Murkowski Is ‘Insanely Un-Libertarian’ UPDATE: ‘99% . . . No Way’ Murkowski Will Get LP Nomination, Official Says

The deal that Palin-hater Andrew Halcro is trying to broker to secure Lisa the Loser’s Senate nomination on the Alaska Libertarian Party ticket strikes many people as odd, simply because Murkowski is the kind of GOP Establishment type that LP activists loathe in their souls. And at least one top national LP official isn’t afraid to say so:

Wes Benedict, executive director of the Libertarian National Committee, told The Daily Caller that Murkowski hardly fits the Libertarian Party mould. “As far as I’m concerned if Murkowski is for bringing our troops home and for ending the war on drugs and if she voted against the TARP bailout and she is for reducing spending then maybe she could earn a spot on the Libertarian ballot,” he said. “But my understanding is that she voted for the TARP bailout and that is just insanely un-Libertarian.”

(Yeah, I was just compelled to link the Daily Caller for that quote. Life sucks sometimes)

There is much cause for conservative supporters of Joe Miller to be discouraged by the current situation, including the fact that I just got hit with an unexpected $678 repair bill for the 2004 KIA — life sucks sometimes — but we’ll leave that aside for a minute.

The far larger problem is that Team Murky is much better-funded and far more devious than the grassroots activists (and hired GOP clonebots) running Team Joe. What I’m hearing from Anchorage suggests that the Miller people don’t seem to grasp how a game like this is played, whereas the Murkowski crew is playing it like the ruthless political mercenaries they are.

Although Andrew Halcro’s obsessive hatred of Palin is such that he may be working as an unpaid freelance operative for Team Murky, he advertises himself as a political consultant. It is therefore likely he’s getting paid (if not by the Murkowski campaign, then by her Big Money supporters) to play matchmaker between Lisa and the LP.

Meanwhile, the LP people say Joe Miller’s campaign staff seem unduly cautious about reaching out. While Miller’s grassroots supporters are friends with the Libertarians — well-acquainted through common activism in the Tea Party movement — the paid staffers at Team Joe are regular Republican operatives, some of them from out-of-state. And not all of them seem to be taking the Libertarian Party seriously.

Which kind of explains the Tweet that one of those staffers sent out on Miller’s Twitter account:

“What’s the difference between selling out your party’s values and the oldest profession?”

Now, if that got spun as a dig at Murkowski, there would have been public-relations hell to pay, so the follow-up Tweet from Miller depicted it as being aimed at the Alaska LP:

“Please accept my apologies. Staffer trying to encourage Libertarians not to sell out.”

Good news: The LP people in Alaska have a sense of humor: “We don’t view prostitution as necessarily being a bad thing,” one Libertarian said. They understand and are not holding that one against Miller.

Bad news: This embarrassing incident is just one example of how the Miller campaign staff is badly misplaying their opportunity with the LP.

If Team Joe wants to “encourage Libertarians not to sell out,” they could try this simple and direct solution: Have either the candidate or his campaign manager make a phone call to Alaska LP chairman Scott Kohlhaas and arrange to meet for a cup of coffee.

It would be that simple, but that hasn’t happened yet.

Remember, first thing Wednesday morning — as soon as it became clear Murkowski had come up 1,668 votes short in the primary — Halcro called Kohlhaas to open negotiations, and Halcro is in direct communication with Murkowski.

All it would take to end this talk of Lisa the Loser becoming America’s Least Plausible Libertarian is for Alaska LP officials to say, “No deal.”

But — you knew there was a “but” coming, didn’t you? — the LP people aren’t going to make that kind of statement if Team Joe doesn’t show them some respect. So we’ve got something of a Mexican standoff that seems to be caused by a belief among key people at Miller HQ that it would be beneath the dignity of a Republican Senate nominee to reach out directly to those wacko Libertarians.

That’s discouraging, but now some good news: I’m informed that Sarah Palin has taken notice of the situation — she’s in Hershey, Pa., for a speech tonight, prior to her appearance Saturday at the Beck rally in D.C. — and is aware that LP Senate nominee is a fan. Don’t underestimate Mama Grizzly’s savvy.

More good news: Despite what Erick Erickson’s sources told him about Team Murky offering a “sizeable chunk” of Lisa the Loser’s million-dollar campaign account in exchange for the Libertarian Senate nomination, the LP people say they haven’t gotten one red cent from her, nor has anyone made a firm offer to the LP. No money has exchanged hands and no deal has been struck.

Meanwhile, Kohlhaas and other LP officials are being indundated by phone calls from Alaska and national media, but on-the-record public statements from Libertarians remain noncommital.

Call the LP whores if you wish, but they certainly aren’t stupid whores.

UPDATE: Just got off the phone with Alaska LP vice chairman Harley Brown who said, “More than likely — 99 percent — there’s no way Murkowski is going to be our nominee. I don’t see that happening, honestly.”

Furthermore, Brown dismissed as “completely ludicrous” any report that the Alaska LP has accepted or agreed to accept money from the Murkowski campaign. “That’s just somebody running their mouth . . . just a rumor,” Brown said.

Brown is an advocate for the legalization of marijuana, and said his original motivation for joining the Libertarian Party was former Gov. Frank Murkowski’s strong anti-drug policy.

Brown says the LP is willing to meet with Murkowski — it would be “rude” to reject such an offer, he said — and he is “flattered” that the Libertarian Party spot on the ballot is suddenly so coveted. He and other LP activists “worked our butts off” to get enough petition signatures to keep from getting “kicked off the ballot,” he said.

The attention national and statewide media are now giving the LP is “great publicity,” Brown said, and the Libertarians hope it will help their party.

Just a crazy idea: If Joe Miller’s supporters were to contribute to the Alaska LP — hit their tip jar, as it were — that might be an effective way to send a “No Murkowski” message.

UPDATE II: I’d promised to say more about that $678 repair bill, and have now kept my promise.

EXCLUSIVE: Murkowski’s Libertarian Effort Is Led by Longtime Palin Enemy

Early Wednesday morning, Alaska Libertarian Party chairman Scott Kohlhaas got a call from ex-Republican Andrew Halcro, asking if Kohlhaas would be open to having Sen. Lisa Murkowski replace Dave Haase as the LP’s Senate candidate.

Such a switch would be the only option for Murkowksi to be on the Nov. 2 ballot, should she and the National Republican Senatorial Committee fail in their effort to overturn conservative challenger Joe Miller’s 1,668-vote victory in Tuesday’s primary.

A former Republican state legislator, Halcro has disavowed any “official” connection to the Murkowski campaign, but a source in Anchorage says Halcro has masterminded the effort to secure the LP nomination for the incumbent Republican senator as a fallback option, should Miller’s victory hold up. And Halcro acknowledged to an Anchorage Daily News reporter that he is in direct communication with Murkowski.

Major national media have quoted Halcro without noting that, after Sarah Palin won the GOP gubernatorial nomination in 2006, Halcro launched a third-party vengeance campaign focused on attcking Palin. He finished with 9% of the vote, and subsequently launched a blog which made him a “folk hero” to Palin’s enemies, according to an Anchorage Daily News article published in August 2008 — just two weeks before Palin was picked as the GOP vice-presidential nominee.

The New York Times extensively quoted Halcro in a story Wednesday without detailing his anti-Palin animus:

“The Murkowski campaign just did not attack, and these guys are bullies,” said Andrew Halcro, a former state lawmaker and candidate for governor who is now a political consultant. “The Tea Party people are bullies. From his introductory spot to all of the Tea Party spots, they were all scorched earth.”
Mr. Halcro, who supported Ms. Murkowski but did not work on her campaign, said he was aware that Ms. Murkowski’s advisers had debated how to respond.
“At the end of the day it was we weren’t going to give credence to his message by responding,” Mr. Halcro said. “But when somebody’s whacking away at your kneecaps consistently for weeks, you’re going to start to wobble.”

Halcro is now reported to be teaming up with Anchorage pollster David Dittman to conduct a poll testing how Murkowski would fare as a Libertarian candidate.

Erick Erickson of Red State wrote this morning that Murkowski has offered the LP “a sizeable chunk” of her more than $1 million in campaign cash in return for the Libertarian nomination. My source in Anchorage says the Miller team has had no direct contact with Libertarian Party officials, although many grassroots supporters of Miller have spoken to Kohlhaas and Haase.

UPDATE: Dan Riehl has two long reports today about the Alaska situation:

I’ll have more in a little while, but first I have to change out of my pajamas, go buy some smokes and get some more coffee. Remember, I’m still rattling the tip-jar for next week’s planned Alaska trip.

UPDATE II: Vodkapundit on GOP tactics: “It’s almost as if they’re trying to lose.” The sad thing is, why do the worst people always seem to have the Big Money on their side? One of the commenters who lives in Alaska describes Palin-hater Halcro as “a smarmy little richboy scumsucking RINO” and another calls our attention to this photo of the PDS sufferer:

Pathetic looking, isn’t he? Instapundit had a roundup of Alaska Senate news this morning and didn’t link here, but did link our friend Sissy Willis, who also has a roundup. The other day, Rush Limbaugh had an excellent rant about Murkowski as a “Ruling Class RINO.”

UPDATE III: Ace is in fine foaming fury over the NRSC’s intervention. BTW, I don’t know Erick Erickson’s sources are, but he’s gone much further than I have in stating definitively that Team Murkowski has offered to buy the LP Senate nomination. I’ve hinted in that direction, but I don’t know for a fact that such an offer has been made. Anchorage seems to be a political Peyton Place filled with two-bit Machiavellis, doesn’t it?

EXCLUSIVE: Alaska LP Senate Candidate Dave Haase Is ‘Huge Sarah Palin Fan’

Libertarian Party sources in Anchorage say they’ve been deluged with phone calls today from media and “political types” asking about the LP line on the ballot, which is Lisa Murkowski’s only hope to remain in the Senate unless her NRSC lawyer can find a way to steal the GOP nomination from Joe Miller.

Murkowski’s supporters “want us to keep an open mind and not say ‘no’ immediately” to their suggestion that LP Senate nominee Dave Haase step aside and let the incumbent Republican senator run as the Libertarian candidate on the Nov. 2 ballot.

In an e-mail Thursday to Ace of Spades HQ contributor Drew M., Haase praised Murkowski as a “smart lady” and said he had voted for her in the GOP primary.

However, the person who might be most able to sway Haase’s decision is none other than Sarah Palin.

“He’s a huge Sarah Palin fan,” the source in Anchorage said of Haase. The idea that the LP candidate admires both Murkowski and Palin — who are bitter political rivals — might “seem kinda weird,” the source said, but Haase is “a unique individual” who is “open to anybody who is open to his message.” Haase advocates the abolition of both the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Reserve.

Would it make a difference if Palin herself were to contact Alaska Libertarian Party officials directly? The source said such a call “would likely make a difference.” With the LP suddenly in the middle of the nation’s biggest election battle, one call from “Mama Grizzly” might prove decisive.

Palin has a long-standing friendship with Alaska’s Libertarians. In 2005 and 2006, the source said, the future governor attended two LP meetings at the Denny’s restaurant in Anchorage as a guest speaker. During the last few weeks of the 2006 election, the leadership of the Alaska LP endorsed Palin for governor.

UPDATE: You’ll notice some snarky know-it-all in the comments quoting two-day-old reporting about the Alaska LP. The actual situation behind the scenes is complicated, chaotic and subject to change. While rounding up the Miller-Murkowski news at The American Spectator this morning, I came across this:

Meanwhile, Alaska Libertarian chairman Scott Kohlhass told KTUU in Anchorage that if Haase were to step aside as the party’s candidate, the choice of Haase’s replacement would be up to the LP executive committee.

Get it? Although it’s Haase’s decision whether or not to step aside, the choice of Haase’s replacement in such a scenario would be made by the executive committee, of which Kohlhaas is a member. I’d be remiss if I failed to point out that (a) Libertarians are firm believers in free-market capitalism, and (b) at last count, the Murkowski campaign had $1.8 million cash on hand.

Like I said, this is complicated.

BTW, thanks to everyone who has hit the tip jar so far to help send me up to Alaska. It’s past 3 a.m., and I’m too tired to give you a rundown on prospective travel plans and thank everyone individually at this point, but we’re definitely getting there. Mrs. Other McCain talked to me Thursday evening about the family budget. Just keep it coming, y’all.

Liberal Women Try ‘Mama Grizzly’ Shtick: ‘You Know What Threatens Me? My Daughter Not Having the Right to Choose’

From the pro-abortion group Emily’s List, which presumes to answer Sarah Palin:

Ace does the “Top Ten Reasons” this video doesn’t work, but I stopped cold at the woman expressing adamant support for her daughter’s “right to choose.”

Isn’t that kind of creepy? Basically, you’re saying that the abortion of your own grandchild is such a grand idea as to assume paramount importance in your political worldview.

Yeah, I know: She’s talking about the “right to choose,” but the abstract right to abortion can’t be separated from the concrete reality of abortion, and that reality is a gruesome, blood-chilling thing to consider. Philosophical theorizing about “rights” can’t elude that reality. And neither can bear costumes.

BREAKING: Handel Concedes; Nathan Deal Wins Ga. GOP Gubernatorial Runoff

A recount seemed certain last night, but now Karen Handel has called it quits, as Aaron Sheinin reports from Atlanta:

Yesterday, Karen Handel called Nathan Deal a “corrupt relic of Washington.” Today, however, Handel said she is endorsing him as the GOP nominee for governor.
In a statement just released from the Handel campaign, she said she called Deal this morning to concede the nomination.The November ballot is now set. Deal will represent the GOP and face Democrat Roy Barnes and Libertarian John Monds.
Deal spokesman Brian Robinson said that U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga., coordinated the phone call between Handel and Deal.

Good news, then, that Republicans have united to help save my native state from a return of Retread Roy Barnes. And thanks to Orit Sklar for giving me the heads-up last week.

NATHAN DEAL for GEORGIA GOVERNOR

UPDATE: Let me hasten to add that Libertarian gubernatorial candidate John Monds is a friend of mine and a great guy. In 2008, John and I were part of a 2,800-mile round-trip in a 15-passenger van full of “smelly libertarians” for the Libertarian Party national convention in Denver. Tom Knapp was also aboard for that trip.

We know that Sarah Palin endorsed Handel, who lost the GOP primary to Deal, and we know that Palin endorsed libertarian-leaning Rand Paul in Kentucky. If Palin really wanted to “go rogue” in Georgia, she could endorse John Monds on the Libertarian ticket — which would be a real game-changer.

Yeah, a Palin endorsement of the Libertarian candidate here would be a guaranteed nightmare for both Democrats and Republicans in Georgia. It’s extremely unlikely, of course, but I’m throwing the idea out there, just in case Team Sarah wants to try stirring up some serious “you betcha” mischief.

UPDATE II: Allahpundit might have once changed planes at Hartsfield Airport.

World’s Most Dubious Storybook Romance Turns Out to Be Fiction

C’mon, did you really buy into the Bristol Palin-Levi Johnston reunion? Ricky Hollywood is far too deeply in love with himself to permit anyone else to intrude.

In fact, as a pathological narcissist, Levi is incapable of recognizing other people as fully human. They are merely objects which have no purpose for existence other than as means of his own gratification.

Oh, Joy! Guess What the Journolisters Had to Say About Sarah Palin?

Jonathan Strong is back with more delightful disclosures of progressive groupthink:

In the hours after Sen. John McCain announced his choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his running mate in the last presidential race, members of an online forum called Journolist struggled to make sense of the pick. . . .
The tone was more campaign headquarters than newsroom.
The conversation began with a debate over how best to attack Sarah Palin. “Honestly, this pick reeks of desperation,” wrote Michael Cohen of the New America Foundation in the minutes after the news became public. “How can anyone logically argue that Sarah Pallin [sic], a one-term governor of Alaska, is qualified to be President of the United States? Train wreck, thy name is Sarah Pallin.” . . .
“What a joke,” added Jeffrey Toobin of the New Yorker. “I always thought that some part of McCain doesn’t want to be president, and this choice proves my point. Welcome back, Admiral Stockdale.” . . .

(For younger readers, that’s a reference to third-party candidate Ross Perot’s not-ready-for-prime-time running mate in 1992.)

Ryan Donmoyer, a reporter for Bloomberg News who was covering the campaign, sent a quick thought that Palin’s choice not to have an abortion when she unexpectedly became pregnant at age 44 would likely boost her image because it was a heartwarming story.
“Her decision to keep the Down’s baby is going to be a hugely emotional story that appeals to a vast swath of America, I think,” Donmoyer wrote.
Politico reporter Ben Adler, now an editor at Newsweek, replied, “but doesn’t leaving sad baby without its mother while she campaigns weaken that family values argument? Or will everyone be too afraid to make that point?” . . .

(Paging Dr. Andrew Sullivan, OB-GYN!)

Time’s Joe Klein then linked to his own piece, parts of which he acknowledged [in his message to the list] came from strategy sessions on Journolist. “Here’s my attempt to incorporate the accumulated wisdom of this august list-serve community,” he wrote. And indeed Klein’s article contained arguments developed by his fellow Journolisters.

You can read the whole thing. It has been pointed out that most of the people participating in Journolist were not straight-news reporters. Toobin and Klein are pundits easily recognized as purveyors of liberal arguments. So in a way this is kind of like what might happen if some liberal got hold of Bill Kristol’s e-mail caches from 2002 and tried to portray that as evidence of a Zionist neocon Fox News warmonger conspiracy — “Protocols of the Learned Elders of PNAC.”

Nevertheless, the Daily Caller’s Journolist revelations are valid evidence that the synchronicity of liberal media messaging during the 2008 campaign was not altogether coincidental.

UPDATE: Best Headline of the Day:

Salon Editor-in-Chief Accuses
Conservatives of Distorting Facts, Then
Has to Apologize for Distorting Facts

That shows classic Ace of Spades HQ influence. Not as good as this headline, but still very good. More relevant to Journolist, Ace gets in a couple of shots at Dave Weigel:

When Dave (“Who?”) Weigel wanted to bash conservatives about Palin, he asked why we were freaking out over Joe McGinnis invading her privacy, because “any journalist” would jump at that chance.
See, that’s the problem Dave: No they wouldn’t. How do I know this? Because they haven’t. Bill Clinton’s a big, important figure to write biographies about; how come no one’s renting the apartment across the street from his wink-wink “executive offices” in Harlem and peeking at him to see who visits him?
Same with Hillary. There are a lot of interesting subjects who’d sell a lot of biographies — and for all of them, the lurid promise of exxxtra special access!!! Spy footage!!! would sell even more copies.
So why, Dave, if this is something “all journalists” would jump to do, do they not… actually… do… it?
It’s because you’re wrong. Not “all journalists” would do this about their subjects. Not because they don’t want to sell more books. But because the peer disapproval from their like-minded liberal colleagues discourages them from spying on Hillary Clinton.
And they do it to Palin because none of them care if Palin’s privacy is invaded; in fact, they applaud it. Because she is “The Other.” She is inhuman — and you can treat her worse than an animal.

What Ace is saying — and you should definitely read the whole thing, because I’m hoping for the Ace-o-Lanche here and don’t want to be accused of not throwing the maximum traffic his way — is that there is a partisan double-standard in coverage. That is, in itself, neither new nor shocking. But reporters aren’t forced to confront their own biases because except for The Other (i.e., someone who can be automatically dismissed as a down-the-line Fox News/GOP shill) no one will call bullshit on them.

If all politicians with an “R” beside their names are presumed to be fundamentally illegitimate and unworthy of high office,  that premise supports a syllogism with certain conclusions, including:

  • Covering the 2008 Democratic presidential primary campaign with the idea of helping the candidate who seemed most able to defeat the Republican in November.
  • Covering the 2008 Republican presidential primary campaign with the idea of helping the candidate who seemed easiest for Democrats to defeat in November.
  • Covering the anti-Palin accusations of ax-grinding Alaska gadfly bloggers (Dennis Zaki, Jesse Griffin, et al.) as if they were legitimate news stories, while attempting to shut down coverage of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
  • Treating the motives of Tea Party activists with an attitude of hostility and suspicion not applied to, inter alia, SEIU.

Again, I say, such behaviors are logical consequences of the premise that the Republican Party is inherently illegitimate. If you are a young liberal whose formative political experiences were the Lewinsky scandal, the 2000 Florida recount, the 2004 “Swift Boat” campaign, etc., then it may be very easy for you to buy into the belief that Matt Drudge, Rush Limbaugh and Roger Ailes — the “Right-Wing Noise Machine” — are the only reason Democrats lose elections. And because you don’t ever want those nasty Republicans in charge again, you consider it a matter of humanitarian philanthropy to move heaven and earth to stop Fox News and other conservative voices from influencing the mainstream media narrative.

Thus, the young Journolisters refuse to recognize any basic wrong in their efforts, because to undertake such a reappraisal might lead them to reconsider the validity of their political worldview.

What Ace calls the “Otherization” of conservatives is basic to liberal belief. Remember, I was an ethusiastic partisan Democrat who never questioned that affiliation until I was well into my 30s. Given this personal background, I want to believe that it is possible to change hearts and minds, to persuade Ezra Klein and his smart young friends to re-evaluate their political commitments.

And if they choose instead to remain loyal liberals, then we should emulate Ronald Reagan — another ex-Democrat — in saying that the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they need their heads smashed through a plate-glass window.

Uh, your mileage may vary.

UPDATE II: From the comments, on the “distinction without a difference” between pundits and reporters, which is not fully perceived by many TV viewers:

When Jeffrey Toobin is pontificating on CNN (when he’s not cheating on his wife), my elderly family members view him as another straight news reporter.

Or, at least, as a political analyst, rather than as a partisan hack. And this is an important point about television as a medium. I’ve remarked that the best spokesman the Obama campaign had in 2008 was the Allstate Man. If you don’t get that point, you should read Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death.

Meanwhile, Jimmie Bise takes a snapshot of the bleeding mess that is Journolist, and I remind people that “smart” is not a partisan affiliation.

Incentivizing the Anti-Palin Slime

Chris Bodenner at The Atlantic Monthly:

The link is to Jesse Griffin of the Immoral Minority blog, who perpetrated the Palin divorce hoax of August 2009, and who was forced to resign as a kindergarten aide at an Anchorage elementary school after his porn-blogging habits were exposed.

Griffin, Dennis Zaki, Jeanne Devon — when it comes to sliming the Palins, the Atlantic Monthly has no discernible journalistic standards. Any “source” is acceptable, so long as the source is anti-Palin.

UPDATE: Hmmmm.