense gun safety,” but their arguments are still based on flawed logic — an appeal to ignorance and emotion. The more you actually know about firearms, the less likely you are to agree with the gun-grabbers.

What we need is kook control. The perpetrator of the Parkland massacre was psychotic, with a long record of dangerous behavior, and should have been incarcerated either in a jail or a mental ward. Democrats don’t want to do anything about that, because psychos usually vote Democrat.

(Hat-tip: Sean Davis on Twitter.)



 

Category: Crime

In The Mailbox: 02.26.18

Posted on | February 27, 2018 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 02.26.18

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: BCSO Deputy Scot Peterson Wants You To Know He’s Not A Coward
Twitchy: CNN’s Interview With David Hogg And Emma Gonzalez Just Got A Lot More Interesting
Louder With Crowder: EMT Reveals Massive Failures That Took Place During Parkland Shooting
The Federalist: The Gun Control Debate Isn’t Really About Guns. It’s About Human Rights (h/t NeoWayland)

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Shooting Abbott Only Makes Him Stronger, also, No Dutch Lunch For Me
American Power: The Gun Control Debate Could Break America, also, Decolonizing Everything
American Thinker: Exposing The Deep Rot In The Deep State
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday
BattleSwarm: Pat Condell’s YouTube Video About YouTube Censoring His YouTube Video About YouTube Censoring His Videos
BLACKFIVE: Rhys Bowen, The Tuscan Child
CDR Salamander: Unmanned’s Manning Problem
Da Tech Guy:  Imagine There’s No Money And No Guns, also, The Unused Tools In The Military
Don Surber: The Looting In Baltimore Continues, also, Crony Capitalists Learn Not To Mess With The NRA
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, One Fewer Tool For Fools?
Fausta: AMLO’s Friend Romo Gets Richer
The Geller Report: Swiss Islamic Council Justifies Female Genital Mutilation, also, Oakland’s Democrat Mayor Tips Off Illegals To Possible ICE Raid
Hogewash: Team Kimberlin Post of The Day, also, Yours Truly, Johnny Atsign
Joe For America: Dem Rep Ted Lieu Says It’s Okay To Lie About Gun Facts
JustOneMinute: NYT Continues The Honest National Debate On Gun Control
Legal Insurrection: Georgia Senate Blocks Delta Tax Break After Airline Parts Ways With NRA, also, The Berniefication Of The Democratic Party Is Nearly Complete
Michelle Malkin: Broward County Supervisor’s Cure For Systemic Failure? More Money!
Power Line: The Schiff Memo’s Appalling Dishonesty, also, Monday In Pictures – Canadian Idiot Edition
Shark Tank: Governor Scott Should Put An End To Hallandale Beach’s Corrupt & Childish City Hall
Shot In The Dark: The Real Perps
STUMP: Memory Monday – Turning The Corner On Flu, And the Fourth Week Of February 1918
The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler Restart, also, Allowed On Twitter – Jew Hatred, Banned On Twitter – Exposing Jew Hatred On Twitter
The Political Hat: Medical Murder Mania From The Alpha To The Omega
This Ain’t Hell: Jarhead Author Says “I Was A Marine. I Don’t Want Guns In My Classroom”, also, Dreamer Arrested For Threatening School, also also, Little Support For Manning In Maryland Senate Race
Victory Girls: Teen Gun Control Activists Show Why We Shouldn’t Listen To Children
Weasel Zippers: MSNBC Claims Rifles Fire 3x Faster Than Handguns So Teachers With Handguns Would Be Too Slow To Stop Shooters, also, Broward County Sheriff Argues Against Arming Teachers While Deputy Tells Mosques To Arm Themselves
Megan McArdle: You Can’t Have Denmark Without Danes
Mark Steyn: We Are The Champions, also, Everything Must Go! Massive Nationwide Clearance!


Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery

Politics 101: Can Democrats Win?

Posted on | February 27, 2018 | Comments Off on Politics 101: Can Democrats Win?

 

During CPAC last weekend, several people asked my opinion of the chances of Democrats capturing a congressional majority in the fall. Obviously, I don’t have any clairvoyant powers. In October 2016, I was convinced that Donald Trump couldn’t possibly be elected. A month later, he proved me wrong. So I claim no special insight into future political events, mainly because I don’t know what’s going to happen between now and November. There might be a major terrorist attack or some other unpredictable event that could shift things one way or the other. Everybody says that the electoral map favors Republicans to maintain (and probably expand) their majority in the Senate, although it’s possible Mitch McConnell’s clown show could bungle away even a sure thing.

Never underestimate the power of Republican senators to screw things up, but still, given how many seats the Democrats are defending in November, not even Mitch is likely to blow this one. So let’s just count on the Senate to remain in GOP control. What about the House?

Historically, the party that holds the White House loses significantly in the first midterm election after the President’s election:

In the first midterm election for all but two presidents going back to 1946, the president’s party has lost U.S. House seats. Up until President Barack Obama, presidents with an approval rating above 50% at the time of the election lost an average of 14 House seats. Presidents with an approval rating below 50% lost an average of 36 House seats.

President Trump’s job approval is now 41.2% in the Real Clear Politics (RCP) average, but that’s not the only poll number that matters.

Consider the “right-track”/“wrong direction” question. As of today, the RCP average is 56.0% “Wrong Track,” 36.9% “Right Direction,” a 19.1% differential — a major improvement from the eve of the election in November 2016, when the number was 62.2% “Wrong Track,” 31.0% “Right Direction,” a 31.2% differential. Americans now feel much better about how the country is doing than they did before the election, and why shouldn’t they? The stock market is booming — pumping up everybody’s 401(k) value — the GOP pushed through tax cuts that are turbo-charging the economy, and the employment numbers are so good that some economists are beginning to worry about inflation.

Compare this situation to eight years ago. The economy sucked. Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi were promoting “Cash for Clunkers” and “green jobs” and ramming ObamaCare through Congress without a single Republican vote. The RCP “right-track”/“wrong direction” numbers on Feb. 26, 2010, were 34.8%/59.2% — a 24.4-point differential. Whatever people’s personal feelings about President Obama may have been, America objectively was in bad shape in 2010. Trump has never been as popular as Obama, but the country is doing much better, and this objective reality — making America great again, so to speak — is the best reason to suspect that Democrats may be disappointed in November.

Beyond this basic reality, there is also the fact that Democrat voters tend to be isolated in a few major urban areas and their leaders — well, they aren’t exactly mainstream heartland types:

California’s Democrats had their annual convention this week, working to figure out precisely what their agenda will be going forward. There are currently some serious schisms between the hard left and the more traditional elements of the party so they clearly have a lot of work to do. But all the policy talk went out the window when their featured speaker, Congresswoman Maxine Waters took that stage. The event quickly turned into an anti-Trump rally complete with chants and calls to figuratively drag President Trump out of the White House by force. . . .
Waters went on and on about Donald Trump for almost twenty minutes. Her theme was clear… everyone get ready for impeachment hearings. When it finished she was treated to several standing ovations and a chant of “Impeach 45” filling the entire hall.

If America elects a Democrat congressional majority in November, they’ll impeach the President, raise your taxes and confiscate your guns.

Is that what the American people want? Do they really want to put Maxine Waters and her Democrat friends in charge of Congress? My hunch is that selling this Kool-Aid in November won’t be easy. And have I mentioned that the Democrat Party is practically broke?

The Republican National Committee announced . . . it raised $12.4 million in January and has a total of $40.7 million cash on hand. . . .
The RNC also announced it had zero debt and said the total amount it had raised in the 2018 cycle was $144.9 million. . . .
The DNC . . . ended 2017 with $6.5 million in the bank and $6.1 million in debt.

Look, I’m not guaranteeing anything in November, but you can’t beat something with nothing. However unpopular Trump and the Republicans might be, they’re far more popular than Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters and the other kooks currently running the Democrat Party.



 

Category: Congress, Democrats, Election, Polls, Senate
« go back — keep looking »