The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Radical Lesbian Feminism: Coming Soon to a Public School Classroom Near You?

Posted on | July 23, 2014 | 27 Comments

“Can it be valid to conceptualize ‘girls’ as having certain personal attributes universally in common, except perhaps their youth relative to women? In grappling with this question, we need not to lose sight of the fact that, however different, girls’ actions are oriented toward the same or similarly structured objects that construct their bodies’ social meanings, values, and challenges as gendered. . . . Social rules and practices surrounding menarche construct gender as a principle both for division of labor and for compulsory heterosexuality, thus constituting girls in a relation of growing vulnerability to boys’ and men’s appropriation.”
— Susan Laird, “Befriending Girls as an Educational Life-Practice,” Philosophy of Education, 2002

“It has been the political policy of lesbian feminists to present ourselves publicly as persons who have chosen lesbian patterns of desire and sensuality. Whether as individuals we feel ourselves to have been born lesbians or to be lesbians by decision, we claim as morally and politically conscious agents a positive choice to go with it: to claim our lesbianism, to take full advantage of its advantages. This is central to our feminism: that women can know their own bodies and desires, interpret their own erotic currents, create and choose environments which encourage chosen changes in all these; and that a female eroticism that is independent of males and of masculinity is possible and can be chosen. We claim these things and fight in the world for all women’s liberty to live them without punishment and terror, believing also that if the world permits self-determined female eroticism, it will be a wholly different world.”
— Marilyn Frye, Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory (1983)

Last week, I mentioned that the American Association of University Women (AAUW) is pushing to introduce “gender studies” to the high school curriculum, “creating innovative spaces for young people to engage in feminism and activism, equity, and social justice in today’s classrooms.” The symposium on this AAUW program featured Ileana Jiminez, a lesbian English teacher from New York. What this indicates is that the radical theories of feminist academics are ultimately destined for the K-12 classroom — and any parent who objects can expect to be condemned as a sexist homophobe.

Consider the phrase “compulsory heterosexuality.” This phrase entered the feminist lexicon via an influential 1980 essay by Adrienne Rich, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,” which I discussed at length in April. Rich’s essay, asserting that heterosexuality is not natural for women, but rather is imposed as a condition of male supremacy, has been widely anthologized and incorporated in Women’s Studies curricula.

The phrase turned up in a Google search I did, appearing as the title of a book chapter, “Compulsory Heterosexuality as Mis-education.” The author speaks of “the psychological damage inflicted [on gay adolescents] by years of bearing witness to, or experiencing, anti–lesbian and gay prejudice in countless forms”:

They are the product of a lifetime of learning in the hegemonic ideology of heterosexism.
In practice, heterosexist ideology is instilled through numerous mechanisms. Family members initiate children into heterosexist ideology almost from birth, teaching acceptable gendered conduct as well as uneasiness with cross-gendered behaviors. This education is reinforced and expanded by religious institutions, peer groups, and the media . . . By the time children have reached first grade, they have already compiled a significant amount of data about what it means to be gay in a heterosexist society, even though much of what they have learned may well be incorrect, born of fear and prejudice rather than factual information. Schools are in a unique position to correct much of this misinformation at an early age before it ripens into anti–lesbian and gay prejudice and violence.

So, the public schools are to be enlisted to counteract this “fear and prejudice” of “heterosexist ideology”? What kind of lunatic gibberish is this, and who wrote it? This is from Rethinking Sexual Identity in Education, a 2004 book by Susan Birden, and it was originally her Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Oklahoma’s College of Education. Birden expressed her gratitude to her mentor:

While all my committee members have been engaged and helpful, I owe a life-long debt to my committee chair, Susan Laird, for she has been not only an advisor, but also a mentor of the highest caliber. A brilliant scholar, her expertise in guiding me through this entire doctoral process has been a testament to her great skill as an educator. From her comments on my first seminar entry, written some seven years ago, to her comments on the final draft of my dissertation, she has guided me through a maze of philosophic thought, nurturing my interests, pressing me to think more broadly, challenging me to think more specifically. Through it all she has demonstrated profound patience with my leaming, a committed focus and respect for my interests, accomplishing it all with the good humor of a “liver” of life. Susan Laird is both a fierce warrior and a kind soul.

Go read Birden’s dissertation, and you will find it is crammed full of quotes and citations from an all-star lineup of lesbian feminists — Mary Daly, Marilyn Frye, Janice Raymond, Charlotte Bunch, and on and on. Which brings us back to the question of exactly what the hell is going on in the University of Oklahoma’s College of Education, where Professor Susan Laird supervised this dissertation.

In addition to her position in the College of Education, Professor Laird has been a member of the faculty of the department of Women’s and Gender Studies since 1995. And her 2002 journal article, “Befriending Girls as an Educational Life-Practice,” is worth careful study. This eight-page article has 33 footnotes and cites numerous lesbian feminists, including Audre Lorde, Janice Raymond, Judith Butler and Marilyn Frye, the latter an author whose works I’ve quoted as examples of the anti-male/anti-heterosexual themes that have become commonplace in academic feminism.

“Fucking is a large part of how females are kept subordinated to males. It is a ritual enactment of that subordination which constantly reaffirms the fact of subordination and habituates both men and women to it, both in body and in imagination.”
–- Marilyn Frye, Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory (1983)

“Men have been creating ideologies and political practices which naturalize female heterosexuality continuously in every culture since the dawns of the patriarchies. . . . Female heterosexuality is not a biological drive or an individual woman’s erotic attraction . . . Female heterosexuality is a set of social institutions and practices.”
— Marilyn Frye, Willful Virgin: Essays in Feminism, 1976-1992 (1992)

Professor Laird cited Frye (although not these passages) in her 2002 Philosophy of Education article about “befriending girls,” an article which begins by relating the plot of a novel in which the young female protagonist “responds . . . with shock upon discovering this teacher who so generously befriended her is lesbian, but feels a new compassion that challenges [her] to unlearn her own heterosexism.” Did I mention that Professor Laird teaches in the College of Education, and that the title of that article is “Befriending Girls as an Educational Life-Practice”? 

Yeah, Oklahoma, OK.





 

Category: Education, Feminism

ObamaCare: Fake It and Take it

Posted on | July 23, 2014 | 20 Comments

“Healthcare reform” as a massive fraud on taxpayers:

Undercover government investigators were able to obtain thousands of dollars in taxpayer subsidies under ObamaCare using fake identities, according to findings presented to Congress on Wednesday.
The probe by the Government Accountability Office has raised fresh concerns about the ability of the sprawling health care program to prevent or intercept costly fraud schemes. In the case of the GAO investigation, 11 out of 12 applications submitted using “fictitious identities” were accepted, resulting in subsidized health coverage.
“For each of our 11 approved applications, we paid the required premiums to put policies into force, and are continuing to pay the premiums. For the 11 applications that were approved for coverage, we obtained the advance premium tax credit in all cases,” the report said.
According to the GAO, the total amount for these credits was $2,500 monthly, adding up to $30,000 a year.

How’s that Hope and Change workin’ out for ya?

(Hat-tip: Memeorandum.)

 

Category: Health Care

Feminist Prostitution in Canada?

Posted on | July 23, 2014 | 22 Comments

Olga Marques, Ph.D. (@omarques_) is an assistant professor at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology, where her research interests include “Qualitative and feminist research methods” as well as “Sexuality, sexual deviance and sexual labour.” Her Ph.D. dissertation was on “Women’s Engagement with Sexually Explicit Materials: Deviance, Stigma and Negotiating Identities”; her master’s thesis was on “Governing Female Sexuality: Prostitution, Problematic Associations and the Subcommittee on Solicitation Laws.” She once worked on a research project, “Sex Work and Intimacy: Escorts and their Clients,” funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

To put it as bluntly as possible, Professor Marques is a leading expert on Canadian whores, and her feminism seems to be of the variety which views prostitution and pornography as potentially “empowering” to women: Vagina for rent = Equality!

It’s possible I never would have heard of Professor Olga Marques, were it not for her decision Tuesday night to use her Twitter account to troll the #WomenAgainstFeminism hashtag:

See? If you don’t agree with Professor Marques, you’re ignorant. Her claim that women had no rights — and lacked even “inclusion as people” — prior to the rise of the modern feminist movement in the late 1960s, is a myth that has been exposed by, among others, Carolyn Graglia in Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism. Yet, even if you believe that the Women’s Liberation movement of the 1960s and ’70s (what is now called “Second Wave” feminism) was necessary to bring about beneficial reforms, it does not logically follow from such a belief that today’s feminist movement is likewise necessary, nor must you believe the “reforms” advocated by today’s feminists would be similarly beneficial to women. (My traditionalist perspective is the same as Graglia’s, and I would also encourage those who are skeptical of feminist myth-making to read Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s The Divorce Culture: Rethinking Our Commitments to Marriage and Family.)

Never mind any arguments made by feminism’s critics, however. Professor Olga Marques is your intellectual superior. She believes that only ignorant women can be against feminism, and that all women would be feminists if they were “knowledgeable citizens.” 

Canadian professors: They’re so much better than you!





 

RECENTLY:

 

Category: Canada, Crime, Education, Feminism, Sex

Ditch Mitch?

Posted on | July 23, 2014 | 342 Comments

Who was ultimately responsible for the evil Mississippi primary campaign that smeared supporters of Chris McDaniel as racists?

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, that’s who.

The GOP Establishment Incumbent Protection Machine and the big-money donors who fund it have been determined to eradicate the Tea Party movement in the 2014 campaign cycle.

This is McConnell’s formula for Republican success: Destroy all primary challengers, whatever the cost, and ensure that only Establishment-approved candidates win primaries in open-seat races or against vulnerable Democrat incumbents. It’s a cautious, risk-averse strategy, and if Republicans capture the Senate majority in November, McConnell will be congratulated on his success.

On the other hand . . .

What if it all goes sideways? What if this political equivalent of the NFL “prevent defense” turns out to be a formula for GOP failure?

What if all the big money and all the shrewd consultants turn out to be less valuable to Republicans than the grassroots conservative supporters who have been alienated by McConnell’s strategy?

What if Mitch McConnell loses his own Senate seat?

Manu Raju and John Bresnahan of Politico examine that scenario at some length today, and it’s not as far-fetched as it may seem.

Look at the polls: McConnell leads Democrat challenger Alison Lundergan Grimes by 5 points in the Real Clear Politics average, but the race has only been polled four times in the past two months, so we don’t know how solid that lead really is. Most importantly, McConnell is consistently polling below 50% — as low as 42% in a May poll — and that’s always a troubling sign for an incumbent.

As the Politico article says, if McConnell can’t defeat Grimes, the prospects for a GOP Senate majority are pretty remote. And if Republicans can’t take over the Senate this year — when they have every possible advantage, by ordinary calculations — it’s possible to argue that Republicans can never win a Senate majority, that the GOP is doomed to permanent minority status.

This scenario, the de facto triumph of Democrats as uncontested rulers of America as a one-party centralized state, would be a complete reversal of the “permanent Republican majority” Karl Rove promised in the wake of George W. Bush’s re-election.

After all the evil deeds perpetrated by the Republican establishment in the Mississippi primary, some of my conservative friends respond to this possibility with calm: “Let it burn,” they say.

It’s becoming harder to argue that these friends of mine are wrong.

 

Category: Election, Kentucky, Mitch McConnell, Republicans, Senate

LIVE AT FIVE: 07.23.14

Posted on | July 23, 2014 | 4 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
Israel Continues Gaza Offensive; Diplomats Seek Ceasefire

Palestinians evacuate a building in Gaza after IDF warns of impending strike

Multiple sites pounded, including Gaza’s only power plant


Ukraine Separatists Use Shot Down Airliner To Promote Cause
Donetsk Holds Its Breath As Shelling Intensifies


Joko Widodo Wins Narrow Victory In Indonesian Presidential Vote
Beats former general Subianto 53-47%



POLITICS
Perdue Beats Kingston In Georgia GOP Senate Primary

The former Dollar General CEO at his election night party

Will face Michelle Nunn in November


Federal Courts Split On Obamacare Mandates

Obama Arrives In Bay Area For Fundraisers

Bob Barr Defeated In GOP Runoff For GA-11


White House Backing Down On Contraception Mandate

NAACP Worried That Low November Turnout Could Lead To Voter ID Expansion

FAA Put Temporary Ban On Flights To Israel



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Declines On Weak Trade Cues: WTI $102.05, Brent $107.23
Daimler Q2 Profit Boosted By New Models
“Death Blow” To Herbalife Falls Short Of Billing
Harley Shares Fall After Admission Foreign Parts Holding Up Bikes
Credit Suisse Exiting Commodities
Senators Whine About Hedge Fund’s Avoiding $6 Billion In Taxes
Apple Gets Smartwatch Patent
A Solid Device Beneath A Layer of Gee-Whiz Frippery
Google Facing Class Action Over In-App Purchases
EA Profit Surges 51%
One OS To Rule Them All, One OS To Bind Them



SPORTS
Tony Dungy Flayed By Media For Saying What 31 NFL Teams Were Thinking About Michael Sam

Former Bucs, Colts coach Tony Dungy

Regrets becoming part of media circus surrounding the openly gay Rams rookie

Donald Sterling Sues Wife, NBA, And Commissioner

Rangers Use 9 Pitchers In 2-1 Loss To Yankees

Rays Win Sixth Straight, Beat Cardinals 7-2

Red Sox Fall To Jays 7-3

Giants Top Phillies 9-6 In Extras

A’s Agree To Ten-Year Lease To Stay In Oakland

Beckett Rusty As Dodgers Lose To Pirates, 12-7

Hoes Homer In 12th Lifts Astros Over A’s

Fish Hang On To Beat Braves Again

Mets’ DeGrom Tames Mariners For 3-1 Win

Trout’s Two-Run Dinger Too Late To Save Angels

Lucroy Hits Sayonara Homer, Brewers Edge Reds 4-3

Royals Rout Pale Hose 7-1

Cubs Blank Padres 6-0

Santana Homers To Lead Tribe Over Twins

LaRoche Slams Three-Run Dinger, Nats Beat Rockies 7-4



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Jessica Alba Reveals Secret To Happy Family Life

For certain values of happy

Apparently, it’s using girls’ night out to whine about your husband


CBS Films’ Topside Shakeup

“Real Housewives” Daughter Busted For DUI

WGA’s “Call To Arms” Against Murdoch-Time Warner Merger

“Manimal” To Roar With Will Ferrell, Adam McKay And Jimmy Miller


Nikki Finke: Thank You, Readers

After Stepping Off “Ant-Man” Hill, Edgar Wright Sets Sights On “Baby Driver”

President Mysteriously Cancels Hollywood Leg Of LA Visit

Lucy Lawless Heading To “Agents Of SHIELD”

“Sons Of Anarchy” Star Charlie Hunnam: “I Don’t Give A Sh!t About Emmys”

Chuck Pahlaniuk Reconvenes His “Fight Club”

“Meet The Press” Host David Gregory To Be Replaced After Elections

Nick Jonas’ Post-Brothers Life: “Done Giving A Sh!t”

Irina Shayk Courted By Designers After Movie Role



FOREIGNERS
Singapore Inflation Slows From 14-Month High
Israel Opening Second Airport At Eilat In Response To Flight Cancellations
Britain Does U-Turn On Litvinenko Murder Investigation
Costa Concordia Finally Headed For Scrapyard After Massive Salvage Investigation
Parents Of Kidnapped Nigerian Girls Meet With President Johnathan
UK Government Report Finds Islamic Plot To Control Schools
Central African Republic Peace Talks On Hold; Rebels Absent
End Comes For Venezuela’s “World’s Tallest Slum”



BLOGS & STUFF
Proof Positive: “Made” Of Orleans
The Quinton Report: Beretta Moving All Manufacturing Out Of Maryland Due To Anti-Gun Laws
First Street Journal: The Left Keep Telling Us All The Things About Which We Are Not Supposed To Judge Them
Doug Powers: The “It’s The Law” Crowd Blames “Typo” For Big Blow To Obamacare
Twitchy: Sally Kohn Asks “Moronic” Question About Hamas, Israel
American Power: Anti-Israel Nutjob Max Blumenthal – Netanyahu’s “Extreme Right-Wing” Coalition Conducting “Revenge Campaign” In Gaza
American Thinker: Is Anything Obama’s Fault?
BLACKFIVE: Israel Says Kerry Not Invited To Gaza Talks
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: Stupid Liberal Facebook Meme #548215
Conservatives4Palin: Bobby Jindal – Obama’s Broken $18,000 Obamacare Promise
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, July 22
Jammie Wearing Fools: IRS Puts Out Word It Needs Help Destroying 3200 Hard Drives
Joe For America: Illegal Immigration – Destroying Schools One District At A Time
JustOneMinute: Proximate And Fundamental Causes Of The Border Crisis
Protein Wisdom: “Check Your Facts, Not Your Privilege”
Shot In The Dark: When The Obamacare Story Is Finally Written…
The Gateway Pundit: Mark Levin Blasts Jon Stewart – “Read Up, Ivy League Boy, Figure Out What’s Going On before You Cut Your Stupid Jokes”
The Jawa Report: Hamas Missiles Found In Another UN School
The Lonely Conservative: After Four Years, What Has Dodd-Frank Done For The Economy?
This Ain’t Hell: Hegseth – Sanders’ Socialist Agenda Holding Up Help For America’s Veterans
Weasel Zippers: Ex-Planned Parenthood Director – PP Makes $313.29 Profit For Every Baby Killed By Abortion
Megan McArdle: Obamacare Takes A Body Blow


Shop Amazon – Create an Amazon Baby Registry

Category: Live at Five

Trannies Keep Harassing Feminists

Posted on | July 22, 2014 | 37 Comments

Sophia Banks (@sophiaphotos) is a Canadian transsexual who decided to “expose” some radical feminists who stubbornly cling to the notion that being a woman is a condition involving XX chromosomes.

Yes, apparently, it’s come to this: Science is now HATE.

I’ve been covering this conflict intermittently for six months now (e.g., the situation that caused radical lesbians to protest against last month’s London Dyke March) and, despite my profound disagreement with radical feminism, there is no doubt at all that it is the feminists who are the ones being targeted for hateful (but politically correct) harassment by the “transgender community.”

Cathy Brennan writes: “Also, can I just point out that comparing women who know that trans-women are male to Hitler is a very offensive analogy?” Brennan calls these freaks “Men’s Rights Activists who identify as women,” which is grossly unfair to MRAs. I wish Brennan and her radical feminist allies could be strategic enough to realize that there is a huge majority of people who would be willing to support them on this one point — that “woman” is a biological category, not a “gender identity” — if only they realized how important this issue is. The fact that the people being targeted now are my ideological antagonists is not irrelevant to my concern. If hardcore feminists can be targeted this way, what do you think is going to happen when the Tranny Totalitarians target conservatives?

People need to wake the hell up.

 

Category: Feminism, Gays

Schools of Privilege

Posted on | July 22, 2014 | 44 Comments

My hostility to elite institutions of higher education is not entirely a matter of vulgar populism. It is also based on knowledge of what sort of childhood and adolescence is necessary to compete in the admissions sweepstakes at elite private schools.

It’s not just about being “smart.” Unless your Daddy’s a millionaire alumnus, mere intelligence doesn’t matter much in terms of getting admitted to Harvard, Yale, Princeton and other such schools which annually receive many applications from kids with perfect SAT scores (before the test was changed in 2005, more than 900 students each year were “dialing toll-free,” as it’s called, referring to a perfect 800 score on each section of the SAT). No, to get into an elite school, a high SAT score is just the beginning; you’ll also need a near-perfect high-school grade-point average (GPA) and a thick stack of extracurricular activities and awards — captain of the tennis team, student-body president, first prize in the state science fair, etc.

Basically, in order to get into an elite school — unless your family is rich and your Daddy’s a senator, like Columbia alumna Megan McCain — you’re going to have to devote the first 16 or 17 years of your life to compiling the kind of credentials necessary to gain admission. You’re going to have to be a grind, an apple-polishing teacher’s pet, and your life outside the classroom is going to be so crammed full of activities (violin lessons, dance classes, and so forth) that you will have no time for anything resembling a normal childhood. And then what? Well, your folks are going to have to shell out $50,000+ a year for tuition, room and board, so that you can have the privilege of spending four years being indoctrinated by Marxists, atheists and sexual perverts, while acquiring the snobbish certainty that you are morally and intellectually superior to everyone who didn’t graduate from an elite school.

Why anyone would want that for their children, I don’t know. And neither does former Yale instructor William Deresiewicz:

“Super People,” the writer James Atlas has called them—the stereotypical ultra-high-achieving elite college students of today. A double major, a sport, a musical instrument, a couple of foreign languages, service work in distant corners of the globe, a few hobbies thrown in for good measure: They have mastered them all, and with a serene self-assurance that leaves adults and peers alike in awe. A friend who teaches at a top university once asked her class to memorize 30 lines of the eighteenth-century poet Alexander Pope. Nearly every single kid got every single line correct. It was a thing of wonder, she said, like watching thoroughbreds circle a track.
These enviable youngsters appear to be the winners in the race we have made of childhood. But the reality is very different, as I have witnessed in many of my own students and heard from the hundreds of young people whom I have spoken with on campuses or who have written to me over the last few years. Our system of elite education manufactures young people who are smart and talented and driven, yes, but also anxious, timid, and lost, with little intellectual curiosity and a stunted sense of purpose: trapped in a bubble of privilege, heading meekly in the same direction, great at what they’re doing but with no idea why they’re doing it.
When I speak of elite education, I mean prestigious institutions like Harvard or Stanford or Williams as well as the larger universe of second-tier selective schools, but I also mean everything that leads up to and away from them—the private and affluent public high schools; the ever-growing industry of tutors and consultants and test-prep courses; the admissions process itself, squatting like a dragon at the entrance to adulthood; the brand-name graduate schools and employment opportunities that come after the B.A.; and the parents and communities, largely upper-middle class, who push their children into the maw of this machine. In short, our entire system of elite education. . . .

You can read the whole thing at the New Republic. Deresiewicz’s critique of the elite schools is essentially liberal, whereas my viewpoint is conservative. I have no problem with rich people sending their overprivileged kids to elite schools. My problem is with middle-class parents who think they’re doing their kids a favor by spending money they can’t afford to send their kids to schools that teach them to emulate the fashionable attitudes of the decadent rich.

Ted Kaczynski was a Harvard graduate, you know.

UPDATE: The blogger at Booman Tribune is a wretched leftist scumbag whom I would normally never link. However (a) he is a longtime resident of Princeton, N.J., who has had the opportunity to observe young Ivy Leaguers at close range, and (b) he basically agrees with me about this:

Most of them are well-rounded, but I don’t think we should expect most of them to be well-adjusted. Mostly, they’re basket cases who are terrified of failure. They’re also so goal-oriented that they can become unglued if no one is pointing them to the next goal. And maybe there aren’t enough different goals. Med School, Law School, a job in finance. Beyond that, what? . . .
I am very aware of what I’d have to do if I want my four year old son to go to an Ivy League school, and I would consider it a form of torture to inflict that kind of regimen on him.

Exactly so. My oldest daughter is highly intelligent, has excellent study habits and graduated summa cum laude from a state university. (She worked her way through school as a Pizza Hut waitress). If I were a millionaire, I might have encouraged her to think of attending an elite school, but it simply makes no sense to put your kid through that kind of grind if you’re not rich.

What kind of parent would want their kid to be the poorest student at Yale? You want your kid to have the opportunity to be snubbed by a bunch of overprivileged brats? Are you crazy?

And here’s the worst of possibility: You put your kid through the wringer — total grindathon in high school, extra-curriculars out the wazoo, etc. — encouraging her to dream of that Ivy League acceptance letter that she’s not quite good enough to get. The psychic trauma of that rejection will haunt her forever and, having gotten her hopes up, of course, she’ll want to attend the “second-tier” private liberal arts school that does accept her, taking on outrageous student loan debt just to have that semi-elite credential.

She’ll probably major in Women’s Studies and hate you forever and, honestly, I can’t say I would blame her: You are a bad parent.

It’s better, you see, to avoid the high-pressure elitist ambitions. If your kid is truly superior, they will excel naturally, wherever they go to school. If my well-adjusted kids get rich, I hope they’ll send my grandchildren to the best university in the world.

Roll, Tide!

 

Category: Education

Did ObamaCare Just Die?

Posted on | July 22, 2014 | 21 Comments

This seems to be the consensus interpretation of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision this morning:

Court Rules That Subsidies in Obamacare’s
Federal Exchange are Illegal, Dealing
Huge Legal Blow to Health Law
— Reason

In Blow to Health Law, Appeals Court Limits Subsidies
— New York Times

BREAKING: Two Republican Judges
Order Obamacare Defunded
— Think Progress

Court’s Decision Strikes Huge
Blow to Pro-Abortion Obamacare
— LifeNews

So, whether they are liberals or conservatives, for or against ObamaCare, everybody seems to agree that this decision bodes ill for the program’s continuation. That’s good news for America.

 

Category: Barack Obama, Health Care
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin