The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Police Took Professor @KevinAllred to Psychiatric Ward After Twitter Rant

Posted on | November 17, 2016 | 1 Comment

Police took Kevin Allred to Bellevue Hospital for a psychiatric evaluation Tuesday night after the Rutgers University instructor ranted on Twitter about shooting “random white people.” Allred, who teaches Women’s and Gender Studies at Rutgers, was released after his evaluation, which was prompted when a student expressed concern to university officials, a Rutgers spokesman told the Newark Star-Ledger:

Kevin Allred, an adjunct professor on the New Brunswick campus, said on Twitter that New York police came to his Brooklyn home Tuesday night and told him Rutgers called them because they were concerned about statements he made on campus and on Twitter. . . .
NYPD officials confirmed Rutgers police asked them for help with Allred, the [New York] Daily News reported.
“We were informed by Rutgers PD that he made threats to kill white people and he was subsequently taken to Bellevue Hospital for evaluation,” the NYPD statement said.
Rutgers officials said a student filed a complaint about Allred, but gave no further details.
“The Rutgers University Police Department responded to a complaint from a student and took all appropriate action. We have no further comment,” Rutgers spokesman E.J. Miranda said.

Incited to hatred by their mentally disturbed professors, college students all across the country are erupting in anti-Trump tantrums:

On the UW–Madison campus last night, student activists obstructed the speech — by conservative political commentator Ben Shapiro — “Dismantling Safe Spaces: Facts Don’t Care About Your Feelings.”
Plus, local talk host Vicki McKenna was mobbed and the University of Wisconsin police did nothing. I hope the Trump Department of Education will work to ensure that people are safe and able to speak freely on college campuses regardless of their race, gender, or political views.

Our nation’s universities are controlled by Marxist radicals who are committed to destroying Christianity, capitalism and the Constitution.

 

Kevin Allred is part of a taxpayer-funded program at Rutgers whose leaders include notorious lesbian feminist Professor Charlotte Bunch.

 

In 1971, after divorcing her husband, Bunch formed a lesbian collective that became known as The Furies, and issued a manifesto denouncing “male sexual/political domination,” advocating lesbianism as “central to destroying our sexist, racist, capitalist, imperialist system.”

This anti-heterosexual feminist agenda was further described in a 1975 book, Lesbianism and the Women’s Movement, which compiled writings by Bunch and her comrades from The Furies collective.

 

Among the contributors to Lesbianism and the Women’s Movement was Margaret Small, whose essay “Lesbians and the Class Position of Women” declared: “In terms of the oppression of women, heterosexuality is the ideology of male supremacy.” Professor Bunch’s employment at Rutgers has helped to “mainstream” this radical anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology in the feminist movement. In 2013, at a sold-out New York gala for the Global Women’s Fund, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton introduced Professor Bunch, who was the guest of honor at the event.

 

In her introductory speech, Secretary Clinton praised Professor Bunch as an “activist and organizer” and an “extraordinary leader” whose “tireless work and her brilliant vision” placed this radical lesbian on “the front lines of the struggle” to promote feminism internationally.

 

Professor Bunch “was one of a small group of women” chosen by Secretary Clinton to direct the State Department’s feminist agenda, she told the audience at the April 2013 gala. While Secretary Clinton did not mention Professor Bunch’s decades-long commitment “to destroying our sexist, racist, capitalist, imperialist system,” certainly her praise for the world-famous lesbian feminist leader could be considered an endorsement of Professor Bunch’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology.

 

The Women’s and Gender Studies Department at Rutgers, of which Professor Bunch is such an eminent leader, is staffed entirely by Democrats who supported the Clinton presidential campaign. After the election, Kevin Allred began sending out an increasingly bizarre series of messages on his Twitter account:

 

Publicly proclaiming his “queer” opposition to “Trump’s amerika,” and calling all 60 million Trump voters “racist,” Allred alternated angry expressions of anti-white rage with comments that indicated he was suffering from severe depression. After he sent a message about murdering “random white people,” and concerns for his mental health led to police intervention, Allred’s anger and despair swiftly changed to paranoia about “Trump’s crackdown on free speech.”

