The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

More ‘Red Pill’ Thoughts

Posted on | June 28, 2019 | Comments Off on More ‘Red Pill’ Thoughts

Went to bed early Thursday night — it was a long day — and woke up early to start putting together my thoughts on the Democrat debate I missed, but then started engaging the comments on “Missing College Girl Mackenzie Lueck Was a Social-Media ‘Sugar Baby’ Whore.” This inspired some thoughts that I want to record while they’re fresh in my mind, and I’ll get to the debate commentary later. As I said in that post:

If you criticize the “sugar baby” racket, feminists will condemn you for “slut-shaming.” They openly advocate the most irresponsible promiscuity, and consider any criticism to be “sexist.” . . .
Feminist “empowerment” means that there are no moral standards for women, so that the college girl will never encounter anyone in authority on campus who would dare to tell her that whoring around via social media is a bad idea.

This is a point that reflects Rollo Tomassi’s insight about the implications of living in a “feminine primary social order.” Western civilization’s tradition of chivalry toward women — the civilized man was taught to show an appropriate deference toward “the weaker sex” — has been leveraged as a force to advance the anti-traditional agenda of feminism. Yet because human nature cannot be changed by political force, women are still vulnerable in ways that traditional civilization understood, but which feminists wish to ignore or deny. Feminist attacks on sexual “double standards” — their insistence that criticism of female promiscuity is “sexist,” and therefore illegitimate — ignore the real harms experienced by women who attempt to pursue “liberation” in this manner.

Men and women are different, and these differences are socially significant. Forcing people to pretend otherwise is foolish, but that’s what our laws and policies against “discrimination” are about — compelling us to remain silent about real differences between men and women, while implementing an agenda that ignores these differences. Speaking out against the feminist agenda carries real risks (ask James Damore) and this has the effect of silencing common-sense objections to bad ideas promoted in the name of feminism. What this means, at a practical level, is that women’s behavior is off-limits to male criticism. In a “feminine primary social order,” male opinions are essentially irrelevant.

 

Now consider the case of Mackenzie Lueck in this light. Anyone with common sense could have told her that whoring herself out as a “sugar baby” was a bad idea, but she was in a bubble, using her private online accounts to conceal this behavior from anyone who might criticize it. Apparently, her friends knew what she was doing, but using social media and dating apps to hustle cash is considered acceptable by many college girls, so she was shielded from any sort of common-sense warnings about the risks involved in this form of “empowered” sexuality.

“Don’t be a whore” is always good advice, but Third Wave feminist ideology effectively prohibits any criticism of female sexual behavior. Because well-mannered men wish to avoid offending women, a sense of chivalry may lead men to cooperate with this prohibition, and some men will play “white knight” by rushing to defend Mackenzie Lueck (and other girls in the “sugar baby” racket) from any condemnation.

GUYS: YOU’RE NOT REALLY HELPING WOMEN
BY BEING A ‘MALE FEMINIST.’

The world feminists have helped create is not a better world for women than the world they’ve destroyed in the name of “equality.” Your grandmother’s world may have been less equal than the world we live in, but she had the benefit of certain traditional institutions and customs that younger women today are sorely lacking. Deprived of the security that women obtained from the institutions of a traditional social order, young women are now vulnerable to the toxic influence of a culture that promotes sexual exploitation as “empowerment.” But nobody can talk bluntly about this, because feminism won’t allow it.

If there is any hope at all of restoring sanity to our society, men must summon the courage to speak the truth, no matter how “offensive” such truth-telling might be to feminist-influenced women. Indeed, telling the “offensive” truth might help save a woman’s life.

The latest development in the Mackenzie Lueck case:

A former Army IT specialist who owns a home five miles from a park where University of Utah student Mackenzie Lueck went missing, has been named as a person of interest, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Salt Lake City Police have been searching the home of a man they identified as a person of interest in Lueck’s case, revealing they had collected evidence from the home at a press conference on Thursday.
While police declined to name the homeowner, DailyMail.com learned it is owned by Ayoola ‘AJ’ Ajayi, 31, who lists a private room inside the home on Airbnb for up to $40 a night.
Officials announced they are now searching for a mattress and box spring that Ajayi had given away for free on resale website LetGo five days ago.
Salt Lake City Police requested for the person who picked up the items to contact them, as they continue searching for Lueck.
Lueck, a 23-year-old sorority member, disappeared after taking a Lyft car on June 17 from the airport to a park located miles away from her apartment.
Ajayi was employed by the Army as an Information Technology Specialist for nearly two years before leaving in June 2016, according to his LinkedIn.
He currently works at Dell as a Senior Technical Support Analyst and has so for the past 10 months.

No one should jump to conclusions here. Being a “person of interest” is not the same as being a suspect, and even then, this man would be considered innocent until proven guilty. Yet if this story continues developing in this direction, expect feminists to ignore it completely.

Because “intersectionality,” or something.


 

Category: The Red Pill, Utah, Violence Against Women

In The Mailbox: 06.27.19

Posted on | June 27, 2019 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 06.27.19

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
357 Magnum: Hollywood Is Officially Out Of Ideas
Bacon Time: Toaster Bacon?
EBL: Dalai Lama Warns All Of Europe Could Become African Or Muslim
Twitchy: Occasional Cortex’ Chief Of Staff Deletes Tweet comparing Blue Dog Democrats To 1940s Southern Democrats
Louder With Crowder: Arby’s Flips Off Vegans With “Carrot” Made Of Meat

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Update On Hag Rape
American Greatness: Climate Crusaders Defeated In Oregon, For Now
American Thinker: America – Talked Out Of Liberty
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Armed Jews News
Babalu Blog: During A Rally In Miami (A City Full Of Cuban Exiles) Bill De Blasio Quotes Mass-Murdering Socialist Che Guevara
BattleSwarm: Kiddie Table Debate Reactions
Camp Of The Saints: The Never-Eradicated Plague That Is The Red Menace
CDR Salamander: On LCS Manning, Even The Atlantic Goes Salamander
Da Tech Guy: The Bladensburg Cross, SCOTUS Precedent, & The Dirty Dozen, also, Debate Dud & Other Thoughts Under The Fedora
Don Surber: Constitution Mandates Gerrymandering, also, Highlights Of The News
Dustbury: Where It All Began
The Geller Report: Pennsylvania Expected To Become Third State To Ban Child Marriage, also, Obama Appointee Judge Talwani Invents Sanctuary Courthouses
Hogewash: Knit Picking, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Hollywood In Toto: Critics Weaponize Loudest Voice Against Fox News
JustOneMinute: A Character Building Opportunity
Legal Insurrection: SCOTUS Says No Census Citizenship Question For Now, also, Iranian Foreign Minister Claims They Won’t Build Nukes Because They’re Forbidden By Islam
The PanAm Post: Interview With Guaido’s Coordinator For Humanitarian Aid
Power Line: Occasional Cortex Cries Over Empty Parking Lot, also, Ted Cruz Wants To Know
Shot In The Dark: Safety
The Political Hat: Buckley Ban On Reddit – A Prelude To More Or An Impudence For Less?
This Ain’t Hell: The Long Arm Of Fustercluck 2015, also, Bad Messaging Choices
Victory Girls: Photo Of Drowned Family Not What Democrats Say It Is
Volokh Conspiracy: The Rights And Wrongs Of Overruling Precedent
Weasel Zippers: Obama’s ICE Chief Says Don’t Blame Trump, Cages For Illegals Were Built During Obama Administration, also, Flashback Montage – Media Insists Trump “Manufacturing” Border Crisis
Megan McArdle: Fauxcahontas’ Support For Abolishing Private Insurance Is Bold And Risky
Mark Steyn: That’ll Be One Palestinian Piranha Pedicure, Please

Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery

Missing College Girl Mackenzie Lueck Was a Social-Media ‘Sugar Baby’ Whore

Posted on | June 27, 2019 | 1 Comment

Mackenzie Lueck displaying her YOLO attitude on Instagram.

Every so often, the Case of the Missing Blonde becomes a national media sensation. This is predictable — the public has an insatiable appetite for these damsel-in-distress stories — and nine times out of 10, the story ends with police finding her body and then the public loses interest, with the trial of her accused killer attracting little notice. It was the mystery of her disappearance that caused the excitement, and once she’s just another dead girl (usually murdered by an ex-boyfriend), the TV audience interest isn’t quite the same. In the case of missing college senior Mackenzie Lueck, however, her story just took an unexpected turn:

Missing University of Utah nursing student Mackenzie Lueck is a ‘sugar baby’ who sought out men over the age of 35 online, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Lueck, 23, disappeared on June 17 after landing in Salt Lake City, Utah, and taking a Lyft ride to meet a mysterious man in a park around 2am.
The college senior’s social media accounts reveal that she considered herself a sugar baby, and boasted about having at least two unidentified sugar daddies which she found through online sites Seeking Arrangement and Tinder.
DailyMail.com obtained screenshots of Lueck’s posts made nearly three months ago in a private Facebook group where Lueck gave advice on how she finds sugar daddies – wealthy older men who lavish younger women with gifts and money in return for company or sexual favors.
‘Try tinder and be blunt about it. Mine says ”I want a SD/SB relationship with a real connection.” If [they] don’t know what a SD/SB is, tell them bluntly sugar daddy and sugar baby. But if they don’t know, they aren’t really worth your time,’ Lueck’s comment reads.
‘Set your age preferences from 35+. You’ll have the most luck there. Private message me, if you have more questions! I have experience.’
In another message Lueck revealed she has two sugar daddies and which sites she uses to obtain them.
‘I have some experience on seeking arrangements, online only, tinder, and currently have two lol.’
Aside from her personal Instagram, Lueck also operates an alias account under the name @NovaBaby96, with a profile photo that shows a woman in panties that read ‘Daddy’ on the back.
This comes after Lueck’s friends came forward to police to say she was casually dating several people and was interested in older men. Authorities didn’t specify if they’ve spoken with anyone she was dating.

 

Let’s be blunt: Mackenzie Lueck was a whore. Also notice my use of the past-tense verb “was” — they won’t find her alive. And her parents will have to ask themselves how they failed so badly: Why did their daughter turn into a whore? This has become a widespread phenomenon:

Thanks to the wonders of 21st-century communications technology, young women — indeed, teenage girls — are very aware that they are in possession of a valuable commodity which can be leveraged for cash money. This behavior doesn’t necessarily involve the most obvious fee-for-service transactions, but in general, a young woman with an Instagram account full of sexy selfies isn’t just posting those bikini pictures for her own self-validation; this is marketing, and her body is the product.
Ask yourself: If every good-looking girl knows she can leverage her youth and beauty for financial advantage — “Hit me up on Venmo” — simply by posting her photos online, what sort of influence does that have on their attitudes toward men? Answer: Not a good influence.
Many thousands of young women have been utterly corrupted this way. Once this pattern of behavior becomes a habit, it’s quite nearly impossible for a woman to see men as anything other than potential customers — chumps to be exploited for financial gain. . . .
Once you become aware of this phenomenon, a lot of otherwise mysterious behavior by young women becomes less mysterious. Consider, for example, the so-called “wanderlust” culture of young women traveling the world, recording their experiences on blogs, YouTube, Instagram, etc. How is she paying the bills for that trip to a resort in Bali, huh?

Feminists justify and defend such behavior. If you criticize the “sugar baby” racket, feminists will condemn you for “slut-shaming.” They openly advocate the most irresponsible promiscuity, and consider any criticism to be “sexist.” Kelly Tyler published a column announcing she’s had sex with “well over 100 men, but that does not define me as a slut.” Two days later, she followed up with another column: “I Was Slut Shamed and Harassed by r/TheRedPill.” Got that? A woman can publicly celebrate her promiscuity, and all negative reactions are “harassment.” We are only allowed to praise women, never to criticize them, no matter what they do.

And it’s all fun and games until a “sugar baby” winds up dead, you see?

Oh, wait — I forgot to mention that Mackenzie Lueck was a member of Alpha Chi Omega sorority. Care to bet that every girl in AXO knew what she was doing and didn’t think anything was wrong with it? Because most of them were probably doing the same thing. Feminist “empowerment” means that there are no moral standards for women, so that the college girl will never encounter anyone in authority on campus who would dare to tell her that whoring around via social media is a bad idea.


 

Category: Crime, Sex Trouble

Google’s LGBTQ+ Totalitarians

Posted on | June 27, 2019 | 1 Comment

 

A perfect example of how the SJWs have taken over at Google:

Dozens of Google employees have sent an open letter to the organizers of San Francisco’s annual Pride parade urging them to kick Google’s company float out of the parade.
In a letter posted to Medium, the employees wrote of a work atmosphere where concerns from LGBTQ employees are regularly brushed aside.
“We have spent countless hours advocating for our company to improve policies and practices regarding the treatment of LGBTQ+ persons, the depiction of LGBTQ+ persons, and harassment and hate speech directed at LGBTQ+ persons, on YouTube and other Google products,” the letter read.

Stephen Kruiser summarizes: “The gist of the letter isn’t that Google’s LGBTQ+ employees are being treated badly at work, but that the company isn’t stringent enough about cracking down on WRONG SPEECH on YouTube.” In other words, Google hires gay people who then seek to damage the company they work for, in order to pressure the company to engage in totalitarian censorship of anyone they don’t like.

Now do you understand what the firing of James Damore was really about? The LGBT community has become toxic in its politics, abandoning any pretense of seeking “tolerance” and instead demanding that the rest of us obey their diktats or else be banished into outer darkness.

Just the other day, a survey found “that young Americans — generally regarded as the most socially tolerant generation — are less comfortable with LGBTQ people than in previous years. The survey . . . found that Americans aged 18 to 34 who say they are comfortable interacting with queer people fell from 53% in 2017 to 45% in 2018 — even among those whom the report considers ‘allies’ to the LGBTQ community.” This is very much like the little-mentioned backlash that followed the triumph of the civil rights movement in the 1960s. Prior to the mid-1960s, sympathy for the plight of black people in the South under Jim Crow was widespread in the North. But after passage of the landmark civil-rights legislation in 1964 and 1965, there occurred a wave of urban riots across the North, and rather suddenly the Yankees realized that maybe “integration” wasn’t going to be a risk-free process for them. These were the years (1966-69) when radicals like Eldridge Cleaver abandoned non-violence and intergrationist rhetoric, instead demanding “Black Power,” and threatening violence in pursuit of that goal.

So now, after their triumph in the Obergefell case, LGBT activists have taken a similar radical path, and even young people who consider themselves “allies” are becoming uncomfortable with them.

Somebody should warn Taylor Swift she’s on the wrong side of history.

UPDATE: Welcome, Instapundit readers!


 

Category: Gays

DNC Debate Night I: The Aftermath

Posted on | June 27, 2019 | Comments Off on DNC Debate Night I: The Aftermath

Stephen Green nails it: “It was a high-speed multiperson press conference where the questions were asked by cheerleaders. That’s the show the DNC wanted, and it’s the show NBC delivered.”

Julian Castro had the biggest gaffe of the night:

In the first 2020 Democratic presidential debate on Wednesday, former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Julián Castro said that “reproductive justice” involves allowing “trans females” to get abortions. Even in terms of pandering to the transgender community, this was a huge fail.
“I don’t believe only in reproductive freedom. I believe in reproductive justice,” Castro declared. “Just because a woman, or let’s also not forget someone in the trans community, a trans female, is poor doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have the right to exercise this right to choose.” He went on to pledge that he would appoint judges who would uphold Roe v. Wade (1973).
In this brief statement, the former HUD secretary not only supported taxpayer funding for abortion, overturning the Hyde Amendment (which protects pro-life taxpayers from having their money being used to fund abortion). Castro also mixed up the meaning of transgender identities.
According to transgender identity, gender identity is more real than biological sex. A “transgender male” refers to a biological female who identifies as male. A “transgender female” refers to a biological male who identifies as female.
While transgender activists would call for abortion access for transgender people, they would demand it for “transgender men,” not “transgender women.” It is impossible for a “transgender female” to get an abortion, unless he gets a womb transplant.
Feminist author Sady Doyle called his error “a wild rollercoaster of emotion.”
“Castro supports overturning Hyde and confuses trans women with trans men in the same sentence, which is a wild rollercoaster of emotion,” she tweeted.

National Review‘s Jim Geraghty:

Elizabeth Warren treaded water, Cory Booker and Julian Castro found their grooves, Bill de Blasio vented his anger and may have created some buzz, Beto O’Rourke had a terrible night, and everybody else on the bottom stayed on the bottom. . . .
It’s time to call it — [O’Rourke] thoroughly underwhelming as a debater and wildly overrated as a public speaker. Answering the first question in Spanish, unprompted, looked like a pandering gimmick. He had some better moments as the night progressed, but he was hit so many times by so many other candidates he must have felt like . . . a piñata.

Roger Kimball:

The best comment I heard tonight came from my 11-year-old daughter. Walking into my study at one point and overhearing something Elizabeth Warren said about ‘corporations’ or ‘Medicare for All,’ she asked ‘does she know about a thing called money?’

Indeed, while the liberal media seem to think Warren did just fine, her wild-eye attacks on corporations — profit is bad! — indicated a woman who knows nothing about money except how to spend it.



 

Category: Debates, Democrats

In The Mailbox: 06.26.19

Posted on | June 26, 2019 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
Ninety Miles From Tyranny: The 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #663
357 Magnum: Verizon Manages To Break The Internet
EBL: Warren Vs. Sanders – Who Will Prevail?
Twitchy: Media Matters And BUsy Little Bee Carlos Maza Successfully Target Pro-Trump Forum On Reddit
Louder With Crowder: Those Pictures Of Occasional Cortex Crying For Detained Children Are Completely Staged, also, Dan Crenshaw Nails Google For Bias Against Conservatives

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Sarkeesian Spends Her Way To Stone Broke Woke
American Greatness: Trust Trump, But Not Too Much
American Power: NRA TV Shuts Down
American Thinker: Dossier 2.0 – Mueller’s “Black Cash” Ledger
Animal Magnetism: Vacation Totty III
Babalu Blog: How’s This For Some Russian Collusion? also, Yoenis Cespedes’ Brother Yoelkis Defects From Cuban National Baseball Team
BattleSwarm: More NRA Troubles – Wayne LaPierre & The Iron Law Of Bureaucracy
CDR Salamander: The Pirates Of The…Gulf Of Guinea
Da Tech Guy: A-Listers Rush To Prove That Trump Isn’t Hitler Or Running A Dictatorship
Don Surber: Kick Romney Out Of The Caucus
Dustbury: Uglification & Derision
First Street Journal:
The Geller Report: Ilhan Omar Speechless When Confronted About Her Brother/Husband, also, Four Islamic State Terrorists Arrested In Mexico While En Route To Southern Border
Hogewash: Just Trying To Be Helpful, also, Team Kimberlin Post Of The Day
Hollywood In Toto: Why John Wick Star Keanu Reeves Is Having A Moment
Legal Insurrection: Lamestream Media Already Projects Fauxcahontas As Debate Winner, also, Vimeo Bans Project Veritas Over Google Video
Michelle Malkin: Anti-Trump Crafters – A Decade-Long Unraveling
The PanAm Post: Maduro Appears Fearful As Discontent Grows In The Ranks Of Venezuela’s Military
Power Line: Your Guide To The Democratic Debates, With Drinking Game Rules, also, Google Vs. Conservatives, Continued
Shot In The Dark: Professional Courtesy
STUMP: Mortality With Meep – People Continue To Die In The Dominican Republic & The PR Problem Grows
The Political Hat: Gender Stereotypes In The UK Are Now Doubleplusungood
This Ain’t Hell: How The Navy Tapped A Jailed Sex Offender To Be A Department Head, also, There Is A Disturbance In This Farce
Victory Girls: Clint Eastwood Ignores Hollywood Groupthink
Volokh Conspiracy: MN Supreme Court Holds That Non-Media Speakers Are Fully Protected By The First Amendment
Weasel Zippers: NBA Bans “Owner” In Favor Of “Governor” To Avoid Offending Black Players, also, E. Jean Carroll’s Rape Accusation Curiously Similar To Law & Order: SVU Episode
Mark Steyn: Muelling About, also, Cis-ters Are Doin’ It For Themselves


Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Coupons

Category: Linkagery

First Round of Democrat Presidential Debates Tonight at 9 p.m. ET on MSNBC

Posted on | June 26, 2019 | Comments Off on First Round of Democrat Presidential Debates Tonight at 9 p.m. ET on MSNBC

Ten candidates, including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and washed-out wonderboy Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke, will take the stage tonight in Miami, and i’ve got my TV tuned to MSNBC already. The pre-debate discussion — currently being anchored by Nicolle Wallace — is insane. Can’t imagine how the actual debate will be.

UPDATE: Swear to God, watching a half-hour of MSNBC is like stepping through the looking-glass into an alternate reality. They’re sitting around talking about the traumatic experience of 2016. Yeah, it was so traumatic — I nearly laughed myself to death.

UPDATE 9:07 p.m. ET: Beto just spoke Spanish and went overtime.

UPDATE 9:09 p.m. ET: Corey Booker, “famous heterosexual” as Ace calls him, just said some stuff about how “this economy is not working for average Americans.” Booker lumped Amazon in with Enron?

UPDATE 9:12 p.m. ET: Julian Castro just talked about growing up poor and immediately segued into passing the Equal Rights Amendment.

UPDATE 9:13 p.m. ET: “For too long, our leadership failed us,” says Tulsi Gabbard, speaking of U.S. foreign policy.

UPDATE 9:14 p.m. ET: Mayor Bill DeBlasio just endorsed a 70% top tax rate.

UPDATE 9:15 p.m. ET: John Delaney has zero chance. The man has no charisma. He is not merely charisma deficient, he is the opposite of charismatic.

UPDATE 9:16 p.m. ET: Some guy — I missed his name — just went on a rant in favor of wind turbines as the jobs of the future or something.

UPDATE 9:19 p.m. ET: Elizabeth Warren hates giant corporations. She loves “green technology,” claiming there is a $23 trillion market for green products.

UPDATE 9:21 p.m. ET: Amy Klobuchar wants a “public option” for health care. Accuses Trump of “giveaways” to pharmaceutical companies.

UPDATE 9:22 p.m. ET: Elizabeth Warren hates insurance companies, because profits and stuff. She endorses “Medicare for all.”

UPDATE 9:24 p.m. ET: Beto wants “high-quality universal health care.” He considers abortion basic health care.

UPDATE 9:25 p.m. ET: DeBlasio jumped in and started lecturing Beto, then Delaney jumps in and says “Medicare for all” will put hospitals out of business.

UPDATE 9:27 p.m. ET: Tulsi Gabbard is very attractive. I mean, just looking at her versus looking at Elizabeth Warren? It’s Gabbard by a landslide. So I’ll guess she will gain a point or so in the polls, on that basis alone.

UPDATE 9:28 p.m. ET: Elizabeth Warren really hates profit. Health insurance companies are profitable, so she hates them.

UPDATE 9:29 p.m. ET: Everybody started talking at once, and then Amy Klobuchar started talking about women’s “right to choose.”

UPDATE 9:30 p.m. ET: Julian Castro just endorsed taxpayer-funded abortion for the “trans community,” and the audience cheered.

UPDATE 9:32 p.m. ET: OK, I’ve watched a half-hour of this circus, and I need to go smoke a cigarette to try to calm down. It’s crazy.

UPDATE 9:45 p.m. ET: Sorry I was gone so long. Fixed myself a couple of hot dogs while I was out. When I got back, Beto was arguing with Julian Castro about immigration. They’re both for open borders, so I don’t know what the argument was really about.

UPDATE 9:47 p.m. ET: Tim Ryan loves immigrants almost as much as he hates Republicans. The audience applauds.

UPDATE 9:52 p.m. ET: A few reactions from Twitter:

UPDATE 9:55 p.m. ET: Did I mention that Tulsi Gabbard is very attractive? I mean, I don’t care what kind of crazy socialist talk comes out of her mouth, I just enjoy watching her talk.

UPDATE 10:02 p.m. ET: There was some kind of microphone problem while Chuck Todd was asking Elizabeth Warren about gun control. Mass confusion on stage, so they’re taking another commercial break.

Greedy corporate profit opportunity!

UPDATE 10:08 p.m. ET: “Gun violence is a national health emergency,” says Warren, failing to explain what she’d do about it.

UPDATE 10:12 p.m. ET: “We need trauma care in schools,” says Tim Ryan, portraying school shooters as victims of bullying.

UPDATE 10:14 p.m. ET: Beto talking about how he promoted gun control in Texas, without explaining that this is one reason he’s currently unemployed.

UPDATE 10:31 p.m. ET: Cory Booker just said we need to talk about “trans Americans,” particularly “trans Americans of color.” Fiercely heterosexual!

UPDATE 10:31 p.m. ET: More Twitter reactions:

UPDATE 10:39 p.m. ET: Tulsi Gabbard just called for withdrawal from Afghanistan, and looked very attractive while doing so.

UPDATE 10:41 p.m. ET: Tim Ryan disagrees with Tulsi Gabbard. He’s much less attractive than her. Just sayin’ . . .

UPDATE 10:43 p.m. ET: Beto gets a question from Chuck Todd about impeachment. This makes no sense. Beto’s not in Congress. He’s running for president. If he wins . . . no need for impeachment, right?

UPDATE 10:47 p.m. ET: Rachel Maddow just asked John Delaney if President Trump should be prosecuted after leaving office. Delaney said this is not an issue that the American people care about. True, sir, but this is MSNBC, and their audience cares about nothing else.

UPDATE 11 p.m. ET: It’s over, thank God. I don’t know what it means. I suppose we’ll have to wait for Thursday’s debate, and then after that wait for the next few polls to see if this had any impact.



 

Category: Debates, Democrats

Stalinist Regime at Google Is Still Lying

Posted on | June 26, 2019 | 1 Comment

 

Several executives at Google have deleted their social-media accounts after Project Veritas exposed their partisan bias. One of the totalitarians at Google, “Responsible Innovation” Commissar Jen Genai, has resorted to claiming that Project Veritas “edited the video” to create a false impression about the company’s efforts to prevent Trump’s re-election.

Meanwhile, Project Veritas has published a leaked email in which another Google totalitarian, Liam Hopkins, smears PragerU, Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro as “nazis” producing “right-wing content.”

This all goes back to what we learned from the firing of James Damore: Google is staffed by left-wing ideologues, who consider any dissent from their radical agenda to be “hate,” and they are determined to prevent conservative ideas from being disseminated on their platform.



 

Category: Media Bias
« go back — keep looking »