In The Mailbox: 10.11.16

Posted on | October 11, 2016 | 1 Comment

I was hoping to get the Rule 5 post up last night after driving, but going from LAS to Boulder City to NW Vegas and back to LAS again, on top of a three-hour tax class, burned me out. So here’s to Rule 5 Tuesday…

OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Punch Back Twice As Hard
Twitchy: It was Putin! Donna Brazile Raises Deflector Shields, Responds To Charges Of Tipping Off Hillary
Louder With Crowder: Hidden Cam – Democrat Official Describes Massive Vote Fraud Plans

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: The White Knight According To PaulRyan
American Power: Why Did NBC Sit On The Trump Tape For So Long?
American Thinker: Megyn Kelly Calls Juanita Broddrick A Liar
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – The Will To Lead by Anders Fogh Rasmussen
Da Tech Guy: Baldilocks – 2016, America’s First Postmodern Election
Don Surber: Vote For Trump, Lose Your Job
Dustbury: When Your Appliances Know Too Much
Jammie Wearing Fools: 2015 Podesta Email Says “Hillary Has Begun To Hate Everyday Americans”
Joe For America: Watch CNN Coach The Debate Focus Group
JustOneMinute: A New Tradition!
Pamela Geller: Wikileaks Bombshell – Hillary’s “Catholic Liaison” Arrested For Running Prostitution Ring, Other Vile Crimes
Power Line: Michelle Obama Declared Hillary Unfit
Shark Tank: Third Batch Of Wikileaks Emails Put More Pressure On Hillary Campaign
Shot In The Dark: Berg’s Seventh Law, Universal And Immutable
STUMP: Public Pension Quick Takes – California, Oregon POBs, And The Meaning Of Liability Value
The Jawa Report: Obama Pledges To Send Lame Duck To Mars
The Political Hat: Belgium Puts The Youth In Euthanasia
This Ain’t Hell: The Trip Home
Weasel Zippers: Podesta E-Mails – Campaign Acknowledges Benghazi Attack “Preventable”…GOP Criticism “Legitimate”
Megan McArdle: Five Types Of Voters, More Or Less Loyal To Trump
Mark Steyn: Ten Years, And Slightly Less Alone

Today’s Digital Deals
Universal Classic Monsters – The Essential Collection, Just $39.99
Cyalume SnapLight 6″ Glow Sticks, Industrial Grade 12-Hour Duration, 50% Off!

Category: Linkagery

In The Mailbox: 10.10.16

Posted on | October 10, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho

The Birthdays Edition of Rule 5 Monday will be up later today.

OVER THE TRANSOM
Proof Positive: Donald Trump And The Really Terrible, Horribly Horrible Bad Word
EBL: Donald Trump To Hillary Clinton – “You’d Be In Jail”
Twitchy: This Photo Of Bill And Chelsea Sums Up The Second Debate Perfectly
Louder With Crowder: New Low – College Students Sell Blatantly Racist Anti-Cop Clothing

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: How To Publish A Book On Amazon
American Power: Trump Pushes back Against Cowardly GOP Leaders
American Thinker: The Republican White Togas At Work For The Queen Of Sleaze
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday – Debate Recap
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Vince Flynn’s Order To Kill by Kyle Mills
Da Tech Guy: John Ruberry – The Washington Post Is A Communications Arm of The Democrats
Don Surber: Donald Trump, Play Of The Game – 2nd Debate
Dustbury: Strange Search-Engine Queries
Fred On Everything:
Jammie Wearing Fools: Democrats Freak Out Over Trump’s Threat To Prosecute Clinton While Democrat Platform Calls For Prosecuting “Climate Deniers”
Joe For America: Hillary Panics As Wikileaks Drops Another 2,068 John Podesta E-Mails
JustOneMinute: Adding To The “Won’t Happen” List
Pamela Geller: State Department Reports All Christian Churches Closed In Afghanistan
Power Line: Trump Wins
Shark Tank: Could McCain Actually Save Trump In Arizona?
Shot In The Dark: Steer Clear Of Mirrors
STUMP: California Watch – Calpers Valuation, Exits, And Governance
The Jawa Report: Islamic State Citizen And Mujahideen Living In IS Sucks The Big One
The Lonely Conservative: Ugh! I Hate To Say I Told You So
The Political Hat: The Virtue Of Politically Correct Bullying
The Quinton Report: Flashback – Kathy Szeliga In 2013
This Ain’t Hell: Missiles Fired At USS Mason From Yemen
Weasel Zippers: Leaked E-Mail – Hillary Campaign Worried Bill’s Sexcapades Could Sink Her Campaign
Megan McArdle: Innovation Falls, And Retirees Pay The Price
Mark Steyn: As I Was Saying…

Today’s Digital Deals
Boondock Saints – Download Now For Just $6.99!
Up To 70% Off Mens’ And Womens’ Pants

Category: Linkagery

Boomerang: NBC Suspends ‘Today’ Host Billy Bush Because …

Posted on | October 10, 2016 | 2 Comments

. . . uh, why? Honestly, I’m mystified by this unexpected and, to me, inexplicable reaction to the Trump 2005 “hot mic” video leak:

Billy Bush has been suspended from the “Today” show “pending further review of the matter.”
It is unclear if he will ever return to the broadcast.
“He will never be on the show again,” an on-air source said Sunday night, reflecting what staffers are saying behind the scenes.
A second source at the network confirmed Monday that his return is unlikely.
“Today” co-host Savannah Guthrie briefly told viewers about Bush’s suspension on Monday morning.
The sudden change came amid a chorus of calls for disciplinary action against Bush over his vulgar 2005 conversation with Donald Trump that was caught on tape and revealed on Friday. . . .
[T]he executive in charge of “Today,” Noah Oppenheim, said in an internal memo that the executives had decided to go even further and suspend Bush.
“I know we’ve all been deeply troubled by the revelations of the past 48 hours,” Oppenheim wrote.
“Let me be clear — there is simply no excuse for Billy’s language and behavior on that tape,” he wrote. “NBC has decided to suspend Billy, pending further review of this matter.”

OK, do me a favor and go read the full transcript of that 2005 video and tell me what “language and behavior” Bush is being disciplined for. Frankly, I don’t see it. Bush is there with Trump, and Trump’s saying what he’s saying, and Bush says . . . what? Please, explain to me how he said something so reprehensible that there’s “no excuse” for it.

What is the cause of this “chorus of calls for disciplinary action”? What Trump said was without doubt offensive — as I said, it effectively guarantees his defeat in the election — but I’m not seeing what Billy Bush said that was so bad. In context, you’ve got the celebrity Alpha billionaire (Trump’s Apprentice at the time was anchoring NBC’s 9 p.m. Thursday slot, with about 14 million viewers) and it’s Trump being Trump. He’s talking about women, and Billy Bush, an ex-radio talk-show host, in 2005 was 33 and had recently promoted to co-host of Access Hollywood.

What exactly was this young B-list TV personality supposed to say in response to Trump’s comments? What he did say was, “Sheesh, your girl’s hot as sh–” and “Yes! The Donald has scored. Whoa, my man!” and “Uh, yeah, those legs, all I can see is the legs. . . . Oh, that’s good legs.”

OK, maybe you wouldn’t want to be caught on tape saying those things, but is what Billy Bush said a “no excuse” situation? And again, who is it that’s making this “chorus of calls for disciplinary action”?

Guys can’t even say “good legs” anymore, not even just guys talking to each other? Is this the new 21st-century standard? Are we now e a nation of third-grade tattletales? “Teacher! Teacher! Billy said a naughty word!” We need a “chorus of calls” for some people to get a life.

Category: Celebrities, Donald Trump, NBC

‘My Inherent Feminine Wisdom’: Witchcraft and Academic Feminism

Posted on | October 10, 2016 | 2 Comments

“When I was a little girl, I instinctively knew that I was a Witch, without at the time identifying with this special word or know all that it entailed. … Like all children I was closely connected to the magical side of my nature. Later, as an adolescent, I began to realize that this intuitive, and quite potent, side of me was being slowly eroded by a world that discouraged feminine values, but gave special consideration to masculine priorities. Living in an environment so tacitly hostile to what I knew at heart was my inherent feminine wisdom only fueled my desire to cling to it. I turned to Witchcraft . . . in an attempt to give voice and context to abilities I did not want to be forced to give up.”
— Laurie Cabot, The Witch in Every Woman: Reawakening the Magical Nature of the Feminine to Heal, Protect, Create, and Empower (1997)

In 1977, Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis named Laurie Cabot the “Official Witch of Salem.” For four decades. Ms. Cabot (neé Mercedes Elizabeth Kearsey, born in Oklahoma in 1933), operated a witchcraft shop in Salem, and the Boston Globe reported that she “has taught witchcraft at Salem State College, Wellesley College, and Harvard.” She now presides as high priestess of the Cabot-Kent Hermetic Temple, “the first federally recognized Temple of Witchcraft in the history of Salem,” having been granted 501(c)(3) nonprofit status by the Internal Revenue Service in 2010. (This was about the same time the IRS was deliberately harassing Tea Party groups, so that according to Obama’s IRS, the official rule seems to be “patriotism = bad, witchcraft = good.”)

‘Daughters of the Goddess’ author Wendy Griffin.

The belief that witchcraft represents “inherent feminine wisdom,” so that its practitioners are in demand as teachers at major universities, has been widely promoted by feminists. Professor Wendy Griffin taught for 26 years the Department of Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies at California State University-Long Beach. Professor Griffin’s “research examines the religious construction of gender, particularly as traditional representations are challenged in contemporary feminist Witchcraft and Goddess Spirituality.” Professor Griffin edited the 1999 anthology Daughters of the Goddess: Studies of Healing, Identity and Empowerment, in which she declared that devotees of neo-pagan witchcraft “are women involved in a new naming of reality”:

Healing the split between mind and body, feminist and Pagan, sexuality and spirituality, nature and human, and ancient and contemporary understandings of the Numinous is seen as healing the wounds believed to be inflicted by patriarchy. . .
“With each woman, each ritual today, Goddess spirituality contributes to the new reality that is taking form.

Professor Griffin’s 1995 article, “The Embodied Goddess: Feminist Witchcraft and Female Divinity” (included in the 2001 anthology Gender and Witchcraft), describes the connection between the feminist movement and the revival of witchcraft:

In November of 1971, Mary Daly led “hundreds” on an “Exodus from patriarchal religion” . . . by walking out at the conclusion of a sermon she delivered in the Harvard Memorial Church. A few months later, in 1972 in Los Angeles, the first coven of feminist witches which practiced “the Craft” as a religion began to meet under the guidance of Zsuzsanna Budapest. Within a few years, these witches were gathering with several hundred women in the mountains to celebrate their visions of female divinity in religious rituals.

Professor Griffin’s article is “based on four years of research which began when one of my students invited me to attend a religious ritual organized by her coven of feminist witches,” and she describes this group under the name “Coven of the Redwood Moon”:

Of the seven women who were members of the Coven of the Redwood Moon during the study, one was Chicana and another African American. . . .
Most of Redwood Moon’s witches did not attend or had not finished college and had working class jobs. In addition, the majority of the coven members tended to be lesbian, bisexual, or celibate. Only one was in a heterosexual marriage and none of them had children at home. . . .
Circle of the Redwood Moon is a radical feminist coven, and members are trained through reading assignments and discussions to do a radical feminist analysis of gender and power. Called “Dianics,” after the Roman Goddess Diana . . . They differ from most other neopagans in their feminist analysis, political activism, and in that most of them acknowledge only an autonomous female principal and reject the concept of a male divinity.

This is the kind of scholarship Women’s Studies produces — a university professor spending four years in a “radical feminist coven,” combining “analysis of gender and power” and “political activism” with neopagan beliefs, while celebrating “female divinity in religious rituals.” Professor Griffin interprets feminist witchcraft rituals as providing a “a celebratory vision of female power . . . rooted in strength and self-knowledge.” These rituals serve to “not only liberate female sexuality from concepts of sin, but actually celebrate the erotic,” in contrast to what Profess Griffin calls the “patriarchal religious oppression experienced by women.”

Some may dismiss this stuff as absurd, but Professor Griffin has a Ph.D., a pension from Cal State-Long Beach and is now Academic Dean at Cherry Hill Seminary, a 501(c)3 nonprofit which claims to be “the leading provider of education and practical training in leadership, ministry, and personal growth in Pagan and Nature-Based spiritualities.” Professor Griffin teaches a course there called “Voices of Gaia”:

If Gaia could speak, what would she be telling us? As Pagans, it could be argued that we have a unique bond with Her, with the anima mundi, the spirits of place, the wind, water, fire and air.

Witchcraft is treated as a legitimate subject by academic feminists. Women’s Studies professors Susan M. Shaw and Janet Lee explain in their textbook Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions:

In the early twenty-first century, many women participate in revivals of ancient woman-centered religions. . . Wicca, or witchcraft . . . is a Goddess- and nature-oriented religion whose origins predate both Judaism and Christianity. Current Wiccan practice involves the celebration of the feminine, connection with nature, and the practice of healing. As Wiccan practitioner Starhawk suggests, witchcraft encourages women to be strong, confident, independent and to love the Goddess, the earth, and other human beings.

In a 2015 column for the Guardian, feminist Sady Doyle explained how young women use witchcraft as a “way to express feminist ambitions”:

Witchcraft — and the embrace of “magical” practices, like reading tarot cards — has recently experienced a resurgence of sorts among young, creative, politically engaged women. . . .
“To reclaim the word witch is to reclaim our right, as women, to be powerful,” wrote Starhawk, in her seminal 1979 book The Spiral Dance. “To be a witch is to identify with 9 million victims of bigotry and hatred and to take responsibility for shaping a world in which prejudice claims no more victims.”
Today, The Spiral Dance is in its third edition, and has sold over 300,000 copies. It is many people’s first introduction to Wicca, the earth-based spiritual movement that was created in the 1950s and has come to be a recognized religion around the world. It is also one of the most well known and comprehensive texts from a very particular moment in feminist history which until recently was largely unfashionable: the “women’s spirituality” movement, in which women radically rewrote existing religions, or simply made their own to be in line with the goals of women’s liberation.

Laurie Cabot, the Official Witch of Salem, is certainly supportive of “the goals of women’s liberation.” In her book The Witch in Every Woman, Cabot celebrates the “extraordinary power” of women’s sexuality:

What role does sex play in a woman’s life? A woman’s entire existence is sexual, her every move a sexual expression. . . . When it comes to sex, a modern woman must say to herself, “I am the Divine Goddess,” and “I am Sovereign.” Sex should come on her own terms and initiative. Sexuality is power, but female sexuality is extraordinary power.

Cabot goes on to explain that “we harbor many false ideas about women and sexuality . . . that are particularly devastating for women.” She writes of the “disparaging cultural attitudes” about sex and women, arguing that “we need to revamp our laws concerning marriage, divorce and the family in favor of a woman’s position,” thus to remove “the obstacles posed by a patriarchal society.” Cabot, who worked as a nightclub dancer in the 1950s and was divorced twice, trained her two daughters as witches.

“Jody Cabot, daughter of Salem’s Official Witch Laurie Cabot, was raised from birth as a psychic and Witch. She uses the ancient arts of Witchcraft as a metaphysical science.”

Her “metaphysical science” did not predict this 2009 event:

The daughter of Salem’s “official witch” is wanted on a warrant after defaulting in a court case in which she’s accused of stealing money from her mother, the Salem News reports.
Jody Cabot, 49, the daughter of Laurie Cabot, was supposed to appear in Salem District Court Sept. 21 for a status hearing in her case, which involves charges of larceny and forgery dating to 2007.

More background on that case:

Laurie Cabot had gone to police after learning that her daughter had deposited a $3,750 check drawn on her mother’s account and purported to have been signed by her. Laurie Cabot said she never signed any check to her daughter and added that she had been forced to deal with similar incidents in the past, according to a police report.
By the time Laurie Cabot’s bank rejected the check as forged, Jody Cabot had allegedly made $3,200 worth of purchases from Target’s Web site with the money, according to a police report.

Greed, you say? Well, back in 1997, there were such allegations in Salem:

Maria Guerriero, a Salem Wiccan high priestess, said she and [Laurie] Cabot had a falling-out over Cabot’s treatment of other witches who were trying to start businesses.
Cabot’s emphasis on commercial gain has created a competitive environment; and witches and pagans are having trouble separating business from spirituality, Guerriero said.
“Spirituality is something that can’t be sold,” she told the newspaper last week. “It’s like a witch war out here.” . . .
Janet Andrews of Wenham alleges that Cabot threatened to shoot her after Andrews tried to kick her out of her house in May. And Andrews plans to ask an Ipswich District Court judge next week to extend a restraining order against Cabot. . . .
Cabot also failed to file state income tax returns from 1991 through 1995, the newspaper reported.

Laurie Cabot’s “inherent feminine wisdom” might have gotten her a few college teaching gigs, but it didn’t help with local police in 2004:

While two officers were carrying out a court order . . . an angry Cabot put a hex on Sgt. James Walker, a patrol supervisor.
“Look me in the eyes,” Cabot said, according to police. “You are cursed for life.” Cabot then tried to place the same curse on Patrolman Timothy Salvo, police said, but he wouldn’t look her in the eyes.
“He’s a more veteran officer,” said Police Chief Robert St. Pierre.
Cabot did, however, place a general curse on all the law enforcement officers who came to her Essex Street apartment, a group that included two Essex County deputy sheriffs. “The rest of you are cursed, too,” she said.
Although Salem police have been cussed before, this is believed to be the first time they were cursed. No charges were filed against Cabot.
When contacted yesterday, Cabot did not deny the incident. She said she did it to protect a grandson who was being returned by court order to the custody of his father.

So, as Halloween approaches, you may wonder, “What’s up in Salem?”

Join Salem’s Official Witch, Laurie Cabot, as you learn to communicate with loved ones on the Other Side! High Priestess and Founder of the Cabot Tradition of Witchcraft, Laurie will guide you through the Other World help you to communicate with loved ones who have passed on.
Laurie will lecture on the Cabot Tradition concept of the Other World, sometimes called Summerland or Avalon. If you have been wondering, and maybe fearing, what happens to us when we die, this workshop is for you. Laurie will talk about passing on and what happens afterwards from a Witch’s perspective. This workshop is very reassuring for those who are frightened by death. When people learn about dying and what comes afterwards, and even communicate with loved ones who have undergone this process, people are much more accepting that that’s what we all do. Yes; you will die someday. Learn what Witches have always known about this inevitable process, and help to allay your fears of life’s greatest transition.
Using her psychic gifts, Laurie will demonstrate communication with the other side and help people to learn to communicate with and sense their own loved ones in spirit. Please bring something that belonged to someone who has passed on to strengthen the connection.

Yes, talking to the dead! Communicate with “the Other World” — and it will only cost you $75! Pardon my “disparaging cultural attitudes,” but isn’t this just a bunch of superstitious nonsense? Necromancy, astrology, tarot, global warming, multiculturalism, Keynesian economics . . .

OK, so maybe witchcraft isn’t the craziest thing feminists believe in.

Be afraid, America. Be very afraid. pic.twitter.com/nJP3EL2lAe

— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) July 4, 2016

RELATED:

Oct. 1: The Death of a ‘Dianic High Priestess’
July 4: Wicked Witches: Marion Zimmer Bradley and the Feminist Pagan Sex Cult
April 1: The Radical Theology of Feminism

Category: Sex Trouble

Learning Not to Argue

Posted on | October 9, 2016 | 3 Comments

One of the important lessons in life — and it took me a long time to learn it — is to avoid arguments. That is to say, when you find yourself in a situation where someone is determined to dispute about facts, as opposed to mere opinion, just leave it alone and walk away. You have stated what you believe to be true, and the person trying to have an argument with you is, in effect, accusing you of ignorance and/or poor judgment. You are being disrespected, and there is no possibility that someone who has no respect for you will be persuaded by anything more you have to say. Change the subject, or politely excuse yourself from the conversation, because continuing such an argument will only give further offense to your antagonist, and likely cause harm to your reputation.

Yesterday, I stated as a fact that the presidential election is now effectively over, that the release of Donald Trump’s “hot mic” tape is a “non-recoverable error.” I am 57 years old, and have studied politics quite assiduously during my life, and if I don’t know what I’m talking about by now when it comes to elections, then I must be a hopeless fool.

Well, the comments on yesterday’s post were flooded with angry people calling me a fool and worse. What seems to be the problem is that these people do not comprehend the “is”/“ought” distinction. It is of no consequence whether I believe Donald Trump should lose the election. Rather what I am stating, as a matter of fact, is that Trump will lose.

Election Day is now a month away, and we shall see what happens. However, I wish to call to the attention of readers the folly involved in believing that what I write on this blog (which got about 6,000 page views yesterday) could somehow decisively influence the outcome of the election. This is the real source, I suspect, of the wrath directed toward me by angry commenters. There seems to be an idea that blogs exercise a tremendous influence in electoral politics. Although I do not wish to say that my blog (or any other blog) has no influence, what I want to point out is that this influence is greater when it comes to primary campaigns than when we are talking about the final month of the general election for President of the United States. This election is now The Big Show — being covered by every TV network and other major news organization — and is quite unlikely to be influenced at this point by anything I say here.

At the top of my blog is a quote by Arthur Koestler: “One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up.” Regular readers expect me to keep that promise, and it would be a disservice to those readers if, having seen the handwriting on the wall (“Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin”) I didn’t share this fact with them.

Amid the firestorm of hatred unleashed against me for speaking truth, I am confident in my judgment, and unswayed by any criticism. When I state something as a fact, declaring the outcome of future events, all that is required of me is patience in awaiting my vindication. Selah.

Category: Donald Trump, Election

FMJRA 2.0: Function Creep

Posted on | October 8, 2016 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

How Bill Schmalfeldt (@Leonidas_BU) Implicated Himself in Online Fraud
Thinking Man’s Zombie
The Lonely Conservative
Billy Sez
The Artisan Craft Blog
Regular Right Guy
Proof Positive
Batshit Crazy News

Late Night With Rule 5 Sunday: Tax Loopholes Edition
Animal Magnetism
Regular Right Guy
Ninety Miles from Tyranny
Proof Positive
A View from the Beach
Batshit Crazy News

The Death of a ‘Dianic High Priestess’
Rotten Chestnuts

FMJRA 2.0: Bach’s Toccata & Fugue In D Minor
The Pirate’s Cove
A View from the Beach
Batshit Crazy News

No, @Clementine_Ford, Men Don’t Hate Women, But They Definitely Hate You
Regular Right Guy

It’s Come to This: Male Students Trained to ‘Be Accountable to Feminism’
Regular Right Guy
Batshit Crazy News

In The Mailbox: 10.03.16
Regular Right Guy
Proof Positive
A View from the Beach

Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt Is Still Deranged and, Yes, Cyberstalking
The Artisan Craft Blog
Thinking Man’s Zombie
Regular Right Guy
Batshit Crazy News

In The Mailbox: 10.04.16
Regular Right Guy
Proof Positive
A View from the Beach
Batshit Crazy News

In The Mailbox: 10.05.16
Proof Positive
A View from the Beach
Batshit Crazy News

In The Mailbox: 10.07.16
Proof Positive

Now That the Election Is Over …

Posted on | October 8, 2016 | 8 Comments

Trump recorded having extremely lewd
conversation about women in 2005
— Washington Post

Ryan ‘sickened’ by Trump,
joint appearance scrapped
— Politico

Trump on Hot Mic: ‘When You’re a Star …
You Can Do Anything’ to Women
— NBC News

Republican Rep. Barbara Comstock of Virginia urges Trump to drop out of race
— Washington Post

Mike Pence’s Team Boots Reporters
After Audio Emerges Of Trump Saying
He Can Grab Women ‘By The P***y’
— Huffington Post

Congressman Jason Chaffetz withdraws
his endorsement of Donald Trump
— KSTU-TV

Donald Trump Tried to Fire Nancy O’Dell
After She Rejected His Sexual Advances
— Daily Beast

Coffman: ‘Trump Should Step Aside’
— KCNC-TV

This is what pilots call a “non-recoverable error.”

Any attempt to dismiss this as “locker-room banter” runs up against the problem that Trump was not just talking about women’s looks or sharing tales of his sexual adventures, but was boasting about how his status as a wealthy businessman and reality-TV star enabled him to get away with what was arguably sexual assault. Now, what Trump said may actually be true, that “when you’re a star” it’s possible to do this. Which is to say, some women may actually be so flattered by the attentions of a high-status man that they do not object to such behavior. Anyone who has spent much time around sports or show business knows that some women will just throw themselves at a “star.” However, a candidate for President of the United States is judged by an entirely different standard than would apply to a rock musician, an actor or an NBA player.

This election is over. Write “–30–” at the bottom and file it.

Category: Donald Trump, Election