by Smitty
5 seconds of video takes half an hour to push to YouTube through YouStraw, but this is what it looks like back in the hooch:
More pictures and notes below the fold: Continue reading Your Bagram Accommodations →
"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler
by Smitty
5 seconds of video takes half an hour to push to YouTube through YouStraw, but this is what it looks like back in the hooch:
More pictures and notes below the fold: Continue reading Your Bagram Accommodations →
by Smitty
Eric Posner at Volokh presents the challenge, emphasis mine:
Today, originalists—or at least those who enjoy influence such as judges—occupy themselves with the Bill of Rights, and, with the exception of the second amendment, the whole tenor of the movement has been oriented toward eliminating the various civil-liberty related rights manufactured during the last half century. Another group of people—not all of them originalists—want to dismantle New Deal regulatory institutions but this effort has utterly failed.
There is no constituency for reforming the executive. That is a simple political fact about the United States, and therefore no one with real influence is willing to follow the necessary implications of originalism for executive power. Why not? Because Americans want a strong president. They want a strong president to defend the United States from terrorists, to deliver humanitarian interventions, to respond to natural disasters like Katrina, to resolve financial crises, to combat climate change, to fix the deficit. The call for leadership by a strong executive in response to the crisis du jour is reflexive. When a crisis strikes, and the government does not respond adequately, everyone complains that the president has failed to display leadership. This type of response is so reflexive that it is applied even to events that occur outside the United States. Thus, a few days ago the New York Times attributed Japan’s travails to “the absence of a strong leader capable of rallying the nation.” Everyone understands the theoretical risks of a powerful executive—that was the now completely forgotten theme of the Bush administration—but, as a matter of mainstream thinking at least, those risks are worth taking.
This is precisely why no one should be surprised that Obama==Bush. Obama may want to be something different, but the Oval Office succubus could suck a bus.
And this is why I’m no raging Sarah Palin fanboi: there isn’t much indication she’d be any different than the previous two. And the more her fanbase moves in the fanatic Paulestinian direction, the more the Left will laugh, knowing that their Alinsky effort to over-personalize the Presidency is winning.
Keep increasing the involvement, Americans. We can realize the Founder’s dream of an informed electorate if we continue to expound on the ideas that
(1) the State is not God, and
(2) rock star politicians are not the answer.
Keeping those two ideas in mind, executive reform may be possible in an election cycle or two.
by Smitty (via Drudge)
Liberty? Sovereignty? Are they quaint notions? The Business & Media Institute reports:
Two years ago, George Soros said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. In two short weeks, he is going to start – and no one seems to have noticed.
On April 8, a group he’s funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros’s goal for such an event is to “establish new international rules” and “reform the currency system.” It’s all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for “a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order.”
The event is bringing together “more than 200 academic, business and government policy thought leaders’ to repeat the famed 1944 Bretton Woods gathering that helped create the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Soros wants a new ‘multilateral system,” or an economic system where America isn’t so dominant.
RTWT.
While stridently resisting the whole tinfoil hat scene, let me put it this way to any conservative political hopefuls who want traction for 2012. Frame your economic positions in terms of:
Anyone who can speak coherently about these issues has the election half won.
TOP NEWS
Fears Grow Of Humanitarian Crisis In Misurata

Aid organizations scramble to prevent massive disaster
Allied Strikes Target Loyalist Forces Near Misurata
New Problems At Fukushima Reactors Subdue Optimism
Salt buildup concerns nuclear engineers even as progress is made on restoring power to the Fukushima plant
Boehner Presses Administration For Clarity On Libya Goals
Accuses Obama of coordinating more closely with UN, Arab League than with Congress
POLITICS
California Gay Marriage Ban Stands During Appeal

9th Circuit Court leaves ban in place pending appeal
LA City Council Approves Police Hiring Freeze
Obama Romney Aides Wage Twitter Battle Over Health Care
VP Biden Slams Florida Governor Scott Over High-Speed Rail Decision
Supporters Of Maine Governor LePage’s Budget Cuts Rally In Augusta
Records Contradict Haley Barbour On Lobbying For Mexico
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Toyota: Production Delays Likely In North American Plants
Starbucks Annual Meeting: Sweet Songs, But Little News
Oil Falls From 30-Month High As US Inventory Surplus Outweighs Libya Fears
Ten Reasons Firefox 4 Is Better Than IE9
How Amazon Will Lead The Way To Cheaper Tablets
Steve Jobs Ordered To Answer ITunes Questions
SPORTS
Coach K Looks Golden In Chase For Fifth Title

Still learning at 64
Anderson Refuses To Testify Against Bonds Again, Goes To Jail Again
Coach Anderson Leaving Mizzou For Arkansas
Oswalt OK After Taking Ramirez Liner To The Neck
Giants’ Wilson, Ross, Cain Dinged On Wednesday
Jerry West To Knicks Fans: Calm Down
Panthers Hit With Back-to-Back Shutouts
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Superstar Actress Elizabeth Taylor Dies, 79

Felled by congestive heart failure
Chris Brown’s “Dancing With The Stars” Appearance To Go Forward; Cast Ordered Not To Comment
Lindsay Lohan Rejects Plea Deal, Faces Trial
“Boardwalk Empire” Star Paz de la Huerta Punches Out Former Reality Star In NY Nightclub
Hef’s Fiancee Caught With Dr. Phil’s Son
Lady Gaga: Rebecca Black “A Genius”
Britney Spears: 25 Things You Don’t Know About Me
Inside Brad & Angelina’s Family Life
FOREIGNERS
Radiation Scare Sparks Run On Bottled Water In Tokyo
IDF Strikes Gaza Targets In Retaliation For Rocket Attacks
What’s Next For Portugal After PM’s Resignation?
US Lacks Plan For Dealing With Chaos In Yemen
Harper Defends Conservatives’ Budget
BLOGS & STUFF
Ron Johnson: ObamaCare And Carey’s Heart
Flopping Aces: ObamaCare Cheerleader Wants Waiver For His District
Tony Katz: Understanding Obama’s One-World View And Foreign Policy
Jeffrey Goldberg: Dear Reuters, You Must Be Kidding
Atlas Shrugs: Egypt Air Removes Israel From Map
Fausta: Islamic Terrorists Crossing The Border
Allahpundit: Dem Senators Say There May Be Vote On Libya As Early As Next Week
Jawa Report: Stand And Rock With Israel
— compiled by Wombat-socho
by Smitty
For Heaven’s sake, Ace: you can’t have a title like Joe Lieberman: “You Can’t Stay Out of These Things [Foreign Wars Like Libya]… You Have To Take Chances” without reaching for the ABBA:
Sung from Momar’s vantage, the lyrics take on grotesque irony.
by Smitty
There was a fun exchange on a recent post, Troubleshooting ‘Beyond the Welfare State’, with a certain Mork.
Mork: People say they hate “welfare” until they are beneficiaries of it. Plenty of Tea Partiers show up to rallies riding their state-subsidized electric scooters.
smitty: The fact that state welfare distorts behavior in anti-liberty ways justifies welfare how, exactly?
Mork: Seems to me that providing mobility for people who lack it is “pro-liberty” in the essential sense.
smitty: Liberty is liberty is liberty.
“Providing mobility” is one of those delightfully ambiguous terms that might not be completely evil (light rail) but which may just as easily prove an albatross about the neck (entitlements).
Why can’t I have liberty? Why is some helpy-helperperson perennially attempting to obfuscate simple liberty with some term like “providing mobility for people who lack it”?
Mork: Right. So if you can’t afford to pay for your own scooter, just stay at home. God wants it that way.
smitty: Let’s break that down:
“if you can’t afford”
Why can you not afford something? Is there a legitimate lack of equal opportunity? Have you chosen to invest your treasure elsewhere? Has the government decided you should be taxed until blind in order to keep a retirement fund solvent? We have a mix of subjective and objective possibilities here.
“to pay for your own scooter”
Is the foot an illegitimate means of transportation? Are bicycles OK? Why does it have to be some high-carbon scooter? Why do you hate Gaia?
“just stay at home. God wants it that way.”
Has the subject of this thought experiment prayerfully considered the will of God, and determined to be a hermit? If so, then this result should be a source of joy. But is transportation really a theological concern?
This ‘last word’ comment has disappeared from Disqus. The nice thing is that, for all we off-load comment management to a third party, we still retain a local copy in the WP back end. Since it was the driver for this post, I produce it here with an explanatory URL added.
Mork: Derp
Stacy McCain be lovin’ him some Disqus.
by Smitty
Looking at Gateway Pundit’s latest post on Libya, enlightenment struck: the whole apparent disaster is merely a reference to I Have A Pony.
Hoft: “Obama Yesterday: Gaddafi Must Go… Obama Today: Gaddafi Can Stay (Video)”
Now, quoting Wright from memory:
I have a dog named Stay. When he was a puppy, I’d say “Come here, Stay. Come here, Stay. And he’d look at me like (?). Now he just ignores me. . .and keeps typing. He’s an East German Shepherd. Very, very disciplined.”
You may all thank me for clearing that up by linking.
Da Tech Guy, as he so frequently does, captures the take from The Morning Joke. Or whatever that MSNBC thing is called.
Maybe the President is a student of Teddy Wayne’s Unpopular Proverbs.
The Lonely Conservative recalls a 2007 Bidenism on Iran that is amusing in the Libya context.
SWAC Girl:
Americans are confused. Why go into Libya as opposed to, say, Egypt or any of the other hot spots around the world? They are waiting for answers as this president continues his silence and American war planes go where they’re directed by this commander-in-chief.
FilmLadd goes full-on noir in his analysis:
No matter what mindless jingoists would have you believe, there is no such thing as a country so great and powerful that it can not be destroyed by incompetently waged war. Not even the United States. It may not be this one or the next, but like an infinite monkey with an infinite typewriter, eventually it will happen.
. . . you never know. By the time you read this, I might be pushing up the daisies, shuffling off this mortal coil, pining for the fjords. My plan, however, is to be deep into the merciful bliss of a Nyquil-induced sleep.
So let’s hope it is only a late-winter head cold that has put me in such desperate need of the sniffling, sneezing, coughing, aching, stuffy head, fever, so-I-can rest medicine.
While I am probably not yet dead, then, I’m still not likely to be doing much blogging for the next several hours.
But for all you know, my wife and six kids are even now mourning my recent passing, so you should probably hit the tip jar just in case.
Cough cough. Sniff sniff.
Good-night . . .