FMJRA 2.0: Day Late & A Dollar Short, Pre-Veterans Day Edition
Posted on | November 9, 2014 | 4 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
Rule 5 Sunday: Absolutely 100% Lena Dunham Free
Batshit Crazy News
Average Bubba
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot
Proof Positive
A View from the Beach
Ninety Miles from Tyranny
And @AlecMacGillis Misses the Bus
That Mr. G Guy
Enjoyment and Contemplation
Regular Right Guy
Batshit Crazy News
Conservative Hideout
LIVE AT FIVE: 11.07.14
Da Tech Guy
That Mr. G Guy
Batshit Crazy News
Proof Positive
A View from the Beach
Andrea Dworkin…
That Mr. G Guy
Regular Right Guy
Batshit Crazy News
FMJRA 2.0: Astradyne
Batshit Crazy News
The Pirate’s Cove
I’ll Go With “Troll Of The Century”
Regular Right Guy
Political Hat
Election 2014 BREAKING: GOP Wins Senate Majority, @AoSHQDD Says
Batshit Crazy News
That Mr. G Guy
The Lonely Conservative
A View from the Beach
LIVE AT FIVE: 11.03.14
Batshit Crazy News
Da Tech Guy
If Only We’d Smaller Political Units Than Congress. We’d Need A Lot, Though, Perhaps As Many As We’ve States.
Regular Right Guy
That Mr. G Guy
The #StreetHarassment Meme and #Feminism’s Kafkatrapping Tactics
Batshit Crazy News
Law of Markets
Regular Right Guy
Da Tech Guy
The Sweet Hangover of Victory
That Mr. G Guy
Batshit Crazy News
Regular Right Guy
The Pirate’s Cove
GOP #WarOnWomen Results In 100 Female Representatives: We Blame Rule 5
The Camp of the Saints
Batshit Crazy News
Conservative Hideout
LIVE AT FIVE: 11.06.14
That Mr. G Guy
Batshit Crazy News
A View from the Beach
Harvard #SexWeek Punch Lines
That Mr. G Guy
Regular Right Guy
Batshit Crazy News
A View from the Beach
‘Broken People,’ Cats and Prozac
Batshit Crazy News
That Mr. G Guy
The Revision Division
UPDATE: @AmandaBynes Is Crazy
That Mr. G Guy
Batshit Crazy News
Feminists: They’re Not About the ‘D’
Not Good News
That Mr. G Guy
Batshit Crazy News
Top linkers this week:
- Batshit Crazy News (15)
- That Mr. G Guy (11)
- Regular Right Guy (8)
- A View from the Beach (5)
Thanks to everyone for their linkagery, especially the folks who helped make Rule 5 Sunday the most linked post this past week!
Land of the Loops: Bundle of Joy
Sum Ting Wong At CNN
Posted on | November 9, 2014 | 41 Comments
by Smitty
Via Zero Hedge, the CNN clown car is revved up to Full Tilt Boogie:

One has to wonder if this is an innocent typo, or a Freudian slip. There seems an interest in projecting violent acts onto conservatives and veterans. This blog doubles down on its hope that #OccupyResoluteDesk dies old, full of years, and acutely aware of what a no-talent rodeo clown he really is.
To Say the Very Least
Posted on | November 8, 2014 | 59 Comments
Ross Douthat on the Wendy Davis debacle for Texas Democrats:
It should be said, and many people are saying it, that Davis and her team ran a poorer-than-expected campaign overall, and that the allegedly-brilliant team running the Democrats’ new Texas ground game were not in fact so brilliant. But the more important issue, surely, is that the Democrats decided that it made sense to run, well, Wendy Davis as their “change-the-map” candidate in Texas. Nunn and Carter in Georgia were nominations that fit reasonably well with the facts on the ground, and while they obviously disappointed Nunn did at least outperform the last two Democratic Senate nominees in her state. Davis, on the other hand, actually underperformed the Democratic nominee’s totals in the last two head-to-head races against Rick Perry … which is, again, pretty much exactly what you’d expect when you nominate a figure who owed her prominence to a filibuster on late-term abortion to contest a statewide rate in Texas. . . .
Read the whole thing, but you could summarize the basic error of Democrats in Texas and elsewhere this cycle in one word: Hubris.
Republicans did much the same thing in 2005-2006 after Bush’s re-election convinced the Stupid Party that America had reached some kind of GOP utopia, “The Permanent Republican Majority.”
There were people (Hugh Hewitt comes instantly to mind) who actually believed that nonsense, who failed to realize how the betrayal of trust epitomized by John McCain’s “shamnesty” proposals in 2006 and 2007 were alienating grassroots conservatives.
Clearly, Republican leaders believed they could compromise on economic issues and split the difference on social issues. The devastating losses in the 2006 mid-terms and the crushing victory of Barack Obama did nothing to knock any sense into Karl Rove’s GOP Strategery Brain Trust. However, in 2010, conservatives finally told the GOP leadership to go to hell and the grassroots had their own damned revolution. (Fuck you, Charlie Crist. Rot in hell, Arlen Specter.)
The GOP Strategery Brain Trust managed to reassert itself after 2011, as John Boehner and other backstabbing crapweasels managed to fritter away whatever influence had been gained by the historic 2010 Republican landslide. Naturally, then, Mitt Romney got the 2012 GOP nomination and, naturally, lost to Barack Obama. So here we are at last, in 2014, when Mitch McConnell and his cronies have finally recaptured the GOP majority they fumbled away in 2005-2006.
What happened to Democrats in 2014, then, was a sort of natural consequence of political momentum in America’s two-party system. When a party re-elects their president to his second term, the winners always believe they have a complete mandate for their agenda, no matter how narrow the margin of their victory. Republican victories in the elections of 1980, 1984 and 1988 were all by margins that could be called legitimate mandates, larger than the margins of either of Obama’s victories in 2008 or 2012. Nancy Pelosi’s tenure as Speaker of the House lasted only four years, and Harry “The Alleged Pederast” Reid kept the Senate Majority Leader’s gavel for eight years.
Next year, Harry Reid will no longer be Senate Majority leader, but he will still be an alleged pederast.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
To clarify: I have never alleged that Harry Reid is a pederast, but many other people tell me that they have heard this alleged.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
Also, according to Google, "Harry+Reid+pederast" = 51,000 hits. https://t.co/Y7iCY04Qgr So I'm just saying that it has been so alleged.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
No one has ever produced proof that Harry Reid craves the touch of boyflesh, but he has never disproven the reported allegations, either.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
Clearly, the Democrats who thought Wendy Davis could be elected governor of Texas were insane for believing it, but the incoming floodtide of Mexicans will sooner or later turn Texas into a Democrat state, and Democrats will turn Texas into an impoverished and corrupt ruin, as they are already doing in California. Unless the new Republican majority in Congress is absolutely dedicated to a no-more-bullshit border security policy — no amnesty now, no amnesty ever — their majority will prove short-lived, and Mitch McConnell will have the honor of being the Last Republican Senate Majority Leader, presiding over the end of the American republic.
Unless the idiots atop the GOP power ziggurat in Washington wake up, by 2030, the Republican Party will be a withered shadow of its former self, exiled to permanent minority status and political irrelevance. That is to say, if there still is a Republican Party in 2030. It’s not too hard to envision a scenario wherein Democrats win the White House in 2016, take back the Senate in 2018, re-elect Hillary Clinton and recapture the House in 2020, The consequences of such a scenario could lead to either (a) the final collapse of the Republican Party or (b) Texans voting to secede from the Union.
Honestly, I think Texas should have seceded last year, although next year or the year after that would be OK, too. But they need to do it soon, or eventually there won’t be anything left of Texas worth fighting to save, nor anything anywhere else in America, either. Democrats will preside over the Death of America, because the leaders of the Republican Party are all worthless, unprincipled, selfish cowards who care more for the prestige of their own offices than they do for the people who elected them. Any other questions?
@directorblue @rsmccain @AmPowerBlog @ali @verumserum .@jesseberney Missed it by thaaattt much….
— Dave Mason (@EvadMason) November 8, 2014
And the Worst Election Forecast of 2014 (or Possibly Ever) Award goes to … @jesseberney!! http://t.co/05vV90HixB – via @directorblue
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
@rsmccain Hey Wendy Davis for President!
http://t.co/GnB79NSRz3
— Passably Affable (@tbrusletten) November 8, 2014
Let the WENDY DAVIS for PRESIDENT campaign begin! http://t.co/tpyiBLT0id @WendyDavisTexas #p2 #UniteBlue #tcot
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
3 Things I Love: 1. Democrats losing. 2. Democrats trying to explain why they lost. 3. Laughing at Democrat explanations of their losses.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) November 8, 2014
America is hopelessly doomed. Nothing but a miracle can save us. But there is no reason we can’t laugh while it’s still legal to laugh.
Signs Of Pending Apocalypse: DewItos
Posted on | November 8, 2014 | 24 Comments
by Smitty
“That sounds like part of a balanced meal,” said no nutritionist. Ever.
Good Sweet Lord, Pepsi Is Actually Testing A Doritos-Flavored Mountain Dew
http://t.co/V33rUsq5G3 pic.twitter.com/X2IKcaAKPy
— BuzzFeed (@BuzzFeed) November 8, 2014
A Little Salt For The Democrat Gash
Posted on | November 8, 2014 | 23 Comments
by Smitty
This blog was a huge Christine O’Donnell booster, back when. No regrets. But one can’t let this fact pass un-touted, emphasis mine:
The Christine O’Donnell thing really did happen more or less by accident, because she happened to be in the right place at the right time to catch an anti-establishment wave and win a primary in which she was supposed to be a protest candidate. Whereas the Davis experiment was intentionally designed: She was treated to fawning press coverage, lavished with funding, had the primary field mostly cleared for her, and was touted repeatedly as part of an actual party strategy for competing in a conservative-leaning state. Of course she had a much more impressive resume than O’Donnell, with less witchcraft and real political experience, and in that sense she made a more credible candidate overall. (Though, ahem, O’Donnell actually outperformed Davis at the polls in the end …)
Hat tip: Instapundit
The Anti-War Movement Isn’t Dead; It’s Just Restin’
Posted on | November 8, 2014 | 14 Comments
by Smitty
Almost twenty years ago, when I could not conceive of ever being anything but a leftist, I joined a left-wing online discussion forum.
Before that I’d had twenty years of face-to-face participation in leftist politics: marching, organizing, socializing.
In this online forum, suddenly my only contact with others was the words those others typed onto a screen. That limited and focused means of contact revealed something.
If you took all the words typed into the forum every day and arranged them according to what part of speech they were, you’d quickly notice that nouns expressing the emotions of anger, aggression, and disgust, and verbs speaking of destruction, punishing, and wreaking vengeance, outnumbered any other class of words.
One topic thread was entitled “What do you view as disgusting about modern America?” The thread was begun in 2002. Almost eight thousand posts later, the thread was still going strong in June, 2014.
Those posting messages in this left-wing forumpublicly announced that they did what they did every day, from voting to attending a rally to planning a life, because they wanted to destroy something, and because they hated someone, rather than because they wanted to build something, or because they loved someone. You went to an anti-war rally because you hated Bush, not because you loved peace. Thus, when Obama bombed, you didn’t hold any anti-war rally, because you didn’t hate Obama.
Read the whole thing. Very revealing. And know that the anti-war movement will arise, zombie like, in 2017, unless the GOP fumbles and Her Majesty waltzes in.
UPDATE: @AmandaBynes Is Crazy
Posted on | November 7, 2014 | 74 Comments
This isn’t necessarily news to anyone who has followed the (literally) insane misadventures of Miss Ultimate Starlet Meltdown:
Amanda Bynes is flat-out admitting it.
She was tired and fell asleep on a couch at her local mall, the Beverly Center.
It’s the latest step in the Amanda Bynes journey. She tweeted that she slept there because she “did not have money” for a hotel. . . .
It’s all part of Bynes’ latest battle over money. She wants control of her finances. Her parents now have conservatorship. She has been tweeting that her lawyer is working to get control of her money back to her.
Access Hollywood reports that conservatorship is soon be divided between Amanda’s mom, Lynn Bynes, and a professional private fiduciary.
Amanda’s conservatorship attorney David Esquibias told Access he will work with the unnamed private trust firm to ensure that the actress’ needs are taken care of more efficiently.
“My goal is to get her permanent adequate housing,” Esquibias said, adding he hopes to have the change made official by the judge in the case as early as Friday.
I was not given money for a hotel so i have been staying with friends and i didn't get enough sleep last night so I fell asleep on a couch
— amanda bynes (@amandabynes) November 6, 2014
TMZ has gossip from “sources”:
Sources connected to Amanda tell TMZ … she wants “a normal life,” and she believes working in a bar would achieve that goal.
Amanda says she’s well aware of the obvious impediment — she attracts so much attention it would be hard to function as a bartender.
As for why Amanda is even thinking of getting a job … she desperately needs money. She doesn’t have access to her $5.7 million fortune because of her conservatorship, and only gets between $50 and $100 a day. As for what she wants to do with the money, aside from getting an apartment, she wants plastic surgery because she thinks she’s ugly.
Let your brain process these thoughts: She’s got more than $5 million in the bank, but she only gets $100 a day. She’s sleeping on a sofa in the mall, she’s telling friends she wants to get a job as a bartender and she thinks she’s so ugly she needs plastic surgery. Yet all the liberals who run the cultural industry that warped this poor girl’s mind want to keep telling us there’s a Republican “War on Women”?
Andrew Breitbart always said Hollywood was worse than D.C.
As usual, Andrew was right. Damn, I miss him more each day.
Feminists: They’re Not About the ‘D’
Posted on | November 7, 2014 | 19 Comments
How many times do I have to say feminism is a journey to lesbianism before people start waking up to the truth? Liberal guys need to realize their “male feminist” thing is never going to work:
A male-led campaign to promote affirmative consent for sex at DePaul University — which is nominally Catholic but runs a “Queer Peers” mentorship program — has thrown in the towel.
Or rather, the T-shirt.
Selling shirts emblazoned with “Consent the D” — a play on the school’s basketball slogan “Fear the D” (the Demons mascot) that was widely interpreted as “dick” — came off as “flippant” to campus feminists, who didn’t take kindly to an alternative approach to their signature issue, Jezebel says:
“Unfortunately, the ‘Consent the D’ movement was cut short by forces outside of my control,” founder Randy Vollrath said in a video message posted Tuesday. “T-shirt production has been halted while we work to address the issue.”
Vollrath said he appreciates that people didn’t like the T-shirts but objects to their disagreement being ”misinformed” about the group’s intentions.
Via College Insurrection. Guys, let me give you a little clue, OK? Take a look at the Women and Gender Studies faculty page at DePaul:
The Department of Women’s and Gender Studies faculty members have wide-ranging research interests. Some of these interests include intersections of race, class, gender, sexuality; cross-cultural perspectives; violence against women; women in the Middle East; lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and transgender identities and politics; autobiography; queer theories; immigrant women; globalization; transnational feminist perspectives; antiracism; gender and education; feminist theories and politics; gender and family violence; and performance studies among others.
Do you guys see anything — anything at all — in that description that would lead you to think the kind of feminism taught at DePaul University could ever involve, y’know, “consent the D”?
Unless, of course, it’s followed by “Y-K-E” or “I-L-D-O.”
Pardon my heternormative sarcasm, DePaul guys, but it’s not like I don’t have actual research to support what I’m telling you. The truth isn’t hard to find, but you young idiots are probably too busy playing beer pong and XBox to bother looking for the truth.
Here, let me help you: Professor Ann Russo is director of the graduate program in Women’s and Gender Studies. Your first clue is that there is a graduate program, OK? They’re giving out master’s degrees and Ph.D.s in this stuff at DePaul, so it’s not just a few undergrads picking up a few easy A’s for regurgitating “queer theory.” Having a graduate program in Women’s Studies signifies that a university is a serious Dyke Factory. And let’s see what Professor Russo says about herself, eh?
Areas of Interest
Women, Violence, and Justice
Feminist, Anti-Racist, and Critical Race Theories and Practices
Activism and Social Justice Movements
Constructions of Race, Class, Gender and Sexuality in Media
Sexual Identities and Sexuality Debates
Just in case you DePaul fellows don’t get the significance of terms like “gender,” “identities” and “sexuality,” here’s a hint: Normal women don’t need a Ph.D. program to study how to be normal.
Still, you clever college boys may be thinking, “That old man is just crazy. There’s no way the university would be employing women to promote a totalitarian ideology of hatred toward males.” OK, look at Professor Russo’s list of “major publications” and you’ll see:
- Without Apology: Andrea Dworkin’s Art and Politics, Co-authored with Cindy Jenefsky. (Westview Press, 1998)
Bro: ANDREA EFFING DWORKIN.
Feminists have praised Dworkin — and yes, they consider this praise — “as the Malcolm X of the women’s movement.” Professor Russo and her co-author clearly admire Dworkin as a feminist leader:
Without Apology illuminates the politics and artistic practices of Andrea Dworkin, arguably one of the most daring, innovative, and controversial feminists in the United States. Coauthor of civil rights antipornography laws, life-long political activist, and international lecturer and consultant on issues of sexual violence and exploitation, Dworkin has a prolific and distinguished writing career. She has published thirteen books of fiction and nonfiction, and her work has been translated into twelve languages.This is the first-ever book-length analysis of Dworkin’s feminist politics and the first critical analysis to examine her controversial political ideas in light of the literary dimensions of her prose. Cindy Jenefsky, with Ann Russo, looks at Dworkin’s major nonfiction works — including Woman Hating, Pornography: Men Possessing Women, and Intercourse — in terms of the rhetorical dynamics animating her political ideas. Also included within this analysis are Jenefsky’s lengthy interviews with Dworkin, which focus on her identity as an artist and on the artistic principles guiding her work.The result is a novel reinterpretation of Dworkin’s politics and a brilliantly clear analysis of the political nature of artistic practice for readers interested in literary and rhetorical criticism, feminist theory and activism, the volatile debates over pornography and civil rights, and the relationship between contemporary sexual practices and male power systems.
When a professor of Women’s Studies writes a book celebrating the career of Andrea Dworkin . . . do I have to draw you a picture? Your mental laziness is frightening, DePaul dudes. Because, see, it doesn’t take too much Googling to figure out what Professor Russo is all about. Her co-author on that Dworkin book, Cindy Jenefsky? Also the co-author of a treatise called “Phallic Intrusion: Girl-Girl Sex in Penthouse.”
Hmmm. So, Russo and Jenefsky are disciples of the man-hater Dworkin, and Jenefsky co-wrote an entire paper analyzing fake lesbian scenes in a popular skin mag. Would it help — because I know you DePaul guys are too dumb and/or lazy to Google it yourself — if I pointed out that Jenefsky’s co-author on that paper, Diane Helene Miller, is author of a book called Freedom to Differ: The Shaping of the Gay and Lesbian Struggle for Civil Rights?
Wake up, DePaul dudes: Feminism ain’t about “consent the D.”
Thousands of years of patriarchal domination, and you idiots are going to fumble it away because you’re too stupid to use Google?
You dudes are going get aced out of the action if you don’t wake up.
This is the latest in the “Sex Trouble” series of articles about radical feminism’s war on human nature. Readers have urged me to produce a book on this topic; since July I have been publishing articles, based on my research and recent news events, as “draft chapters” of this book that I hope to finish compiling next month. Readers have generously supported this project with PayPal contributions, and it is with profound gratitude for this support that I once again remind you of the Five Most Important Words in the English Language:
« go back — keep looking »
