The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

The World’s Youngest Blogger Paraphrases Congress

Posted on | December 24, 2011 | 11 Comments

I DENOUNCE THIS ATROCITY!

Posted on | December 24, 2011 | 21 Comments

I’m not sure which is more profoundly offensive: The song itself, or Richard McEnroe posting it under the title, “A Ron Paul Christmas”:

There are so many layers of sick humor atrociously bad taste hate crime involved, I’m not sure where to begin:

  • Orthodox Jews will be horrified by this shiksa‘s expression of carnal lust for Jew-flesh;
  • Ron Paul supporters will be insulted by the suggestion that a politician hates Jews merely because he has been known to rant about the  “Israel lobby” (nudge, nudge, wink, wink); and
  • Islamic fanatics will be infuriated by this taunting reminder their relentlesss efforts to annihilate every Jew on the planet have failed.

These are just three of the most obvious human rights violations involved and therefore:

I DENOUNCE RICHARD McENROE

Because, hey, being denounced by me? It’s like the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval with the ADL, SPLC, Media Matters, etc.

FMJRA 2.0: Twisting In The Wind

Posted on | December 24, 2011 | 4 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


Report: Huntsman, Bachmann, Santorum Fail to Make Virginia Primary Ballot UPDATE: Close Calls for Newt and Perry

Shorter Ace: ‘Bitches Lie’

Fear of a Ron Paul Planet

Slouching Toward Cedar Rapids

Yeah, That Was Pretty Quoteworthy

Republican Fascism And Raaaaacism

Sean Hannity Flummoxed By Michelle Malkin

No, Jesse Jackson, Jesus Was An #Occupier To About The Extent You Are Worth Two Hoots As A Reverend

Bibi, You Rock

Politico Stirs The GOP Pot

From an Undisclosed Location

‘Fatwa’ Against Bollywood Actress

Minnesota Republican Resigns Post Over Allegation of ‘Inappropriate’ Relationship

Santorum Campaign Sends 60,000 Mailers to Iowa Voters: ‘No Surrender’

FMJRA 2.0: Toys In The Attic

Schadenfreude, Virginia

Will To Reich: ‘You Are A Pyromaniac In A Field Of Strawmen’

Kim Jong’s Illness Finally Takes Him

Gingrich Campaign ‘Imploding’ in Iowa; Ron Paul Leads; Rick Santorum Gains

LIVE AT FIVE – 12.19.11

I Don’t Know If I Agree With Surber

 

Your Monthly Sarah Palin Wink

Rule 5 Monday

For Some Strange Reason, I Was Reminded of Lawrence v. Texas

Vice President Condi Rice?

Memo From the National Affairs Desk: Strange Rumblings in the Heartland

Perry Iowa TV Ad Attacks Newt Gingrich as ‘K Street,’ Mitt Romney as ‘Wall Street’

LIVE AT FIVE7:30 – 12.20.11

BREAKING: Rick Santorum Gets Endorsement by Key Iowa Social Conservative Leader Bob Vander Plaats UPDATE: In Interview, Santorum Says Endorsement ‘Sends a Strong Signal’

News Flash: Democrats Lie (and Have Conniptions When They Get Caught)

Because I’m Feeling Kinda Bad About Giving Ace of Spades Such a Hard Time …

Meghan McCain: I Look At Callista Gingrich, And All I Hear Is Foreigner

LIVE AT FIVEEIGHT – 12.21.11

Britannia, Rule the Waves!

#OccupyDC Nativity Scene

The Weird Turn Pro

The Deadly Menace of Fake Boobs

E-Mail From Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

Scott Ott And The #40Dollars

Behold, I Bring You Peace, Goodwill, and Also This Gratuitous Vintage Pinup Girl

Senior Game Player, Gamely, Denies Game In Progress

God-Hating Feminist Blogger Denounces Iowa Republicans and Rick Santorum

LIVE AT FIVEEIGHT – 12.22.11

70% Of Americans Self-Identify As Raaaaacists Who Want Valid Elections

Santorum Surge: It’s Real and Spectacular

Two Wrongs Don’t Make A Right. Two Thousand Wrongs? A Right Jolly Commie Start.

Minnesota Republican ‘Made Some Mistakes and Errors in Judgment’

LatmaTV Delivers A Brutal Carol

LIVE AT FIVE – 12.23.11

Whittle Speaks As The GOP Would, Had It Hair #1 Where Necessary

Classics of the Golden Age of Fringe, Or: Ron Paul Digs the Beatles’ White Album

Perry Heartache In VA: Just A Bit Outside

Gingrich Misses Virginia Ballot Too

 

Top linkers this week:

  1. The Pro From Poca (13)
  2. Lonely Conservative (8)
  3. Katy Pundit (7)
  4. (tied) Lisa Graas, Daily Pundit, and Zilla Of The Resistance (5)

Thanks to everyone for the linkagery! Deadline for next week’s FMJRA will be Friday, December 30.

 

Gingrich Misses Virginia Ballot, Too

Posted on | December 24, 2011 | 83 Comments

This was pending late last night, but now has been confirmed: Like Rick Perry — and Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum — Newt Gingrich failed to submit enough eligible signatures to qualify for the March 6 Virginia Republican primary. That leaves Virginia voters to choose between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul. Irony?

A poll released Wednesday showed Gingrich with a slight lead over Romney among Virginia Republicans in the race for president. The Quinnipiac University poll shows Gingrich at 30 percent and Romney at 25 percent among Republican voters.

Leading the poll. Not on the ballot.

UPDATE: Extra embarrassment for Newt? He actually left the campaign trail in Iowa this week to return to Virginia for two days in an attempt to make the ballot — a costly and, as it proved, futile waste of time.

And Newt lives in Virginia.

UPDATE II: Just dawned on me — all the “Anybody But Romney” voters in Virginia will have only one choice on March 6.

“Ihese stooges don’t scare me!”

UPDATE III: Linking Politico (not me), Ed Morrissey gets it wrong:

Bachmann and Santorum don’t have the resources to put people on the ground in Virginia; they’re both sinking everything they have into Iowa.  I don’t think anyone expected them to qualify for the Virginia ballot.

But as I explained Thursday, Santorum did have an effort afoot in Virginia to get on the ballot. I was on the grassroots conference call at which that effort was discussed and a top Santorum staffer said they were “hoping for a Christmas miracle” in Virginia.

Another “Christmas miracle” would be if my friends like Ed would actually bother to read my blog once in a while.

Also, I hope Santa brings me a pony. That could happen.

So anyway, the reason the Santorum campaign didn’t submit signatures is that they fell short of the 10,000 minimum, whereas the Perry and Gingrich campaigns cleared the 10,000 mininum but were rejected during the validation process. As the state elections board says, some petition signatures are always invalidated, so to get 10,000 minimum (including at least 400 in each of the 11 congressional districts), they recommned getting at least 15,000 signatures statewide, with at least 600 in each district.

As I also explained Thursday, it was obvious the moment the numbers were announced that Gingrich and Perry, with about 11,000-12,000 signatures each, might take a hit in the validation process. But nobody important can be bothered to read this blog. IYKWIMAITYD.

UPDATE IV: And just in case anyone was wondering: No, Virginia rules do not allow write-in votes in a primary campaign.

Perry Heartache In VA: Just A Bit Outside

Posted on | December 23, 2011 | 31 Comments

by Smitty

Via the Washington Post:

Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry failed to submit enough valid signatures to qualify for the Virginia primary ballot, state GOP officials said Friday evening.
Perry’s campaign told state election officials it had submitted 11,911 signatures, but a Republican source familiar with the situation said that the Texas governor did not submit the required 10,000.
Earlier Friday, the Republican Party of Virginia certified former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul (Tex.) to appear on the March ballot.

One other amplifying bit of information:

How pathetic will it be if Virginia Republicans’ primary ballot choices are only Mitt Romney and Ron Paul? (Write-ins are NOT allowed in primaries.)

While the situation is not quite as freakish as being doused in gas and having my ear cut off for a Tarentino flick, there is a noticeable “clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right” feel to it all.

For all I think Ron Paul has excellent ideas on monetary policy, the handwriting is on the newsletter for his campaign. His foreign policy ideas are simply unrealistic, and disqualify him from consideration, even before the fringe ideas come into play.

I thought that the Herman Cain ejection from the race was grossly out to lunch. Yet those supporting Ron Paul need to review that and note that this is just the primary. In the hypothetical case that Ron Paul held the GOP nomination, or even show up as VP somehow, we’d have a new tidbit every hour on the hour from the nomination to the election. The Obama campaign would distort Ron Paul’s corpus to the point where BHO would be saving the country from electing Adolf Mao Stalin. Ron Paul supporters need a good night’s sleep, a cup of coffee, and some reflection.

Irrespective of anyones regard for the fellow (and I don’t personally care about any of the candidates) there is a time for idealism, and a time for pragmatism. The Constitution itself has already been substantially corrupted. There isn’t much need for idealistic defense of any virginity there, since the molestation has already occurred before most of our lives began. Thus, I really hope that the 1992 debacle of Perot does not recur. You can argue that Mitt is as big a Ruling Class knob as Bush41, and I won’t defend either gentleman, but BHO is far more diabolical than Billy Jeff. There is no idealistic argument for splitting the conservative vote, only foolish ones.

Given his high mileage, is Gingrich some kind of a compromise between the silly and RomneyCharybdis*? From the WaPo:

State party officials are spending Friday certifying the signatures. They have not examined Gingrich’s signatures yet, but expected to do so by late Friday night. His campaign said it submitted 11,050 signatures .

Gingrich is actually a Virginia resident. If he can’t figure out the Newtonian mechanics of getting on the primary ballot in his own state, can he be relied upon to Win The Future?

I can’t resist the thought that, if Sarah Palin was actually running, she could have mustered a cool 20k signatures without excessive effort.


*For a bit of late-night, overly literary snark, compounded through the use of a cutesy little footnote.

Classics of the Golden Age of Fringe, Or: Ron Paul Digs the Beatles’ White Album

Posted on | December 23, 2011 | 79 Comments

IYKWIMAITYD:

Question: What do Ron Paul and Charles Manson have in common?
Answer: Both warned their followers of an impending “race war.”

Maybe Lisa Graas isn’t the first blogger to make that comparison, and if some other blogger wants to accuse Lisa of “stealing” their material . . .

Well, lots of that going around lately. Back of the line, pal.

Being a huge Beatles fan myself — quick, somebody tell Charles Johnson — and feeling in a rather contrarian mood today, I’m going to hazard an extremely limited defense of Ron Paul on this newsletter controversy.

Stipulate from the outset that those newsletters contained a lot of bad, wrong, racist and paranoid stuff. Further stipulate that Ron Paul authorized some cranky ghost-writer to use such fear-mongering to raise money, thereby attracting to his core following a bunch of the kind of people who enjoy reading stuff like this:

“I’ve been told not to talk, but these stooges don’t scare me. Threats or no threats, I’ve laid bare the coming race war in our big cities. The federal-homosexual cover-up on AIDS (my training as a physician helps me see through this one.) The Bohemian Grove — perverted, pagan playground of the powerful. Skull & Bones: the demonic fraternity that includes George Bush and leftist Senator John Kerry, Congress’s Mr. New Money. The Israeli lobby, which plays Congress like a cheap harmonica. And the Soviet-style ‘smartcard’ the Justice Department has in mind for you.”

Considering myself something of a connoisseur of lunatic gibberish, I stand in awe of whatever unknown genius wrote that demented paragraph of paranoia-for-profit. One of these days, when some shrewd publisher hires me to edit a college textbook (The Norton Anthology of Right-Wing Extremist Literature), I’ll probably cite this as a classic example of late 20th-century direct-mail fundraising appeals.

By God, he pushed every button, didn’t he? Racism, homophobia, secret societies, currency manipulation, Jew-hating, anti-communism, Big Brother surveillance — it’s all there in 94 cleverly crafted words of undiluted 100% pure fearmongering. You have to appreciate the prophetic vision of the thing, foreshadowing in the dead-tree era the subsequent development of e-mail solicitations from MoveOn.org, Organizing for America and other such radical groups.

Lament this as politics, if you will, but as literature, it just might be the finest example of its genre ever written. It is to hate-hustling what Michelangelo’s David is to sculpture. Read more

Must-Read Post Of The Day

Posted on | December 23, 2011 | 8 Comments

by Smitty

Tom Blumer over at Pajamas Media has a crucial outing on the federal budget:

Here are two important but little-known and underappreciated points about the Super Dupers’ failure which cannot be emphasized enough:

  • None of the alleged “savings” under discussion (really reductions in projected spending increases) would have kicked in until the beginning of the 2013 fiscal year almost ten months from now. According to an Associated Press report, the “automatic” cuts noted earlier (if anyone believes they’re really going to happen) won’t begin taking effect until January 2013. In other words, contrary to the expectations of most, everyone involved apparently agreed during August’s debt-ceiling debacle that fiscal 2012 would be off-limits. Now, apparently, so is the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
  • Even if they had met their definition of super success, the $1.2 trillion involved would have reduced projected 2013-2021 spending of $40 trillion (Page XI at link) by only 3%. Spending for fiscal 2011 was $3.6 trillion. According to the CBO, if spending runs on autopilot for the next ten years — who’s to say it won’t, given that the government has already gone without a budget since April 27, 2009? — fiscal 2021 spending will be $5.4 trillion. Given the tendency to push most savings to further-off years, a “successful” Duper deal might have trimmed that to $5.2 trillion. Big duping deal.

Study the whole thing. And keep in mind that the budget affects the economy, which is The. Central. Issue. of the 2012 election, orbited of course by foreign policy, border security, the culture wars, &c.

And Barack is going to whine that he inherited the wound. Sure, and poured in a lick of salt. But when sober citizens attempting to address the real problems are thrown out of the halls of Congress. . .

Whittle Speaks As The GOP Would, Had It Hair #1 Where Necessary

Posted on | December 23, 2011 | 15 Comments

by Smitty

Should we just draft Bill Whittle for POTUS?

Update: Whittle/Gillespie 2012?

I saw that NG clip while going back to YouTube to help float the question of whether the GOP is relatively more feckless than the Australian Greens:

Update II:
During his news conference, when asked if House Republicans “caved”, Boehner said, “Sometimes it’s hard to do the right thing. It may not have politically been the smartest thing in the world, but I’m gonna tell you what, our members waged a good fight.”

« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin