It’s David Brooks Fisking Day!

The worthless douchebag is back to slagging “populists” again:

[V]oters aren’t as stupid as the populists imagine.

People who think voters are stupid? Those are elitists like you, Brooks, you despicable swine. As author of “National Greatness” and the gutless vermin who called Sarah Palin a “fatal cancer to the Republican Party,” you are quite clearly the problem and not the solution.

Grab a nice hot cup of STFU, Brooks. Nothing is more amazing than the fact Pinch Sulzberger wastes the money it takes to employ America’s worst op-ed columnist. And that’s really saying something, when you realize that Pinch also employs Maureen Dowd and Frank Rich.

The only purpose you serve is as a bipartisan rallying point. If liberals and conservatives agree on nothing else, all least we can all agree on this: David Brooks is a worthless douchebag.

The Senate Feud in Kentucky

Lisa Graas, a Kentuckian who supports Bill Johnson in the GOP Senate primary, informs me that FreedomWorks is supporting Rand Paul. She also compiles a list of Kentucky conservative bloggers who are backing Johnson and says:

As a tea partier, a Reagan conservative and a Christian here in Kentucky, I’d like the folks at Freedom Works to know that I will be voting Democrat if Rand Paul wins the GOP primary here.

Lisa had told me about her feelings a few weeks ago and it troubled me. When I was in Kentucky to cover the Sparkman investigation, I talked to some staunch conservatives who are Paul supporters. My sympathy for them may prejudice my perspective on this fight, but I know there are good people on both sides, and I hate to see this kind of blood feud among conservatives.

We’re going to see lots of contested primaries this year. As one GOP operative told me, “If you’ve ever considered running for office as a Republican, this is the year to do it.” I’m not in a position to tell Kentuckians how to conduct their feuds, but if my advice were asked, I’d advise this:

  • In criticizing a rival primary candidate, avoid making public doomsaying declarations like, “If so-and-so wins the primary, he’ll lose in November” or “If so-and-so wins the primary, I’ll vote Democrat.” (Anyone who wants to call me a hypocrite here, given how savagely I went after Crazy Cousin John . . . Well, OK, but that turkey was doomed from Day One, no matter what I said. “Don’t Blame Me, I Voted for Bob Barr.” )
  • Rand Paul needs to recognize he’s got a serious problem with a huge chunk of the GOP base in Kentucky, and his campaign needs to do whatever is necessary to fix that problem. If you’re a Republican and you’ve got pro-life Catholics like Lisa Graas swearing vows against you, you’ve got big trouble. Even if you can win the GOP primary, you’ll be badly wounded when the general election campaign begins.
  • Likewise, Bill Johnson’s campaign needs to recognize that they’re not doing themselves any favors by deliberately ostracizing libertarian-minded Republicans. It’s one thing to disagree with Rand Paul on specific issues. It’s another thing to make Paul’s supporters feel as if they are unwelcome inside the Big Tent, even if you think Paul’s supporters are dangerous kooks. Hey, kooks can vote, y’know. 

Bad tactics are the small change that add up to bad strategy, and I think these primary fights escalate into blood feuds mainly because of the vicious negativity of some campaign operatives who are mentally accustomed to a win-at-any-cost rationale.

Personal friends of mine have been hurt by these tactics, and I know the damage done. Dishonorable politics attract dishonorable people, and vice is habit-forming. The path that led Jack Abramoff to federal prison began with a few “minor” ethical compromises.

I’ll close with some advice that is perhaps not strictly neutral, but which is of general application: If you can’t win a GOP primary without accusing your opponent of treason or sodomy, maybe you deserve to lose. And if your campaign staff can’t do better than that, maybe you need to get a new campaign staff.

UPDATE: Some heavy-duty stuff going on in the comments, where Dr. David Duncan links his own post relating his experiences dealing with Rand Paul’s supporters. I kind of knew I was kicking a hornet’s nest here. Like I said, I know good people who support Paul, and if Paul has supporters who are harming his cause by their tactics, that’s something he needs to deal with.

Porn Is Bad for Kids

You’d think this would be common sense, but some “experts” have dismissed the harm. I agree with Pundette, who says the whole “scientific study” approach is flawed:

We don’t really need a study to tell us that tender, developing minds and souls are bound to be malformed and damaged by exposure to pornography.

One of the weirdest effects of pornified culture is young women feeling pressured to conform to the Porn Norm. Beyond the trend of extreme depilation — the deforestation of the pubic delta, so to speak — now girls are getting surgically altered:

[A] young woman consulted a doctor about the fact that her labia minora extended slightly beyond her labia majora and that this caused her embarrassment. Instead of reassuring her that this was entirely normal, the doctor recommended, and carried out, surgery on her labia.

Ouch. And, honestly, what a tragedy. I’m struggling to find a way to say this in a PG-13 way, so I’ll just say it: Lots of guys like that extra helping of cauliflower. IYKWIMAITYD.

More to the point, form follows function, natural is better, and it’s bizarre to think that women now fear being judged by the aesthetics of their genitalia.

Hear the words of the Rule 5 king: Ladies, it’s all good. If any guy is ever so fortunate as to get close enough for a visual inspection of your Valley of Bliss, you should expect him to genuflect in gratitude.

And give you jewelry.

At any rate, listen to Pundette. She can say all this far more tactfully than I ever could.

UPDATE: On the other hand, Radley Balko makes some good points about the dangers of prosecutorial overkill. A thing can be bad, wrong and immoral without requiring felony charges again 16-year-olds.

There Are Still 5 A’s in Raaaaacist!

I’ve headlined the attack on Hillbuzz, but Cynthia Yockey was out of the chute early with this important background:

The Daily Kos and Democratic Underground have outed Kevin DuJan as the owner of the blog, Hill Buzz. They are smearing him with the false charge that that he is a racist. They are urging their readers to destroy his career and attack him physically. (I’m not linking them, but you can verify this by Googling. Instead, I suggest you read Hill Buzz here.) . . .
Hill Buzz is written by a group of gay men in Chicago who began the blog in early 2008 as part of their efforts on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Thanks to experiencing the dirty tricks of the Obama campaign up close and personal during the primaries, as soon as the Democratic nomination was stolen from Hillary, they became supporters of John McCain. They blogged, campaigned, phonebanked and donated money for McCain/Palin with unbounded zeal and passion.
Now Kevin DuJan and Hill Buzz need our support. We MUST push back against FALSE charges of racism because Lefties will use it to destroy innocent people as long as it keeps working. Certainly if we do not hang together on this, we will hang separately. . . .

(Hat-tip: Dan Collins.) Cynthia is exactly right, and I’m sorry to have arrived late for this rally. We are at a point when — as I explained yesterday — there is a tectonic upheaval in the political landscape, re-arranging coalitions to form new alliances.

Gay PUMAS for Palin? Welcome to Camp Wolverine, guys. It’s kind of a default alliance for freedom against The Chicago Way. Speaking of Chicago and freedom, when I posted about freedom fighter Lech Walesa coming to Chicago to campaign Friday for Adam Andrzejewski, the first comment included this:

I don’t care if this guy is from Alpha Centauri. If he’s for tax cuts, I’m there.

Megadittos, baby. Future Ex-Democrats, the future is now!

UPDATE: While sending an e-mail to a friend just now, it dawned on me what this is: The Dark Side of “Ellie Light.”

UPDATE II: Jehuda the Rhetorican asks, “I wonder if ‘Puma Hunting’ is on the rise out of fear of a Hillary 2012 run?” A question weighty enough to intrigue Professor Glenn Reynolds.

How Do You Pronounce ‘Andrzejewski’?

That’s the question that popped up on Twitter after I posted this news at The American Spectator:

It’s not every day that a Nobel Prize winner becomes involved in a U.S. election, but Lech Walesa — famed for his Cold War leadership of the Solidarity movement in Poland — will be campaigning this week for a GOP gubernatorial candidate in Illinois.
The former Polish president will be the keynote speaker Friday at a Chicago luncheon fundraiser for Adam Andrzejewski, one of five Republican candidates for governor in Illinois.
“I applaud Mr. Andrzejewski’s commendable effort to bring real reform to politics,” Walesa wrote in a letter endorsing the 40-year-old businessman. “His insistence on transparency in public life are badly needed not only in the great state of Illinois, but in any democracy.” . . .

Read the rest. Andrzejewski just announced plans for a “money bomb” online fundraiser Wednesday, and released this video featuring the faces (but not names) of his opponents:

That’s the kind of anti-tax, anti-big-spending message we can expect to see more of this election year, thanks to the Tea Party movement.

After the question of how to pronounce the candidate’s name came up on Twitter — where Andrzejewski is @AdamForIllinois — I suggested his camapign needs to enlist famed “Wheel of Fortune” host Pat Sajak (who is a Republican) for a video: Man-on-the-street interviews with people trying to pronounce “Andrzejewski” until Sajak comes on and says, “Buy a vowel.” And then the slogan: “Andrzejewski: It’s How to Spell ‘Reform’ for Illinois.”

I’ve got all kinds of experience with this problem. My editor at the American Spectator is Wlady Pleszczynski. I can pronounce it, but I can never spell it. Thank God for the miracle of cut-and-paste technology.

Right now, I’m struggling with another difficult word: D-E-A-D-L-I-N-E.

UPDATE: A Chicago TV interview where he says, “With a name like ‘Andrzejewski’ you have to be good”: