The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Does That Mean That BHO’s Actual Birth Certificate Was An Attachment?

Posted on | June 20, 2014 | 32 Comments

by Smitty

For a warmup, via Insty, we have Paul Ryan skewering the smarmy IRS commissioner John Koskinen:
JK is all: “Yeah, yeah, we all know I’m bullet-proof. Get your piece and make room in line and for the next guy. Imma have a second bourbon after this for you, Ryan.”

The kicker is the Joe Crowley chaser (via Breitbart) where he tries to link anyone not buying the IRS line to those who think Obama was born in Kenya:

“Like those who continue to refuse to believe the birth certificate from the state of Hawaii is actually real, conspiracy theorists will continue to rattle sabers,” Crowley said. “But really dose anyone in this room want to be seen in that light.”

Now that the IRS is up to seven (7) [VII] hard drives full of email for employees connected with the case mysteriously deciding to imitate Obamas foreign policy at the same time, anyone stupid enough not to suspect some amount of conspiracy afoot is probably stupid enough to think Sarah Silverman is a nun. New York, go ahead and send Lady Gaga to Congress in place of Crowley. If our Congress is to be a joke, might as well toss in a little song & dance.


And no, this post is not an endorsement of Birtherism. The title is pure sarcasm directed at Crowley. Obama was a dope smoking twerp who grew up in Hawaii, and the IRS is, IMO, guilty of any accusation anyone cares to hurl, until they quit jacking about and deliver the evidence.

Category: Democrats, Scandal

Brett Kimberlin Annoys a Judge

Posted on | June 20, 2014 | 22 Comments

It’s been weeks since I’ve paid any attention to Brett Kimberlin’s ridiculous federal lawsuit, the one that my co-defendant John Hoge has described as Kimberlin v. the Universe, et al. The reason for this long silence is that there just hasn’t been any real news in the case. Judge Grimm issued a letter order that put a lid on the extraordinary number of filings made in the case, and the defendants are basically now waiting to learn (a) if Kimberlin’s motion to amend his complaint will be accepted or (b) whether the various motions to dismiss and objections to the amended complaint have sufficed to show that (c) the amended motion is futile and (d) the entire lawsuit should be dismissed. Meanwhile, the case has been handed over to a new judge, George J. Hazel, who has this week received two letters from the Perjuring Pro Se Pipsqueak.

The first letter asks for more time to effect service on several defendants, including Ali Akbar and Breitbart.com, despite the fact that Kimberlin was already granted an additional 60 days on April 28. Now, having failed to effect service for more than six weeks — and with just days remaining until the June 28 deadline — Kimberlin wants to move the goal posts, asking that the court ignore his failure. Instead, Kimberlin wants the court first to rule on his motion to amend and then extend the deadline 60 days past that ruling.

Some of my fellow defendants (or their lawyers) are sure to point out what’s wrong with this: If the court denies the motion to amend — as I hope and expect they will — the suit would then be ripe for dismissal, except for the fact that not all the defendants have been served, some eight months after Kimberlin first filed his complaint. That would be extended to at least 10 months if Kimberlin were granted the delay he now seeks. Those defendants who have already responded to Kimberlin’s suit (including those who have spent money to hire lawyers) can very well argue that such a delay would be unfair to them, leaving them in limbo because of Kimberlin’s failures.

Of course, if the court should grant Kimberlin’s motion to amend, this would re-start the clock for everybody — but I honestly don’t think that’s going to happen, because the arguments made in opposition to the amendment were very strong. Kimberlin’s original suit is so badly flawed, as a matter of law, that it’s a slam-dunk for dismissal, and his proposed amended complaint did not substantially improve the suit, while adding numerous new errors in the process. When these problems were pointed out by the defendants in their opposition motions, Kimberlin’s response was just a lot of arm-waving and a repetition of his claims that the defendants are Very Bad People Who Do Very Bad Things.

Kimberlin’s second letter to Judge Hazel is simply absurd: He invokes the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling rejecting the defendant’s appeal in the case of United States v. Osinger. The irrelevance of this to Kimberlin’s case is obvious to anyone.

Here is a brief summary of Osinger’s crime:

Osinger was prosecuted for cyberstalking under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. Among the things he did was create a phony Facebook page for his ex-girlfriend and post grossly inappropriate photos. He sent emails to her boss, co-workers and family members about it. And not to be subtle, he sent her about 40 texts over two days to let her know how he was going to destroy her life.

This was a crime, not a civil tort. Neither I nor any of the 20 other defendants in Kimberlin’s suit have violated 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. None of us have been arrested or indicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2261A or any other federal criminal statute, and no one is investigating us for such a crime. In writing to Judge Hazel, however, Kimberlin says he alleges that the defendants in his suit have “engaged in . . . criminal conduct that is not protected by the First Amendment.”

And the point is . . . what?

Anybody can allege anything, but the federal government has not appointed Brett Kimberlin to prosecute criminals, and his claims that he has been a victim of felonies by the defendants reminds me of nothing so much as it does an old episode of The Andy Griffith Show in which Gomer Pyle runs around shouting “citizens arrest.”

The law doesn’t work that way. If Brett Kimberlin has been the victim of felonies perpetrated by the defendants — who include Erick Erickson, Michelle Malkin and Glenn Beck, among others — where are the indictments? Why isn’t the FBI slapping the cuffs on these alleged Very Bad People Who Do Very Bad Things?

Answer: Because Brett Kimberlin is full of crap.

Is it a federal crime to call somebody “full of crap”? I’m not a lawyer, so I don’t know. Maybe you should hit my tip jar, just in case.





 

Category: The Kimberlin Files

Obama’s Jihad-Loving DHS Adviser

Posted on | June 20, 2014 | 23 Comments

Add @MohamedElibiary to the list of Obama administration scandals that the Democrat-Media Complex expect us to ignore. Ace of Spades was all over this story last night: “By the way, this ‘senior fellow’ at DHS is a Muslim Brotherhood booster. He called Mohammad Morsi, the now-deposed Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt, Egypt’s Nelson Mandela.” But al-Qaeda just captured Saddam’s old chemical weapons plant in Iraq, so there’s nothing to worry about.

 

Category: Barack Obama, Iraq, Islam, Terrorism

The Media’s President

Posted on | June 20, 2014 | 44 Comments

“Obama: Anatomy of a World Leader,” by Alex Gray (detail)

Da Tech Guy makes the obvious point: The reason the media aren’t going after the IRS scandal is because Barack Obama is their president. Not since JFK’s fictitious “Camelot” have the media invested so heavily in maintaining the image of a president, an image of competence and success that can be maintained only by ignoring all contrary evidence and pretending that all criticism of Obama is racist — RAAAAACIST!

This is more than just “liberal bias,” it’s outright dishonesty, made easier by the blind partisan hatred of Republicans that has become prevalent among journalists since the Bush era. Reporters and editors were convinced (and remain convinced) that George W. Bush (a) “stole” the 2000 election, and (b) lied about the Iraq war, which all Democrats believe was fought for bad motives — and Democrats outnumber Republicans in the press corps by a factor of at least 5-to-1.

Even if you set aside the usual liberal prejudices about Republicans — that they are greedy, hateful, sexist, racist homophobes who destroy the environment for profit — the Iraq war confirmed in the minds of the press corps what they already believed, that Republicans are dishonest warmongers. Thus, the media believe, it is not only a professional obligation but also a matter of civic duty that journalists do all they can to ensure no Republican is ever elected president again.

Among the multitudinous ramifications of this belief system is the despicable prejudice of James Fallows, a Democrat Party hack of the most shameless sort: “James Fallows of The Atlantic and Media Matters are on a crusade to silence Republicans from ever appearing or have their voices heard in the Media.” Joe Fein was trying to call attention to this problem on Twitter a few days ago, but Joe was so angry about it he couldn’t make his point clearly. I understand: The mere thought of James Fallows should make any honest man angry.

When I was in Mississippi to cover the GOP primary a couple weeks ago, I sat next to Molly Ball of the Atlantic. The association between Fallows and the Atlantic came to mind and I went off on a rant about that despicable fraud. Molly responded by assuring me that James Fallows is a very nice person and, alas, I didn’t have the presence of mind to invoke The Banality of Evil. Of course, the press corps is nowadays so crammed full of despicable frauds that it is perhaps unfair to single out Fallows, except that he has been practicing this fraudulence for so  many years and is in some sense typical of Our Moral Superiors™ — the elite-educated fools whose contempt for the common sense of ordinary Americans is so dangerous because it is entirely unconscious.

Whenever I think of James Fallows, I immediately think of The Vision of the Anointed, a book no liberal has ever read, because if they ever read it, they wouldn’t be liberals anymore. But I digress . . .

The decline of Obama’s approval ratings must disturb Fallows and his comrades among Our Moral Superiors™ — how can the American people be so ungrateful for the presidency that the media have so diligently sold them? Of course, Fallows could answer the question easily, by referencing his belief that the American people are profoundly stupid.

And if all other explanations fail: RAAAAACISM!

 

Category: Barack Obama, Democrats, Media Bias

LIVE AT FIVE: 06.20.14

Posted on | June 20, 2014 | 5 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
Under Pressure: Iraq PM Maliki Faces Both Political, Military Threats

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki

Shiite rivals seek to oust him, ISIS jihadis want his head on a stick

Prosecutors Claim Wisconsin Gov. Walker Part Of Criminal Scheme
Yet, no charges filed against Walker or his staff

Rebels Beg Russia For Help As Ukraine Fighting Rages
Ukrainian forces apparently making progress in isolating Slovyansk



POLITICS
California Rep McCarthy Elected House Majority Leader

New Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy

Tea Party and southern factions shut out of leadership again


John Hickenlooper’s No Good, Somewhat Awkward, Very Bad Day



Administration To Announce More Benefits For Same-Sex Couples

State Department Bars Ugandan Officials For Gay Rights Abuses

House Votes To Sever Funding For NSA Surveillance

Court Overturns LA Ordinance That Prohibits Living In Cars

Supremes Narrowly Limit Business Method Software Patents

Report Claims IRS “Recycled” Lerner’s Hard Drive



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Edges Higher: NYMEX $106.69, Brent $114.91
Shire Tops Flat Euro Shares On Bid Hopes
S&P 500 Ends At Record High As Fed Optimism Lingers
Oracle Sales, Profit Miss Estimates Amid Cloud Transition
Red China Stocks Fall, Heading For Biggest Weekly Loss In Two Months
Wheat Set For First Gain In Six Weeks As Rain Expected To Delay Harvest
Electric Motorcycle Could Jolt Harley-Davidson Shares
Test A Personal Drone Detection System For $500
New, Cheaper iMac Looks Like DIY Nightmare
T-MObile Partners With Rhapsody For UnMusic Radio Service
FCC Fines Phone-Jammer Vendor $34.9 Million



SPORTS
Kiermayer’s Two-Run Dinger Lifts Rays To Victory

Kevin Kiermayer goes yard right before Evan Longoria also bashes a homer

Archer gets 8 K’s in 5-0 shutout

Miami’s Heaney Loses Debut To Mets’ Wheeler

Kazmir Shuts Down Red Sox, A’s Win Again

Ole Miss Knocks Out TCU, Gets CWS Rematch With Virginia


Mauer Carries Twins Past White Sox, 4-2

Howard Has 3 RBI’s As Phillies Extend Streak To Four

Padres Score Four In Seventh To Beat M’s

Gallardo Dominant As Brewers Down Snakes

Black Caps Push Second Test Against West Indies To Fifth Day: 257 For 8 At Stumps

Gavin Floyd Breaks Elbow, Braves Beat Nats 3-0 Anyway



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Kelly Rowland Debuts Bare Baby Bump In Cute Yoga Picture

Pretty good shape for a pregnant lady.

Doing boxing and yoga to stay in shape

Box Office Preview: “Jersey Boys” Tanking, “Think Like A Man Too” Topping

The Unspeakable Armenian Discusses Her Priorities

Lady Gaga Scraps Rape-y Video

“Unauthorized Saved By The Bell” TV Movie Heads For Lifetime

Did Justin Bieber Get TWO Women Pregnant?

Kat Von D Death Threats

AMC Picks Up Second Season Of “Better Call Saul”

Zachary Quinto To Guest Star On “Girls”

Ed Sheeran Denies Dating Taylor Swift, Reveals Ten-Year Plan

Marvel Setting Jon Spaihts To Script “Doctor Strange”

Will Rumer Willis Join Sister Scout’s Topless Protest?



FOREIGNERS
Russian State Media Reports 10,000 Refugees From Ukraine Living In Rostov Region
UN Report Says Global Refugee Count Highest Since WWII
Australian Troops Head For Baghdad To Guard Embassy
Felipe VI Sworn In As King Of Spain
Car Bomb In Central Syria Kills 34
Ten Die In Bulgaria Flooding
Burma President Sacks Rakhine State’s Chief Minister, Also Religious Affairs Minister
Pakistan Army Kills 232 Jihadis, Destroys 20 Hideouts
Kurds Emerge As Big Winners From Iraq’s Chaos
Indian Media Highlighting Court’s Remarks On Rape: “A Failure Of Live-In Relationships”



BLOGS & STUFF
Michelle Malkin: Fed-Up Vet Blasts VA’s “Lie, Delay, Deny” Abyss
Twitchy: “Monster Hunter” Author Larry Correia Targeted For Deviating From “Rape Culture” Orthodoxy
American Power: Grim Overcrowding, Filthy Conditions At Illegal Alien Detention Centers In Arizona, Texas
American Thinker: Iraq And The Bloody Price Of Lies
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – The Hydra Protocol
Conservatives4Palin: Send Reinforcements To The Good Guys – #MSSen And #OKSen
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, June 19 and June 20
Jammie Wearing Fools: Bitter Hack Peter King Still Whining About Ted Cruz
Joe For America: Sheriff Joe Doesn’t Take Any BS
Pat Dollard: Seattle Man Faces Six Years In Prison For Trying To Keep Republicans From Voting In 2012
Protein Wisdom: Hayek And You
Shot In The Dark: PRSure
The Jawa Report: Newport NC Store Clerk Loves ISIS
The Lonely Conservative: Illegal Aliens Pouring Across The Border Are Bringing Diseases
This Ain’t Hell: Kyle Carpenter Receives Medal Of Honor
Weasel Zippers: Government Advertised In January For “Escorts” For 65,000 Illegal Alien Children To Be “Resettled”
Megan McArdle: An IRS Conspiracy? Not Likely…Yet


Shop Amazon – Celebrate 4th of July

Category: Live at Five

Democrat 2016 Hopeful Schweitzer Implodes After ‘Gaydar’ Comment

Posted on | June 19, 2014 | 35 Comments

If you were betting on former Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer as a 2016 Democrat presidential dark horse, you just lost. Out of a clear blue sky, in a total non sequitur, Schweitzer decided to gay-bait a Republican — and every man in the South while he was at it:

Last week, I called him on the night Majority Leader Eric Cantor was defeated in his GOP primary. “Don’t hold this against me, but I’m going to blurt it out. How do I say this . . . men in the South, they are a little effeminate,” he offered when I mentioned the stunning news. When I asked him what he meant, he added, “They just have effeminate mannerisms. If you were just a regular person, you turned on the TV, and you saw Eric Cantor talking, I would say — and I’m fine with gay people, that’s all right — but my gaydar is 60-70 percent. But he’s not, I think, so I don’t know. Again, I couldn’t care less. I’m accepting.”

Ed Morrissey points out that Cantor and his wife have been married for 25 years and have three children. As if he hadn’t damaged himself enough by gay-baiting Cantor, however, Schweitzer also decided to call Dianne Feinstein a whore, more or less.

So . . . Martin O’Malley, anyone?

 

Category: Democrats

‘The First Time She Molested Me, I Was Three. The Last Time, I Was Twelve’

Posted on | June 19, 2014 | 56 Comments

Moira Greyland is the daughter of famed novelist Marion Zimmer Bradley, who died in 1999. Greyland’s father — Bradley’s second husband, Walter Breen — was accused of sexually molesting a 12-year-old boy in 1989, ten years after he separated from Bradley, who was accused of covering up her for husband’s pedophile activities. Bradley’s own tendencies toward lesbianism have been noted, but now Moira Greyland has claimed that she was molested by her mother:

The first time she molested me, I was three. The last time, I was twelve, and able to walk away. I put Walter in jail for molesting one boy. I had tried to intervene when I was 13 by telling Mother and Lisa [Waters, Bradley’s personal secretary and reputed lesbian lover], and they just moved him into his own apartment. I had been living partially on couches since I was ten years old because of the out of control drugs, orgies, and constant flow of people in and out of our family ‘home.’ None of this should be news. Walter was a serial rapist with many, many, many victims (I named 22 to the cops) but Marion was far, far worse. She was cruel and violent, as well as completely out of her mind sexually. I am not her only victim, nor were her only victims girls.

Paul St. John Mackintosh discusses the case at TeleRead. Greyland was born in the mid-1960s and, if her parents were part of an “out of control” scene that included drugs and orgies in the 1970s, this would have made them part of the radical counterculture. And what do we know about the content of Bradley’s fiction?

An undercurrent of feminism runs throughout the Darkover series. Bradley frequently examines sex roles and the limitations they place on the individual. . . . Critics have praised Bradley’s ability to incorporate feminist and utopian ideals into the harsh realism of Darkover without diminishing the credibility of the characters or their society.
Bradley’s feminist interests are also evident in . . . The Mists of Avalon (1982). This novel, which retells the Arthurian legend from the viewpoint of the women involved, has received considerable critical attention.

Furthermore, we know that Bradley wrote lesbian pulp fiction under pseudonyms, including I Am a Lesbian (as Lee Chapman, 1962) and The Strange Women (as Miriam Gardner, 1967).

Marion Zimmer Bradley (left) wrote lesbian novels under pseudonyms.

What else do we know about her?

Bradley . . . professed a lifelong interest in the occult and in the early 1980s described herself as “neopagan,” explaining her faith as one that “rejects the Christian belief in man’s dominion over the earth.”
She said she also believed in clairvoyance, extrasensory perception and reincarnation . . .

This is not to say that all neopagan lesbian feminists are bad people. Just saying you can’t blame this one on the heteronormative patriarchy.

(Hat-tip: Commenter “Mm.”)

 

Category: Crime, Feminism, Gays, Sex

‘Victims Proliferate’ at Occidental: The Unfortunate Truth About Campus Rape

Posted on | June 19, 2014 | 60 Comments

“The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules or took a few liberties with our female party guests — we did.”
— Eric “Otter” Stratton, Animal House

“Colleges and universities are being educated by Washington and are finding the experience excruciating. They are learning that when they say campus victimizations are ubiquitous (‘micro-aggressions,’ often not discernible to the untutored eye, are everywhere), and that when they make victimhood a coveted status that confers privileges, victims proliferate.”
— George Will, June 6

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, which was once an important and reputable newspaper, has announced it is dropping George Will’s column because of his comments about the alleged “epidemic” of rape on college campuses. Provocative language in opinion columns is apparently something that newspapers can do without in the 21st century. Losing readers and losing money, now they have decided to lose truth, too.

George Will’s provocation — his assertion that colleges have made “victimhood a coveted status that confers privileges” — may have been unnecessarily offensive to some readers, but the truth is not always pleasant, and the question remains to be answered: Is this true? Have the attitudes prevalent within academia incentivized false accusations of rape? Perhaps more importantly, we must ask, have college administrators deprived the accused of their due process rights? This was what George Will suggested in his letter to four senators who objected to his June 6 column when he said “sexual assault is a felony that should be dealt with by the criminal justice system, and not be adjudicated by improvised campus processes.” Hear! Hear!

This problem of sexual assault accusations being treated as school disciplinary matters, rather than being investigated as criminal charges, is central to the discussion of the alleged “rape epidemic” on college campuses. And it is also central to a pending lawsuit in California:

Los Angeles County Superior Court judge refused to seal portions of a lawsuit against Occidental College on Wednesday, denying such a request from attorneys for the liberal arts school.
Lawyers for Occidental had asked Judge Luis A. Lavin to make confidential an investigative report included in a case filed by a former student who was expelled after an internal school panel found that he had sexually assaulted a classmate while both were drunk.
Attorneys for the Eagle Rock college argued that documents contained “sensitive, confidential and personal information.”

(In other words, “information” that makes Occidental College look bad.)

Attorneys for The Times and the man opposed Occidental’s request, saying that the lawsuit had been filed earlier this year and that the college had made no previous effort to seal any documents.
The judge agreed, saying: “I don’t understand why [it] is so pressing in June when it wasn’t so pressing in February.”
The Times published a story earlier this month based partially on allegations contained in the documents.

(What a novel idea: Publishing the facts!)

The nearly 180-page investigative report, conducted by an outside firm, contained interviews about the incident with witnesses and the victim. In it, the students said: Both had been drinking, she went to his room, took off her shirt while dancing, kissed him and returned to his room later for sex, asking in a text message if he had a condom. When friends stopped by the room to ask if she was OK, she told them yes.
The crux of the case was whether she was too drunk to understand what she was doing — and whether he knew or should have known of her impaired condition.

(Friends don’t let friends get that drunk.)

The suit alleges that Occidental failed to provide the male student with a fair hearing, that it didn’t follow its own sexual misconduct policy and that it did not provide sufficient evidence for the finding. The [accused] student, who was a freshman, was expelled last year after the panel found that the woman, who was also a freshman, was too incapacitated to provide consent.

So, two freshmen — both of them teenagers, too young to legally buy alcohol — get drunk. According to witnesses, whose testimony is corroborated by evidence (e.g., the girl’s text message about a condom), the girl manifested enthusiastic consent to sex with the boy. Subsequently, however, the girl claimed that the boy had taken advantage of her “incapacitated” condition and, rather than treating this as a criminal accusation, Occidental College instituted a disciplinary “sexual misconduct” proceeding against the boy, violated its own stated policy in the process, and unfairly expelled him.

Of such flimsy stuff is the campus “rape” epidemic built.

The Dead Kennedys could not be reached for comment.

Perhaps this controversy — not just the situation at Occidental College, but also the situation with feminists shrieking at George Will’s alleged insensitivity to rape victims — could be mitigated by pointing to the “is”/”ought” distinction involved.

If we look at the “ought” side of the campus sex scene, if we ask what ideally should be happening, certainly conservatives do not advocate that students should get drunk and have sex.

In terms of moral ideals, conservatives favor sobriety and chastity. However, when we consider the “is” side of the equation — the reality of student life — conservatives must acknowledge as a matter of fact that college kids do get drunk and do have sex. As an ex-Democrat, I speak with the authority of experience on this subject, and this is what I wrote in an American Spectator column last year:

The rhetoric of SlutWalk activists — “No means no!” — is obviously not directed at the lurking sociopath, the knife-wielding career criminal who pounces from ambush in darkened alleys. Rather, feminist harangues about the meaning and importance of consent are directed at otherwise law-abiding men who don’t cope appropriately with sexual rejection.
Nowhere is this problem more widely decried than at America’s colleges and universities. Date rape is an apparently common campus crime that usually involves two drunk young people, one of whom has an erect penis, and the other of whom is unable to avert what the erect penis typically does.

This is simply the fact of the matter and, however unfortunate the facts may be, if we are going to yell “rape” every time two college kids get drunk and have sex, we’re going to be yelling constantly. But the feminist Thought Police are deliberately confusing the issue, claiming that opinion columnists who use provocative language to discuss this phony “epidemic” are complicit in rape.

Absurd accusations of word-rape (“Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But George Will’s Column Raped Me”) are not going to subtract even a single rape victim from the tragic total. But the important question is this: Are we doing a disservice to rape victims when we describe as a “victim” the college freshman who gets drunk and has sex that she regrets after she sobers up the next day?

What about guys and their own regrets of drunken sex? Can’t we discuss the fact that teenage boys do things when they’re drunk that they probably wouldn’t do if they were sober? Isn’t this why we have laws against selling alcohol to teenagers? Couldn’t college administrators do a lot to reduce the frequency of these incidents by getting serious about punishing underage drinking on campus?

Where is Dean Vernon Wormer now that we really need him?

“You’re finished! No more Delta! . . . I’m going to
revoke your charter! And if you wise guys
try one more thing — one more — I’m going
to kick you out this college!
No more fun of any kind!”

It’s a sad thing when we become nostalgic for the Bad Old Days.

 

Category: Crime, Education, Feminism, Journalism, Sex
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin