‘Aggregate Demand,’ Again

What is it with this neo-Keynesian stuff? Back in July, Brad DeLong did his little paean to “aggregate demand.” At least DeLong is an economist. Matthew Yglesias, not so much:

So if for whatever reason businessmen or politicians or media figures or anyone else feels more comfortable expressing the situation as one caused by “uncertainty” that’s fine. But the name of the game is still fiscal and monetary expansion. But instead the proposed cure typically seems to be “shift public policy in a more rightwing direction.” That wouldn’t do anything about uncertainty or a shortfall in aggregate demand. It’s just a faux-sophisticated way of saying “I’m a rich businessman who wants politicians to cater to my interests more.”

Yglesias knows all about “faux-sophisticated” ways of saying things. What he doesn’t know is economics.

What’s the Very Best Thing About Republicans Winning the Election?

Britney’s got a new boyfriend. No, that’s not the best thing about the election. The best thing about the election is, now that Republicans have won a solid majority in the House of Representatives, it feels safe to blog about silly stuff like Britney Spears again.

For months, the approach of Nov. 2 seemed like such a do-or-die moment that the entire right-wing blogosphere was totally game faces, until we were on the verge of turning into Continue reading What’s the Very Best Thing About Republicans Winning the Election? →

Kill the Rich!

Frank Rich, I mean. Three weeks ago, I spent an hour or so debunking his claim that Obama cut your taxes. Being quite proud of the result, I immediately e-mailed it to Instapundit and . . . no linky-love.

So after about four or five hours, I e-mailed him again: “I don’t get it. Here we have Frank Rich using his New York Times column to push a bogus Democratic Party talking-point a week before the election, and I’ve expended the time and effort to dismantle it, and no linky-love? What gives?”

The answer came in the subsequent link:

“PICKING ON FRANK RICH IS SO EASY IT’S HARDLY WORTH IT, but some people enjoy the practice.”

Well, the election is over and Americans evidently weren’t swayed by that idiotic Obama-cut-your-taxes propaganda, so I suppose Professor Reynolds is right: Frank Rich can be ignored as harmless.

It is nevertheless enjoyable practice to dismantle the endless idiocy of the Worst Columnist in America the World All Human History.

Today, for example, Rich denounces those “wealthy Americans . . . who take far more from America than they give back.”

Rich’s editors permit him to go on in this vein for 1,538 words in a column that involves no original reporting. He interviewed no one. He didn’t pick up the phone and call any sources, nor did this column require him to set foot outside his apartment. He watches “60 Minutes,” reads Think Progress and throws in some “empirical evidence” from a “deservedly lauded new book” by two political science professors.

What is the journalistic purpose of such an effort? Where is the value to the New York Times?

One possible answer: Rich articulates the inner rationale by which the newspaper’s liberal readership justify their political prejudices. He lends his Harvard-educated eloquence to these prejudices, providing his readers with reassurance that they’re absolutely right and that anyone who disagrees with them is hopelessly ignorant. Continue reading Kill the Rich! →

LIVE AT FIVE – 11.14.10

TOP NEWS

President Looks Good But Gets Nothing Done In Asia

President Obama listens to Russian President Medvedev at the APEC summit

No hard target forex agreement, no free trade deals with Japan or the ROK.

Karzai Calls For Reduction In Afghanistan Ops Intensity
“The time has come to reduce the presence of, you know, boots in Afghanistan . . . .”

Suu Kyi Urges Followers To Persist In Push For Democracy
“You have to stand up for what is right.”

POLITICS

Lawyers Start Leaving Alaska As Write-In Count Nears End

 

GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller visits the vote count site

Miller refuses to concede until absentee ballots counted

GOP Takes Tough Stand On Saving Bush Tax Rates

Pelosi Won’t Let Go

Dems Agree On Leadership Structure; Clyburn Settles For New #3 Post

Federal Offices Not The Only Ones Waiting For Resolution

Bennet Declines Offer To Lead DSCC

THE ECONOMY, STUPID

Ireland Urged To Seek Aid To Solve Debt Crisis

Auction Of Madoff Effects Raises $2 Million

Saudi Arabia Defriends, Refriends Facebook

Samsung Galaxy Tab Doesn’t Have To Be iPad Killer To Succeed

SPORTS

Bowl-Barred Trojans Grind On, Upset #18 Arizona

USC's Mark Tyler runs it in for a TD in the second quarter

USC on pace for a ten-win season

#3 TCU Dominates San Diego State 40-35

NBA’s Big Story So Far: Not The Heat But The Hornets

Spurrier’s Cocks Down Gators 36-14

Kopitar Scores Twice In Kings Win; Islanders Suffer Tenth Straight Loss

FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS

Disney Reworks Demi Series

 

Demi Lovato

“So Random” show-within-a-show becomes main focus in star’s absence

Kanye West’s Media Trainer Quits After Disastrous “Today” Interview

Zsa Zsa Gabor Heading Home From Hospital

New Boyfriend For Britney?

FOREIGNERS

Burmese Democracy Activist Freed After Seven Years’ House Arrest

Obama Tells Medvedev New START Treaty Is Top Priority

Nationwide Strike Called In Bangladesh After Ex-PM Evicted

Iraqiya Bloc Returns From Walkout, Agrees To Role In Unity Government; Allawi Talking Withdrawal To Form New Bloc

BLOGS & STUFF

Sarah Palin: An Open Letter To GOP Congressional Freshmen

Jonathan Last: American Narcissus

Michelle Malkin: Obama Doesn’t Need An iPad, He’s Got a $102,000/Year iReggie

Verum Serum: Jon Stewart Is The Left’s Rally Monkey


— compiled by Wombat-socho

Buying Gold? Caveat Emptor

On previous occasions, I’ve made the point that gold prices are going up and that, in times of uncertainty — as, for example, when the Federal Reserve is pursuing a clearly inflationary policy — gold is a good investment. (Did I mention the DJIA lost 251 points this past week?)

The title of my most recent post on this topic was, “You Should’ve Listened to Glenn Beck.”

A reader decided to investigate and created a post at an Internet discussion board, which linked to a very interesting graphic from Ritholtz.com.

Ritholtz.com contends that a gold retail company promoted by Glenn Beck is guilty of deceptive practices. I have no time to investigate the controversy myself, but would urge anyone planning to invest in gold (or anything else) to do their own research and be sure that they are getting a fair value for their dollar.

Economics 101: It is always in the seller’s interest to maximize his profit from any transaction and you, as the buyer, are responsible for looking out for your own interest.

In the interest of fairness, I now link “Why gold is a bad investment,” by Jonathan Burton of MarketWatch. But I am not personally persuaded by Burton’s argument, given that he is obligated to mention that (a) gold is still about $900 an ounce below its 1980 peak in inflation-adjusted dollars, and (b) George Soros has a substantial investment in gold.

Wait: George Soros getting investment advice from . . . Glenn Beck?

Come up with your own crazy conspiracy theory to explain that one.

UPDATE: Welcome, Instapundit readers! A lively discussion in the comments below, including a link to the Classic Liberal, who discusses the difference between bullion coins — sold for the per-ounce value of their gold content — and numismatic coins, sold for their value as collectibles. The later category seems to be where concerns about ripoffs arise.

Let me provide what may be a helpful analogy. I’m a consumer fireworks buff. (You can hit the tip jar and help fund next year’s Fourth of July show.) Fireworks retailers offer all kinds of “discount” come-ons to entice buyers, most commonly the BOGO (Buy One, Get One “free”) and alleged freebies (e.g., spend at least $500 and get a “free” 6-shell mortar kit).

Of course, nothing is “free.” The stores don’t make money by giving stuff away. All this alleged “free” stuff is a marketing gimmick, encouraging the unwary consumer to spend more in the belief that he’s getting an awesome deal.

Sooner or later, the really avid fireworks freak stumbles onto the Pyrouniverse forums and learns that he can buy fireworks by the case from wholesalers. In the process, he discovers that the 6-shot mortar kit that retails for $24.99 ($12.50 with the BOGO “discount”) has a wholesale price of $54 for a case of 12 kits — $4.50 a kit. Furthermore, wholesale companies also have volume discounts, e.g., 10% off purchases over $500, so that you could effectively get that entire case of mortar kits “free.”

This discovery of the vast gap between retail and wholesale prices frequently results in the fireworks buff becoming profoundly bitter about retailers. “What a rip-off!” he declares, explaining that he spent more than $1,000 retail on last year’s Fourth of July show, thinking he was getting a great deal, only to learn too late that he could have gotten an equivalent amount of fireworks for less than $400 wholesale.

Well, caveat emptor, my friend. And let me ask you, “What else are you buying retail without really shopping around for the best price?” Clothes? Furniture? Electronics? What is true of fireworks is true of nearly everything else you spend money for, including investments.

Except in punishing outright fraud, however, the answer to “rip-offs” is not government regulation or class-action lawsuits. The answer is to stop being a chump.

Government cannot abolish stupidity. If the government can’t abolish the kind of stupidity that leads to fireworks injuries — and they can’t — they certainly can’t abolish the kind of stupidity that leads to people paying too much for collectible coins.

But government never ceases in its tireless effort to “protect” you, and guess what our friends in Washington slipped into the ObamaCare bill?

Starting Jan. 1, 2012, Form 1099s will become a means of reporting to the Internal Revenue Service the purchases of all goods and services by small businesses and self-employed people that exceed $600 during a calendar year. Precious metals such as coins and bullion fall into this category and coin dealers have been among those most rankled by the change.
This provision, intended to mine what the IRS deems a vast reservoir of uncollected income tax, was included in the health care legislation ostensibly as a way to pay for it. The tax code tweak is expected to raise $17 billion over the next 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Whoa! A tax on everything you buy, including gold? You want to talk about a rip-off . . .

Ezra Klein Is a Liberal. Is It Redundant to Say That Ezra Klein Is Also Insane?

There seems to be a lot of batshit crazy going around lately, but who can top this headline?

How Joe Lieberman Help the
Democrats Lose the Election

Ezra, take that headline to the nearest pharmacy and collect your prescription for Thorazine.

Jehuda the Rhetorican tries to make sense of this Rorshach inkblot and concurs: Ezra’s daft, nuts, wacko, zany, Fruit Loops and cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.

Thought experiment: Suppose that Jeff G.’s November fundraiser at Protein Wisdom were such a smashing success that Jeff had enough extra cash to book a round-trip flight to Reagan National Airport. Now, suppose that somebody wangled Jeff an invitation to a cocktail party attended by some of these smarmy know-it-all intellectual pundit types.

How many glasses of whiskey would Jeff need to drink before somebody called 911? And how many pundits would be in need of emergency medical treatment by the time the cops showed up and tasered Jeff?

Understand that I’m just throwing this scenario out there as a hypothetical. No one would actually be crazy enough to send Jeff to a D.C. cocktail party.

Or would they?

‘President of the Back of the Bus’

In order to keep the leadership perks for herself and fellow big-shot honky Steny Hoyer, Nancy Pelosi created a meaningless “No. 3” position for James Clyburn. Michelle Malkin’s snarktastic reaction:

Imagine if the Republicans created a figurehead position out of thin air to keep “the black guy” from making waves and challenging the two white people at the top. MSNBC would have their lead story for the next week.
The new as-yet untitled position (I assume “President of the Back of the House Bus” is not under consideration) Pelosi is creating for Clyburn will at some point be known as “We lost because of him!”

(Via Memeorandum.) How is Nancy’s “Liberal Honkies in Charge” plan going to help Democratic turnout in 2012? Do you suppose Charles Lollar might get some of Steny Hoyer’s voters thinking twice?

Professor Palin and the Class of ’12

A wonderful introductory lecture for the freshmen:

Never forget the people who sent you to Washington. Never forget the trust they placed in you to do the right thing.
The task before you is daunting because so much damage has been done in the last two years, but I believe you have the chance to achieve great things.
Republicans campaigned on a promise to rein in out-of-control government spending and to repeal and replace the massive, burdensome, and unwanted health care law President Obama and the Democrat Congress passed earlier this year in defiance of the will of the majority of the American people. These are promises that you must keep. . . .

Read the whole thing.