In The Mailbox: 10.03.16
Posted on | October 3, 2016 | 2 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Hillary Clinton’s War On Women
Twitchy: Marine Says It’s “Sickening” How Media Has Twisted His Q&A With Trump
Louder With Crowder: Baseball Legend Curt Schilling Goes Off On Hillary – “She’s The Epitome Of Evil”
RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Management-Speak And The Presidential Debate
American Power: Vin Scully Calls His Last Game
American Thinker: It Finally Happened – Politics Has Ruined Everything Fun
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye Blue Monday
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Reckless Creed by Alex Kava
Da Tech Guy: JD Rucker – Why Homeschooling Is An Issue That Affects Every Conservative, Whether They Do It Or Not also, The H&R Block/Turbotax Ads You’ll Never See
Don Surber: NYT Praises Trump’s Business Acumen
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries
Jammie Wearing Fools: Pathetic Clinton Staffer Spends Hours At Ohio State Futilely Trying To Register Supporters, Can’t Find Even One
Joe For America: Whistleblower Claims Hillary Killed Libya Peace Deal Over Personal Vendetta
JustOneMinute: Compounding Confusion
Pamela Geller: George Soros Tied To Scheme That Let Illegals Vote In Virginia
Power Line: “Personal Foul, Shooting A Bow And Arrow”
Shark Tank: BCBS Drops 44,000 Obamacare Members
Shot In The Dark: This Is DFL Government
The Jawa Report: Five Years Later InshallahShaheed Still Dead!
The Lonely Conservative: Useful Idiots And The Theater Of The Absurd
The Political Hat: The Ultimate Tool Of The Patriarchy? Puppies!
This Ain’t Hell: Marine PFC Amanda Issa, also, Military Budgets For Gender Reassignment Treatments
Weasel Zippers: Hillary On Julian Assange – “Can’t We Just Drone This Guy?”, also, Air Force To Mandate Diversity Quotas In Candidate Pools For Key Positions
Megan McArdle: Trump’s 1995 Return Shows Good Tax Policy At Work
Today’s Digital Deals
Power Cables For Android Phones Almost Half Off!
Shop Amazon Fashion – Extra 25% Off Men’s Suits & More
Late Night With Rule 5 Sunday: Tax Loopholes Edition
Posted on | October 2, 2016 | 3 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
Lots of ginned-up controversy over Trump’s taxes this weekend, and from what I’ve seen on social media, the basic argument seems to be “My credits/deductions are good and right, but yours are bad and wrong!” which of course is nonsense, but this is the level to which the media have sunk in the waning days of our republic. As a necessary distraction from all the depressing news this week, I offer an attractive accountant for your consideration. Wasn’t easy to find this; apparently there’s a whole subgenre of accounting porn. Who knew?
As usual, many of the following links are to pics generally considered NSFW. The management is not responsible for problems stemming from your failure to exercise discretion in clicking, nor for the possible contamination of your precious bodily fluids.
In some professions, lingerie is a job-related expense.
The Last Tradition leads off with some leftovers from last week: Sam Fairs and Leesa Unique, followed by Mary Jean Lastimosa and Georgia Kousoulou. Ninety Miles from Tyranny has Morning Mistress, Hot Pick of the Late Night featuring Camel Toe, and Girls with Guns; Goodstuff checks in with Lana Wood, a/k/a Plenty O’Toole, Animal Magnetism has Rule 5 Space Invaders Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon, and Register-Republic joins us with Rule 5 Saturday.
EBL’s herd this week includes Ella Fitzgerald, the considerably less talented Alicia Machado, Evan Rachel Wood and Thandie Newton from the Westworld reboot, Elizabeth Hurley, Badgers, Ex-Muslim Milo Girl, and Tatyana Lobov.
A View from the Beach returns with Time for Another Brazilian – Sofia Resing, Darcsizzle Snookers Some Snook, But What is on the Chief Scientist’s Shirt?, Conspiracies at Clinton.com, Silly Celebrities Get Naked For Hillary, Maryland Moron Arrested Topless in Rehobth Beach, Post-Post Debate Debates Over Hillary.com, Are You Tough Enough?, Some Teigen for Tuesday, Yes, There is a Supergirl, Was the FBI Investigation of Clinton.com a Sham?, and The Morning Eye Opener – Yolandi Only.
Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Summer Crockett Moore, his Vintage Babe is Virginia Grey, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Calvin Klein? That’s not Calvin!! At Dustbury, it’s Oksana Akinshina and Donna Fargo.
Thanks to everyone for their linkagery, especially the FMJRA links that made last week’s Rule 5 Sunday the most-linked post of the week here at The Other McCain!
Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women
‘The Fire Under All of This Smoke is … Barely Enough to Light a Cigar’
Posted on | October 2, 2016 | Comments Off on ‘The Fire Under All of This Smoke is … Barely Enough to Light a Cigar’
So says Jazz Shaw of Hot Air in addressing the “October surprise” of the New York Times report on Donald Trump’s taxes. What the Times seems to have done is to extrapolate from the documents it mysteriously obtained to guess about what might be found in documents it does not have. They assert that, because Trump reported major losses of business income in one year, therefore Trump could have avoided income taxes in subsequent years. This may be true, but we don’t know.
Donald Trump Tax Records Show He
Could Have Avoided Taxes for Nearly
Two Decades, The Times Found
— New York Times
As news of Trump’s taxes broke, he goes
off script at a rally in Pennsylvania
— Washington Post
Some comments on the New York Times
story about Donald Trump’s tax returns
— Bronte Capital
Donald Trump Tax Returns Reportedly
Show $916 Million Loss in 1995
— ABC News
The New York Times Paid No Taxes in 2014
— Breitbart
The New York Times risked legal trouble
to publish Donald Trump’s tax return
— Washington Post
Those are today’s headlines at Memeorandum, and CNN’s going wall-to-wall on it, as if Trump were a cop who shot an unarmed black man. The unmistakable pro-Clinton cheerleading at CNN is the tip of a massive iceberg of liberal media bias in this campaign, which is arguably the secret of Trump’s success so far. Trump appeals directly to voters who don’t trust the media, so that whenever the media report something negative about Trump, his basic answer is always, “See? Media bias!”
Whether or not this will be enough for Trump to win the election, however, is the important question. The latest Fox News poll has Clinton leading by 5 points, 49%-44%, and the Real Clear Politics average of national polls show Clinton expanding her lead from a virtual dead heat on Sept. 19 (when it was Clinton 44.9%, Trump 44.0%) to 2.5 points (47.5%-45.0%) now. How much faith we can put in polls is always a matter of dispute, but the closer we get to Election Day, the more likely the polls actually do predict the vote. What the polls cannot predict, however, is whether some event between now and Nov. 8 — for example, a major terrorist attack — might cause voters to shift toward Trump. There are limits to how far media bias can help Democrats, and this election may yet demonstrate that fact. We shall wait and see . . .
The Sex Trouble project has been supported by contributions from readers. The first edition of Sex Trouble: Radical Feminism and the War on Human Nature is available from Amazon.com, $11.96 in paperback or $1.99 in Kindle ebook format.
Be afraid, America. Be very afraid. pic.twitter.com/nJP3EL2lAe
— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) July 4, 2016
In The Mailbox, 09.30.16
Posted on | September 30, 2016 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox, 09.30.16
— compiled by Wombat-socho
OVER THE TRANSOM
Proof Positive: Captain America Vs. Hillary
EBL: Evan Rachel Wood Westworld Rule 5
Twitchy: Ted SMASH Hulk! Senator Cruz Slaps Back At Actor Mark Ruffalo
Louder With Crowder: YouTuber Mercilessly Mocks Hillary’s Insincerity, And It’s PERFECT
RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Podcast #20 – The Run Guts Pull Cones Episode
American Power: Hedge Funds Short Deutsche Bank
American Thinker: Hill On Bill’s Women – “We Reached Out To Them”
Animal Magnetism: Rule Five Space Invaders Friday
Da Tech Guy: Hyde Amendment Turns 40, Much To Hillary’s Annoyance
Don Surber: Hillary Leads Among College Graduates Earning Less Than $35K
Dustbury: Quote Of The Week
Jammie Wearing Fools: The Media’s Not Even Pretending To Be “Objective” About Trump
Joe For America: Guess What’s Happening To The NFL Three Weeks After Anthem Protests?
JustOneMinute: Waddya Mean “Democrats”, You Corporate Stooge?
Pamela Geller: Clinton Names Merkel As Her Favorite World Leader
Power Line: FBI Director Comey Claims “I Am Not A Weasel”
Shark Tank: Zika Virus Funding Could Fall Prey To Federal Bureaucrats’ Red Tape
Shot In The Dark: Return Of The DFL Dictionary
STUMP: Public Pensions Primer – Intergenerational Equity
The Jawa Report: Shocking News! Mateen Lied To FBI But Wasn’t Charged
The Political Hat: When The Republic Is Over
The Quinton Report:
This Ain’t Hell: Hillary Clinton And Alicia Machado – The Sisterhood Of The Traveling Getaway Car, also, Wait Lines To Get Out Of VA
Weasel Zippers: Gary Johnson Asks “Who’s Harriet Tubman?”, also, Effort To Deligitimize Judicial Watch As Media Comes Straight From The White House
Megan McArdle: The Economics Of Dining As A Couple
Today’s Digital Deals
Today’s Open-Box And Pre-Owned Item Deals
Shop Amazon Exclusives – Body Candy Spiral Dichroic Glass Dangle Earrings
Feed Her Majesty To Her Master, Cthulhu? Sure. Prosecute Her? Not Wise.
Posted on | September 30, 2016 | 2 Comments
by Smitty
In Defense of William F. Buckley Jr.
Posted on | September 30, 2016 | Comments Off on In Defense of William F. Buckley Jr.
“In the hands of a skillful indoctrinator, the average student not only thinks what the indoctrinator wants him to think . . . but is altogether positive that he has arrived at his position by independent intellectual exertion. This man is outraged by the suggestion that he is the flesh-and-blood tribute to the success of his indoctrinators.”
– William F. Buckley Jr., Up From Liberalism (1959)
Never trust anyone who speaks ill of their own parents. Probably everyone goes through that adolescent phase of thinking their parents are idiots, but mature reflection — when we understand the difficulties of adult life, and have become parents ourselves — ought to temper our judgment, and curb any temptation to criticize our elders. Furthermore, people who malign their own parents are in essence testifying against themselves. “The nut doesn’t fall far from the tree,” after all, and if your parents were such awful people, what should we expect from you?
In 2009, Christopher Buckley published in the New York Times some anecdotes about his late father, William F. Buckley Jr., that were not entirely flattering. Among other things, Buckley the Younger accused his father of hogging the TV remote and changing channels at a whim. “If it were so, it was a grievous fault. And grievously hath Caesar answered it.”
Now, I rise to speak in defense of William F. Buckley Jr. not only because I might also be guilty of hogging the remote — “my remote,” as I call it — nor even to remind my own children of their duty of filial piety, although these are certainly important considerations. God forbid that, after I’m mouldering in the grave, any of my numerous progeny should think to profit by badmouthing me in print, as Christopher Buckley has done to his deceased father. Oh, sure, perhaps it wasn’t malice that inspired Buckley the Younger to tell these tales about the Old Man, but great reputations can be undermined as much by carelessness as by spite, because who knows what use a man’s enemies might make of the discovery that, e.g., the deceased Great Man hogged the TV remote?
To see how this works, examine “William F Buckley — A Case Study In Narcissistic Personality Disorder” by The Anonymous Conservative, who makes of Buckley’s remote-hogging a symptom of psychiatric illness and/or bad character. It would perhaps suffice to discredit this claim to point out that the anonymous author uses the phrase “the Cuckservative Establishment,” and asserts:
Conservatism is merely an expression of the K-selected psychology. It is invigorated by the disasters produced by liberalism, as the horrors liberals cultivate have their effects on the minds of the populace. Nobody can create it through positivity, any more than you can create a high tide with a water pump. You can massage things at the edges, humiliate a liberal here and there, even hold the line on one issue or another with subtle threats of force in places, as with guns, but in the grander scheme, r and K are like the tides.
What fresh Hell is this? For those unfamiliar with the subject of population demographics, let me offer this brief bit from Wikipedia:
In ecology, r/K selection theory relates to the selection of combinations of traits in an organism that trade off between quantity and quality of offspring. The focus upon either increased quantity of offspring at the expense of individual parental investment in r-strategists, or reduced quantity of offspring with a corresponding increased parental investment in K-strategists, varies widely, seemingly to promote success in particular environments.
The terminology of r/K-selection was coined by the ecologists Robert MacArthur and E. O. Wilson based on their work on island biogeography; although the concept of the evolution of life history strategies has a longer history.
E.O. Wilson and “sociobiology” have exercised an influence among certain secular (or as they would call themselves, “scientific”) conservatives, who wish to marshal Darwinism in support of various ideas that liberals generally dismiss as falling into the category of “racism.” My own experience of being hate-listed by the SPLC for daring to treat these subjects as worthy of inquiry should suffice to prove that I am no “Establishment cuckservative” fearful of liberal disapproval, nor am I prone to retreat from any defensible truth. However, I am also skeptical of speculative theory, which is what Darwinism is, as it goes beyond the facts of nature to imagine a remote past in which random accidents accumulated into “progress” that led pond scum to become something more than pond scum. At any rate, while “r/K selection theory” might be a useful tool with which to explain various natural phenomena, I hesitate to endorse how The Anonymous Conservative has taken the ball and run with it as “The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics”:
As the images flowed through my brain, I saw one side, brave, strong, and honorable, the other, groveling, weak, and pathetic. The presence of one side enhanced the fitness of the population, while the persistence of the other deteriorated it. One was genuinely good and created magnificence, and one was not. The daring and the cowards. The patriots and the traitors. The Warrior and the Hippie. The Capitalist and the Communist. The stoic NRA member, and the easily frightened and insecure anti-gun pussy. The Marine, and the Womyn’s studies major at UC Berkeley. Republicans and Democrats, Conservatives and Liberals. Complexity in adaptation and a devolved simplistic fecundity. Evolution and Devolution. The production of a great society, and the decline into chaos of a collapsing society. It all made sense. I thought back to the microbes, and the conditions which produced them, thought of r/K theory, and all of this was borne in my mind.
As I say, fear of liberal disapproval plays no part in my work, and insofar as this application of “r/K” actually contains truth, I would defend it. Yet employing this as a pretext to attack the reputation of the late William F. Buckley Jr. leads to rather bizarre claims:
People like Buckley only slow the ascent of conservatism, by trying to demonize the leading edge of the movement on behalf of their mentally damaged fellow travelers on the left. Driven by the urge to assuage their own fears of not being in control of the flow of events, they are seeking one thing. If they are not in control, someone else must be, and that someone else must be the smart person.
Notice the analogies between the narcissist’s behavior, and that of the modern Cuckservative right. People are happy in America. Things are good. What do the Cucks innocently support? Importing floods of 69 IQ foreigners into the nation, who have no hope of ever assimilating. Importing people who cannot create even a semblance of freedom in their home countries, let alone protect it from leftists here. People who come from cultures where nepotism and corruption are so endemic to their culture that even if the US artificially imposes democracy and freedom in their home nation, they have no ability to maintain it themselves. People who come to the US in search of free resources, provided by government. People who vote by margins of 70 or 80% for the liberal’s promises of free resources provided through theft from the productive. People who kill innocent Americans and destroy the nation’s unity through divisions of language, and culture, and moral philosophy.
No one can accuse me of wanting to import “floods of 69 IQ foreigners into the nation,” etc., and I’m quite sure William F. Buckley Jr. never supported any such scheme. The question of how to fix our broken immigration “policy” (which in truth is no policy at all) has bedeviled the conservative movement for the past 30 years. The Right seems to be caught between (a) rank-and-file opposition to open borders, (b) the Chamber of Commerce crowd’s appetite for cheap labor, (c) sentimental fools who get all misty-eyed while quoting Emma Lazarus and invoking their great-grandfather’s arrival at Ellis Island, and (d) the Republican Party’s predictable cowardice when accused of “racism.”
As someone who has spent more than two decades in conversation with leading minds of the Right — including the so-called “alt-Right,” some of whom owe me personal favors, and vice-versa — I abhor the kind of internecine warfare that goes on between various factions of the conservative movement. Years ago, I started joking that I should write a history of these conflicts which I proposed to entitle First, They Came for Mel Bradford. If you don’t get that joke, I won’t bother you with an explanation of how Bradford’s appointment to a position in the Reagan administration was sabotaged with the assistance of George F. Will, among others. Nor will I explain why in recent months I’ve thought of an imaginary sequel to that story that I propose to title Sam Francis Could Not Be Reached for Comment. In the seemingly interminable wars between neoconservatives and paleoconservatives, the neocons have engaged in a lot of dishonorable backstabbing to gain and maintain their predominant influence within the GOP, while the paleocons have engaged in too many self-defeating tactical blunders. Rather than to rehash all these ancient grievances, however, my purpose here is to defend Buckley’s reputation against the preposterous accusation that he “slow[ed] the ascent of conservatism.” Most of Buckley’s peers and comrades — including people I had the opportunity to know, like M. Stanton Evans, Paul Weyrich and Phyllis Schlafly — have joined him in the Great Beyond, so that they are unavailable to testify in his defense. Therefore, I will attempt briefly to rescue Buckley’s good name from the posthumous smear of being an “Establishment cuckservative.”
The modern American conservative movement began in the 1940s in reaction to (a) FDR’s New Deal and (b) the threat of Soviet Communism. These were separate dangers that were nevertheless in some way related, given how the Alger Hiss case exposed the way Soviet agents had penetrated the federal government during Roosevelt’s presidency. We could recite a long roster of names — inter alia, Owen Lattimore, Harry Dexter White and Henry Wallace — to explain why what liberals called “McCarthyism” arose in the late 1940s and early ’50s. William F. Buckley Jr.’s first contribution to the anti-Communist 
Buckley was accused of being a crypto-fascist and his book was metaphorically compared (by Frank Ashburn in the Saturday Review) to the burning cross at a Klan rally. Despite this vilification, Buckley had truth on his side and, as we look back across the span of more than six decades, the accuracy of his assessment is all the more remarkable. Now that Yale actually is being run by godless Commies, we can point to Buckley’s timeless classic and say, “See? We told you so.”
It was not Buckley’s intention to make himself the leader of a movement, but what happened was that the movement’s demand for leadership more or less required Buckley to step into that role. While there were many great minds at work in the project of crafting an intellectual response to the challenges facing America in the 1950s, no one else had the distinct combination of traits that Buckley brought to his job as founder of National Review. On the one hand, Buckley was full of the youthful impudence necessary to mock the reigning pieties of liberalism, while at the same time he had a profound reverence toward traditional values of faith, freedom and family. At a time when Republicans were embracing the moderate “go-along-to-get-along” attitudes of the Eisenhower administration, Buckley and National Review stood for a real system of conservative principles. Buckley’s conservatism included (but was not limited to) opposition to the Welfare State in domestic policy, and an unflinching hostility toward Communism. However, as we look back on that era, we must remember how the grand drama of the Cold War overshadowed every other consideration in American politics. Probably no one under age 40 today has any notion of the seriousness of the Soviet menace and what a tremendous feat it was for Buckley and others to organize the West’s victorious strategy in that historic contest.
Let it be said that I may here be giving Buckley too much credit for his role as de facto intellectual leader of the conservative movement that ultimately elected Ronald Reagan president and, in consequence, forced the collapse of the Soviet Union’s “Evil Empire.” Knowing that many other people contributed to that success, and not wishing to diminish the role of others by exaggerating Buckley’s eminence, still I feel the greater danger is in not giving Buckley enough credit for what he did.
Too easily do the young forget what their ancestors accomplished, succumbing to the belief that historic events were somehow inevitable. However, as Ronald Reagan famously said, “I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing.” Confronted with the crisis of the late 20th century, Buckley was not content to do nothing, and if it is wrong to give him too much credit for the success of the conservative movement, so would it be wrong to blame Buckley too much for the movement’s failures over the past 25 years. Certainly there are legitimate grounds on which to criticize Buckley. No one in public life is exempt from criticism, but when the subject is someone so directly involved with a historic success, it behooves us not to be nitpicky about their faults and errors. Never will I forget that night in 1989 when I watched live on CNN what seemed to me a miracle — the fall of the Berlin Wall, an event that answered the prayers of many millions of freedom-loving people around the world.
How much credit does William F. Buckley Jr. deserve for the success of the conservative movement that rallied Americans to stand firm against Communism, to elect Ronald Reagan and support his anti-Soviet strategy, and thus to lead America to victory in the Cold War? However you answer that question, you cannot say Buckley’s contribution was minor, and I think everyone who loves liberty owes a certain debt to the man who once dared to stand athwart history, yelling Stop.
Now shut up, you kids, and hand me back my remote.
« go back — keep looking »
THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD
HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!
Search
Recent Posts
- Rule 5 Monday: Everything Stops For Tea
- What’s the Over/Under on How Soon Barrett Brown Gets Arrested Again?
- FMJRA 2.0: Marking Time
- ‘There Is No Truth … Only Power’
- In The Mailbox: 05.15.26 (Evening Edition)
- In The Mailbox: 05.15.26 (Afternoon Edition)
- This Should Not Need to Be Said
- In The Mailbox: 05.12.26
- In The Mailbox: 05.11.26
- Do You Hate Communism Enough?
Click here to manage your email subscription options.
RSS reader subscription
MEMEORANDUM
Recent Comments
THE AMAZING GONZO FEED
Major Leagues
ADVERTISEMENT
Axis of Fedorables
- All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values
- Allergic to Bull
- Cat House Chat
- Chris Cassone
- Conservative Daily News
- DaTechGuy
- Fishersville Mike
- Girl on the Right
- Haemet
- Hogewash
- Just A Conservative Girl
- Marooned in Marin
- Paco Enterprises
- Sissy 'put moi in your blogroll' Willis
- So It Goes In Shreveport
- SWAC Girl
- The (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely Conservative
- The Camp of the Saints
- The World's Youngest Blogger
- Uncoverage
- VA Right
AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!
Archives
- May 2026 (24)
- April 2026 (59)
- March 2026 (44)
- February 2026 (37)
- January 2026 (45)
- December 2025 (42)
- November 2025 (44)
- October 2025 (44)
- September 2025 (47)
- August 2025 (48)
- July 2025 (48)
- June 2025 (47)
- May 2025 (48)
- April 2025 (42)
- March 2025 (48)
- February 2025 (49)
- January 2025 (48)
- December 2024 (42)
- November 2024 (44)
- October 2024 (47)
- September 2024 (43)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (63)
- June 2024 (59)
- May 2024 (48)
- April 2024 (43)
- March 2024 (55)
- February 2024 (46)
- January 2024 (45)
- December 2023 (53)
- November 2023 (62)
- October 2023 (57)
- September 2023 (56)
- August 2023 (53)
- July 2023 (69)
- June 2023 (67)
- May 2023 (53)
- April 2023 (60)
- March 2023 (73)
- February 2023 (65)
- January 2023 (56)
- December 2022 (60)
- November 2022 (64)
- October 2022 (58)
- September 2022 (68)
- August 2022 (75)
- July 2022 (69)
- June 2022 (73)
- May 2022 (74)
- April 2022 (57)
- March 2022 (79)
- February 2022 (65)
- January 2022 (58)
- December 2021 (62)
- November 2021 (68)
- October 2021 (73)
- September 2021 (63)
- August 2021 (60)
- July 2021 (80)
- June 2021 (64)
- May 2021 (64)
- April 2021 (58)
- March 2021 (73)
- February 2021 (57)
- January 2021 (71)
- December 2020 (77)
- November 2020 (81)
- October 2020 (84)
- September 2020 (94)
- August 2020 (75)
- July 2020 (68)
- June 2020 (83)
- May 2020 (77)
- April 2020 (65)
- March 2020 (85)
- February 2020 (94)
- January 2020 (95)
- December 2019 (88)
- November 2019 (60)
- October 2019 (113)
- September 2019 (91)
- August 2019 (91)
- July 2019 (88)
- June 2019 (80)
- May 2019 (74)
- April 2019 (97)
- March 2019 (100)
- February 2019 (85)
- January 2019 (93)
- December 2018 (90)
- November 2018 (83)
- October 2018 (96)
- September 2018 (79)
- August 2018 (107)
- July 2018 (98)
- June 2018 (86)
- May 2018 (78)
- April 2018 (78)
- March 2018 (97)
- February 2018 (61)
- January 2018 (70)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (68)
- October 2017 (67)
- September 2017 (70)
- August 2017 (68)
- July 2017 (52)
- June 2017 (60)
- May 2017 (56)
- April 2017 (80)
- March 2017 (80)
- February 2017 (102)
- January 2017 (104)
- December 2016 (65)
- November 2016 (86)
- October 2016 (77)
- September 2016 (81)
- August 2016 (66)
- July 2016 (83)
- June 2016 (81)
- May 2016 (65)
- April 2016 (64)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (74)
- January 2016 (66)
- December 2015 (64)
- November 2015 (85)
- October 2015 (71)
- September 2015 (80)
- August 2015 (67)
- July 2015 (79)
- June 2015 (69)
- May 2015 (72)
- April 2015 (94)
- March 2015 (122)
- February 2015 (71)
- January 2015 (93)
- December 2014 (99)
- November 2014 (67)
- October 2014 (109)
- September 2014 (87)
- August 2014 (106)
- July 2014 (132)
- June 2014 (154)
- May 2014 (126)
- April 2014 (145)
- March 2014 (144)
- February 2014 (142)
- January 2014 (185)
- December 2013 (192)
- November 2013 (173)
- October 2013 (175)
- September 2013 (181)
- August 2013 (172)
- July 2013 (147)
- June 2013 (135)
- May 2013 (128)
- April 2013 (105)
- March 2013 (162)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (206)
- December 2012 (190)
- November 2012 (176)
- October 2012 (240)
- September 2012 (206)
- August 2012 (235)
- July 2012 (223)
- June 2012 (161)
- May 2012 (230)
- April 2012 (269)
- March 2012 (282)
- February 2012 (247)
- January 2012 (267)
- December 2011 (285)
- November 2011 (300)
- October 2011 (302)
- September 2011 (297)
- August 2011 (288)
- July 2011 (297)
- June 2011 (245)
- May 2011 (260)
- April 2011 (344)
- March 2011 (293)
- February 2011 (201)
- January 2011 (263)
- December 2010 (265)
- November 2010 (266)
- October 2010 (305)
- September 2010 (280)
- August 2010 (272)
- July 2010 (230)
- June 2010 (244)
- May 2010 (256)
- April 2010 (222)
- March 2010 (271)
- February 2010 (286)
- January 2010 (229)
- December 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (1)