SlutWalk: Feminism as Gynocracy, and Why Andrew J. Patrick Is in Trouble
Posted on | September 11, 2013 | 73 Comments
Andrew J. Patrick is blaming me for his being harassed by a notorious left-wing troll blogger, after Andrew quoted me:
What people used to mean by the word “rape” has been revised in recent decades because of college women complaining about date rape. . . .
Date rape is an apparently common campus crime that usually involves two drunk young people, one of whom has an erect penis, and the other of whom is unable to avert what the erect penis typically does.
That quote from my Aug. 12 American Spectator column “SlutWalk Insanity,” expresses facts and common sense, not ideology.
Feminism is an ideology advanced by a political movement and is totalitarian in both its purposes and methods. It is distaff Marxism, substituting “women” for the “proletariat” — and the “patriarchy” for “capitalism” — in the ancient Marxian rhetoric. The goal of feminism is not equality, but female supremacy: Gynocracy.
Advancing this totalitarian cause requires feminists to exacerbate hostility between men and women, by accusing men (collectively) of wrongfully oppressing women (collectively), so that all women are inspired to a sense of shared grievance against men.
Once you understand feminism as an ideology, you are no longer an intellectual hostage to the categorical syntax of their progaganda, in which skepticism toward their rhetoric is automatically denounced as thoughtcrime, where dissent is “hate” and we can only talk about women in ways approved by feminists. After decades of militant activism, people now unconsciously monitor their words lest they give offense to the feminist sensibility, so that arguments which directly contradict feminist ideology have the power of shocking outrage:
We had turned the corner at U Street and were marching up 14th Street when the woman with the megaphone leading SlutWalk DC started a new chant: “We love consensual sex! We love consensual sex!” Well, OK, but who doesn’t? Is there any actual opposition to this agenda? Is there an Anti-Consensual Sex Movement that someone forgot to tell us about? Oblivious to the absurdity, about 400 women joined in shouting this slogan, which was at least better than their previous chants: “Blame the system, not the victim!” and “One! Two! Three! Four! We won’t take it anymore! Five! Six! Seven! Eight! Stop the violence! Stop the hate!” The “violence” to which that chant referred is rape, and “hate” is any discussion of rape (or any other subject) that doesn’t conform to feminist ideology. To distill their rhetoric to its totalitarian essence: “Shut up, because rape.”
The SlutWalk movement is about rape in pretty much the same sense Nazism was about the Versailles Treaty — it’s the legitimate grievance that empowers a movement of irrational hatred. We may laugh at the carnival sideshow aspect of women stripping down to their underwear to march down the street in broad daylight, carrying deliberately provocative posters and shouting nonsensical slogans. But the leaders of the movement have a radical ideology they take very seriously, and that ideology is sufficiently influential that anyone who criticizes it risks condemnation as being anti-woman, or even pro-rape. . . .
That was the lead of my SlutWalk column and the reader perceives that, if feminists were offended, it was because they hate the truth.
Andrew J. Patrick finds himself harassed by a notorious troll blogger who is not a woman and has never been raped. This left-wing troll blogger instead positions himself as a male “ally” of feminism, draping himself in the borrowed mantle of indignant victimhood so that he may point the finger of blame. Like Hugo Schwyzer, in other words, the male feminist exploits women’s grievances to empower himself.
Sic semper hoc — Marxism was always a matter of intellectuals empowering themselves by exploiting the grievances of the “proletariat.” And in those nations where Marxist-Leninist regimes gained power, the result of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” was generally a dreadful slaughter whose victims included not only many workers who had somehow failed to conform to the revolutionary agenda, but even revolutionary leaders themselves whose only “crime” was to pose a threat to the paranoid monsters in charge of the regime.
Trotsky was ultimately killed by the revolution he helped make.
See those protest signs from the 2012 L.A. “War on Women” march? “VotePSL.org” is the Party of Socialism and Liberation, a Marxist radical group, and this is the context that is often overlooked by those who speak of a “moderate” feminism or “mainstream” feminism. From its beginnings in the 1960s, modern feminism has always been led and controlled by leftist radicals who see their movement as part of a wider revolutionary struggle against bourgeois capitalism. The problem is that people are not taking feminist rhetoric seriously:
[University of California-Santa Cruz Women’s Studies] Professor Bettina Aptheker is the daughter of a famous American Communist, the late Herbert Aptheker . . .
Professor Bettina Aptheker is by her own proud admission both a Communist and a self-described “lesbian activist.” . . . Aptheker’s course syllabus describes lesbianism as the “highest state of feminism” . . . In other words, change in sexual orientation is an inevitable final stage in the development of the socially conscious individual.
Allison Jaggar is professor of philosophy and a former chair of the Women’s Studies Department at the University of Colorado, Boulder . . . Integrating Marxism and feminist theory, Jaggar describes herself as a “socialist feminist” and “activist,” who seeks to combat “the male-dominant structure of everyday life.” . . .
“The political economy of socialist feminism,” writes Jaggar, “establishes that, in contemporary society, women suffer a special form of exploitation and oppression. . . . The distinctive social experience of women generates insights that are incompatible with men’s interpretations of reality . . . The validity of these insights . . . must be tested in political struggle . . .”
If you are not a socialist lesbian, you’re not actually a feminist at all, and people who think they can tame such radicalism — to co-opt this revolutionary movement in the oxymoronic name of “moderate feminism” — are blinded by their own naive delusions.
Either the radical feminists must triumph and “the male-dominant structure” must be destroyed by “political struggle” or . . . not.
There is only one question here: Whose side are you on?
LIVE AT FIVE: 09.11.13
Posted on | September 11, 2013 | 12 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
Obama Gives Qualified Support to Russian Plan As Wrangling Shifts To UN

Trying to make his case on TV
Giving diplomats a chance to bail him out while still working to persuade an unwilling Congress to let him use the Big Stick
Rand Paul Responds To Obama’s Speech
Gun-Grabbing Colorado Democrats Ousted In Recall Vote
State Senate President Morse and State Senator Giron looking for new work this morning
Thompson Vows To Fight On To End of Democratic Mayoral Primary
DeBlasio close to necessary 40% to avoid runoff, but count not over yet
POLITICS
9/11 Anniversary To Be Marked With Tributes

Not forgotten
Name reading, wreath-laying, other quiet memorials at all three 9/11 sites; no political speeches
NSA Violated Phone-Records Privacy for Years, Lied To Secret Court
Boehner Seeks To Force Senate Health Care Vote In Budget
Senator Leahy: US Needs Smarter Approach To Pot Policy
Pervy Pols Lopez, Kellner Lose Bids For NYC Council Seats
McConnell To Vote No On Syria Resolution
Lawmakers Renew Push To Label Fort Hood Murders As Terror, Provide Benefits To Victims
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Oil Continues To Slide On Easing Of Syria Tension: NYMEX $107.11, Brent $111.57
Dow Drops BoA, Alcoa, HP
S&P 500 Gains For Sixth Straight Session, Apple Falls
Time Buys American Express Publishing
Trump Outlines Plans For Luxury Hotel In DC’s Old Post Office Building
Europe Props Up McDonald’s
Google Loses Appeal In Landmark Street View Ruling
Motorola Now Shipping 100K Moto X Phones Weekly From Texas
Walmart Announces Smartphone Trade-in Program
Apple Takes Aim At Pandora With iTunes Radio
Blue HTC One Coming Exclusively To Best Buy
SPORTS
Boston’s Buchholz Back Strong, Blanks Rays

5 IP 0 R 1 BB 3 H 6 K
Red Sox extend lead in AL East to 8.5 games
Soriano Carries Yanks With 2 Dingers In Win Against O’s
“Hammer” Hurts The A’s With Two Homers, Twins Win 4-3
Porcello Goes The Distance As Tigers Maul White Sox 9-1
Team USA Clinches World Cup Berth After Beating Mexico
Royals Not Finished, Beat Tribe 6-3
Nationals Keep Hope Alive, Beat Mets 6-3
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Leah Remini Admits On “Ellen”: “We’ve Lost Friends” After Leaving $cientology

Leah Remini and Ellen DeGeneres
Dishes on difficulties of leaving the cult
Chloe Grace Moretz: Too Cool For School
Lamar Odom: I Don’t Have A Crack Problem
Maya Rudolph Welcomes Fourth Child
Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher Arrive At Same Airport, Groundless Speculation Ensues
Holly Madison Marries Pasquale Rotella At Disneyland
“The Killing” Cancelled By AMC: No Season 4
“Pirates Of The Caribbean 5” Delayed Beyond Summer 2015
Miss America’s Sgt. Therese Vail Is First Contestant To Expose Tats
FOREIGNERS
Delhi Gang-Rape Case: Prosecution Seeks Death For Convicts
Norks, ROK Agree To Reopen Kaesong Industrial Complex Next Week
Muslim Rebels, Philippine Military Clash On Third Day Of Standoff
UK House Of Commons Deputy Speaker Resigns Amid Sex Charges
Kenya’s Deputy President Ruto Denies Murder At ICC
Car Bombs Hit Egyptian Intel HQ In Rafah On Gaza Border
Legislative Speaker Stripped Of KMT Membership
Thousands Rally Behind Navalny To Challenge “Rigged” Moscow Vote
Pope Visits Refugees At Rome Center
BLOGS & STUFF
Dead Republican Party: A Prayer for #2MillionBikersToDC
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: Local Democrat Wants to Be Another Nail in California’s Coffin
Michelle Malkin: Flashback – Spitting On Their Graves
Twitchy: Cockroach Richard Dawkins Brazenly Defends Abuse Of Children
American Power: The Worst Day In Diplomatic History
American Thinker: President Obama Twerks America
The Necropolitan Sentinel: Yelena Belilovsky’s American Life
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, September 10
Jammie Wearing Fools: Flailing Obama slumps to lowest ratings of his presidency, as US voters see him as ‘a weak and indecisive leader’
JustOneMinute: Live From DC
Pat Dollard: Former Hostages Say Syrian Rebels Committed Chemical Attack Being Blamed On Assad
Protein Wisdom: Never Forget
Shot In The Dark: Do The Right Thing
The Jawa Report: You Suck At Trolling
The Lonely Conservative: One Year Later And Benghazi Witnesses Are Still Unavailable
Megan McArdle: Harvard’s Gender Bender
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 151 Comments
If there is no God, there is only Science and, as everyone who has studied the “climate change” phenomenon is aware, Science involves a self-selecting cabal of credentialed insiders empowered to dismiss criticism from anyone who does not concur in the sacred consensus.
So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!
Richard Dawkins, one of the world’s best-known and outspoken atheists, has provoked outrage among child protection agencies and experts after suggesting that recent child abuse scandals have been overblown.
In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.
Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.”
He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.” . . .
“I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.
He said the most notorious cases of pedophilia involve rape and even murder and should not be bracketed with what he called “just mild touching up.”
This just in: Man who has spent entire adult public life attempting a Freudian vengeance against God-As-Father-Figure-Betrayer announces that a bit of “mild pedophilia” did “no lasting harm” to his psychology.
See more at Salon, Memeorandum and Gateway Pundit — but you know, who has been warning you about this? Who took alarm over the Kaitlyn Hunt story? Who told you about the atheist sex scandal?
Who told you about the Pervert Party and the New Abnormal? What about Slutwalk Insanity and the Psychotic Professor?
Does anyone else see a pattern here? Perhaps the apostles of the Gospel of Science could examine these correlations, and confirm my impression that there is a distinct non-randomness involved.
Did I ever mention that Brett Kimberlin is an atheist?
Frown Down, Town Clown
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 50 Comments
by Smitty

Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt: Why Can’t He Explain His Cyberstalking?
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 54 Comments
Bill Schmalfeldt ranting, 2011. (Image via Thomas Anderson at Vimeo)
Monday, the state’s attorney’s office in Maryland announced that it would not prosecute Bill Schmalfeldt for violating the peace order that prohibits Schmalfeldt from directly contacting John Hoge. And so this afternoon, Schmalfeldt sent this message on Twitter:
Isn’t that rather a specific list of people in whom Schmalfeldt now claims to have lost interest? Need I remind you that this list is in fact the list of defendants in a lawsuit Brett Kimberlin has filed claiming “DEFAMATION, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, HARASSMENT, STALKING, CONSPIRACY, INVASION OF PRIVACY AND INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.”
This confirms what Bill Schmalfeldt said last November:
Everything that Bill Schmalfeldt has done to harass Aaron Walker, Lee Stranahan, Ali Akbar, Patrick Frey, Ken White or John Hoge in the past 15 months, he has done on behalf of Brett Kimberlin.
Why is defending Brett Kimberlin so important to Bill Schmalfeldt?
Out of all the causes on the planet that Bill Schmalfeldt might have chosen to support for the past 15 months, why Brett Kimberlin?
Good luck getting Bill Schmalfeldt to provide a rational explanation for why he has made this his life’s work.
Did you notice the similarity of language? In November — at a time when he was relentlessly harassing me — Bill Schmalfeldt declared he would stop “investigating” (which was a term he used to describe his harassment) if everybody would “forget Brett Kimberlin even exists.”
Now that Brett Kimberlin has sued several of the people Schmalfeldt has harassed? Bill Schmalfeldt says he wants us to “forget I exist”!
Quite a convenient coincidence, I’d say.
Barrett Brown and the Thug-Mob Anarchist Threat of ‘Anonymous’
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 59 Comments
Barrett Brown interviewed by NBC’s Michael Isikoff, 2011
“There are strong reasons for believing that what to us appear the worst features of totalitarian systems are not accidental byproducts but phenomena which totalitarianism is certain to sooner or later produce.
“Just as the choice architect who sets out to plan economic life will soon be confronted with the alternative of either assuming dictatorial powers or abandoning his plans, so the totalitarian dictator would soon have to choose between disregard of ordinary morals and failure.
“It is for this reason that the unscrupulous and uninhibited are likely to be more ‘successful’ in a society tending toward totalitarianism.”
— Friedrich Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1944)
Last night someone on Twitter sent me a link to a Pastebin file that contained the transcript of an IRC chat that Barrett Brown had with a hacker in March 2011. Brown at that time had been acting as unofficial spokesman for “Anonymous” for about a month. At that time, Brown was angry at Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs.
Anyone who knows my history with LGF knows how I feel about Charles Johnson. Put it this way: If Charles Johnson went out riding his bicycle on the Pacific Coast Highway and got run over by a semi truck, I’d nominate the truck driver for a Nobel Peace Prize.
OK, so no love lost there, but what this IRC chat transcript revealed was that Barrett Brown was willing to use a hacker (whose knowledge of Johnson and LGF consisted entirely of what Brown told him) to shut down Little Green Footballs — for pure personal spite.
Barrett Brown was a selfish, arrogant famewhore and, after Charles Johnson “parted ways with the right” in late 2009, Brown saw in this a potential opportunity to jump on a bandwagon that would enhance his own gloriousness, and used his blogging access at Vanity Fair to promote a proposed collaboration with Charles Johnson that would eventually become “Project PM.” Eventually, however, Brown’s wretched habits — Barrett is one of the most shameless bullshit artists ever to walk the Earth — made this collaboration impossible. By December 2010, Johnson and Brown had a falling-out, and Barrett recorded a YouTube video describing their abortive partnership:
“Obviously, it was a mutually beneficial working relationship. We had certain shared goals, you know, we said nice things about each other. We had sex on the beach. We wore condoms, though. I’m just kidding — it was barebacking. . . . Charles Johnson is not being very factual. He’s deleting comments. He’s deleting his own comments. It’s really a little much.”
That video was later deleted, but clearly Barrett Brown bore a grudge against Johnson so that, four months later in March 2011, he solicited a hacker to knock Little Green Footballs offline.
Here’s the thing: It took only five minutes for the hacker to accomplish this criminal mischief, merely to satisfy Barrett Brown’s grudge.
There’s no love lost between CJ and me, of course, but the digital vigilante ethos of Anonymous, which enabled Brown basically to put out a “hit” contract on his enemy, is what was wrong with the Anonymous project from Day One. The radical slogan, “By Any Means Necessary” — which recognizes no ethical limits in political combat, but justifies dishonesty and criminality as long as these serve to advance the Glorious Cause — encourages and incites wrongful tactics against anyone identified as an Enemy of the Glorious Cause.
And anyone can become such an Enemy, simply by becoming a nuisance to one of the leaders of the radical mob.
This brings us to the Hayekian insight: Why the Worst Get on Top.
Barrett Brown coveted leadership status with Anonymous for selfish reasons, and one of those reasons was that, if anyone disagreed with or criticized Barrett Brown, he could sic his hacker buddies on them, to shut down their Web sites, to dox them or otherwise harass them, to intimidate them, to smear them.
The Pastebin of the March 2011 IRC chat between Barrett and the hacker whose attack temporarily shut down Little Green Footballs has been deleted (because, I suspect, the person who posted it is friends with the hacker) but what I read there stunned me. This hacker had never heard of Charles Johnson or LGF, and had no knowledge of how or why the yearlong collaboration between Charles and Barrrett had ended badly. All this hacker knew was that Barrett said Charles was a bad person and, within a matter of minutes, the hacker had LGF offline.
Think about that. No matter how much you hate Charles Johnson — and I hate him like God hates sin — this vindictive hacker attack incited by Barrett Brown was entirely unscrupulous. Besides being an all-purpose douchebag, what had Charles Johnson done to deserve that, except to have once befriended Barrett Brown?
Yet who but a douchebag would ever be Barrett’s friend?
Bad causes attract bad people. Julian Assange is a bad person and WikiLeaks is a bad cause, and when members of Anonymous mobilized in support of Assange (and in support of the traitor Bradley Chelsea Manning), it was inevitable that those marching beneath the Anonymous/WikiLeaks banner would include some of the very worst people in the world, e.g., the criminal drug dealer “Sabu,” who rolled over like a punk to save himself from prison.
The radical anarchist is the enemy of all mankind. He may be able to cite a laundry list of grievances against the status quo, but his real grievance is his own childish resentment of authority, his sociopathic craving for a lawless world in which there are no hindrances to the fulfillment of his own depraved and selfish desires. Alienated from society, with no friends except those fellow outcasts who share his resentful attitude, the radical anarchist seeks to destroy, rather than to reform, the institutions of civil society. His impulses are those of a juvenile vandal hurling a stone through the glass window of a department store and claiming that this is a blow against “Corporate America.”
Anyone who thinks they can benefit from association with such radical anarchists must eventually learn a painful lesson.
Because the ethos of anarchism is wholly selfish, the radical who is your “friend” today will sooner or later betray your trust and, because his irresponsible worldview always absolves him of fault, the radical will blame you for whatever went wrong between you. And if the anarchist thug mob sides with your ex-friend in the resulting conflict, you will find the outlaw tactics you once cheered (when they were directed against your enemies) are now turned against you. And because you have, by joining this mob, eschewed the protection of law — anarchists don’t call the cops, eh? — you will find you have no effective way to fight back against your thuggish ex-friends.
Utmost savagery is therefore the only safety within the mob. Obtaining a reputation as a dangerous antagonist — a man not to be crossed, who wreaks total vengeance against his enemies — can only be accomplished by repeated acts of brutality, and such acts therefore become habitual to members of the mob. What was the purpose of the Moscow Show Trials, except to demonstrate Stalin’s ability and willingness to destroy anyone who threatened his power?
This is why I am an opponent of such tactics, and of any individual or movement that encourage such tactics. Being an enemy of radicalism is always less dangerous than being an ally of radicals. If you see someone acting on the principle that the end justifies the means, be assured their vicious means will soon become ends unto themselves.
Perhaps Charles Johnson can write a lengthy explanation of why his friendship with Barrett Brown was such a mistake. And perhaps, in writing such an account, Charles Johnson can persuade some journalists to stop celebrating Barrett Brown as a First Amendment hero.
Charles Johnson might thereby cheat a truck driver out of a Nobel Prize nomination, but this would be a small sacrifice, eh?
P.S.: Jen Emick found a Google cache of that deleted Pastebin showing Barrett inciting a hacker against Little Green Footballs. A certain Twitter account claims that this IRC log is a forgery, but that Twitter account is a Neal Rauhauser fanboy, and so is not to be trusted.
Hunting the Syrian Squirrel
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 66 Comments
“Obama: Anatomy of a World Leader,” by Alex Gray (detail)
You’re not supposed to say that The Syrian Crisis has been manufactured for domestic political purposes. The underlying situation is legitimately serious enough — a two-year civil war in which the dictatorship has allegedly used sarin nerve gas against civilians.
The problem is that this administration is so dishonest and cynical, so committed to campaigning and so inept at governing, that whatever they do, our natural suspicion is that they’re playing politics.
Serious People therefore cannot say what a lot of people suspect: When Congress returned from their August recess, they were due to have hearings on a series of Obama administration scandals — IRS, NSA and especially, Benghazi. By ginning up an international crisis over Syria, Obama was basically shouting: “Look! Squirrel!”
If Syria is the Big Story that all Serious People are supposed to be talking about, all the scandal investigations — IRS, NSA, Benghazi — became by definition Small Stories for Unserious People.
SYRIA SAYS IT ACCEPTED
RUSSIAN WEAPONS PROPOSAL
— Associated Press
Syria accepts Russian proposal on weapons;
France to bring resolution to Security Council
— Washington Post
Obama Backs Idea for Syria to Cede Control of Arms
— New York Times
“Did John Kerry just River
himself a Royal Flush?!?!? Wow!”
— AOSHQ
OK, there’s the requisite Syria News Headline Stack, and I can therefore say I’ve done my quota, so all you Serious People who have been running around on the Syrian Squirrel Hunt can stop mocking my unseriousness for ignoring the Big Story.
Tomorrow? Yeah, the one-year anniversary of the Benghazi attack, and all anyone will be talking about is the president’s Syria speech.
Tell me again how serious you are, Serious People.
You just got played.
Chumps.
LIVE AT FIVE: 09.10.13
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 10 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
Obama Welcomes Russian Proposal On Syrian Chem Weapons

“It’s possible if it’s real”
Russian FM Lavrov proposes Syrian handoff of chem weapons to international monitors
Religious Rioting Spreads In Uttar Pradesh
Army given orders to shoot on sight as Hindu/Muslim violence continues
Four Face Death After Conviction For Fatal New Delhi Bus Rape
Case shocked India, spurred protests over sexual violence laws
POLITICS
Campaign For Syria Strike Derails Obama’s Domestic Agenda

Republican Senator Ted Cruz
Immigration, NSA, farm bill and continuing resolutions all on the back burner
Fox Poll: Voters Say US Less Respected Since Obama Took Office
Hawaii Governor Calls For Gay Marriage Special Session
USDA Fails To Reduce “Food Insecurity” Despite Spending $^ Billion More
Colorado Voters Go To The Polls In Gun-Control Recall Election
De Blasio Has 14-Point Lead As New Yorkers Head To Polls Today
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Oil Drops In Asian Trade On Possible Resolution To Syrian Crisis: NYMEX $108.36, Brent $112.69
Mergers, Homes And Phones Lift Markets
Icahn Slams Dell Board After Dropping Buyout Fight
CFTC May Tighten Rules On High-Speed Trading
Consumer Credit Rises Even As Credit Card Use Drops
Niagara Ceramic Closing, 110 Laid Off
Facebook Tramples Twitter’s Turf With Media-Friendly Tracking
PayPal Unveils New Gadget To help Stores ID Shoppers
Galaxy Gear Sets Low Bar For Apple Smartwatch
Snapchat Rivals Facebook With Over 350 Million Pics A Day
Net Neutrality Goes On Trial: A Guide To Verizon v. FCC
SPORTS
Yu Sharp? Not As Sharp As Cole, As Pirates Notch Historic Win Against Rangers
Marlon Byrd celebrates with Garrett Jones after scoring the lone run against the Rangers
Pirates clinch first winning season since 1992 with pitchers duel; now only one game behind Cardinals
Ryan Newman In The Chase After NASCAR Issues Epic Penalty
Girardi Signals Panic In Pinstripes As Birds Beat Yanks 4-2
KISS Extends Arena Football Offer To Tebow
Vick, McCoy Upstage RGIII As Eagles Defeat Redskins
Astros Rally For Four In The 9th, Beat Ms 6-4
Tribe Holds Off Royals For 4-3 Win
Gio Flirts With No-hitter, Settles For One-Hit Shutout Of Mets
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Vanessa Hudgens: A Whole New World

What a $3335 blazer looks like on Vanessa Hudgens
The Marie Claire interview
Tina Fey To Host “SNL” Premiere; Miley Cyrus Set For October 5
Scarlett Johansson Is Feeling Really Productive
Jane Lynch’s Estranged Wife Lara Embry Wants More $$$
Robin Quivers: I’ve Been Fighting Cancer
Britney Shows Off Tanned, Fit Bikini Body At Video Shoot
Sharon Osbourne Reveals She Had A Fling With Jay Leno When She Was 25
Ellen Page Fights For “Queen And Country” At Fox
Famed Car Dealer Cal Worthington Dies At 92
Jenifer Aniston Fends Off Rapist In Gritty New Movie
Patrick Stewart Marries Girlfriend Sunny Ozell, Ian McKellen Officiates
FOREIGNERS
Israel Skeptical On Syria Giving Up Chemical Arms
Kenya’s Deputy President Goes On Trial At ICC
Zamboanga In Flames As Fighting Erupts In Southern Philippines
Pakistani Parties Back Government Peace Push
Left Concedes Defeat In Norway, Conservative Erna Solberg To Form Government
PRC Renews Push For Control Of Internet
BLOGS & STUFF
Zilla of The Resistance: The Anti-Totalitarian Guide To Internecine Conflict
Leather Penguin: MediaWatch – WaPo at the Crossroads; Politico’s Cancer Moves Northward
First Street Journal: Economics 101 – The Economics Of The Left
The Right Scoop: An Invitation To Our Friends On The Left
Doug Powers: Which movie will she blame this time? Susan Rice to brief Congress about Syria on one-year anniversary of Benghazi
Twitchy: Attention Celebs Calling For A “Black NRA” – Colion Noir Has A Video Just For You
American Power: Obama May Look Incompetent on Syria. But His Behavior Fits His Strategy to Weaken America Abroad
American Thinker: Common Core Standards Flunk Logic 101
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: This Stupid Week, And I Feel Fine Edition
The Necropolitan Sentinel: Cross Off The List
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, September 9
Jammie Wearing Fools: Biden Flashback – Obama Has “Steel In His Spine”
JustOneMinute: John Kerry, Accidental Genius?
Pat Dollard: Muslim Brotherhood Imposes Jizya Tax On Egypt’s Christians
Protein Wisdom: Obama Chutzpah Vis A Vis Syria
Shot In The Dark: 10K
The Jawa Report: Meanwhile In Afghanistan
Lonely Conservative: Boy, The EPA Sure Is Secretive These Days
Megan McArdle: Just 1 Weird Trick To Get You To Read This Article


