The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

‘Basically, There’s No Hardcore Ravaging of Women in Novels Anymore. And That’s a Bad Thing.’

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 32 Comments

Hey, don’t blame me — somebody at GQ said that. I’m just quoting it because I saw it linked at Protein Wisdom. So it’s not like I am making the argument that women ought to be ravaged, hard-core or otherwise.

At least not in novels.

One reason I’ve never tried to write a novel is because, sooner or later, you’ve got to have a sex scene. There’s this gnawing fear that (a) the scene would be interpreted as the writer’s own personal fantasy or a roman à clef and (b) the results might be ridiculous.

UPDATE: One of the commenters points out that the GQ writer uses “ravage,” where ravish is actually better. Girl On the Right wants to be ravished, and often, and by someone who knows how.

Category: Books, Sex

Great: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi Have Screwed Up My Last Day in L.A.

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 23 Comments

WOODLAND HILLS, Calif. — My plans were all set: I’d drop by Pamela Geller’s 7 p.m. event on Sepulveda Boulevard, get some quick pictures, jump in the rental car, hustle down to LAX and return the car, and still leave myself plenty of time to catch the red-eye flight back home. What could possibly go wrong?

President Barack Obama will visit Los Angeles this Monday, for a 24-hour stay during which he will headline a fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
The President is scheduled to land at Los Angeles International Airport at 4:10 pm on August 16th, attend the DCCC fundraiser that evening, spend the night, and depart Tuesday morning.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced last month that she will also be present at the DCCC’s top-dollar event, which is reportedly being held at the home of Marilyn and John Wells and costs between $2,500 and $30,400 to attend.

(Insert profane adjectives and obscene epithets here.) Wells is a liberal TV producer, and guests at the event will include Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and Barbra Streisand.

What this means for me is that there will be police blocking off streets, heavy-duty Secret Service/DHS security all over town, and almost certainly an apocalyptic traffic jam between Sepulveda Boulevard and LAX, with further hassles at the airport because of the extra security for Air Force One.

In other words, I’m screwed, blued and tattooed. The 405 will be a gridlocked nightmare. A high-speed “Dukes of Hazzard” run to the airport — zig-zagging crazily through traffic on the surface streets — would almost certainly get me arrested now that presidential-level security is in effect throughout Los Angeles. The cops would run my license number through the headquarters computer which would kick off a red alert on the DHS Right Wing Extremist Watch List and it would quickly turn into an ugly scene. Pepper spray, tasers, K-9 units, SWAT . . .

No, I can’t risk that. Mrs. Other McCain made me promise to stay out of trouble during this West Coast trip, and even if I explain that it’s not my fault (“Honey, I’m a victim of police brutality — like Rodney King!”) she’d let me rot in San Quentin before she’d pay my bail. And I can’t re-schedule the flight for later, because I need to get back East to go cover the Christine O’Donnell Senate campaign in Delaware.

So I’ll have to scratch my plans to attend the 7 p.m. Geller/Spencer event at the Skirball Center and instead leave early for LAX, and probably end up sitting around an airport lounge for hours, all because of Obama.

Hit the tip jar, folks — it’s going to be a long night.

UPDATE: Dan Riehl calls attention to the NRCC’s response to Obama’s traffic-snarling Hollywood trip:

Don’t let Democrats mislead voters – the economic mess is a result of THEIR failed agenda. A group of Republican House Members have come together to agree to match dollar-for-dollar the funds raised through this page to offset the large sums of money the President will raise for vulnerable Liberal Democrat Members.

Suggestion: Skip the national GOP committees and give your money directly to Republican candidates of your choice. Giving $20 directly to individual candidates like Allen West, Liz Carter, Bill Gunn, Ray McKinney or Mattie Fein will have far more impact than giving a similar amount to the national committees, which (a) can collect their money in big lumps from special-interest fat cats, and (b) regularly support backstabbing RINO losers like Dede Scozzafava.

Category: Barack Obama, California, Mrs. Other McCain, Shoe Leather Fund

What Do You Mean, ‘WE’?

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 29 Comments

by Smitty

In the post on the GZM as an election issue, I had said:

“I’m all for seeing ecumenical centers at all sorts of hallowed sites, like Mecca, Medina, and Ground Zero. Because if ‘tolerance’ and ’sensitivity’ are not omni-directional, then they may just be cheap talking points proffered by the nefarious.”

And our senior critic from the Left, Young4Eyes, replied:

Your point is moot.
It’s not a matter of any tolerance or sensitivity being omni-directional or not; I’ve heard this argument before and it strikes me as sadly devoid of any reason.
Our principles are not theirs. Dare I say that our standards are better? Of course.
Therefore any excuse making that seeks to equate their ways with ours is pathetic. WE abide by principles that distinguish us from their Sharia standards.
You fools, unwittingly of course, are playing along into Sharias intolerance by letting your emotions get the best of you.Your arguments state: well Sharia laws wouldn’t allow for religious freedom, so why should ours?
Because we are America.
Anything else reeks of the phony Conservatism you folks espouse.

Actually, the point is well-founded on a reasonable argument. I even expounded on the point here.
The notion of deciding what is and is not tolerance is a purely moral case.
I can espouse and follow as radical a flavor of Christianity as I care to, even dropping out to become an Amish farmer.
Do I get to drag you with me, though?
No, that would be unethical.
WE, in fact, do not abide by standards that distinguish us from Sharia. Sharia, from casual reads of Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Andrew McCarthy, is a totalitarian, Borg-like system that, in full bloom, really doesn’t play well with notions like, say, Western Civilization.
And, no, I don’t think Christianity, and its individual moral choices and doctrine of individual salvation require a completely passive acceptance of being treated like a doormat. Furthermore, the notion that the US is a “Christian nation” is truly radical to me, for reasons stated in the previous sentence: Christianity is an individual, apolitical, moral endeavor. If you want to attend my church, study the Bible in the King James version, and build some argument whereby you think your point is tenable, fine.
Until such time, all I see is projection: “You fools, unwittingly of course, are playing along into Sharias intolerance by letting your emotions get the best of you.Your arguments state: well Sharia laws wouldn’t allow for religious freedom, so why should ours?”
Who is being denied religious freedom here? Who has explicitly stated “You cannot go to location X unless you are a member of Y faith”? What, specifically, is intolerant about requesting your own views on a matter as emotionally charged as a mass murder receive respect? And not lip service, but tangible action?
What about a church at Ground Zero that was destroyed, and has not been rebuilt, but may not be receiving equal consideration?
I realize you’re here to troll, Young4Eyes, but even you must admit that the Ground Zero Mosque is achieving exactly the opposite of its stated intent, and this Saul Alinsky “Hold the opposition to their standards” tactic is a barrel of hogwash.

Doctor Zero is also worth your time on the topic.
As is the rather more passionate Freeberg.

Category: New York

Obama’s Propaganda Machine

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 2 Comments

Rep. Darrell Issa’s office has issued a new report on how the Obama administration is using taxpayer dollars to promote a political agenda. Jonathan Strong of Daily Caller writes:

One of the Obama administration’s more expensive “propaganda” efforts, according to the report, was a television commercial boosting the then-newly passed health care law. The advertisement features 84-year-old television star Andy Griffith and was designed to sell senior citizens, whom polls show are particularly opposed to ObamaCare, on the “good things [that] are coming” in the law.
“Free check ups, lower prescription costs, and better ways to protect us and Medicare from fraud . . . I think you’re gonna like it,” Griffith said in the ad. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the federal agency responsible for implementing the health care law, paid $700,000 for the commercial, the Issa report says.

Dan Riehl notes that the administration has used blog trolls to spread its message, and there’s more from Bob Owens at Pajamas Media. Fox News featured the Issa report:

Category: Barack Obama

Congratulations, Pamela Geller!

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 17 Comments

The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America just went into its second printing, Pamela told me last night in a phone conversation. 

Geller is in Los Angeles to speak tonight (7 p.m.) with Robert Spencer at the Skirball Cultural Center in an event co-sponsored by Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Pamela told me that they are planning a 9/11 rally against the Ground Zero Mosque with Newt Gingrich. She is quoted in a Wall Street Journal story today:

Conservative blogger Pamela Geller, founder of a group called Stop Islamization of America and a vocal opponent of the mosque near Ground Zero, blasted Mr. Obama in a statement. The president, she said, “has, in effect, sided with the Islamic jihadists.”

It’s as if Obama is trying to help Pamela sell books — as is Hamas:

A leader of the Hamas terror group yesterday jumped into the emotional debate on the plan to construct a mosque near Ground Zero — insisting Muslims “have to build” it there.

Having Hamas on your side isn’t exactly a formula for success in American politics. Obama has screwed the pooch on this one. This morning I was watching MSNBC, where Rep. Martin Frost (D-Texas) was telling Obama to keep his presidential nose out of New York’s business and Pat Buchanan was opposing the mosque saying, “This is sacred ground!” Clearly, Pamela is winning this argument.

UPDATE: Professor Donald Douglas plans to attend tonight’s L.A. event with Geller and Spencer.

Category: Atlas Shrugs, Barack Obama, Books, New York, Religion

Conspicuously Absent Words

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 4 Comments

by Smitty

Reading Lefties can be a source of sad amusement. Curtis Valentine at PuffHo has a piece trying to find the ointment on the economic fly. Here is a bit of introductory text for flavor:

Over the past twenty-five years, the exorbitant increase in the American standard of living has had an inverse affect on our tendencies to borrow and share. With millions of Americans enjoying a flourishing economy, the idea of Keeping up with the Jones’ was given new meaning and the term community development was reserved for poor neighborhoods filled with America’s underprivileged.

For all the Americans migrating to major cities and the immigrants arriving on our shores over the past century, this sense of community was the expectation not the exception. The recent age of overconsumption has caused the middle class to become less dependent on one another creating a level of independence that altered the traditional idea of community as we all envisioned it.

But then there is this:

With all the talk about preserving the institution of marriage and strengthening the American family, there has been little discussion about creating communities and institutions that can act as a support system or safety net for the families in times of need. The need is even more pronounced in single-parent homes that depend on extended family members, friends, and neighbors for emotional and financial support.

OK, Curtis, you managed to say “institution of marriage”. You almost uttered a word to describe where such an event occurs; a church, or a synagogue, or even a mosque maybe? See, those are safety nets not only when in need, but even more importantly, before the need arises.

You can generalize to “community of faith”, if you’re fretting an attack for proselytizing. But the statistical truth since the Great Society is that your social programs are a cure worse than the disease.

Socially, as politically, our task is to revive the mostly valuable traditions that the country is founded upon, and tell the Curtis crowd to talk to the hand.

Category: Culture

Ron Miller Question And Answer Part 2

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 6 Comments

by Smitty

Last Wednesday, I took in the Ron Miller party for “Sellout”. The man has a great, pro-American story, and now we’re enjoying the Q&A portion of the evening. The last clip is going to hurt a few people in their business model.

Growing up in an apolitical family

An interestig Condi Rice fact.

Segmenting communities

A shameless plug, and the notion of balkanizing the population as a means of building collectivism. Individualism as the antidote.

Diving on media grenades

Ron Miller is willing to go anywhere that Clarence Thomas or Michael Steele has gone. Critics can discount ideas, but Ron is confident in letting experience talk.

Condi Rice was no victim

“Victimhood is a choice,” speaks Ron. But it is not necessarily a holdover from slavery, but rather an effort on the part of some to keep a sense of grievance alive.

Previously:

Category: Racism, Religion, Republicans
Tags:

Ladd Ehlinger Jr. Goes Hollywood

Posted on | August 16, 2010 | 21 Comments

My latest column at The American Spectator:

HOLLYWOOD, Calif. — On a sound stage near Santa Monica Boulevard, actress Valerie Novak flubs a line and director Ladd Ehlinger Jr. asks her to repeat it. “And — action!”
Novak nails the line this time and continues with her dramatic monologue when the director’s cell phone rings, forcing another retake. Ehlinger mutters, “Can somebody fire the director, please?”
Sunday’s daylong shoot was running slightly behind schedule, as actors and actresses lounged around the studio awaiting their turns in front of the camera for a series of political advertisements. Three members of Ehlinger’s cast are Republican candidates for Congress and, by Labor Day, these videos could be bringing them YouTube fame. . . .

Please read the whole thing. Here are some more photos of yesterday’s shoot in Hollywood:

Ladd Ehlinger Jr. adjusts the camera to make sure he’s got the parting of the CGI green-screen Red Sea in perfect focus.

Stage 15 of Ben Kitay Productions: “Quiet on the set!”

Mona Lee Goss is actually a much nicer person than the character she’s portraying in this shot.

Standing between Steel Chambers as the Monster and Jack Marino as Igor, Mattie Fein is easily the best-looking character in this photo.

Standing alone, I’m easily the best-looking character in this photo.

Mark Reed is running for Congress against Brad Sherman in California District 27. Considering his Native American ancestry, when Reed says “take our country back,” it has a distinctive resonance.

Mattie Fein and political operative Ali Wolter relax on the set.

“Toto, I don’t think we’re in What’s the Matter With Kansas anymore!”

Who could possibly wish harm to sweet little Kylie O’Brien?

Who else? It’s the Wicked Witch of the West!

Category: California, Celebrities, Congress, Election, Hollywood
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin