The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

In The Mailbox: 10.07.16

Posted on | October 7, 2016 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 10.07.16

— compiled by Wombat-socho


No linkagery yesterday since Feedly was down.
This is the day on which we celebrate victory against the Turks at the Battle of Lepanto.


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: #FreeDilbert – Scott Adams Shadowbanned On Twitter For Supporting Trump; $TWTR Nosedives – Coincidence?
Twitchy: October Surprise? WikiLeaks Drops The First Batch Of “Well Over 50,000” E-Mails Allegedly From John Podesta
Louder With Crowder: MEDIA COLLUSION – White House Orders CBS To Keep E-Mail Scandal Quiet
Captain Capitalism: Why Donald Trump Is Doomed To Fail (h/t Adam Piggott)


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Podcast #21 – The Muff-Diver Episode
American Power: As Obamacare Collapses, Democrats Eye Nationalized Healthcare
American Thinker: Why Environmentalism Became Both A Religion And A Con Game
Animal Magnetism: Rule Five Nuclear-Powered Friday
Da Tech Guy: Is This The President We Want For Our Daughters? Hillary Edition
Don Surber: Why We Need Voter ID
Dustbury: Thank You For Being A Doll
Fred On Everything: Compaction, Pack Instinct, And Territoriality – Some Aspects Of Irrationality
Jammie Wearing Fools: President Gun Control Once Again Grants Clemency To Violent Criminals Convicted Of Firearm Offenses
Joe For America: Phoenix VA Hospital Still Killing Veterans – Obama And McCain Still Silent
JustOneMinute: Happy October
Pamela Geller: Muslim Student Cuts Throat Of Female Classmate, Gets Choked Out By Heroic Canadian Boy, also, Sharia Halloween – Muslims Bully Amazon Into Removing Costumes
Power Line: Thoughts From The Ammo Line
Shark Tank: Trump Cites “Weak” Job Report
Shot In The Dark: The Standing Army
STUMP: Chicago Public Schools – Who Is Profiting?
The Jawa Report: Where Can Oppressed Muslimas Find Freedom And Independence?
The Political Hat: The Family That Shoots Together…
This Ain’t Hell: Tell Me Again How Vote Fraud Is “Insignificant”, also, MGEN Ron Lewis, Another SHARP Casaualty
Weasel Zippers: Sarah Jessica Parker “Terrified” Trump Fans Might Shoot Her, also, Indiana Voter Registration Fraud Investigation Spreads To 57 Counties
Megan McArdle: How To End The Death Penalty For Good


Today’s Digital Deals
Snuggle-Pedic Bamboo/Memory Foam Body Pillow – 70% Off!
Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery

Which Is Worse: AIDS or ‘Stigma’?

Posted on | October 7, 2016 | Comments Off on Which Is Worse: AIDS or ‘Stigma’?

 

Remember the herpes-infected feminists who used the #ShoutYourStatus hashtag to encourage pride in having sexually transmitted diseases? That came to mind when I encountered a chart of AIDS-related terms — promoted by the University of California-San Francisco — comparing “stigmatizing” language (left) versus “empowering” language (right):

 

You see we must avoid “blame-centric language” when discussing how the AIDS virus is transmitted, because that would involve “stigma,” as if becoming infected with a deadly virus is a bad thing. Consulting the full list of terms, we find that these experts advise that you should avoid “prostitute” and say “sex worker” instead. Never use the word “promiscuous” to describe HIV-infected people, the experts say: “This is a value judgment and should be avoided. Use ‘having multiple partners’.”

By a similar token, you should avoid calling these people “crazy.” Instead, you could call them “reality averse” or maybe just “Democrat voters.”




 

Category: Gays

The Error of Comparing Group Averages

Posted on | October 7, 2016 | Comments Off on The Error of Comparing Group Averages

One of the basic tricks of Lying With Statistics is to use certain characteristics — age, race, sex, etc. — to define a group, and then report some data about the group as an average. CNN does this:

Working class white men saw their income drop 9% between 1996 and 2014, according to a new report from Sentier Research. This group, who Sentier defines as having only a high school diploma, earned only $36,787, on average, in 2014, down from $40,362 in 1996.
Meanwhile, college educated white men saw their income soar nearly 23% over the same period, from $77,209 to $94,601.
Published by two former Census Bureau officials, the Sentier report shines yet another light on the fortunes of the white working class. This group has become a force in the 2016 presidential election, serving as the backbone of Donald Trump’s support. And the Republican candidate’s campaign has tailored much of his campaign to the working class, with promises that he will bring back the manufacturing jobs that once allowed them to support their families.
The study first looked at the 1996 incomes earned by 10 groups of men in two-year cohorts ranging in age from 25 to 26 to 43 to 44. Sentier then looked at what men earned 18 years later, when the youngest cohort were 43 to 44 and the oldest were 61 to 62.
The results varied greatly by age. The youngest group of working class white men, who were 25 to 26 in 1996, saw their incomes rise by 19%, from $32,677 to $38,803, over the 18-year period. However, their college educated peers enjoyed a 133% explosion in their incomes, from $40,487 to $94,252. . . .
In addition to showing the tough times the working class has faced, the report also shows the big income boost that comes with a college degree, [study co-author Gordon] Green said.
“People say it may not be worth it to go to college. These numbers show that isn’t true,” he said.

You can read the rest. Whatever these statisticians have discovered, it does not explain much about any individual person’s life, because the groups — men with or without a college diploma — are so large that their “average” incomes are essentially meaningless.

If you are college-educated and your income has not “exploded” since 1996, why not? That’s because this group is so large and diverse, including both computer engineers and English majors, that to make generalizations based on their “average” income tells us very little.

This is something you would understand if you have read, for example, Thomas Sowell’s The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy, or Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein’s The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.

To generalize as broadly as does the CNN story — to describe college-educated white males as if they constituted a uniform class — implies that they necessarily share the same fate on the basis of those particular characteristics. But is it really true that having a college degree (any degree) automatically confers a “big income boost”? And what about that category “white”? This includes 247 million Americans — 77% of the U.S. population — and attempting to make economic generalizations about “white males” (i.e., more than 120 million people) doesn’t tell us much of anything about “the backbone of Donald Trump’s support.”

(Via Memeorandum.)

 

Category: Economics, Education

If You Want Books, You Got ‘Em

Posted on | October 6, 2016 | Comments Off on If You Want Books, You Got ‘Em

— by Wombat-socho


I was more than a little appalled to realize I hadn’t done any book posts since July, when I wrote about Don Surber’s Trump The Press, Jean Larteguy’s The Praetorians, and even some SF. So in this post I’m going to play catch-up and briefly talk about the new stuff I managed to get read in between sleeping, eating, and Ubering.

Probably the best thing I’ve read was John Ringo & Larry Correia’s Monster Hunter: Grunge, a prequel to Larry’s Monster Hunter International series starring a Marine turned Monster Hunter during the 1980s. It’s an interesting book, with just as much action (but not as much sex and politics) as Ringo’s Paladin of Shadows books, and fits in very well with the later Monster Hunter novels.

Also very good is Kia Tsakos Heavey’s Domino, an excellent little tale of the eponymous barn cat who has to confront a new cat in the neighborhood with some strange ideas…ideas that ultimately threaten not only Domino and his new family, but their entire neighborhood. Good for young adults, too.

There’s been a lot of excitement over Kurt Schlichter’s People’s Republic, which could in some ways be a sequel to Tom Kratman’s A State Of Disobedience in that it tells the tale of an America split between Red and Blue states, with a low-level state of war going on between the two. Kelly Turnbull is an infiltrator, a veteran who specializes in penetrating the People’s Republic and getting people out, and after one such exfiltration almost goes bad, he’s recruited by one of the richest men in Texas to get someone out – someone who may not want to come out. Plus, he has to take a blooded but inexperienced young officer with him. It’s a fun story, a grim look at how the blue states would most likely decay without the red states propping them up, and as with other such books, its main problem is that it’s too short. Hoping a sequel comes out soon.

I’ve also been reading There Will Be War Volume VI, which is every bit as good as the other anthologies in the series; John Ringo’s The Last Centurion (which I bought for the Kindle because my dead tree copy is still packed up) which goes a little too well with the Schlicter and Kratman books mentioned supra with its tale of epidemic flu and feckless politicians in Washington bungling the response and recovery. I’m also in the middle of reading John C. Wright’s Iron Chamber of Memory, Henry Vogel’s The Fugitive Heir (which is reminding me a lot of Heinlein’s Citizen of the Galaxy), and Adam Piggott’s Pushing Rubber Downhill, to say nothing of G.K. Chesteron’s Orthodoxy. Plus, I have Karl Gallagher’s Torchship Pilot waiting for me. Will I be able to wrap all these up, get my continuing education for next tax season done, and cheer my Nationals into the World Series? Tune in again next month to find out!

Category: Books

Why Is Sex Making Young People So Sad?

