‘And the War, Tragically, Continues’

Frank Rich’s latest idiotic idea is that Fox News coverage of the Ground Zero Mosque controversy has thwarted U.S. anti-insurgency efforts in Afghanistan.

No, seriously. He actually devoted 1,572 words to making that absurd argument.

This inspired Rob Long to script a scenario:

I can see it now: the flickering firelight in a dark cave somewhere on the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan; the hum of a gas-powered generator; a static-filled, snowy image on the tiny television. On the rickety table, a letter of surrender addressed to General Petraeus. A Taliban terrorist leader is about to sign the letter. His pen is poised over the paper.
And another Taliban terrorist stops him and points to the TV. “Did you see what they called us on Hannity?”

Yeah, that’s a comment on my latest Ricochet contribution, so please read the whole thing. 

Throngs of lovestruck blog groupies will thank you for it.

T-Mac On Miller

by Smitty

Thad McCotter on Dennis Miller’s radio show. Six minutes on GZM. Thoughtful, dispassionate, sprinkled with good humor. Five minutes on offense against Pelosi & crew, with a swipe against Jimmy Carter. Nothing earth shattering, but I’m a T-Mac fan, so there.

They take a question in the end, and McCotter exits by asking Miller if he’ll have a membership in Gutfeld’s new club next to the GZM.

‘The New Phonebooks Are Here!’

And I’m now “Guest Contributor” of the week over at Ricochet — one of those guest-blogging gigs that doesn’t actually involved getting paid, but . . . Well, at least I tried. Their editor, James Poulos, is a friend of mine and when Scott Immergut invited me to contribute, I replied by e-mail:

While our sideburned friend Mr. Poulos advises me to accept the invitation, two questions occur immediately to my capitalist mind:
1. Does this involve large sums of cash?
2. Does it require any real work?
Generally speaking, Item 2 depends on Item 1, but if there are other considerations involved — fawning adoration by lovesick blog groupies, possible future payment of bar tabs, etc. — please be specific.
While I’ll probably accept the invitation anyway, a bit of haggling at least helps me maintain the illusion that I’m doing something worthwhile.
The haggling didn’t result in any ironclad promises of large sums of cash, but it’s the principle of the thing. And I’m sure there’s some “fawning adoration” involved, so go check out my first Ricochet post: “Why Is Al Hunt on ‘This Week’?”

Rule 5 Sunday

by Smitty

The week in gorgeousness was dominated by Rima, who, with full political incorrectness, prefers bikinis to burkhas and non-confrontational locations for cultural reconciliation. Also politically incorrect: Jennifer Aniston, who was hoisted on her own ‘retard’. While Rule 5 does not support breaches of decorum, a consultation with Janet Jackson, a private piercing revelation, and a ridiculous euphemism like “wardrobe malfunction” or “hope and change” might buy more notoriety. Continue reading Rule 5 Sunday →

On Taking Oneself Too Seriously

by Smitty

Pat Condell, who is a stand-up comic when not ranting on YouTube, offers some safe ethnic humor:

One should view others soberly, and seek to walk humbly amongst fellow humans. Taking oneself less seriously has been quite a boon to me, particularly online, where plain text obscures as much as it communicates.

Blah, Impeach, Blah, Blah

by Smitty

iOwnTheWorld echoes a Jeffrey Kuhner editorial in the Washington Times about the need to impeach BHO:

If Republicans win back Congress in November, they should – and likely will – launch formal investigations into this criminal, scandal-ridden administration. Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has promised as much. Mr. Obama has betrayed the American people. Impeachment is the only answer. This usurper must fall.

No, really, impeachment isn’t the only answer. For example, there is a Presidential election in 2012. Unless you’re going to argue that it’s all a farce, the fix is in, and the event will be a dog’n’pony, impeachment is not ‘the only’ answer.
More to the point, as I’ve argued elsewhere, BHO is more symptom than disease. Impeaching him might bring pleasure to some. That pleasure, along with $5, will still get you a beverage at Starbucks.

  • That Federal overreach problem would still exist in any case, as the SCOTUS pries the words “general welfare” far enough apart, like some vast python, to devour the entire body politic.
  • The Federal Reserve would still be easing vast quantities of suppository into a public orifice near you.
  • The Federal bureaucracy will remain. It, along with the lobbyists, write and administer the colostomy-bag-of-tricks that today we call “legislation”. They will continue wielding the Pen of Damocles in a way that will have you begging for the Sword.

I’ll double down.
The whole impeachment meme is a variation on Alinsky Rule 12. The entry level course would use personalize the opposition, and make them an example.
An advanced usage of Rule 12, call it 12.5, could be having a polarizing figure like BHO suck the oxygen out of the room. Long before Alinsky, there was chess. In chess, controlling tempo is crucial. Controlling the news cycle is the goal here. Accepting some damage on one flank might limit damage in a more vulnerable location. Say:

  • the economy
  • existing bankrupt entitlements
  • Constitutionality of new entitlements

There might be some temptation to think that an Alinsky Rule #9 threat of impeachment is helpful. Yuck. Real adults don’t play cheezy games. If the members of the Congress won’t support Impeachment, either for reasons of partisanship or a squishy case, then just forget it. Impeachment is not the sort of thing to try: it’s a ‘not-do’ until such a hypothetical time when a ‘do’ should arrive. Consider Blago before taking the eye off the ball.  Consider that Ryan’s Roadmap is the closest thing to a recovery strategy around, and where is the buy-in?
The last decade has seen both the consolidation of power in the Executive, and a continuous assault on whoever is in the Oval Office. In a whacky retro way, restoring Federalism and separation of powers is the answer, not impeachment.  Focus on the disease, not the symptoms, people.
Impeachment should join Birtherism and Is-he-Islamic-ism in the ‘blah, blah, blah’ bin.

Scratch Gingrich in 2012: Newt Backs Out of 9/11 Rally Against Ground Zero Mosque

Stick a fork in him, he’s done:

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) will not be addressing a protest of the proposed mosque in lower Manhattan on the anniversary of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.
The organizers of the rally, Stop Islamization of America and Freedom Defense Initiative, announced Gingrich as one of the event’s confirmed speakers on the Web last weekend. . . .
[A] spokesman for Gingrich, a possible 2012 presidential candidate, told The Hill that the former leader of the House had never confirmed his appearance. Instead, one of Gingrich’s staff had agreed to send a video message from him to be shown at the Sept. 11 rally.
That has since been canceled. . . .
[The spokesman] did not comment on why Gingrich was no longer planning to send a video message to the rally . . .

Two words: Testicular atrophy.

In the space of five days, Gingrich has gone from comparing the mosque to a Nazi sign at the Holocaust Museum to quitting a protest against it.

Make an enemy of Pamela Geller? Be my guest, Newt. Nice presidential campaign you had there.

Is the GOP Heading for Heartbreak?

OK, after reading Karl’s Hot Air post, I’m starting to feel a bit embarrassed about my own grim outlook on the fall elections: Am I too pessimistic? Am I turning into Allahpundit?

Let me explain: I was at Doug Hoffman’s headquarters in Saranac Lake, N.Y., the night he came up short, and I was at Tim Burns’ headquarters in Washington, Pa., the night he came up short. So I’ve seen the agony of defeat at close range, and I know what disappointed hope looks like.

By contrast, I was in Boston for the Scott Brown victory celebration when the confetti rained down and the band played and the AOSHQ crew broke out the pudding. Miracles can happen and, if a Republican can win Ted Kennedy’s seat, nothing is impossible.

So let me give you a reason for optimism: Randy Altschuler in New York’s 1st District has $1.8 million cash on hand, compared to $1.4 million for incumbent Democrat Rep. Tim Bishop. The bad news is that Altschuler is in a Republican primary against GOP establishment candidate Chris Cox, who’s got more than $800,000 cash on hand.

Meanwhile, in NY-23, our hero Doug Hoffman has about $200,000 cash on hand and is facing a GOP primary against an establishment candidate, Matt Doheny, who’s got nearly $700,000. And the (Dede-endorsed) Democrat incumbent, Rep. Bill Owens, is sitting on $600,000.

Go back to Jim Geraghty’s list of 99 most feasible Republican pickups for November and from the “Blue” (easy) category choose MD-1. This district, containing the Eastern Shore area of Maryland, was long represented by moderate Republican Wayne Gilchrest, who routinely won 2-to-1 landslides, but lost the 2008 GOP primary to conservative challenger Andy Harris. But when the Obama tide hit in November 2008, Harris lost narrowly (49%-48%) to Democrat Frank Kratovil.

MD-1 looks like a sure bet to flip back to the Republicans this fall. However, as of June 30, Kratovil had $1.3 million cash on hand, whereas there are two leading GOP candidates in the Sept. 14 primary, Harris (about $900,000 cash on hand) and Rob Fisher (about $240,000 cash on hand).

So here you’ve got what should be an easy win for the GOP — and yet (a) the Democrat’s got a significant money advantage and (b) the Republicans must fight out a primary battle that won’t end until seven weeks before Election Day.

Returning to Geraghty’s list, let’s pick one from the “Green” category (“should be GOP wins”):  PA-3, up near Lake Erie, a district won by George W. Bush in both 2000 and 2004. In 2008, however, the Obama wave lifted Kathleen Dahlkemper to a 52-48 win over third-term incumbent Phil English. As of June 30, Dahlkemper was sitting on $1 million in campaign cash, while her GOP opponent, Mike Kelly, had a measly $100,000.

You see why I’m worried, folks? Republicans need to gain 40 seats to take over the House. When you combine the “Blue” and “Green” categories in Geraghty’s list, the total is 39 seats, and some of those races might be a lot tougher for the GOP than Geraghty thinks. “Blue Dog” Democrat Rep. Bobby Bright in AL-2, for example, got lucky when the Republican establishment lined up behind Martha Roby, who isn’t exactly a dynamic political personality. As of June 30, Bright had $730,000 compared to Roby’s $120,000.

Moving up to the “Yellow” (50/50) category, we find we’re in the same range as PA-12. How’s our friend Tim Burns doing since the May 19 special election? As of June 30, he was about even with Democrat Mark Critz in cash-on-hand. Another race I’m following is Ray McKinney in GA-12. As of June 30, Ray’s opponent, incumbent Democrat Rep. John Barrow, had more than $600,000 cash on hand, compared to less than $80,000 for McKinney.

Money isn’t everything, but it’s essential to running any political campaign and, almost everywhere, we see Republican challengers at a significant financial disadvantage to the Democrat incumbents they must beat if the prophecies of a GOP House majority are to be fulfilled. 

These candidates can’t depend on the Washington-based Republican establishment to bail them out. RNC reportedly has only $5 million cash on hand. The NRCC has $17 million, compared to $33 million for the DCCC.

If conservatives online don’t start paying attention, Nov. 2 may be another one of those “agony of defeat” moments — a long night of tearful Republican concession speeches that brings smiles to the faces of Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann.

And nobody wants to see that, right?