Rule 5 Sunday: Is This It?
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 8 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
The Rio Norte Line kicks off this week’s Rule 5 Roundup with one of the hottest redheaded engineers on the Intertubes, continues with an explanation of rugby rules, and winds up with some Golf Channel Rule 5. Also, the Emergency Bra! Over at The POH Diaries, it’s the battle of the home-wreckers, and in related news, WyBlog announces that Detroit’s Booty Bus has been shut down. Randy’s Roundtable takes a break with Hilary Rhoda and follows that with Lyndsay Ellingson, while Three Beers Later brings us Sabrina – and not your father’s Audrey Hepburn flick, either. Also, ketchup and mayonnaise! Eye Of Polyphemus settles this week on the decidedly non-cheesy Alison Brie, while Fishersville Mike notes the remake of Footloose with Julianne Hough. Reaganite Republican continues his theme of teenage crushes with Marilu Henner, and the Daily Ramble makes its debut here with Crista Nicole.
El Opinador Compulsivo checks in with a view from the car show, a young lady who’s apparently testing the woofers in her headphones, car service worth every penny, and a fuzzy picture.
Postaldog checks in this week with Jordan Carver, while Jake Finnegan’s Burkalesque Babe this week is Kim Kardashian. In Lingerie Football League action, Troglopundit notes Angela Rypien getting flagged for unnecessary roughness, while Maggie’s Notebook puts the spotlight on Russian model Valentina Zelyaeva. Dustbury this week is all about Rosario Dawson and Debbie Gibson, but brings the bonus Zooey content! She sings! She makes Cracked writers gnash their teeth! w00t!
A View From The Beach has an interesting portfolio full of gals who like Star Wars. Really, really like Star Wars. On a related topic, Fritz discovers science asking the big questions, and runs the sexual harassment PSA seen here last week. Because you all probably need the reminder, right?
Soylent Green picked Aleida Nunez for the Monday Motivationer, and then blinds us with science, goes country on Tuesday, doubles the hawtness for Humpday, salutes Finnish Googlers, puts his 1500th post solidly behind him, brings the all-important Corset Friday, and finally indulges in a little Photoshop foolery.
At the Camp of the Saints, we begin with Rule 5 News, explores bipartisanship with Sara Leal, spotlights Aurora Cossio, and notes the beginning of hockey season with some Ice Girls.
Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe was Jessica Lowndes; the Vintage Babe was Jamie Lee Curtis. Giselle Bundchen does Sex In Advertising, and finally offers us some memory loss to go with our beer goggles.
Thanks to everyone for their links this week! To be included in next week’s Rule 5 roundup, please send your links to Rule 5 Wombat by October 22.
Do Not Click The Link …
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 8 Comments
. . . while drinking a beverage, because I promise you that you’re going to spit it all over your computer. Also, NSFW language:
Craigslist Ad for a 1990 Nissan Skyline That’s
So Awesome You Motherf–rs Can’t Handle It
Althouse on the Cain Train?
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 72 Comments
“I thought David Gregory really lost his cool early on, as he was questioning Cain about 9-9-9. If you watch the video, you can see he’s agitated and grimacing in a way that really lacks the usual polished journalist quality.”
— Ann Althouse, “Herman Cain Nailed Meet the Press”
This is an unexpected but really quite welcome development. Professor Althouse has been critical of Cain previously and (like most in academia) is not generally a fan of the populist style. From the transcript of Meet the Press, she excerpts these examples of David Gregory’s visible frustration:
The reality of the plan is that some people pay more, some people pay less…. You’re saying [prices] actually go down?… This isn’t about behavior, Mr. Cain, this is about whether you pay–if you don’t pay taxes now, and you now have income tax and a sales tax, you pay more in taxes…. Mr. Cain, we talked to independent analysts ourselves…. We’re not just reading newspaper clips here… They tell us, they’ve looked at this, based on what’s available of the plan, and it’s incontrovertible.
I hadn’t really spotted that, but she’s right: Cain stood his ground, and one of the points that flustered David Gregory was this:
MR. GREGORY: The wealthiest Americans would pay less, the poorest Americans and middle class would pay more. You don’t dispute that.
MR. CAIN: I do dispute that. You are making — you and others are making assumptions about what wealthy Americans would do with their money, and you’re making assumptions about what the middle class and the poor. You can’t predict the behavior. If wealthy Americans…
MR. GREGORY: This isn’t about behavior, Mr. Cain, this is about whether you pay — if you don’t pay taxes now, and you now have income tax and a sales tax, you pay more in taxes.
MR. CAIN: More people will pay less in taxes. More people will pay less in taxes when you consider all the taxes.
What Cain was saying is that every system of taxation involves hidden economic incentives, and incentives influence behavior. Cain was correctly saying that the sales tax element of “9-9-9,” which Gregory and others assume would impose higher taxes on the poor, would only cause them to pay more taxes if they do not respond to the incentives, namely to spend less — or buy more secondhand merchandise, which isn’t taxed under his plan.
Cain is likewise correct in saying that “you can’t predict behavior” — i.e., The Law of Unintended Consequences. While this is as good an argument against “9-9-9” as it is in favor of it, Cain is correct that we cannot make easy assumptions about how such a radical alteration of the federal tax system would impact the economic behavior and financial well-being of various classes of people.
We can agree that a flat tax will generally be of most benefit to the wealthy (who pay a much higher percentage of their income under the existing progressive system) without assuming, willy-nilly, that others will be impoverished as a result. And the point of “9-9-9” is not to achieve “social justice,” but rather to unleash capital investment to spur economic growth. It is a supply-side solution to our current economic woes, and as such has been praised by the Club for Growth and by Art Laffer.
Would a man rather be unemployed and paying no taxes, or would he rather have a job and pay taxes? That’s the real choice, and yet David Gregory can’t seem to understand it.
We could update an old joke Ronald Reagan used to tell: “A recession is when your neighbor loses his job. A depression is when you lose your job. And a recovery is when David Gregory loses his job.”
PREVIOUSLY: Remember When David Gregory Raked Obama Over the Coals on ‘Meet the Press’?
I Got AutoMotivated
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 4 Comments
by Smitty
Pole position on The Week in AutoMotivators. And it motivates me to do more of same. I can’t figure out if TrogloPundit’s new sweetheart photo is more or less disturbing than the last.
Noise Like This Makes Me Glad I Spent That Time In Afghanistan Trying To Help Them Become Like Us
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 34 Comments
by Smitty
Via Insty, there is a story about fix a speeding ticket for the offspring of a deputy.
Hey, that’s just how things work in Afghanistan: you know people, you pay them, you buy the desired outcome.
Other than going after these people hammer and tongs, I can’t think of ways to reverse a culture of corruption. Suggestions?
462 Days Until Jan. 20, 2013
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 36 Comments
Inauguration Day, when four long years of endless misery known as the Obama presidency come to an end. And I’m counting the days.
It’s 79 days until Jan. 3: The Iowa GOP caucuses.
And it’s 107 days until the Jan. 31 Florida primary.
To give you a sense of proportion, it’s been 72 days since I departed from Reagan National Airport — where I set up the National Affairs Desk in the airport lounge — for my 10-day trip to Iowa leading up to the Aug. 11 Fox News debate and the Aug. 13 Ames Straw Poll.
Yesterday I talked to Dan Collins, who gave me the name of his Rumanian friend who lives in Iowa City, about 30 miles from Cedar Rapids. A one-way ticket from Baltimore-Washington International Airport to Cedar Rapids departing the day after Christmas — Dec. 26, which is 71 days from today — would be $281 if I booked it now. So I’d have a full week in Iowa before the caucuses on Jan. 3.
And a flight departing Jan. 4 from Des Moines to Boston’s Logan International Airport would be $145 if I booked it now. Read more
Remember When David Gregory Raked Obama Over the Coals on ‘Meet the Press’?
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 35 Comments
Yeah. Me neither.
When Democrats go on Meet the Press, it’s like Justin Bieber sitting down for a hard-hitting interview with Tiger Beat. (“Do you like puppies?”) When conservatives go on Meet the Press, it’s like Hans Frank on trial at Nuremberg, except without benefit of a defense lawyer.
David Gregory just got through interrogating Herman Cain and grilled him relentlessly until, as Alex Pappas reports at The Daily Caller, the guilty perp finally confessed his crime:
Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain admitted Sunday that “some people” would pay more in taxes every year under his “9-9-9” tax reform plan.
“That’s right. Some people will pay more,” Cain told David Gregory of NBC’s Meet the Press. “But most people will pay less, that’s my argument.”
Gregory, like all other critics of 9-9-9, seemed obsessed with the sales tax component. A 9% sales tax would be an incentive to saving and a disincentive to consumer spending, and you can argue about that as an economic effect. But as to the “who would pay more” question — a fetish of class-warfare liberals — Herman Cain is correct that this is dependent in large measure on individual choices, to wit:
Asked by Gregory who will pay more, Cain said, “The people who spend more money on new goods. The sales tax only applies to people who buy new goods, not used goods. That’s a big difference that doesn’t come out.”
UPDATE: After the Cain interrogation, Gregory then went to a panel discussion about the GOP campaign with Chuck Todd, Katty Kay and Joe Klein (none of whom would ever vote Republican under any circumstance) and followed that with a weird segment: a debate between Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (as proxy for Rick Perry) and former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty (proxy for Mitt Romney). It was as if Gregory meant to say: “OK, now that we’ve dismissed Herman Cain as a complete joke, let’s talk about the real contenders.”
UPDATE II: The media’s Nuremberg tribunal continues:
Long Ties to Koch Brothers Key to Cain’s Campaign
You can see the gallows from the courtroom window.
UPDATE III: Of course, the liberal media were salivating in anticipation of Gregory’s MTP assault on Cain, as Salon news editor Steve Kornacki wrote Friday:
“Herman Cain is about to get his time in the bright lights and he’s got 20 days to show he can handle it,” Scott Reed, a GOP strategist told Politico for a story that ran this morning. Actually, Cain may have a lot less than 20 days, because a look at this weekend’s Sunday show lineup finds that he’s scheduled to appear on “Meet the Press.” . . .
As for Cain, it’s often seemed like he’s winging it as a candidate, tirelessly preaching the “boldness” of his 9-9-9 tax plan and trying to handle everything else on instinct. Does he know what he’s getting himself into on Sunday?
Thanks to Joe in the comments for the catch. It’s important to note that Herman Cain is a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. Only if Gregory’s interview hurt Cain with GOP primary voters would it have any negative impact on his campaign. And from that perspective, I didn’t see any damage. Maybe others saw it differently — and I’m sure the usual suspects will show up in the comments to tell us all about how catastrophic MTP was for Cain.
UPDATE III: Quick rundown of the headline reaction:
Herman Cain: ‘I’m Not Familiar With
The Neoconservative Movement’
— Huffington Post
Cain Says His Deadly Fence Plan Was ‘a Joke’
— New York Times
Cain foreign policy would lean on experts
— Politico
Cain: People Will Demand 999
Even Though It Raises Their Taxes
— Think Progress
Cain says his rise in polls is for real
— Associated Press
GOP presidential candidate
Cain defends ‘9-9-9’
— Washington Times
UPDATE IV: Thanks to The Lonely Conservative for the video:
#OccupyWallStreet Weenies Get No Love From Schlichter
Posted on | October 16, 2011 | 7 Comments
by Smitty
Your rant of the day comes from Kurt Schlichter. A sample:
The mainstream media’s cameras can’t get enough of these pierced protesters, with their crudely written signs proclaiming their unfocused discontent and general anger at society’s selfishness in failing to satisfy their every want and desire.
Of course, those cameras discreetly turn away when the placards demanding socialist revolution and blaming the Jews come out. The protesters’ function is to demonstrate inchoate outrage simply by being there. When they start talking, they start alienating the normals.
These are Potemkin protesters, community organized by government worker unions to allow liberal Democrats a way to triangulate to the center next year. Only the rebel media outfits will actually stick a mic in the protesters’ dirty faces and let them talk.
Kurt’s spleen dump recalls an old Smith family saying: “If you’re looking for sympathy, it’s in the dictionary between s**t and syphillis.”