The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Notorious Transgender Activist Compares Feminist Critics to Drug Addicts

Posted on | May 7, 2018 | 1 Comment

 

Feminist critics of transgenderism are “dogmatic” and debating them is “pointless,” according to Char Vortryss, a member of a controversial group that will hold a panel Saturday at the San Francisco Public Library.

“Until you come to understand that your dogma is harmful [and] decide to find another way, ‘debate’ is pointless,” Vortryss said in a Twitter thread. “It’s like with an addict. Interventions don’t work. You gotta find your own bottom, decide on your own that you’ve had enough [and] want to change for the better. Until then, all we can do is protect ourselves from the harm you’re trying to cause.”

A male-to-female transgender also known as “Char the Butcher,” Vortryss became notorious for having the slogan “Die Cis Scum” tattooed on his/“her” arm, posing with a baseball bat in a photo that was perceived by many as a threat to feminist critics of transgenderism.

 

“Cis” is the antonym of “trans.” Disparaging biological women as “cis scum” was part of a long-running conflict between transgender activists and critics they call “TERFs” (trans-exclusive radical feminists).

Last month, the San Francisco Public Library announced that it had made changes to an exhibit by Vortryss’s group, the Degenderettes, after complaints from patrons about “artwork that could be interpreted as promoting violence.” Among the exhibits in the Degenderettes display was a blood-stained T-shirt with the slogan, “I punch TERFs.”

The Degenderettes library exhibit (above) included a T-shirt by Mya Byrne (below).

 

The feminist blog Gender Trender pointed out that the shirt displayed in the library exhibit had been worn at the San Francisco Pride Parade by Degenderettes member, 40-year-old “Mya Byrne.” A folk singer formerly known as Jeremiah Birnbaum, Byrne was criticized in 2015 for “misogyny” after publishing a poem about the adolescent experience of masturbating while wearing his/“her” sister’s underwear.

Warning against “a crazy-ass woman-hating subculture of straight men who identify as transwomen and . . . call themselves TransDykes,” the Gender Trender blog condemned Byrne as part of a movement of “deranged” heterosexual men who advocate “violence against women.”

 

Char Vortryss is the transgender alias of 34-year-old Clinton James Crawford, who in February 2017 was one of three people granted petitions by a San Francisco judge “to change their gender to ‘non-binary’ — meaning they are legally neither male nor female” according to California courts. Vortryss’s spouse Xin Farrish is also “non-binary.” Vortryss concluded his/“her” Twitter thread by announcing a panel the Degenderettes will host Saturday at the San Francisco library.

 

Vortryss linked a Facebook announcement that included this:

Furthermore, the exhibition of art created by the Degenderettes at the Hormel Center has been subject to a misinformation campaign run by trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) and far-right extremists. Pieces of the exhibit have been decontextualized and misrepresented in order to draw negative attention to both the Degenderettes and the San Francisco Public Library. The talk-back will feature moderation and steps will be taken to ensure the safety of attendees, but it is important for us to note that there may be greater attention on the event due to the above.

 

Transgender activists have done more that merely threaten their feminist critics with violence. Last year, 60-year-old Maria Maria MacLachlan was attacked by a transgender activist in London’s Hyde Park, an incident that made international headlines. More recently, British police have investigated “hate speech” accusations against feminists, including long-time lesbian activist Linda Bellos, who was “interviewed under caution” last month for remarks she made at a November event.



 

RECENTLY:

 

Category: Sex Trouble, The Transgender Cult

Rule 5 Sunday: Crash Test Girl

Posted on | May 6, 2018 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Fans of the Discovery Channel’s Mythbusters show are well acquainted with Kari Byron, easily the most attractive member of the show’s “B Team”. The rest of us probably have only heard of the show because it had Kari in it. At any rate, she’s got a book out now, Crash Test Girl, in which she maintains that not only do scientific questions yield to the scientific method but so can your life questions. Here we see Ms. Byron tastefully attired in an R2D2 dress.

I’m pretty sure this is the droid I’m looking for.

Ninety Miles From Tyranny brings us Hot Pick of the Late Night, The 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #244, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns; meanwhile, Animal Magnetism goes into the swamp for Rule Five CDC Lies By Omission Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon.

EBL’s herd this week includes Sarah Edmondson, Cultural Appropriation Rule 5, Linda Vester, Westworld Season 2, OMG Please No, Mercedes Schlapp, Sophia Hutchins, Split, Jojo Fletcher, Stretch, May The 4th Be With You, Vintage Hollywood Cinco De Mayo, and Derby Day Rule 5.

A View From The Beach gives us Amanda Peet, Paging Dr. Frankenstein!, The Revolving Door of Russiagate, “Stacy’s Mom”, First World Problems, More Random Russiagate, In New York, Pussy Grabs You, America is Ready for Sexbots, Soulless Ginger Attempts Humor, Fails, Wind Farms Foul Weather Forecasts, and I’m Not Sure This is Sound Science, But Why Take Chances?

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Olga Kurylenko, his Vintage Babe is Nancy Kovack, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Griffin. At Dustbury, it’s it’s Marilyn Milian and Adele.


Thanks to everyone for their luscious linkagery!


Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

Category: Rule 5

FMJRA 2.0: Mexican Radio

Posted on | May 5, 2018 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Rule 5 Sunday: Bikini Barrel Racing?
Animal Magnetism
Ninety Miles From Tyranny
A View From The Beach
EBL
Proof Positive

The Rhetoric of ‘Social Justice’
A View From The Beach
EBL

The Other Podcast: Episode 10
EBL

FMJRA 2.0: Exactly What You Wanted
The Pirate’s Cove
A View From The Beach
EBL

In The Mailbox: 04.30.18
EBL
Proof Positive

In The Mailbox: 05.01.18
A View From The Beach
EBL
Proof Positive

Yes, America, Erynn Brook Hates You
EBL
Pushing Rubber Downhill

In The Mailbox: 05.02.18
A View From The Beach
EBL
Proof Positive

‘Preying on Vulnerable Teenagers’?
EBL

What the Democrat Party Wants to Teach America’s Children About ‘Gender’
EBL

‘Big Brother’ Gets a Sex-Change
EBL
Pushing Rubber Downhill

In The Mailbox: 05.03.18
A View From The Beach
EBL
Proof Positive

Some Advice for You ‘Incel’ Losers
EBL
Pushing Rubber Downhill

In The Mailbox: 05.04.18
EBL
Proof Positive

Top linkers this week:

  1. EBL (14)
  2. (tied) A View From The Beach & Proof Positive (6)

Thanks to everyone for all the linkagery!


Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Try Amazon Music Unlimited Free Trial

Category: FMJRA Award

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Predator

Posted on | May 5, 2018 | 1 Comment

 

Nice career you had for a while there, Professor Diaz:

Author Junot Díaz has withdrawn from a writers’ festival in Australia after fellow writers accused him of past sexual misconduct and misogyny, organizers said Saturday, adding that a moment of reckoning had arrived for the Pulitzer Prize winner.
Díaz was confronted Friday in a Q&A session at the Sydney Writers’ Festival by author Zinzi Clemmons. She asked Díaz about his recent New Yorker essay detailing his sexual assault as an 8-year-old boy and then asked him why he had put her in a vulnerable position when she was a student six years ago.
Clemmons . . . later tweeted that when she was a 26-year-old graduate student, Díaz cornered her and forcibly kissed her after she invited him to speak at a workshop.
Subsequently, writers Carmen Maria Machado and Monica Byrne tweeted they had also been subjected to inappropriate and aggressive behavior from Díaz. . . .
Clemmons told The Associated Press she believed she was far from being the only woman “exploited” by Díaz, a creative writing professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and said she could not bear to think of the others.
“Junot Díaz has made his behavior the burden of young women — particularly women of color — for far too long, enabled by his team and the institutions that employ him,” Clemmons wrote in a statement to the AP. . . . .

Yeah, I’m totally shocked that a “progressive” advocate of “social justice” has been exposed as a sexual predator, for the millionth time.

(Hat-tip: Donald Douglas on Twitter.)

