Pariah Dogs And Wandering Madmen

by Smitty

Returning home, I sat down with a cuppa tea and took in Rush: Beyond The Lighted Stage. As an unrepentant fanboi, it was a full-on treat, except the part which was a pleasure. I’ll definitely catch them on the Time Machine Tour.

Somewhat cheesily, the movie ends with an exit question of why Rush never made it big in the mainstream. The movie proffers a couple of reasons; Geddy’s tenor voice, the band’s general weirdness. I wonder to what degree the ‘N’ word might have played a part. Allow me to offer a quotation from Roadshow, by Neil Peart, pp83-84, and then explain. Emphasis original.

Now that we were getting close to opening night, Alex, Geddy, and I played through that show with earnest dedication to getting everything right. I was giving it everything that I had, straining and sweating, and in fact, I was already playing for an audience, though they were imaginary. It is a defining trait in my character and attitude toward performing that no audience is more unforgivingly critical than that imaginary one. They knew exactly how well I was supposed to play, and whether I had or not.

People sometimes misunderstand the difference between doing something for fun and doing it at the highest possible level. With memories of Little League, or just a necessary fantasy to hold onto, people like to imagine that it must be fun to be a professional athlete or performer, not realizing the difference between a pastime and a profession. It is probably safe to say that any job done professionally is never going to be fun, exactly–because it’s a job.

Don’t get me wrong, I love my work as much as anyone ever could, but it is still work. As the great American journalist Ernie Pyle use to say, after describing someone’s difficult job, “Try it sometime.” Late in his life, Buddy Rich was asked if he considered himself the world’s greatest drummer, and he gave an inspiring reply: “Let’s put it this way: I have that ambition. You don’t really attain greatness. You attain a certain amount of goodness, and if you’re really serious about your goodness, you’ll keep trying to be great. I have never reached a point in my career where I was totally satisfied with anything I’ve ever done, but I keep trying.”

Amen. And it’s the trying that’s so hard, especially in live performance. Every night you push yourself to your absolute limits, mentally and physically, and as the standards rise, you’re like a high-jumper continually raising the bar. On a good day, you might clear it, but the rest of the time you just fall on your ass.

All this is context for a crucial idea:

And trying, the philosophy of Tryism, is the key to much about me, my attitude toward fans, other artists, and my own self-image. If I am uncomfortable with strangers making a fuss about me, and feel embarrassed by any show of admiration, people sometimes accuse me of thinking I am “too good”. In fact, the opposite is true–I don’t believe I deserve that kind of attention. I have never thought I was very good at anything; I just tried hard. And nothing came easily. Having one’s childhood personality shaped by being inept at every sport is a cliché, but it had its effect on me. What else do people judge you by at that age?

This un-pretentious concern for excellence as its own reward shines through Rush’s catalogue, and is crucial to their status as possibly the biggest cult band of all time. While that interest in rugged, individual purity of expression resonates with fans, it’s a standing affront to critics and executives, so admirably skewered as the Priests of the Temples of Syrinx. While Rush are less political than most, and may in fact be raging Trotskyites in real life, such a revelation would come as a shock.

Rush will always be labeled pariah dogs and wandering madmen by critics, until the precious mainstream narrative lies shattered by the weight of critical projection.

This post’s title is the opening line to “Far Cry”:

Bonus, full Colbert appearance:

Who Commits Crime?

When I was about 15, I read Helter Skelter, prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi’s account of the Manson Family and the Tate-LaBianca murders. One fact that struck me was that Manson was, for most of his life, a small-time hoodlum who compiled a record for relatively minor crimes like burglary, car theft and foregery long before he became notorious as the leader of a murder cult.

A few years later, as a freshman in college, I was assigned to read In Cold Blood, Truman Capote’s classic crime story about the murder of the Clutter family in Holcomb, Kansas. The same pattern was evident: Dick Hickock and Perry Smith had been a couple of minor criminals — forgery, theft, assault, etc. — until they committed the mass murder that made them infamous.

You see this pattern replicated in many other high-profile murders. Matthew Shepard’s killers, Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson, both had criminal records — one for marijuana possession and the other for burglary. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold had been busted as juveniles for a break-in and theft about 14 months before they perpetrated the Columbine High massacre.

This pattern illustrates a common-sense truth so basic that it seems a bit silly to state it directly: Criminals commit crime.

Because of the way crime is portrayed in both the news media and popular entertainment, many Americans have been conditioned to think of murder as a crime to which everyone is equally susceptible. TV detective dramas especially present this distorted perspective, because the element of surprise usually requires that the killer be someone unsuspected — the apparently upstanding citizen whose hidden motive for murder is uncovered in the final 10 minutes of the hour-long mystery. The man-bites-dog angle in journalism means that when a murder is committed by a previously law-abiding person, this fact will be highlighted in news coverage. And sometimes, as in the Shepard murder, the criminal background of the killers will mostly be ignored by media focused on more “newsworthy” elements of the crime.

Contrary to media distortions, criminality is not evenly distributed throughout the population. A small and fairly distinct group of career criminals — recidivists, habitual violators, call them what you will — account for the majority of serious crime in America. This fact was best illustrated in the early 1990s, when transit policy in New York City decided to crack down on subway turnstile-jumpers and discovered that about 15 percent of those apprehended were wanted on warrants for major felonies, including armed robbery, rape and murder.

Murder is simply one end of a continuum of criminality and, therefore, leniency toward “minor” crimes will inevitably result in more murders, as illustrated by the case of a suspected Los Angeles serial killer:

Investigators believe they have connected “Grim Sleeper” suspect Lonnie Franklin Jr. to 10 murders.
Now they are trying to tie him to dozens more.
More than 30 cold case files dating back to 1984 are getting a new look in light of Franklin’s arrest, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck said Friday. . . .
Franklin was arrested at least 15 times for car theft, burglary, assaults and other crimes, but avoided prison despite calls by law enforcement officials for tough sentences, according to Los Angeles County court records released Friday and obtained by the Los Angeles Times.
Franklin faced up to three years in prison in 2003 after pleading no contest to receiving stolen property, He was sentenced to 270 days in jail and released in May 2003, more than four months early, the records showed. Two months later, the body of one of Franklin’s alleged victims was found.

If Franklin is indeed the “Grim Sleeper,” many victims may have died simply because California authorities failed to imprison him for his “minor” offenses.

Criminals commit crime.

LEAKED: New NASA Space Station Plan Incorporates Relativity

by Smitty

NASA’s swell new global bureaucratic quaalude mission was greeted by howls of derisive laughter and sporadic vomiting. This blog’s attempt at a “don’t shoot the messenger” call on Administrator Bolden, too, got sucked into a steep gravity well.
iOwnTheWorld mustered a caustic contest to name a new Mosque Shuttle, with the sort of result you’d expect:

But to where will this infamous space chariot go?

Based upon Escher's Relativity

It will be a sign of resurgence when an actual leader is elected that is capable of setting a national goal. Mars, Moon base, whatever. You can have Socialism or you can have quantum leaps, but you can only have both in the mouth of a salesman.

D Is For Democrat

by Smitty (via iOwnTheWorld)

GradeGov warns of the lame duck session:

Depending on the results of the election, it would seem that McConnell may have the mandate to just announce a standing filibuster. The only point in trying to pass odious legislation would be that, signed into law, the legislation may require veto-override capability to remove.

GradeGov.com gives my Congresstool a ‘D’. Why so high, one wonders? All the more encouragement to work to the ethical limit to elect a representative Representative, instead of Moran. Americans who want to alter course away from shoal water must support their local candidate, even if not agreeing 100% with their issues. November is an election of Biden-esque proportions.

Wedding Day

My 21-year-old daughter, Kennedy Catherine McCain, is getting married at 10 a.m. today to Martin, which means that my attempts to bribe the couple into eloping have failed.

When I saw this headline, I misunderstood for a second and thought the judge had ruled weddings unconstitutional but . . .

Several months ago, I remember being told that this would be what is called a “small” wedding. For reasons that have not been adequately explained, we have only an estimate of the number of guests who have RSVP’d, but it’s somewhere between 130 and 197. And they must be fed.

As you might guess, I won’t be blogging much today. More on the happy occasion here.