 

The Daily Mail reports:

Kevin Allred — best known for his women and gender’s study class ‘Politicizing Beyonce’ — was at his Brooklyn home when police arrived on Tuesday night.
Police had responded to his home after Rutgers police told NYPD that had Allred made ‘threats to kill white people,’ according to the New York Daily News.
Officers said they were there after several failed attempts to get in touch with him by Rutgers officials, but Allred told the Daily News he has no record of school officials trying to reach him.
Cops then loaded the adjunct professor into an ambulance and took him to Bellevue Hospital where he spent two hours and underwent an evaluation.
When he was released, he tweeted, calling the ordeal a ‘s*** show’ and said it was part of a crackdown on free speech amid Trump’s election. . . .
Allred recounted the whole incident on Twitter and said police told him he was ‘a threat based on political statements’ he made on ‘campus and on Twitter.’ . . .
Allred told the Daily News that during class on Tuesday he had asked students about the presidential election and flag burning as a form of protest.
‘In class, we talked about flag burning generally as a form of protest, and what does the flag mean to different people,’ Allred told the Daily News.
‘Then I made a comment, essentially saying, “Would people feel the same way about being so lenient with the Second Amendment if people went out and got guns to shoot random white people?”‘ . . .
He also tweeted that students should participate in a walk-out to protest Trump’s election that was set to place on the university’s New Brunswick campus.
‘Now more than ever it’s important to fight back, make your voices heard, push for change in WHATEVER way you can. cuz Trump wants us silent,’ he tweeted.
‘And the new regime will go to even greater lengths to silence us. Trump has already proved it true before taking office. let’s not let him.’ . . .
Walkouts were planned at at dozens of schools, including Yale in Connecticut and Rutgers in New Jersey.

Universities employ deranged “queer” Democrat activists like Kevin Allred to indoctrinate students with radical beliefs and expect parents and taxpayers to spent money for this kind of partisan brainwashing.

Who’s crazier: Radical professors, or parents who pay thousands of dollars in tuition so their children can attend universities like Rutgers?




 

 

Category: Education, Election, Gays, Sex Trouble

There Are Still 5 A’s in RAAAAACIST!

Posted on | November 17, 2016 | 2 Comments

 

For more than 30 years, the Democrat Party and the major media (but I repeat myself) have been engaged in a propaganda campaign, the goal of which was to make “Republican” a synonym for raaaaacist!

There are 5 A’s in “raaaaacist,” to distinguish this political propaganda term from actual racism. (Maybe there should be 5 A’s in “haaaaate,” too — as in, “Republicans haaaaate women and gay people.”) Once you recognize this for what it is — a partisan smear — you cease to be bamboozled by the social-justice racketeers who peddle it.

Having seen what kind of hateful abuse Democrats pour out against my black Republican friends (and my female Republican friends, and my gay Republican friends), I long ago ceased to care about being branded a racist, sexist, homophobe by liberals who think that voting Democrat makes them an arbiter of moral virtue, qualified to pass judgment on me, or my friends, or anyone else. These cheap tactics finally backfired on Democrats this year, as Scott Alexander explains:

There is no evidence that Donald Trump is more racist than any past Republican candidate (or any other 70 year old white guy, for that matter). All this stuff about how he’s “the candidate of the KKK” and “the vanguard of a new white supremacist movement” is made up. It’s a catastrophic distraction from the dozens of other undeniable problems with Trump that could have convinced voters to abandon him. That it came to dominate the election cycle should be considered a horrifying indictment of our political discourse, in the same way that it would be a horrifying indictment of our political discourse if the entire Republican campaign had been based around the theory that Hillary Clinton was a secret Satanist. Yes, calling Romney a racist was crying wolf. But you are still crying wolf. . . .

You should read the whole thing. However, I must take issue with Scott Alexander’s mocking reference to Hillary Clinton as a “secret Satanist.” After all, it’s hardly a secret that she is a devoted devil-worshiper.




 

RELATED:

 

 


Category: Election, Racism

In The Mailbox: 11.16.16

Posted on | November 16, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
First Street Journal: Brilliant Economist Who Designed Failed 2009 Stimulus Tells Us Trump’s Economic Plan Bound To Fail
EBL: Keith Olbermann – Who Let The Dog Out?
Michelle Malkin: Kris Kobach for DHS Secretary
Twitchy: Where Is The National Media? Violence Continues Against Trump Supporters
Louder With Crowder: Iowa Lawmaker Introduces “Suck It Up, Buttercup” Law For College Crybabies


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Keep Your Eyes Open And Your Big Mouth Shut
American Power: Twitter Suspends Alt-Right Tweeters Including Richard Spencer And Pax Dickinson
American Thinker: How Trump Can Defeat The Establishment Bureaucracy, also, The Totalitarian Impulse Flourishes At George Mason University
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Hump Day News
Da Tech Guy: Fifteen Million Reasons Why The Left Is Demonizing Stephen Bannon
Don Surber: President Trump 1, WHCA 0
Dustbury: Poisoned Especially For You
Jammie Wearing Fools: It’s Come To This – Black Man Gunned Down After Joking He Voted For Trump
Joe For America: Largest Organized Vote Fraud Operation In Texas History Discovered – Thousands Of False Ballots
JustOneMinute: Times Holds Up Mirror To Their Readership
Pamela Geller: Pepsi Shares Plummet After CEO Insults Trump
Power Line: The Dogs Are Barking, But The Caravan?
Shark Tank: Hillary’s Violent Election Night Meltdown
Shot In The Dark: The Order
The Political Hat: Star Chamber At Columbia University
The Quinton Report: Maryland Public Defender’s E-Mail On Trump Called Inflammatory
This Ain’t Hell: Jeff Miller Eyed For VA Chief, also, Reversing Obama’s Social Justice Sailor’s Fundamental Changes
Weasel Zippers: Rutgers U Lecturer Visited By NYPD After Threatening Trump Supporters, Threatening To Kill White People, also, List Of Cities Refusing To Comply With Federal Law Grows To 18
Megan McArdle:
Mark Steyn: Advice For The Loyal Opposition


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery

Political Analysis From Feminist Tumblr

Posted on | November 16, 2016 | 3 Comments

Crazy Number One:

I feel like the key White Pathology that explains Trump is this idea that everything in life is graded on a curve, not just wanting to have good things, but to have MORE of those things than other people. A pathology that’s both the opposite of stronger together and the opposite of the Lake Wobegon Effect. . . . (blah blah blah)

Crazy Number Two:

I can personally testify that a lot of people who tend to vote Republican in general have this weird-to-me tendency to fret about the possibility that someone, somewhere might be getting money, resources, or a lucky break that they “don’t deserve.” This is different from the worry that a less “deserving” person might take something away from a more “deserving” person. Even if no one loses anything, and there’s plenty to go around, they’ll get worried and indignant that someone might get more than they “deserve.” . . . (blah blah blah)

Crazy Number Three:

this makes me think a lot about Weber and the growth of capitalism-as-ethics in the wake of the Reformation. . . . .

Blah blah blah.

What is missing from this discourse? Well, yes — sanity, of course. However, notice that the entire premise is that there can be no rational reason why any American would not vote for Hillary Clinton. Therefore, the discussion begins with the assertion that only “White Pathology” can explain Donald Trump’s election, and therefore the assumption of Republican irrationality is built into the conversation, while all Democrat voters are presumed to be as wise and empirical as Mister Spock. So our friends from Feminist Tumblr are qualified to act as psychoanalytic interpreters of “White Pathology.” People who don’t vote for Democrats are bad people, according to these Genius Experts™ who then proceed to explain (to each other, and a few hundred other Tumblrinas) what’s wrong with white people. Of course, I’d bet $20 that every one of these Genius Experts™ is also white, probably 20-something liberal arts majors whose qualifications to act as political analysts are . . . Well, what exactly?

Hey, I’ve got an idea — instead of a bunch of liberal arts majors playing armchair psychiatrists, let’s take a look what are known as “facts”:

Trump added to Romney’s totals in several key states, while Clinton generally lost votes compared to Obama in 2012:

Iowa: Trump by 148,000 votes (9.6 points)
Trump: 68,000 more votes than Romney
Clinton: 172,000 fewer votes than Obama

Michigan: Trump by 12,000 votes (0.3 points)
Trump: 164,000 more votes than Romney
Clinton 297,000 fewer votes than Obama

Ohio: Trump by 455,000 votes (8.6 points)
Trump: 111,000 more votes than Romney
Clinton: 511,000 fewer votes than Obama

Pennsylvania: Trump by 68,000 (1.2 points)
Trump: 223,000 more votes than Romney
Clinton: 155,000 fewer votes fewer than Obama

Wisconsin: Trump by 27,000 votes (1.0 points)
Trump: 1,500 more votes than Romney
Clinton 238,000 fewer votes than Obama

Is it possible to explain why this happened? Well, let’s listen to Mark Steyn, who has a few years of professional experience in such matters:

The problem for the left is that, when everyone’s Hitler, nobody’s Hitler.
At which point, enter the Teflon Pussygrabber.

Maybe you should read the whole thing, because Steyn isn’t some idle young liberal arts major with a Tumblr blog, but a man deeply familiar with politics, and with years of successful experience in explaining stuff. The problem with the Tumblrinas is that they spend almost zero time reading conservative writers, but rather tend to read what liberals write about conservatives. Consider that I’m sitting here with a stack of radical feminist books on my desk — I just spent an entire hour skimming through Lucy Irigaray, OK? — which is necessary, if one wishes to truly understand feminism. Yet I can guarantee you that not a one of these Tumblr Feminist pundits has ever bothered to read Mark Steyn, or Richard Weaver, Friedrich Hayek, Thomas Sowell, Ann Coulter, et al.

Liberals are simply ignorant, yet begin all their arguments with the baseless assumption that they are intellectually superior to others. Come to think of it, maybe that’s the real reason Hillary lost the election.



 

 

Category: Election

Yes, @kmo75947, Feminists Do Hate Men

Posted on | November 16, 2016 | 3 Comments

 

Kelsey Mo (@kmo75947 on Twitter) is a student in the Barrett honors college program at Arizona State University, where she is enrolled in the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication. She decided to clear up a “misconception” about her radical ideology:

I walked along the street on my way to a Barrett, the Honors College event with a good friend when she asked me out of the blue, “So is feminism just man-hating?” A little caught off guard, I patiently explained that feminism is not about hating men but about equality between the sexes. It surprised me that my friend would ask me that question because I talk about feminism often enough that I assumed she knew my sentiments. . . .
The misconception about feminism comes from a lack of understanding what feminists’ goals are.
“I don’t think they understand feminism as well,” said Lauren Barnes, president of the Barrett Feminist Club. “I think that there’s obviously with any movement there are some people who are radical, there are people who just misunderstand things, and they don’t hear what the real definitions are or what the real movement is.”
The goal of feminism is to achieve gender equity in all aspects. . . .
“Feminism is trying to counteract that and to give equality for everyone and to allow everyone to pursue their own careers and live their lives as they believe. Not in some sort of constraint under some gender roles,” Barnes said. . . .

Oh, “gender equity in all aspects”?

 

As of 2016, according to the U.S. Department of Education, there are about 12.4 million female students enrolled in American colleges and universities, compared to about 9.1 million male students. In order to achieve “gender equity” in college enrollment, we must either (a) do something about the anti-male discrimination in our nation’s school systems, or else (b) expel about 3.3 million college girls.

After all, don’t feminists believe that the absence of “gender equity” (e.g., the disparity between men’s and women’s average annual income) proves that women are victims of sexist discrimination? By this logic, then, isn’t the shortage of male students on U.S. campuses proof that universities are discriminating against men?

If, as Lauren Barnes told Ms. Mo, feminism’s goal is “to give equality to everyone,” why aren’t feminists protesting against the inequality in higher education? And the answer is, because feminists hate men.

 

Feminists are against equal educational opportunity for male students. Feminists claim to be victims of oppression, falsely accusing men of “sexist” discrimination. This dishonest propaganda tactic serves to compel government to discriminate even more against men, an anti-male bias that feminists justify as necessary to “gender equity.”

Women have been a majority of U.S. college students since 1978, and the male-female enrollment gap has widened significantly in the past 25 years. Despite this clear evidence that the American education system is biased against male students, Ms. Mo and Ms. Barnes believe that militant feminism is still necessary on university campuses, and why? Because “equality for everyone and to allow everyone to pursue their own careers” requires elimination of “gender roles,” according to Ms. Barnes.

 

Ms. Barnes posted that photo of her backpack to her @radsaddfeminist Twitter account, displaying her fanatical commitment to feminism, an ideology that is about ending the “constraint” of “gender roles.” Notice, prominently displayed on her backpack, this patch:

 

That design is from a 1993 flyer by Ann Carroll who was part of the so-called “Riot Grrl” punk-rock scene of the early 1990s. It reads:

Excuse Me
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I am not going to smile,
act dumb, hide my body, pretend, lie, be silent for you. And that
everything I do I do for me and I’m not going to let you
laugh at me, make fun of me, harass me, abuse me or
rape me anymore. Because I am a girl and me
and my girlfriends are not afraid of you!

To whom is this hostile, accusatory message addressed? Who did Ms. Carroll accuse of all these evil actions? Answer: Men. All men.

Feminists do not smile for men. Feminists don’t do anything for men. Feminists hate men, because men are bad. Quod erat demonstrandum.

This was the anti-male message of Ann Carroll’s 1993 flyer, a message ASU feminist Lauren Barnes displays on her backpack, as she accuses men of being too stupid to understand what “equality” means:

“I think a lot of people think feminism is supposed to take power away from men or say that women are inherently better than men, but it’s just because men are so used to being in power that women being equal to them can seem as a threat, and they don’t understand that it’s also supposed to empower men,” Barnes said.

No, Ms. Barnes, we understand exactly what feminism is supposed to do, and obviously you do think you are “are inherently better than men,” because otherwise you might think they could understand what feminism is without you having to explain it to them. Feminism is an organized anti-male propaganda campaign in which feminists constantly accuse males of being “sexist.” Feminists deliberately insult males by acting as if men are too stupid to understand anything with being lectured about what men are doing wrong, namely, everything. No man has ever done anything right, according to feminists. All men are bad, wrong and stupid. Feminists believe no man is capable of thinking for himself, because then he wouldn’t need all these feminist lectures, would he?

Lauren Barnes is implacably hostile toward all men, falsely accusing them of criminal intentions — rape, harassment, etc. — merely because they are male, and because feminists believe all men are evil. My hunch, however, is that most men at Arizona State University are smart enough to avoid Lauren Barnes as much as they possibly can. Most men at ASU probably never even speak to Lauren Barnes. Men ignore her, because she’s a feminist, and feminists are notoriously obnoxious. She probably doesn’t notice the way men on campus carefully avoid any social interaction with her, because . . . Well, no one has ever dared to accuse Lauren Barnes of having a romantic interest in men, have they? I doubt it.

Even if she did harbor some heterosexual interest, however, what man could possibly find Lauren Barnes attractive? I mean, is the dating scene in Tiempe so dismal that guys are hitting on chicks with “KEEP YOUR POLITICS OUT OF MY UTERUS” patches on their backpacks? Really, how’s a guy supposed to strike up a friendly conversation with a girl who is into slogans like, “GENDER ROLES ARE A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT”?

No matter how much progress toward “gender equity” there has been in recent decades, my guess is most guys at Arizona State University are smart enough to avoid wasting time with Lauren Barnes. So, while it is hypothetically possible that she’s heterosexual, in reality . . .

Arizona State University is committed to providing “an inclusive and affirming academic and campus environment for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, questioning students and their allies. . . . LGBTQIA (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans*, Queer/Questioning, Intersex, Asexual/Ally) Services at Arizona State University works to sustain an environment of respect, compassion and equity for all.”

 

It’s a free country. Lauren Barnes is free to hate men, and men are free to stay as far away as possible from Lauren Barnes. And being avoided by men would make Lauren Barnes happy. She’s a feminist, and ASU provides “an inclusive and affirmative” environment for . . . feminists.

IYKWIMAITYD.

 

Category: Education, Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 11.15.16

Posted on | November 15, 2016 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 11.15.16

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
First Street Journal: If We’re Going To Enforce The Immigration Laws, We Can’t Be Soft-Hearted
EBL: They’re Not Taking Trump’s Victory Well On The Left…
Twitchy: Maria Bartiromo Reams Jonathan Gruber Over Obamacare
Louder With Crowder: Real Hero – Concealed-Carry Gun Owner Shoots Man Attacking Deputy


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Would You Put Up This Flyer?
American Power: Asra Nomani – Why I Supported Donald Trump
American Thinker: An Arrogant And Lazy Presidency
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
Da Tech Guy: Baldilocks – Life As A Renter
Don Surber: The Real Reason Polls Got It Wrong
Dustbury: Dammit, Lilakoi Moon
Jammie Wearing Fools: Trump Electors Being Harassed – “We’re Just Getting An Orchestrated Barrage From The Left”
Joe For America: Watch Rioter Throw Epic Tantrum When She’s Arrested
JustOneMinute: Lots To Process
Pamela Geller: UK Approves Muslims Aborting Female Babies For Fear Of Appearing “Racist”
Power Line: The Ellison Angle
Shark Tank: 69 Of 112 Protesters Arrested In Portland Didn’t Vote
Shot In The Dark: Open Letter To The House And Senate MNGOP Caucuses
STUMP: Public Pension And Finance Ballot Initiative Results
The Jawa Report: Cornhole Watch – Hamza Ahmed, also, Confirmed – Han Solo Poked The Princess
The Political Hat: Venezuela – The Socialist Paradise And The Death of Democracy
This Ain’t Hell: VA Backpedals On Sex-Change Surgeries, also, Roman Army Veteran Under Consideration For SecDef
Weasel Zippers: Planned Parenthood Got $500 Million From Taxpayers, Spent $38 Million On Hillary, also, No, Trump Didn’t Request TS Clearance For His Kids
Mark Steyn: Darkness Falls In The City Of Light


Today’s Digital Deals
Save Up To 50% On Select PC Storage & Networking Products
Save 65% On Alien Seven-Film Bundle

Category: Linkagery

Feminists Hate Donald Trump: The Joys of Happy Fun Victory Week #MAGA

Posted on | November 15, 2016 | 2 Comments

 

 

Say what you will about our President-elect, he’s got all the right enemies, especially feminists like Amanda Marcotte and Jessica Valenti. Having gone all-in for Hillary Clinton, these partisan Democrats spent months inciting irrational hatred toward the Republican candidate, and now they are seeking to exploit the delusional fears they themselves helped create. Valenti’s post-election column:

Last night, seated between my 68-year-old mother and six-year-old daughter, I expected to watch the first woman get elected president of the United States. We bought champagne and cake, and promised Layla that she could stay up as late as she wanted to watch. My daughter fell asleep on the couch, still wearing a shirt emblazoned with the word “feminist” and an “I voted” sticker.
This morning, I’ll have to tell Layla that Hillary Clinton lost, that a woman won’t be president. Even more difficult, I’ll have to tell her that Donald Trump won. The man she knows as a bully who says terrible things about women, people with disabilities and immigrants — the man who brags about hurting people and separating families — will lead her nation.

Oh, woe to Jessica Valenti’s little girl, living in the posh home of her feminist mother, the bestselling author of Sex Object, and her father, the Harvard-educated publishing executive at Vox.com. How terrible that their child will live in a nation that elected Donald Trump! Let’s all throw a pity party for the children of affluent, influential partisan Democrats!

 

How are those “male tears” tasting now, Ms. Valenti? Are you satisfied with the result of your dishonest career of hateful selfishness? You have spent more than a decade fomenting anti-male hatred, cruelly ridiculing the decent men of this country whose only crime is working hard to support their wives and children. You have become rich and famous from your hate-mongering propaganda campaign against American men. You travel around to university campuses giving speeches to encourage young women to emulate your vicious attitude. Yet now you expect us to feel sorry for you, because the American people have rejected your political idol, Hillary Clinton? “Tell it to the Marines,” as Sherman once said.

Meanwhile, the bloodthirsty monster Amanda Marcotte is afraid that President Trump will interfere with the baby-killing industry:

“We have seen how unconstitutional laws that force women to travel to other states for abortion care make this care essentially unobtainable, and it would be unconscionable to erect even more stringent barriers,” Dr. Willie Parker, the board chair for Physicians for Reproductive Health, said in a statement. “President-elect Trump’s attack on fundamental rights is unacceptable.”
But how much damage will Trump be able to do to this legal right?
Julie Rikelman, the litigation director for the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a phone interview, “We should definitely be concerned because obviously there is a threat to women’s constitutional rights, but we at the center continue to believe that Roe v. Wade would not be overturned.” Rikelman’s organization, the Center for Reproductive Rights, led the successful legal challenge that resulted in this year’s Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt decision, which struck down a series of restrictive abortion laws in Texas.
“We know that the right [to abortion] has held up for over 40 years, and it’s held up through a variety of administrations, both pro-choice administrations and anti-choice administrations,” Rikelman continued. “But every time the issue has come before the Supreme Court in the last 40 years, it has refused to overrule Roe v. Wade and it has repeatedly upheld the right.”
Because of the legal principle called stare decisis, the court is reluctant to directly overturn precedent.

Killing babies is the only “right” Democrats like Amanda Marcotte really care about. When they’re not bathing in “male tears,” feminists are up to their necks in the blood of innocents whose deaths they celebrate.

“I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding . . . time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. . . . Nothing will make me want a baby. . . . This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.”
— Amanda Marcotte, March 2014

Feminists are always surprised to discover that their deadly hatred of human life is not popular among ordinary Americans. Democrats can’t understand why most women reject the hateful politics of feminism:

Any woman who has a husband and children is a victim of oppression, according to feminist theory. Abolishing marriage and motherhood have been fundamental goals of the feminist movement for more than 40 years. . . .
Because feminism is a theory of power, originating from the idea that women are oppressed by male power, the pursuit of “equality” requires the destruction of every source of this oppressive power. This radical agenda, essentially destructive in its methods and purposes, is the basis of feminist theory, a major goal of which is eradicating the traditional family. . . .

You can read the rest at The Patriarch Tree.




 

RELATED:

 

 


Category: Abortion, Donald Trump, Election, Sex Trouble

Rule 5 Monday: Happy Fun Victory Week

Posted on | November 15, 2016 | 5 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Not sure how I missed this, but evidently there was both a Twitter and an Instagram account for Babes For Trump, and there’s some lovely young women on there proclaiming their support of the God-Emperor. What better way to wrap up Happy Fun Victory Week by showing off some of these fine American women? As usual, keep in mind that many of the following links are to pics generally considered NSFW, and the management is not responsible for any problems arising from your inability to exercise discretion when clicking. Remember, the Emperor protects. *makes sign of the aquila*

I don't know about you, but this reminds me of the closing theme from

I don’t know about you, but this reminds me of the closing theme from “Buckaroo Banzai”.

Ninety Miles from Tyranny leads off this week with Hot Pick of the Late Night, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns, followed by Goodstuff, who brings the far-out science with Elke Sommer. Animal Magnetism checks in from Alaska with Rule Five One Last Electoral College Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon, and The Last Tradition brings us Jewel Santini and Candice Pillay.

EBL’s thundering herd this week includes Teresa Palmer, Tippi Hedren, Hillary Zedong and a fascist Lady Gaga, There’s Got To Be A Morning After, Emmy Rossum, Amy Adams, Planet Claire, Granny’s Tonic and Donna Douglas, and Tara Ross.

A View from the Beach presents Kate Mara, Well, If You Insist, Good News for Unhappy Celebrities, MD Seeks to Ban Skate Shooting, Topless Terrorists Take on Trump, Rebecca Romijn Peddles Her Wares, Clinton.com, The Final Countdown, Gone Fishin. . ., Who’s In Your Wallet?, Harry Potter Meets Rule 34, Its National Ginger Day! and Running Out of Steam at Clinton.com.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Haley Bennett, his Vintage Babe is Shirley MacLaine, and Sex in Advertising is covered by DKNY. At Dustbury, it’s Deepika Padukone and Demi Moore.

Thanks to everyone for your linkagery!
Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

Category: Rule 5
« go back — keep looking »