Posted on | October 6, 2016 | 1 Comment

 

“The vested interests of our age . . . have constructed a wonderful machine, which we shall call the Great Stereopticon. It is the function of this machine to project selected pictures of life in the hope that what is seen will be imitated. All of us of the West who are within the long reach of technology are sitting in the audience. We are told the time to laugh and the time to cry, and signs are not wanting that the audience grows ever more responsive to its cues.”
— Richard Weaver, Ideas Have Consequences, 1948

Failure must have an explanation, and the disappointments of the entitled narcissistic Special Snowflake™ require a scapegoat. It will not do for overprivileged brats to accept that life is not fair, nor can we expect Special Snowflakes™ to take responsibility for their own failures.

How many times do we have to hear variations on the same sad story? College girl goes to a party, gets drunk, then wakes up with a hangover, an impaired memory, no panties, and a profound sense of shame.

“This cannot be my fault!” she tells herself. “I’m a victim!”

Go read the lawsuits filed by more than 100 male students who say they were falsely accused of rape and deprived of their due-process rights in university administrative disciplinary procedures, and you will see this basic narrative repeated over and over and over again: Two kids get drunk and have sex, she subsequently regrets having sex and — invoking the central point of one notorious case — “regret equals rape.”

No one wants to be accused of being pro-rape (or a “rape truther,” to employ feminist Amanda Marcotte’s vivid phrase), and so there is a reluctance to criticize irresponsible college girls too harshly. Because it is easier to remain silent than to express unpopular truths, we find that liars are increasingly influential in academia — hello, Professor Lisa Wade — and common sense is now quite uncommon on campus.

We are expected to believe that college girls in the 21st century are afflicted with an extraordinary naïveté about how sex happens.

“Why are these boys furnishing me with free alcohol?” we must imagine the college girl asking herself, as she downs her ninth drink. “And why does this boy want me to go back to his dorm room at midnight?”

Gosh, honey, this is all a huge mystery to you, isn’t it? You graduated high school at the top of your class, and your parents are paying $60,000 a year to send you to this elite private liberal arts college, so maybe you could do a little arithmetic, add 2 + 2 and tell us what this is about.

Maybe these clever girls could consult the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Yale and ask Professor Kaneesha Parsard to explain why college boys provide free alcohol to college girls. Professor Parsard is teaching a class this fall called “Bodies and Pleasures, Sex and Genders” (WGSS 205), so it’s possible she could give you a clue on this subject, about which college girls seem so clueless.

By the way — and I must point this out — college boys are no less idiotic than the girls. How many times do I have to repeat the same advice? Never talk to a college girl. Before parents send their sons off to college, they should take them to the local tattoo parlor and have that phrase emblazoned in reverse-script on their chest, so that every time the boy gets out of the shower and looks in the bathroom mirror, he is reminded once again: “Never talk to a college girl.”

 

Feminists have fomented such a climate of anti-male hatred on campuses, that only right male students have now is the right to remain silent. When I shared this advice with a Yale student a few months ago, he said, “But if you don’t talk to girls, they might think you’re gay.”

To which I replied: “And . . . ?”

Who cares what a girl at Yale thinks about anything? It must be presumed that every girl at Yale (or Harvard, Cornell, Princeton, etc.) is wicked, deceitful and selfish — untrustworthy and cruel, apt to make a false rape accusation as an act of spiteful revenge — because the unsuspecting young man who presumes otherwise might be lured into her sexual trap. Shun them all, and don’t even bother explaining why you don’t talk to them. These hideous Ivy League she-monsters deserve no such explanation.

Feminism is the reason college boys can’t trust any girl on campus and, even beyond ideology, I blame it all on The Great Stereopticon:

What has happened, I would argue, is that The Great Stereopticon’s message machine keeps selling such wildly contradictory stories about love and sex to young people that the proliferation of scripts has become schizophrenic. Anyone attempting to live according to the stories sold to them by the Hollywood fantasy factory and the Madison Avenue advertising cartel will discover that these narratives cannot be replicated in the real world, and certainly not without substantial risk of negative consequences. . . .

Read the whole thing at The Patriarch Tree, and remember: Never talk to a college girl. Let them all go to Hell by the path of their own choosing.




 

Category: Education, Sex Trouble

Everything Is RAAAAACIST!

Posted on | October 6, 2016 | Comments Off on Everything Is RAAAAACIST!

Except, of course, racial segregation:

Students of color at Columbia University can apply to attend an upcoming racially segregated retreat hosted by the school that promises to embolden and empower participants, according to organizers.
The “Students of Color Leadership Retreat 2016” is open to students within the Columbia University undergraduate community, including its all-women’s Barnard College.
Slated for the weekend of Nov. 12 at Greenkill Retreat Center at the New York YMCA Camp, the event is billed as “an intensive weekend of personal development, empowerment and community building for student leaders at Barnard and Columbia who identify as African/African-American/Black, Latino/Hispanic, Asian/Asian-American, Pacific Islander, Arab and Middle-Eastern, Native & Indigenous, and Multiethnic/Multiracial,” according to the university’s website as well as the retreat’s online application form.
“SOCLR is designed for students who identify themselves as a person of color as a primary identity,” Columbia’s website adds.
The application asks students to state their gender identity/expression, their gender pronoun, their racial identity, and also answer a few questions on what they plan to gain from attending the retreat, paid for by the private, Ivy League institution. Lodging, food and transportation are provided, the application notes. . . .
Asked for additional information, such as whether white students may attend, the cost of the retreat, and about how many students will attend, Melinda Aquino, associate dean of multicultural affairs in Columbia College and Columbia Engineering Undergraduate Student Life, gave a statement on the benefits of the event in an email to The College Fix.
“The Students of Color Leadership Retreat is a long-standing annual program for undergraduates at Columbia and Barnard,” Aquino stated. “The program, which is geared towards any student who self-identifies as a student of color, provides structured activities and guided exercises that enable participants to build community and reflect on their abilities to effect positive change within their own lives, within student organizations, within the Columbia University community, and within society at large.”
Aquino pointed out the Office of Multicultural Affairs also hosts other leadership and community-building programs and retreats that meet the needs of “all students interested in diversity and identity,” including an LGBTQ leadership retreat and an “Intergroup Community Building Initiative” retreat, aimed at creating a more “cohesive” Columbia that affirms “all identities and creates a space for healthy discourse about divisive issues.” , , ,

You can read the whole thing at The College Fix. The author is Toni Airakinsen, and if you’re not following her on Twitter, why not?

Speaking of things you should be doing, try reading my article “Shows About White People = RACISM!” at The Patriarch Tree.




 

RELATED:

 

Category: Education, Racism

In The Mailbox: 10.05.16

Posted on | October 5, 2016 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 10.05.16

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Moderator Elaine Quijano – Ready For Hillary
Michelle Malkin: Will Illegal Foreign Voters Steal The Election?
Twitchy: “Edgy” Stephen Colbert Mocks Mike Pence’s Faith With -What Else?- A Gay Joke
Louder With Crowder: CNN Caught Deceptively Editing Keith Scott Shooting Video


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: The Perils Of Advice
American Thinker: Who Are The Real Fascists?
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Hump Day Veep Debate News
Da Tech Guy: The “Why” Question For Tim Kaine
Don Surber: TARP Was All About Kickbacks
Dustbury: And He Makes The Team
Jammie Wearing Fools: Shady Clinton Crime Family Foundation Quietly Refiles Three Years Of Taxes
Joe For America: Wikileaks Leaked Clinton Docs AGAIN
JustOneMinute: If Putin Has One Eye On The U.S. Election
Pamela Geller: EU Orders UK Newspapers NOT To Report When Terrorists Are Muslims
Power Line: The Obama Years In One Chart
Shark Tank: Ros-Lehtinen Faces Tough Democratic Challenger With Criminal Past
Shot In The Dark: Let That Cycle Spin
The Jawa Report: Boobies Are The Water Of Life
The Lonely Conservative: Bread & Circus Vs. Circus & Bread
The Political Hat: Dissenters Purged From Venezuelan Civil Service
This Ain’t Hell: Hey Timmie, You Really Showed Us Deplorables…, also, The Pentagon’s Transgender Handbook
Weasel Zippers: NFL Sunday Night Football Ratings In Freefall, also, NSA Contractor Arrested In Possible New Theft Of Secrets


Today’s Digital Deals
Save on Select Yukon Outfitters Survival Kits
Clearance Deals, Overstocks, And More

Category: Linkagery

No, @Clementine_Ford, Men Don’t Hate Women, But They Definitely Hate You

Posted on | October 5, 2016 | 2 Comments

“Like most feminists, I have often been told that I hate men. I’m no longer interested in denying that claim.”
— Clementine Ford, May 2015

Last year, it was reported that the birth rate in Australia had fallen to a 10-year low, and the discouraging demographic situation Down Under has merited the attention of the Australian national government. Perhaps officials should note that this decline has coincided with the career ascent of Australia’s leading professional baby-hater, Clementine Ford:

Clementine Ford’s vehement hatred of babies (or, as she would say, the “clump of unwanted cells,” which has no value whatsoever) is enough to make me glad that she’s 10,000 miles away, so that I don’t have to worry about her sneaking around trying to kill any of my children. Checking the headlines in Australia, I found two cases of babies being murdered this year — one in Melbourne and one in Geraldton — but in both of those cases, the mother was charged. However, if there are any unsolved baby murders in Australia, the police should check Clementine Ford’s alibi.

Notoriously merciless in her hatred toward children, Clementine Ford also has nothing but contempt for the male half of the human race:

My name is Clementine Ford and I’m a writer, speaker and professionally angry person living in Melbourne. . . .
I’m not interested in placating men about their intentions or feminist credentials. . . .
I don’t speak or write about feminism in order to convince men or sway them to my point of view. I do it because I want to let other women know that it’s okay to speak up and to be angry and to tell the truth about their lives. Also, women are f–king funny and rad and I want to hear more from them and less from men.

She has no interest in “placating” any male, nor does she seek to persuade males, but only to incite women to hate males as much as she does, and she never wants to hear anything a male has to say about it. Also, she cannot seem to fathom why she is so unpopular with men:

In the fifteen or so years that I’ve been actively feministing, I’ve never tired of being asked whether or not I hate men. . . . If I could summarise my experience of the anti-feminist backlash into one tedious, repetitive interaction, it would be thus: “Do you hate men? Wait, let me rephrase that. Why do you hate men?”

(Pause, reader, to reflect on why men might not enjoy being constantly insulted and belittled by a “professionally angry person” whose entire career consists of insulting and belittling men. She gets paid to portray men generally as being ignorant monsters, then dismisses all criticism of her anti-male hate rhetoric as “backlash.”)

Although my care factor for whether or not men think I hate them hovers somewhere just below zero . . . the blatant lack of self-awareness on display when this question is asked . . . still manages to astonish me. . . .

(Men are not only ignorant monsters, but they lack self-awareness, and blatantly so. So she insults you, and if you object to her insult, this proves you’re too stupid to understand her point.)

Do feminists hate men? When you consider the level of hostility women are subjected to just for standing up for ourselves, surely the better query is why do so many men seem to hate women so fiercely, so aggressively, so violently and so passionately? . . .

(You see? The feminist insults you, and considers your objection to her insult to be evidence that you “hate women so fiercely,” etc. In other words, no man is allowed to disagree with her. Shut up, you ignorant male worm, while Clementine Ford insults you some more.)

Instead of berating feminists for being misandrists, perhaps these men should start taking responsibility for the abominable, destructive and dehumanising treatment of women throughout all of history up to and including the present day.
Because here’s the thing: at a broad sweep, men have given us countless reasons to hate them. They have certainly provided ample evidence of their hatred for us, and the violence they inflict has more physical, cultural and economic power behind it than women subjugated by a patriarchal system could ever hope to replicate.

You see, you ignorant male worm — yes, you there, so despicable and lowly as to be unworthy of Clementine Ford’s notice — that you are responsible for the “abominable . . treatment of women” not only during your own worthless life, but “throughout all of history.” Clementine Ford gets paid to blame you personally for all those “women subjugated by a patriarchal system” as a consequence of the “physical, cultural and economic power” you possess, merely because you are male.

It’s rather strange that Clementine Ford, “subjugated by a patriarchal system” as she is, gets paid by the publisher Allen & Unwin, a firm founded more than a century ago by Sir Stanley Unwin, which is a division of the publishing conglomerate Harper Collins which, in turn, is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s $15 billion global communications empire NewsCorp. Rather than being “subjugated” by male-owned corporate media, instead Clementine Ford is being subsidized by these powerful men.

What does Clementine Ford think of Allen & Unwin chairman Patrick Gallagher? What is her opinion of Allen & Unwin CEO Robert Gorman? Are her publishing bosses also guilty of “abominable, destructive and dehumanising treatment of women” as she insists men generally are?

Well, while Clementine Ford is gloating about “male tears,” there is more serious reason for concern. In a recent Facebook post, Clementine Ford claimed to be in possession of “a tiny human,” although how this was to be distinguished from a “clump of unwanted cells,” she did not specify.

No one has yet been able to confirm this report, but it is alleged that Australia’s leading professional baby-hater, Clementine Ford, has somehow gotten her hands on an actual living baby.

 

Was this a kidnapping? Did she (or perhaps a lesbian partner) get artificially inseminated? We don’t know, but it’s been nearly six weeks since that rumor was reported, and she’s probably killed it by now.

Thank God I live in America, and Clementine Ford is 10,000 miles away.




 


Category: Abortion, Australia, Sex Trouble
« go back — keep looking »