 

Category: Crime, Education, Progressivism, Racism, Sex Trouble

Transgender Supremacy: Understanding the Ideology of a Totalitarian Menace

Posted on | May 5, 2018 | 3 Comments

Clinton James Crawford, a/k/a “Char Vortryss” a/k/a “Char the Butcher.”

Nobody actually believes in “equality.” No such thing as “equality” has ever existed in human history, nor is there any policy agenda which could feasibly bring about “equality” in the future. (You could read Thomas Sowell’s The Quest for Cosmic Justice, which has a chapter entitled “The Mirage of Equality,” if you are unclear on this subject, but if everyone read Sowell, we wouldn’t be having these arguments, would we?)

Everyone has their own hierarchy of values, and humans are naturally concerned for their own selfish interests, so it is absurd to think that anyone would propose a policy of “equality” with the intent that this would harm their interests, or negate their preferred values. When we see people advocating “equality,” therefore, we know that they are either deluded or dishonest, or perhaps both. So-called “social justice warriors” (SJWs) are not to be trusted, because their egalitarian “progressive” ideology is based upon false beliefs. To claim that the existing social order is inherently unjust requires the claimant to offer a feasible proposal for a more just society. Students of history know that such schemes have a sordid and blood-soaked record. During the 20th century, Marxist-Leninist regimes killed an estimated 100 million of their own citizens in pursuit of “social justice” and, if these regimes could not bring about a condition of “equality” despite exercising all the powers of totalitarian dictatorship, should we suppose “social justice” could be implemented through the less rigorous measures of democratic governments?

Cynic that I am, it is always my suspicion that those who speak of “equality” and “social justice” seek some personal advantage by such advocacy, if only to enhance their reputations by putting themselves on “the right side of history.” The question of motive always comes to mind when we encounter leftist arguments, and the title of this blog post might well have been, “Why Does Yonatan Zunger Hate Lesbians?”

In January 2017, a couple of weeks before President Trump’s inauguration, Zunger wrote an article entitled “Tolerance is not a moral precept.” This was essentially a clumsy restatement of the arguments that Herbert Marcuse notoriously made in “Repressive Tolerance” (1965), i.e., that the Left should not extend “tolerance” to the Right. Keep in mind, of course, that scarcely 10 years earlier, the Left had demanded (and liberals had defended) “tolerance” for Communists who were, after all, pawns of Stalin’s brutal dictatorship. By the mid-1960s, however, especially after LBJ’s crushing landslide re-election, the Left decided that liberal “tolerance” was now a hindrance to its ambitions, as opponents of the Left might have equal right to assert that their opinions and beliefs also deserved a fair hearing and protection against reprisal.

The subtext of Zunger’s article was, of course, that the Left should not extend “tolerance” to supporters of President Trump, and he chose to illustrate his argument with a curious photo.

 

This photo of a radical transgender activist with a baseball bat, Zunger captioned “perhaps the perfect summary of the appropriate limits of tolerance,” and it must be noted that the person in the photo is a member of a San Francisco group called “The Degenderettes.”

The Degenderettes slogan “Die Cis Scum” was popularized in 2012 by transgender White Nationalist “Char The Butcher”.

So says the feminist blog Gender Trender in reporting on a recent controversy at the San Francisco Public Library, which hosted an “art exhibit” put together by this bizarre gang of demented freaks:

The San Francisco Public Library unveiled an exhibit [in April] featuring blood stained t-shirts encouraging patrons to “punch” feminists, along with several installations of deadly weapons painted pink: baseball bats covered in barbed wire, axes, among others, all designed by men to kill feminist women.
The male creators of the exhibit also included a helpful manifesto, blaming lesbians, feminists and other uppity women for causing more deaths (by “harassing” men with their dastardly opinions!) than all the actual real murders committed by violent men.
The display, launched mere days after the mass murder of women in Toronto by “incel” terrorist Alek Minassian and echoing his philosophy, was funded by the non-profit Friends of The San Francisco Public Library and created by The Degenderettes, led by Scout Tran Caffee, founder of Trans Dykes: the anti-lesbian Antifa.  The group specifically targets lesbians as “oppressors” of men — because they exclude males from their dating pools. The men in the group identify as transgender and consider themselves to be male lesbians. . . .

You can read the rest of that at Gender Trender. Because I have been writing about the conflict between transgender activists and their feminist critics (“TERFs,” trans-exclusive radical feminists) since January 2014, I am quite familiar with this ideological dispute and its participants. Although I am an outspoken opponent of feminism, this is a controversy in which any sane person must agree with radical feminists. There is no such thing as a “male lesbian” and, whatever else one might say about the phenomenon of transgenderism, it is wrong for men who enjoy pretending to be women to accuse people who actually are women of “hate” for not wanting to date so-called “transwomen.”

 

“Would you date a trans person? Honestly? . . . Well, if you said ‘no,’ I’m sorry, but that’s pretty discriminatory.”
— Riley J. Dennis, November 2016

Accusing people of bigotry because they don’t want to date you? If that’s not a textbook definition of “entitlement,” I don’t know what is. If a Chinese man prefers to date only Chinese women, this doesn’t make him a racist, nor does it make him a homophobe but, according to Riley Dennis, heterosexuality per se is a form of unjust discrimination. More to the point, however, homosexuality — specifically, lesbianism — is condemned as “discriminatory” because, like nearly all autogynephiles, Dennis considers himself/“herself” a transgender “lesbian.”

This is absolute insanity, and the totalitarianism of the transgender cult consists of (a) their effort to compel others to participate in their delusions and (b) their attempts to silence anyone who criticizes this agenda. Meanwhile, back in San Francisco . . .

Evidently, the Degenderettes “art show” generated some bad publicity, because the library was forced to make changes:

SFPL exhibits are intended to address social issues of the time. We do not endorse nor advocate the viewpoints of the exhibits. Due to concerns raised by library patrons, we are altering the degenderettes antifa art exhibit at the Main Library to remove a shirt, a piece of artwork that could be interpreted as promoting violence, which is incompatible with our exhibitions policy.

And in announcing these changes on their Facebook page, the library attached a copy of a poster for the exhibit, which included a quote from Yonatan Zunger’s January 2017 article about “tolerance.”

 

Why does Yonatan Zunger hate lesbians? Why does he support these baseball-bat-carrying freaks who want to inflict violence on feminists? Because they align themselves with “Antifa”? Because they don’t like Republicans? By the obverse of that logic, I should be celebrating neo-Nazis. On the contrary, however, I find myself defending lesbian feminists who, whatever their other errors may be, at least understand that the categories of “male” and “female” are biological facts, and not political ideologies or fashion statements which can be claimed as “identities” by anyone on the basis of any whim that suits them.

We must think back to 1938, when Hitler demanded the Sudetenland. The question at issue was not whether one liked Germans, or whether one thought that the lines on the map of Central Europe as drawn in the aftermath of the First World War were ideal. No, what was at issue — Churchill saw this clearly, as Chamberlain did not — was Hitler’s implacable aggression. Hitler had not been subtle in Mein Kampf about the scope of his ambitions, and his totalitarian regime was devoted to military conquest. All radical movements are like this: One is never confronted by their final demand. Give them everything they demand today, and tomorrow they will return with a new list of demands.

Chamberlain and the appeasers never understood this about Hitler, but Churchill saw it quite clearly: To appease such an aggressor, he said, was to feed the crocodile, hoping to be eaten last.

We need not speculate why the bullies with baseball bats imagine they can impose their will on us, and silence all opposition by accusing their critics of “hate.” Anyone who has paid attention to the Culture War knows very well what inspired them to this aggression, and it is intensely ironic that lesbian feminists are the ones now manning the front-line trenches against the bizarre ideology of the transgender cult. Yet it will do little good to recount the history which has brought us to this desperate predicament, or to scorn alliance with those who, in some sense, were complicit in the decades-long descent into the ungodly madness of “gender theory.” No, let us make no recriminations nor indulge any I-told-so lectures now, when we are confronted by the implacable foe. All who fight on the side of truth are our allies, so long as the battle rages.

 

Nobody actually believes in “equality,” and the transgender cult’s rhetoric is an implausible farrago of nonsense. “Transwomen are women” is one of their oft-repeated slogans, which no honest and intelligent person could possibly believe. Hormone injections and surgery can turn a man into a simulacrum of a woman, but this artificial creation is not actually the same thing as a woman, and everybody knows this. In arguing for “equality” based on such fraud, what the transgender cult is actually doing is asserting their own superiority. These deranged fanatics claim the authority to decide who is or is not a woman and, if you deny that they have such authority, they will accuse you of “hate.”

This non-negotiable demand of transgender ideologues — that everyone else must defer to their authority — is totalitarian, an imposition of power, as dishonest as Hitler’s claim to the Sudetenland.

If we wish to be free — to defend our liberty, including our right to speak the truth — we must reject the transgender lie of “equality.”

Like I keep saying, people need to wake the hell up.



 

 

RECENTLY:

 

Category: The Transgender Cult

In The Mailbox: 05.04.18

Posted on | May 4, 2018 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 05.04.18

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: The Pooperintendent Of Schools
Twitchy: J.R. Salzman et al. Bust Vet, House Candidate For Lying About Guns
Louder With Crowder: Democrat Proposes Forcing Gun Owners To Give Up “Assault Weapons”
According To Hoyt: Heinlein Was An Optimist
Monster Hunter Nation: Further Examples Of Why, In My Opinion, Mike Glyer Is A Scumbag And File 770 Is Evil
Vox Popoli: A Bureaucratic Approach To Literature


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott:
American Power: The Redistribution Of Sex
American Thinker: Terms of Entrapment
Animal Magnetism: Rule Five CDC Lies By Omission Friday
BattleSwarm: LinkSwarm For May 4
BLACKFIVE: James Phelan, The Agency
Da Tech Guy: Last Man Standing and The Hill
Don Surber: Sermon From Our Lady Of Never Trump
Dustbury: AAA Is Very Narrow
The Geller Report: 200 German Migrants Attack Police, Force Retreat, also, Parents Accuse CAIR Of Lying In “Islamophobia” Lawsuit
Hogewash: Europa Rising, also, Team Kimberlin Post Of The Day
Joe For America: Cornell U Offering Course On “Overwhelming Evidence” That Global Warming Is Real
JustOneMinute: Yet More On Trump And Campaign Finance Violations
Legal Insurrection: Manafort Judge Says Mueller Only Cares About Impeachment Or Prosecution Of Trump, also, Wanna Join Us For Cultural Appreciation Day?
Power Line: Our Deranged White House Press Corps, also, “White Privilege” And “Toxic Masculinity”
Shark Tank: Gillum Voted For A Coal Plant
Shot In The Dark: Nick Coleman Is Still A Monkey
STUMP: Alternative Assets & Pension Performance
The Jawa Report: The Forth Will Be With You Always
The Political Hat: How To Solve Britain’s Bladed Weapon Epidemic
This Ain’t Hell: Friday Morning Feelgood Stories, also, Hayden Says Jade Helm Hysteria Generated By Russian Bots
Victory Girls: Redskins Cheerleaders Are Boarding The #MeToo Bus, And I Don’t Care
Weasel Zippers: Federal Judge Allows Two Illegals To Get Married So One Can Ride The Other’s Asylum Application, also, CNN Writer Says Kanye Should Be No-Platformed
Mark Steyn: The Process Is The Punishment (As Always)


Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Outlet Deals

Category: Linkagery

Some Advice for You ‘Incel’ Losers

Posted on | May 3, 2018 | Comments Off on Some Advice for You ‘Incel’ Losers

 

Never give your enemy a reason to celebrate. Nothing gives a feminist more sadistic pleasure than making fun of guys who can’t get laid. For a bunch of pathetic losers to organize a “movement” on the basis of their inability to get laid is, to put it as mildly as possible, not helpful.

When that autistic Canadian plowed down more than 20 people, killing 10 of them, on a Toronto sidewalk last month, it inspired dozens of columns by feminists who seized upon the loser’s pre-massacre Facebook post: “The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!”

How about not doing stuff like that? Because, as I say, it’s not helpful.

The autistic Canadian apparently didn’t expect to survive his rental-van rampage and, when a police officer confronted him, the loser was captured on video begging: “Shoot me in the head!”

Whenever we see a story about a mass-murder rampage that ends with suicide — the Columbine massacre, for example — the obvious question occurs: “Why mass murder? Why not just kill yourself first?”

It’s the go-out-in-a-blaze-of-glory revenge fantasy.

The loser considers himself a victim. He feels humiliated by his insignificance, and he wants to die in a way that will “make news.” So, rather than jumping off a bridge or swallowing a bottle of sleeping pills, the suicidal loser rents a van and runs over random people because, in his warped mind, this will avenge the wrongs he feels he has suffered.

Except, of course, these random people had nothing to do with why the autistic Canadian couldn’t get laid, and the same thing can be said for every other “involuntary celibate” loser on Reddit. The only person to blame for your problems is you. It’s not the fault of Sohe Chung, the 22-year-old student who was the youngest victim of last month’s Toronto rampage, nor was it the fault of Betty Forsyth, 94, the oldest victim. None of the people who got run over by that addled freak had anything to do with him or his problems. So how could this be counted as “revenge”?

This is sad testimony to how pathetic you “incel” losers really are. Your revenge fantasies are as ill-conceived as all your other fantasies.

‘Incels’ are almost always men, often young, who can’t find sexual relationships — but blame the behaviour of women for this. . . .
Incels blame feminists for having destroyed the chances of ‘ordinary’ men. The Reddit Incel group R/Incels was banned after becoming a haven for misogynist content. Articles posted to the subreddit included, ‘All women are sluts’, ‘reasons why women are the embodiment of evil’ and ‘proof that girls are nothing but trash that use men.’ . . .
‘Incels’ describe sexually active women as ‘Stacys’ who have sex with brainless ‘Chads’ — many blame feminism for their predicament. . . .
A ‘Chad’ is a sexually active ‘alpha male’ type who has sex with women — and is thus hated by ‘incels’.

Speaking as a “Chad” named Stacy, I would advise losers who actually want to solve their problem to begin by rejecting the “Alpha/Beta” categorization as useless for this project. Your problem is not Chad or Stacy, your problem is you. Unless and until you can accept the reality of your own incompetence as the cause of your failure, there is no point even giving you any further advice. You are the problem, not them.

And you know something? Confessing your own inept helplessness might be your best line. Think of yourself as a Harmless Lost Puppy, and try to convey that impression in your approach to women. Develop a way of talking that conveys a cheerful but clueless demeanor. Because every woman wants to help a Harmless Lost Puppy, right?

See, the thing is, there is no One Right Way to get laid. You can read a million blog posts at pickup artist (PUA) sites, but think about this: If those guys are really getting so much action, how come they’ve got so much time to write long lectures about how to get laid? Like, if you’re hooking up with bikini models on a regular basis, why even bother logging onto the Internet? And if your tactics are so perfect, do you really want to share your pickup secrets with the whole world? Heck, no.

My own success baffled everyone, myself included. Was I an “Alpha male”? Was I tall and muscular with a dominant personality? No, I was a akinny clown, as homely as the north end of southbound mule. But I have a few redeeming traits, and was keenly observant. The problem with losers, generally, is that they tend to get obsessively fixated on one girl (the “rifle” approach) rather than talking to every girl they meet (the “shotgun” approach), which is how you get the Law of Large Numbers working to your advantage. Also, stop being distracted by beauty. If you are a total loser, you can’t afford to be picky. Operate on the assumption that any obviously attractive girl is out of your range, and instead concentrate on finding an ugly girl who might actually like you.

Griselda Hoggface may be your only hope to avoid Darwinian extinction, and you should be nice to her. A complete loser like you should be grateful that any woman can even stand to be in the same room with you. You’re a disgusting excuse for a human being, and everybody hates you.

The basic problem with guys like “the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger” is that their self-esteem is too high. They are arrogant fools who don’t hate themselves as much as they should, and therefore fail to understand why they deserve to be rejected. Unable to accept the reality of their own pathetic condition — vile scum, deserving nothing but contempt — they engage in the exact same reversal rationalization that is the basis of feminist ideology: “I’m unhappy and nobody likes me and, because this cannot be my own fault, therefore I am a victim of oppression!”

 

Feminism is an anti-male hate movement, based on the belief that there are two things wrong with men:

  1. Everything men say;
    and
  2. Everything men do.

So-called “men’s rights activists” (MRAs) make the mistake of believing feminists are actually sincere in their rhetoric about “equality.” This is rather like Chamberlain believing Hitler would be content with acquiring the Sudetenland. Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It, and if there were only one male left alive on this planet, feminists would accuse him of “oppressing” them.

The good news is that most women aren’t feminists, otherwise Hillary Clinton would be president, right? Certainly the Chads of the world don’t bother kowtowing to feminist demands, and no “incel” loser should imagine he could benefit from a feminist regime of “equality.”

Feminists hate you and they want you dead. Or locked away in prison, which is where Alek Minassian will spend the rest of his miserable life.

Running over random people in downtown Toronto isn’t going to solve any problems and, as I said, never give your enemy a reason to celebrate, which is what feminists are doing in the wake of the autistic Canadian’s rampage: “See? We were right! Male violence! Misogyny!”

You idiot “incel” losers are your own worst enemies. It would be wrong for me to give you any useful advice, because if you ever got a clue, you might reproduce, and your DNA would continue polluting the gene pool. You’re a failed specimen, an error of evolution, a Darwinian mistake, and it’s probably best for you to delete your account and kill yourself.

“The Incel Rebellion has already begun!”

What a sick joke. You’re a disgrace, even by Canadian standards.



 

Category: Sex Trouble

In The Mailbox: 05.03.18

Posted on | May 3, 2018 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 05.03.18

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Wobblies Take Over Oregon Burgerville
Twitchy: Ellen Pao Tweets Tech CEOs About Employing Incels And WHOA NELLY
Louder With Crowder: Rapper T.I. Comes To Kanye’s Defense


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Throwing Away A Perfectly Good Black Boy
American Power: When Old Left And Far Right Share A Bedroom
American Thinker: A Leftist Core Belief – Denying Evil
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Fusion News
BattleSwarm: Islamic State-Inspired Mall Attack Thwarted
Bring The HEAT: Here, Have Some Warthog
CDR Salamander: Aucoin Rediscovers His RIO Instincts, also, Diversity Thursday
Da Tech Guy: Saturday At The Defund PP Protest, also, Cecile’s Legacy
Don Surber: Kanye Just Doubled Trump’s Support Among Black Men
Dustbury: Help Like This I Don’t Need
The Geller Report: Swedish Toddler’s Mom Gang-Raped & Filmed By “Child” Refugees, also, Facebook Enlists Eric Holder’s Law Firm To “Advise” On Anti-Conservative Bias
Hogewash: Another Excuse, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Joe For America: Trump To Cut “Family Planning” Money From Family-Killing Abortionists
JustOneMinute: Giuliani Indulging In Ex Post Rationalization
Legal Insurrection: Norks Reportedly Free Three American Detainees, also, We Can Now Conclusively Say The Iran Nuke Deal Was Induced by Fraud
Power Line: Caputo’s Complaint, also, A BRIDGES Too Far
Shark Tank: Police Union Endorses Putnam & Graham In Governor’s Race
Shot In The Dark: An Idea Whose Time Must End
STUMP: Happy Public Finance Story – The Detroit Bankruptcy
This Ain’t Hell: PR ANG C-130 Crashes In South Carolina, also, Navy’s Newest LPD To Be Named For WW2 Medal Of Honor Recipient
Victory Girls: CIA Wrong On Russian Pro-Trump Interference
Weasel Zippers: Students Across America Walk Out In Support Of 2A, also, Barron Trump Reportedly Bullied At School
Mark Steyn: Post-Boy Scouts And Forever First Ladies


Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals

Category: Linkagery
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin