Democrats and George Stephanopoulos (But I Repeat Myself)

The “revolving door” between the Democrat Party and the liberal media functions as a full-employment program for party operatives, who can collect paychecks from TV networks for doing the same work they would otherwise do for Democrats. Nearly everyone in the major media is a Democrat (e.g., 89% voted for Bill Clinton in 1992) and so it does not seem at all unusual to them that George Stephanopoulos, a lifelong Democrat Party operative who worked for the Clinton campaign, should be employed as a “journalist” hosting ABC’s Good Morning America:

Former Democratic activist turned journalist George Stephanopoulos on Thursday went after Carly Fiorina for attacking Planned Parenthood during Wednesday’s presidential debate. The Good Morning America co-host grilled, “Another powerful moment last night was when you talked about those Planned Parenthood tapes. But analysts who’ve watched all 12-plus hours say the scene you’ve described, that harrowing scene you described, actually isn’t in those tapes.”
He wondered, “did you misspeak?” Fiorina shot back at the man who secretly donated $75,000 to the Clintons: “I don’t know whether you’ve watched the tapes, George. . . . Certainly none of the Democrats who are still defending Planned Parenthood have watched those tapes.”

We have previously discussed the Planned Parenthood videos and Fiorina’s reference to them during the Wednesday debate. The facts of the matter are known. What is important here is that (a) Fiorina emerged from the debate as a much more viable candidate for the Republican nomination, and therefore (b) Stephanopoulos was obligated, as a Democrat Party operative, to attack Fiorina.

The naked partisanship of Stephanopoulos is not merely “liberal bias”; it is outright propaganda on behalf of the Democrat Party, which reflects ABC News policy of supporting Democrats. All of the producers and executives at ABC News are also partisan Democrats, so that the network has an organizational mission of advocacy on behalf of the candidates and policies of the Democrat Party. This is not only dishonest (because it presents partisan propaganda as objective “news”), but also dangerous, in that individuals like Stephanopoulos and organizations like ABC News cannot be expected to report honestly about the failures of Democrat officials and policies. The public is deliberately misled about, for example, the effectiveness of the Obama administration’s foreign policy, because many millions of citizens are spoonfed disinformation from Democrat partisans like Stephanopoulos.

Democrats will likely nominate as their 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, for whom George Stephanopoulos formerly worked and with whom he is still friends. Does anyone anticipate that Stephanopoulos will be objective in reporting on evidence of Mrs. Clinton’s incompetence, dishonesty and corruption? No, of course not. No one expects honest political coverage from ABC News. They belong to an industry whose business is manufacturing lies.

(Hat-tips: Evi L. Bloggerlady and Aleister at Legal Insurrection.)





 

32 comments

  1. When you called George Stepinsomethingawfulus a journalist, I thought at first, “Hey, that should be in quote marks!”

    But, no. The occupation of journalist has fallen so far that it’s now like alchemist. It’s so unworthy of respect as it is that it needs no quotes.

  2. 89% voted for Bill Clinton in 1992

    I would love to see more recent numbers. I’d bet that the poll itself had an effect, with conservative would-be newsmen deciding that they’d rather not be surrounded by libs all day, as a quality-of-life issue, and adding a business concentration so that they could do something more respectable, like PR (heh). I’d expect something closer to 99% in the under-35s.

  3. I still don’t understand why they can’t be sued for In-Kind donations to Democrats. All of the Media is guilty and it’s so blatantly obvious.

    It may however be the one reason why we won’t see a resurrection of the Fairness Doctrine by the FCC. So there’s that.

  4. Your post is unmitigated b.s.. It’s disingenuous to play semantics with Fiorina’s words when everyone with a lick of sense knows she was addressing a horror that we all know is Planned Parenthood’s stock in trade.

  5. First Off I am Anti-Abortion.
    Yes we know PP is bad,

    When you start making up stories it hurts the chances of being able to win others over to see what we are about.

  6. Politics is the act of electing lawmakers. It’s only through electing the right lawmakers that we can eliminate abortion.

  7. my associate’s stride close relative makes $98 an hour on the portable workstation……….Afterg an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month… Just few hours of your free time, any kind of computer, elementary understanding of web and stable connection is what is required…….HERE I STARTED…look over here
    —-vnk…..
    ???? http://GoogleLatestHighPayingJobsNetworkOnlineCenters/$98hourlywork…. =??????????????????????????????????

  8. The former employee describes the exact thing Fiorina spoke about. Did anyone think they had actual video footage of a felony murder?

    You cannot have watched even one of these videos in full (and all were posted in full unedited versions within 24 hours of the edited releases) and defend PP in any fashion.

  9. Remember that was the year Perot won 19%, Clinton only won 43% of the vote, so it is likely other journalists who would have voted Democratic normally but drew the line at Slick Willie went for Ross. The anti-GOP vote was likely 95% or more.

  10. There are a handful of conservative or libertarian journalists, but they don’t work for the Lamestream Media.

  11. my associate’s stride close relative makes $98 an hour on the portable workstation……….Afterg an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month… Just few hours of your free time, any kind of computer, elementary understanding of web and stable connection is what is required…….HERE I STARTED…look over here
    pda…….
    ???? http://GoogleGoodPayOnlineJobsNetworkOnlineCenters/$98hourlywork…. ??????????????????????????????????????????????

Comments are closed.