Merry Christmas, Haters
Posted on | December 25, 2014 | 82 Comments
Protests flared into early Thursday in the St. Louis suburb where a white policeman fatally shot a black man who brandished a gun at a gas station on Tuesday night.
A group of protesters marched onto Interstate 170 in the city of Berkeley, Missouri, around 7 p.m. on Wednesday, blocking traffic for roughly 45 minutes. The demonstration followed a vigil at the Mobil On The Run gas station where the shooting occurred.
The site was just a few miles from the Ferguson street where a white police officer shot dead 18-year-old Michael Brown in August, fuelling weeks of protest in the region and across the country.
People obsessed with race keep pointing out white cop, black suspect, because fomenting racial hatred is all that matters to them. There is video of this incident, however, and police say it appears the suspects may have been attempting to stage an ambush: When the officer responded to a reported theft at the Mobil gas station/convenience store, he encountered two suspects, one of whom drew a 9mm pistol.
That 18-year-old suspect had an extensive criminal record, having been previously charged with “three assaults, armed robbery, armed criminal action and multiple uses of weapons since he was 17.” Police say the serial number had been filed off the suspect’s pistol, indicating the weapon was probably stolen.
From what we know, then, it appears that this suspect was a one-man crime wave — a menace to society, a dangerous thug — and the police officer who shot him was entirely justified in doing so. We have already seen how hateful race-baiting rhetoric motivated Ismaaiyl Brinsley to murder NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos. As one retired NYPD officer said on CNN: “We have two dead police officers, and I guess Al Sharpton got what he wanted.”
The dangerous consequences of promoting irresponsible hate-mongers like Sharpton, however, won’t stop the liberal media from recycling an anti-police narrative which implies that in any conflict between a white cop and a black criminal, the criminal is actually a victim.
"The Al Sharpton Christmas Race Riot Holiday Special." Season's Greetings form MSNBC!
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 24, 2014
On a parallel hate front, we have feminists whose desire to fight “rape culture” led to a hoax at the University of Virginia in which members of Phi Kappa Psi fraternity were falsely accused of gang rape by a girl who evidently invented her attacker, “Haven Monahan.” (The false accuser reportedly plagiarized an episode of the old teen drama Dawson’s Creek in a fake e-mail.) Why did this apparent fabrication become a lurid 9,000-word article in Rolling Stone? Because it seems that the writer, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, was hunting for a dramatic rape story at an “elite” university, a heinous crime perpetrated by “privileged” rapists — in other words, she wanted a horror tale in which the demonized villains were rich white males. The tale told by Jackie at UVA fit that feminist narrative. Unfortunately for Erdely (and for the feminist narrative), it seems that Jackie is a pathological liar and, whatever the reality of “rape culture” on campus, the Phi Kappa Psi brothers were falsely accused.
“But like most colleges across America, genteel University of Virginia has no radical feminist culture seeking to upend the patriarchy.”
— Sabrina Rubin Erdely, Rolling Stone
Rape, attempted murder, but Guillermo Hector Diaz is not a UVA fraternity member, so feminists don't care. http://t.co/TdDsBnl5uo
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 25, 2014
Police suspect Apollo Hernandez raped a relative and killed his mother, but he's not a UVA frat member, either. http://t.co/8I7rV2573O
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 25, 2014
Rape suspect Alberto Suarez captured. He's not a UVA fraternity member, however, so feminists don't care. https://t.co/Kd5OcBKF3e
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 25, 2014
Feminists only care about rape when UVA fraternity members are accused. Otherwise, don't bother them. They don't care.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 25, 2014
This kind of hate is all about progressive ideas of “social justice.” Yet as Friedrich Hayek showed, social justice is a mirage — the utopia toward which radical egalitarian ideologues claim to be leading us does not exist, and can never exist, simply because human society requires social order and all social orders involve hierarchy. Once you realize that “equality” is a false goal, you realize that what progressives are actually doing is destroying the existing social order — democracy, economic liberty, the rule of law — with the intention to replace it with a social order controlled by a political elite, with less real liberty for the “masses” and no rule of law to protect the rights of individuals.
It is amazing to me that any American would let these hateful demagogues appealing to prejudice persuade us to embrace their “social justice” swindle, a dishonest scam by which a power-hungry elite seek to defraud us all of our true inheritance, liberty.
What your Women's Studies professor got for Christmas. #feminism (hat-tip @MsEBL) pic.twitter.com/r9BXiqBbag
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) December 25, 2014
Merry Christmas, and may God bless America.
She Never Fails to Amaze
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 117 Comments
Amanda Marcotte’s irrepressible weirdness:
Before I take off for the rest of the week, I want to flag this amazing post at Feministing written by Katherine Cross that articulates better than anything I’ve ever read why it is so irritating to women to have men constantly sharing how our appearance makes their dicks feel, even if the determination is that we adorn ourselves in a dick-pleasing manner. Often, women react to this constant judgment by saying, “It’s not about you,” but the counterpoint is always that, in some cases, women are clearly trying to look sexy, and thus it must be because it is a performance solely for the benefit of men. . . .
Really? I mean . . . really?
Who are these “men constantly sharing” their phallic responses with women? Whence this sense of “constant judgment”?
Decades ago, I gave up attempting to explain why women decorate themselves the way they do. It’s utterly irrational.
Yes, feminists have a theory of how the “patriarchy” is to blame for women’s fashion habits, but in all my years of being a male supremacist oppressor, I’ve never understood this.
Consider, for example, the designer handbag. One encounters women who complain constantly about their economic plight but who nevertheless simply must have a $200 designer-label purse.
Likewise, shoes — stand-up comedians have endlessly mined the female obsession with shoes. I’m convinced that every woman, no matter her socioeconomic status or cultural background, secretly yearns to be Imelda Marcos. Even the wealthiest man is probably content with owning two or three pairs of shoes (dress shoes in black and brown for business, plus a pair of sneakers for the weekend) while his female office assistant owns a closet full of shoes in every color and style imaginable.
As I say, feminists have tried to blame women’s fashion obsessions on the patriarchy (Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth was the most famous attempt), but having spent my entire life as a male supremacist oppressor, I’m certain it’s not my fault that women are the way they are. Perhaps I wasn’t important enough to be invited to the secret meetings of the Omnipotent Male Cabal where it was decided that women must be brainwashed into spending all their money on handbags and shoes. Still, I think most men probably share my view that women’s fashion appetites are (a) insane and (b) not our fault. Certainly, no sane man has ever felt an urge to discuss fashion with Amanda Marcotte — telling her how her “appearance makes their dicks feel”? really? — and even less would any sane man wish to discuss such a subject with Katherine Cross:
We can even see this in GamerGater propaganda . . . That movement’s ongoing obsession with dyed hair is premised on a similar belief that all women who disagree with them and color their hair brightly — green, or blue, or pink, for instance — are doing so because they wish to thumb their nose at men specifically, or that they are doing it as an entirely self-conscious, petulant political statement; again, for men’s benefit. One male Gater even described this phenomenon as “having political statements shoved at me just by taking a cursory glance at a person.” To them, women with dyed hair are doing it just to irritate them.
It is interesting to note that many of the “Social Justice Warrior” feminist types assailing the videogame industry as a bastion of misogyny have strange-colored hair. It is also interesting to note that some of these women were born male, for example “Brianna Wu” a/k/a John Walker Flynt, whose Encyclopedia Dramatica file is quite interesting.
You may not be aware that Katherine Cross is accused of unethical journalism, having allegedly failed to disclose her professional association with Anita Sarkeesian’s Feminist Frequency while covering Sarkeesian’s feminist videogame crusade. And you might also be unaware that Katherine Cross was born male and has written at some length about her own transgender status, “the difficult lives we have to live before we can truly be ourselves . . . perpetually battling with a world that despises us,” et cetera. Transgenderism has frequently been a subject of Katherine Cross’s writing at Feministing and, in light of that, let us read more of her column that Amanda Marcotte so highly recommended:
Thus, our appearances are always a complex dance between our own desires and what we think the desires of others are; this is true of all of us. Even when women are performing for others, we do so no more frequently than men do, and often as not are performing for other women . . . We are adrift on the same silken sea of fashion and taste as men are.
To believe that we as women solely adorn ourselves for the specifically sexual gaze of men is, looked at in this way, a denial of humanity.
Yeah. Whatever you say. Dye your hair green and sail away on the “silken sea of fashion.” We don’t care. Really. We’re just so grateful that you gave Amanda Marcotte another excuse to make an utter fool of herself, endorsing a transgender feminist’s critique of how men allegedly judge women by “how our appearance makes their dicks feel.”
How do Amanda Marcotte and Catherine Cross make you feel, guys?
Set Aside All Traditional Modes Of Argument, And The Left Does Make Sense
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 17 Comments
by Smitty
But among all the posturers, none was so preening as New York’s Mayor Bill de Blasio. In advance of a trip to Washington for a White House summit on policing, he told the press that a “scourge” of killings by police is “based not just on decades, but centuries of racism.” De Blasio embroidered on that theme several days later, after a Staten Island grand jury declined to indict an officer for homicide in Garner’s death. (The 350-pound asthmatic Garner had resisted arrest for the crime of selling loose cigarettes; officers brought him to the ground, provoking a fatal heart attack.) “People are saying: ‘Black lives matter,’” de Blasio announced after the grand jury concluded. “It should be self-evident, but our history requires us to say ‘black lives matter.’ It was not years of racism that brought us to this day, or decades of racism, but centuries of racism.” De Blasio added that he worries “every night” about the “dangers [his biracial son Dante] may face” from “officers who are paid to protect him.”
The mayor’s irresponsible rhetoric was a violation of his role as the city’s leader and as its main exponent of the law.
The idea of leaders as exponents of the law is rooted in traditional, rational categories of thought. Fifty years after the Godless Commies launched their assault on our culture, you need to get past all that.
If an official is a Democrat, in the media, or part of the Racism Industrial Complex (all of which had been distinct some years previously) then everything he’s about is the flesh. If you’re not in his club, you’re an animal to be herded.
All that they do or say is about inflaming the hormones. Rage breaks down traditional culture, hedonistic pleasures maintain their sheep in an infantile, irrational flock.
The ultimate test of American Exceptionalism (or even Anglosphere Exceptionalism) is how well we weather this diabolical assault, and set about restoring the ideas of the rule of law, private property, limited government, and individual liberty that the Left so hates and is out to demolish.
But, like Democrat plantation owners of old, their cause is not just. God has bad news for them under the sun, and even worse when their time for eternal judgement arrives.
via Instapundit
A 21st-Century Feminist Family
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 23 Comments
Elizabeth Fierro describes her teenage life in Austin, Texas:
I used to be self-conscious about the fact that I have three moms. I worried no one would understand my experience of having divorced biological parents, both recently remarried to beautiful women. . . .
I did hear about families with same-sex parents — never from books and films, but my elementary school best friend had two moms and a hyphenated last name. When I was 12, the first family I babysat for had four adopted children and a pair of loving fathers. . . .
I’m lucky to have the family I do. Not everyone recognizes it — I’ve certainly read my fair share of articles about the alleged horrors that having same-sex parents means for a child — but I truly am lucky. For me at least, more parents means more shoulders to cry on, more voices to phone, and more love to give and receive. Having triple the maternal presence that most children get instilled in me a deep appreciation for motherhood—I have three women in my life who managed to turn down the volume on all the expectations that come with that role, and instead focused on doing what is right for them.
Yet, doing what was right for them wasn’t always easy. When my parents decided to remarry, for example, my dad was able to legally marry in Texas, half an hour from home. My mom and her fiancée, by contrast, had to drive 22 hours to Minnesota last summer to get their marriage paperwork signed — and their marriage still isn’t official in the State of Texas.
That is just one example of how my family gave me a different social experience than many other children. . . .
You can read the rest of that. You can also read her journalistic output for the Harry Potter Alliance: “Lizzie is a Ravenclaw, Gleek, Starkid, and Nerdfighter devoted to making the world a better place.” And by “better,” she evidently means feminist:
If you haven’t been living under a rock for the past seven or eight days [she wrote in July 2013], then you must know that quite a lot went down involving social justice recently. But what exactly happened? What are the implications of DOMA and Prop 8’s repeal? What is the VRA and what happened to it? Why exactly did Wendy Davis spend 11 hours talking without eating, drinking, or sitting down? . . .
Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional. . . .
This is clearly a win for LGBTQ+ community and supporters across the country, though it may be bittersweet for some people. My mom and her fiancee are to be married in Minnesota on August 1st, as one of the first couples to be legally married in the state- however, since we live in Texas and will have to travel to a different state for them to be legally married, they will be granted none of the federal benefits that same-sex couples who live in Minnesota will. We all cried twice after hearing the news: once out of happiness, and once out of happiness tinged with sadness, jealousy, and curiosity about what it would mean for us to move to a different state. . . .
Can you imagine talking for 11 hours without eating, drinking, sitting down, or going to the bathroom? Welcome to Wendy Davis’s life last Tuesday.
SB5 was the bill under debate in Texas last Tuesday. It would ban all abortions after 20 weeks and require all abortion clinics to meet certain incredibly high standards — standards that would close all but about 5 abortion clinics, which, in a state as large as Texas, would make it nearly impossible for all women living outside of the largest Texan cities to receive an abortion. . . .
Wendy Davis’s courage, the courage of the people in the stands, and the support of all the people watching the filibuster is remarkable. Still, it is baffling to me that it is 2013 and we are still voting on women’s rights, and the thought that Davis’s filibuster may have been for nothing makes me cringe. . . .
Kill your baby (women’s rights!) and if any of them happen to survive, make sure they have gay parents. That’s “a better world.”
Feminist Amateur Hour
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 32 Comments
If you ever get bored with professional feminist crazies like Jessica Valenti (“Damn these gendered Christmas chores!”) and Amanda Marcotte (“Damn that Baby Jesus!”), you should check out the craziness churned up by the amateurs at Everyday Feminism. You can tell they’re amateurs not necessarily because their arguments are less coherent or articulate than Marcotte’s and Valenti’s — that would be difficult to achieve — but because on the page where Everyday Feminism solicits contributions they don’t say anything about paying for contributions.
These are sisters working for the Cause, you see, and you can get a pretty good idea of what the Cause is all about by consulting the biography of Everyday Feminism’s founder, Sandra Kim:
Nothing says “feminism” like being “a genderqueer person of color,” and intersectionality means that they’re not just amateur experts on how women are oppressed by patriarchy, but they’re also amateur experts on everybody’s oppression everywhere. If you’re looking for raw craziness, then, Everyday Feminism is cranking it out daily.
This brings us to Katy Kreitler’s recent column “Feminism Is a Verb: Why the Movement Has No Use for Fad Feminism”:
It’s great that many are breaking down the absurd stereotypes about feminists and feminism and coming to embrace the label openly.
But in our efforts to rebrand the term “feminist,” are we so relieved to see people finally presenting feminism without denouncing it on the lines of inaccurate associations and baseless stereotypes that we will accept any basic, conservative definition of it? . . .
I’m bored with claims that feminism is just the notion that women are people, or merely a belief in equality and nothing more.
And I’m tired of people declaring that they guess they’re feminist, *shrug*.
I mean, I declare with more fortitude that I don’t want onions on my burrito.
And I hate onions, y’all. But I hate the heteropatriarchy more. And I want to fight to change it.
And I’m not really interested in a feminism that doesn’t include a strong, dedicated commitment to doing the same.
I also don’t really understand how you can be a feminist in theory when you live in a sexist world.
If we spend all of our efforts trying to get people to say “Okay, fine, I’m a feminist” and nothing more, then we’re losing sight of the reason we need people to be feminists in the first place. . . .
Feminism is not just the belief that women and men deserve social, political, and economic equality.
It is also the understanding that, on all of those levels, in all facets of society, all around the world, they don’t. And it is the commitment to changing this for women and for all groups who are disadvantaged from culturally created, systematic, oppressive reactions to their identities, particularly to their gender identity.
No one may doubt Katy Kreitler’s feminism! She hates heteropatriarchy worse than onions on a burrito, y’all, and she is disadvantaged by systematic, oppressive reactions to her gender identity!
And hey, congratulations on breaking down “absurd stereotypes about feminists,” like for example the stereotype that they’re all crazy.
Who is this person? That’s the first question that crosses my mind when I encounter raving lunacy like this.
See? You’ve got to have a master’s degree from an elite private institution (University of Southern California 2014-2015 undergraduate tuition, $48,280) before you can fight heteropatriarchy as a clinical social worker and an Everyday Feminist contributor.
Perhaps some readers are wondering, “How’s that workin’ out for ya, Katy?” My guess is, she’s eating her burrito alone.
These are your choices: Either you shame single women or you celebrate single women. Guess which is the correct feminist choice for Katy?
We are products of a lifetime of gendered social messages that tell us that every woman needs a man — that to not have one, even for a moment, is a failure at womanhood. . . .
We tell ourselves when we are out of a relationship that we are lonely when we are, in fact, surrounded by people who love us. . . .
We routinely ask every unmarried friend, coworker, and family member that we haven’t seen in five minutes, “Are you seeing anyone?” as though it is a perfectly appropriate gauge of how they are doing.
We talk to our kids about their future spouses and weddings, assuming they will, of course, be heterosexual and get married.
We reproduce notions of the ticking biological clock, the unfulfilling career path, the predatory divorcee, and the crazy cat lady.
We shame each other. We shame ourselves.
And we have done so for centuries.
Is there a Pulitzer Prize for Sour-Grapes Rationalization? Because when Katy Kreitler gets to the part about how “the gendered partnering process” is “required to maintain the patriarchal order,” she definitely qualifies herself for a nomination. The competition is fierce, however. Feminist theory keeps directing young women toward Crazy Cat Lady status, and as long as there are web sites like Everyday Feminism, they’ll always have a forum to celebrate their empowered lifestyles and warn the rest of us about those heteropatriarchal onions.
‘The Worst in Demagoguery’
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 15 Comments
Certainly, Joan Walsh is an expert in demagoguery:
Consider, if you will, the recent behavior of Salon’s Joan Walsh, who yesterday suggested in earnest that the conservative-led condemnation of the “climate” that supposedly provoked the shootings in New York City represented the unconscionable “politicization” of murder. “To blame the peaceful movement against police brutality that’s emerged nationwide,” Walsh wrote, is “the worst in demagoguery.” “Right wingers,” she added, “are using a terrible tragedy to make sure that no one can find middle ground.”
Charles C.W. Cooke goes on to cite in great detail Joan Walsh’s partisan demagoguery over Jared Loughner’s Tucson mass murder.
Never let it be said that liberals have no standards. In fact, they have two — one for them, and one for everybody else.
(Hat-tip: Instapundit.)
(P.S.: The image at the top of the page is from Joan Walsh’s appearance on a May 6, 2014, episode of MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews, which might be worth watching just to remind yourself of what kind of partisan bubble these people live inside. The topic was the mid-term elections and the prospect of Republicans taking over the Senate and, as you can see, the chyron used for this discussion was “Revenge of the Haters,” i.e., liberal journalists operate on the assumption that all opponents of the Democrat Party’s policies are motivated by “hate.”)
He’s German, and a Feminist
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 14 Comments
Paul Nungesser is the Columbia University student accused of rape by Emma “Mattress Girl” Sulkowicz. The New York Times interviewed him:
Speaking carefully, with a slightly formal bearing and an accent so faint that it can be hard to place, Mr. Nungesser, who is from Germany, says he believes sexual assault is an important cause for concern. “My mother raised me as a feminist,” he says, well aware of how those words will strike some people, “and I’m someone who would like to think of myself as being supportive of equal rights for women.”
Hmmm. He is “supportive of equal rights for women,” and is accused of raping one student, groping another and having an abusive relationship with his ex-girlfriend. At one point, I thought he might be innocent, but he’s a German feminist, so therefore he must be guilty.
Defending red-blooded American males, OK.
Defending German feminists? No way.
LIVE AT FIVE: 12.24.14
Posted on | December 24, 2014 | 4 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
Bush The Elder Hospitalized In Houston
The former president turned 90 in June
Experiencing shortness of breath; will be held at Houston Methodist Hospital for observation
Tornadoes Rip Across Southeast
Four killed
NYPD Union Boss Escalates Criticism Of City Hall
“That blood on the hands starts at the steps of City Hall, in the office of the mayor,” Lynch said Saturday
Protesters reject Di Blasio’s call for hiatus
POLITICS
Sheriff Joe’s Bid To Block Obama’s Amnesty Rejected

Maricopa County (AZ) Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Federal District Judge holds sheriff has no standing to sue
Merry Christmas! FEMA Demands Flood Victims Return Checks
Court Rules Against Greens Seeking EPA Regs For Lead Bullets
Florida Gay Marriage Ruling In Legal Limbo
Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY) Pleads Guilty To Tax Evasion
Issa Probe Fails To Link White House To IRS Scandal
Navy Investigates: Did Bin Laden’s Shooter Reveal Classified Info?
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Bearish As Dollar Strengthens: WTI $56.83, Brent $61.41
Dow Breaks 18,000
Keurig Announces Massive Recall
Japanese Stocks, Dollar Up As Robust US GDP Lifts Holiday Mood
US Economy Grows Most Since 2003 On Consumer, Business Spending
FTC Sues Data Broker Over Consumer Info Sold To Scammers
Rockstar Patent Sale Latest Sign Of Cooling In Smartphone Litigation
Google, Microsoft Battle Marriott’s Plan To Shut Down Personal Wifi
ITC To Investigate Samsung’s Complaints Against Nvidia
Latest Firefox Phone Has Transparent Shell
New Versions Of Classic Games Helped Nintendo Rally In 2014
SPORTS
Lillard’s Three Forces OT; Scores 40 As Blazers Top Thunder

Damian Lillard shoots in front of the Thunder’s Russell Westbrook
Portland rallies, beats OK City 115-111
Habs Rally, Beat Islanders 3-1
Cavs Thump Timbermutts, Lose Varejao
Nyets Storm Back To Beat Nuggets
Sixers Rally From 23-Point Deficit To Beat The Heat
Jets Stop The Unstoppable, Thump Blackhawks 5-1
Kobe-Less Lakers Stun League-Leading Warriors
Red Wings Score 4 In 3rd, Rally Past Sabres
Bledsoe Gets Triple-Double As Suns Beat Mavericks
Bruins Get Revenge On Predators, 5-3
Rose’s Bulls Top Wall’s Wizards, 99-91
Nats Sign Veteran Reliever Heath Bell To Minor League Deal
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Kim Dickens Cast In “Walking Dead” Spinoff After “Gone Girl” role

“Treme” alum will play lead in “Cobalt” project
Companion series expected to be set in California
Hayden Panettiere, It’s A Girl!
Cameron Diaz Engaged To Benjie Madden
Amy Adams’ Silence On Sony Hack Gets Her Booted From “Today”
Helena Bonham Carter, Tim Burton Split
Documentary Confirms Michael Rockefeller Eaten By Cannibals
Russell Crowe: Older Women Can’t Find Work In Hollywood? A Myth
Clint Eastwood’s Divorce Is Final
Katherine Waterston From “Inherent Vice” Lands Female Lead In Steve Jobs Film
FOREIGNERS
Prosecutors Seek Detention Of Former KAL Exec in “Nut Rage” Case
Aussie Anti-Terror Police Arrest Two A Week After Sydney Siege
Tribal Rebels In Assam Kill 34
Norks’ Internet Partially Restored After Outage
Shinzo Abe Reelected As Japan’s Prime Minister; LDP Coalition Wins 2/3 Majority In Diet
Rebels Say New Ukraine Peace Talks To Be Held Today
Algerian Army Kills Man Behind Frenchman’s Beheading
French Troops On Patrol In Dijon, Nantes And Tours After Recent Attacks
BJP Wins Majority In Jharkhand, Will Play Kingmaker In Kashmir
Agreement Reached In Northern Ireland Talks
BLOGS & STUFF
Louder With Crowder: Michelle Malkin’s Epic Teardown Of Michelle Obama And Jeb Bush (Video)
Michelle Malkin: All Life Matters – Jahi McMath’s Journey
Doug Powers: Charles Rangel Caught In Flat Out Lie, Sun Rising In East Mean It’s Another Normal Day
Twitchy: NYC Landmarks Go Dark To Honor Fallen Police Officers
American Power: Heidi Klum’s Sharper Image Too Sexy For Vegas
American Thinker: Black Conservative Son Educates Father On Democrats’ Race Lies
Conservatives4Palin: Governor Palin – “God Bless Rev. Franklin Graham’s Samaritan’s Purse”
Don Surber: Palin Rules Don’t Apply To Al Sharpton
Jammie Wearing Fools: Communists, Al Sharpton To Keep Protesting Despite Di Blasio’s Plea
Joe For America: Merry Christmas, Your Pension is History
JustOneMinute: Brilliant Sleuthing Uncovers Violent Protesters!
Pamela Geller: NYPD Cop Killer Worked For Hamas Affiliate ISNA
Protein Wisdom: The Big Lie Of The Anti-Cop Left Turns Lethal
Shot In The Dark: Insert Narrative Here
The Gateway Pundit: NYC Cop Killer Had Pocket Full Of $100 Bills, But No Job Or Home
The Jawa Report: Islamic State Of Losers Surrounded At Sinjar
The Lonely Conservative: Protesters Crash Memorial Service For Slain NYPD Officers
This Ain’t Hell: Army Times – The Military’s Shift Left
Weasel Zippers: Obama Administration Crams In A Whopping 1200 Regulations Right Before New Year
Megan McArdle: If Single-Payer Can’t Work In Vermont…
Mark Steyn: A Lesson From Luke
I’ll be out of town and off the internet until Sunday, possibly Monday; y’all behave yourselves.
Thanks again to everyone who bought stuff through my Amazon links, and to those of you that picked up the book.
Merry Christmas to one and all!
Shop Amazon Gift Cards – Instant Delivery or Free One-Day Shipping