Aw, C’mon, Governor Perry
Posted on | November 16, 2011 | 62 Comments
by Smitty
This is either a result of (a) incomplete analysis, or (b) a cheap populist appeal:
“Any congressman or senator that uses their insider knowledge to profit in the stock market ought to be sent to jail—period,” said Mr. Perry, who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination.
This sounds swell, but is going to hit a major brain freeze right around Article 1, Section 5:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two-thirds, expel a Member.
What I think would be effective, if I may utter the dread words “Constitutional Amendment” is along the lines of:
Every Congress, in the 18th month thereof, shall require a confidence vote by at least two thirds of the legislatures of the States. Failure to meet this confidence threshold shall result in no member of that Congress being allowed to retain their seat after that seat is next up for election.
I call this the “Kill Switch” Amendment. It’s not an individual term limit, but rather a global one. Chemotherapy, sadly, wipes out a few good cells with the bad. But don’t let your love of good tissue trick you into tolerating cancer. The Paul Ryans and Allen Wests are going to get themselves re-elected. If the Congress fails its confidence vote, they can either run for a Senate seat, state office, or just take a two-year sabbatical.
Example reasons for amputating a Congress en masse could include, but are not limited to:
- Failure to balance the budget.
- Failure to limit the federal government to the enumerated powers of the Constitution
- Failure to check the Executive branch.
- Failure to do more than insult the notion adhering to ethics.
- Failure to read legislation prior to voting on it.
- Failure to adhere to the Oath of Office.
I’m not going to say I had Princess Pelosi in mind when I wrote that list.
The argument that “government is too complex; we need to retain experience” is mostly specious. When someone says it’s too complex, the follow-up question is why we haver permitted the cancer of complexity to overtake matters. For example, in doing the homework for the simple act of retaining a nanny for The World’s Youngest Blogger, I have two words for the IRS, the second of which is “you”. The only reason that Doing The Right Thing with respect to taxation resembles a course in Differential Equations is that we have allowed to many “experts” to obfuscate matters.
The notion of a Kill Switch has the virtue of brutal simplicity. Possibly there would be a way to rig the idea; but would you vote for somebody willing to change their name legally just to get into office?
I predict that, with enough fresh blood and reduced incumbency, the Congress could move closer to serving the people, and resemble less an obnoxious aristocracy. You see that in the relatively less corrupt military; when the people are shifted around often enough, the focus moves more to accomplishing the mission. Sure, people end up making themselves look good, but that remains more a by-product of getting things done. Arguably, there is some loss to the size of mission scope brought on by lack of experience. However, I’m contending here that less scope is better. Or did you think ObamaCare was a keen idea?
Now, the idea of judicial term limits may be worth exploring. And one can admire the way Rick is willing to stir the pot, as with telling the truth about Socialist Security. Meanwhile, Governor Perry, can you please quit with the emotionally nifty appeals that are not going to mean much in the real world?
Update: linked at Dustbury.
LIVE AT FIVE – 11.16.11
Posted on | November 16, 2011 | 7 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
State Investigating Ex-PSU Coach Sandusky’s Charity Amid Child Sex Abuse Case
When crying, stung by bee
Ousted Wall Street Protesters Face An Uncertain Future
Bloomberg denies First Amendment includes right to camp out
As Rivals Slip, Gingrich Finds Traction
LOLWUT?
POLITICS
Mayors Grow Weary Of Filthy #OWS Hippies And Their Shenanigans
New York, other cities move to break up occupiers’ camps
Solyndra: Energy Department Pushed To Keep Layoffs Quiet Until After Midterm Elections
Illegal Aliens Descend On Alabama To Protest Immigration Law
Governor Asterisk Hosts 100th NH Event
Feds, ACLU Ask Appeals Court To Strike Down Alabama Immigration Law
Boehner Calls Tax Plan That Increases Revenue $300 Billion Fair Offer
Former Holder Chief Of Staff’s Nomination To Bench Imperiled By “Fast And Furious”
Copyright Office To Endorse Controversial Hollywood-Backed Online Piracy Act
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Wall Street Rises On US Economy, Progress In Italy
Euro Falls To Five-Week Low Before France, Spain Bond Auctions
Asian Shares Sluggish On Euro Zone Contagion
Dell Outlook Cloudy
Report: FHA Could Need Taxpayer Bailout Next Year
Kindle Fire: A Grown-Up E-Reader With Tablet Spark
Nook Tablet: Great Hardware Begging For An Ecosystem
Facebook Security Breach Raises Concerns
AMD Bulldozer Chip Wants To Flatten Intel
Apple’s iPhone 4S Battery Troubles Now Joined By New Problems
SPORTS
Duke’s Coach K Passes Bobby Knight On Wins List
NBA Players File Antitrust Lawsuit
Tigers Ace Justin Verlander Unanimous Pick For AL Cy Young
QB Matt Leinart Gets Starting Opportunity With Texans
Hockey Night In Canada: League Wants To Better Protect Goalies
Bruins Win Sixth Straight
Wild Surge To 4-2 Win Over Blue Jackets
Avalanche Lose To Crosby-less Penguins
Nationals Chasing Wandy Rodriguez?
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Heather Locklear, Jack Wagner Call Off Engagement
NBC’s “Prime Suspect” To Shut Down Production
Diane Keaton: Bulimia, Woody And Me
Matt Weiner: “Mad Men” Goes To (20)11
No Booze For “Boardwalk Empire”‘s Paz De La Huerta
Justin Timberlake’s Marine Date Tells Her Story
FOREIGNERS
Syria Releases Prisoners, Death Toll Drops Ahead Of Arab League Meeting
Palestinian “Freedom Riders” Board Israeli Buses In Protest
Afghan Elders Fear Tragedy If US Leaves Too Soon
Thai Army Turns Flood Relief Into PR Opportunity
Euros Tell Israel Military Strike On Iran Nuke Program Not An Option
Papademos Government Expected To Survive Confidence Vote, But Cracks Already Appearing In Alliance
Clegg Clashes With Cameron Over EU
Philippines Wants Decisive Action On China Sea Oil Claims
BLOGS & STUFF
NRO Corner: #OWS Protests Eviction
OWS Exposed: NYC Claims Occupiers Stockpiling Weapons
Hit & Run: NY Court Upholds Eviction Of #OWS
Weasel Zippers: Charlie Rangel Outraged At Eviction Of #OWS From Zuccotti Park
Ramesh Ponnuru: GOP Loses Way By Misreading Bush History
Hot Air: Limbaugh Comes To Cain’s Defense
Power Line: The Trouble With Crony Capitalism
Lonely Conservative: White House Urged Solyndra To Delay Layoffs Until After 2010 Elections
Seth McLaughlin: Rick Perry Calls For Part-Time Congress, Term-Limited Judges
Examiner: Crackdown On #OWS Coordinated With Federal Law Enforcement
Conservatives4Palin: Farm State Legislators Attempting To Use Supercommittee To Write New Farm Bill
Michael Z. Williamson: Wait, I Have This Idea…
‘Sugar Baby’ Seeks ‘Successful Mentor’
Posted on | November 15, 2011 | 15 Comments
Her name is Julia Biryukova and her toddler is missing:
The website offers a “secure place for like-minded Sugar Daddies, Mommies and Sugar Babies to meet each other.”
JB signed up to be a sugar baby, “which means she’s looking for someone wealthy to take care of her,” Wade said. JB said she is “looking for financial stability and assistance.”
“I am looking for a successful mentor,” the profile said. “I am looking for a REAL man. YOU tell me YOUR ‘ideal’ arrangement!”
The profile says JB expects “$3,001 – $5,000 monthly.”
The profile page features nine photographs of Biryukova and describes her as 30 years old, a nonsmoker and nondrinker who can “speak fluent Russian, Ukrainian and English” and lives in Redmond. The last time JB accessed the account was Oct. 26, Wade said.
Biryukova, 30, is a native of Ukraine. She moved to the United States as a child and has an apartment in Redmond. She and her husband, Solomon Metalwala, are involved in a divorce and child custody dispute.
Biryukova told police she left her 2-year-old son, Sky Metalwala, alone in her car Nov. 6 and went to get gas with her 4-year-old daughter. She said that when she came back about an hour later, Sky was gone.
Police said the car started and ran fine when they took it for a test drive. Investigators said they have been frustrated that Biryukova has not answered questions about discrepancies in her story.
Could an anthropological essay be written about this? Of course. We remember the case of Susan Smith, who drowned her two young children because her new boyfriend wasn’t interested in becoming a stepfather. High rates of divorce and illegitimacy have put a lot of women into situations similar to Biryukova’s, where motherhood impairs their romantic prospects.
Biryukova’s evident belief that she might fetch more than $3,000 a month in support as some rich man’s “sugar baby” certainly casts suspicion on her in this case. How would a 30-year-old divorced mom fare in such market? And how much would she improve her market position by striking “mom” from her profile?
This is a larger problem symbolized by this situation and it would be worth an essay, were I in the mood to write an essay.
Old And Busted: Nobel Peace Prize.
The New Hotness: Confucian Peace Prize
Posted on | November 15, 2011 | 13 Comments
by Smitty
In Vladimir style, he wakes up one morning with a prize so cool that neither Jimmy Carter, nor St. Albert of Gore, nor even the vaunted #OccupyResoluteDesk have one:
After two wars in Chechnya, one conflict in South Ossetia and two of the deadliest hostage relief operations in modern history, the former KGB officer was named on Monday as the winner of the second Confucian peace prize.
It is unclear if Putin is even aware of the award which was chosen by an obscure cultural organisation, the China International Peace Research Centre, from a field of nominees including Bill Gates, Angela Merkel, Kofi Annan, Jacob Zuma and a Tibetan Panchen Lama imposed by Beijing.
The 16-judge panel said that Putin deserved the award because his criticism of Nato’s military engagement in Libya was “outstanding in keeping world peace”, regardless of the fact that it had no bearing on the outcome of the north African conflict.
The five member Nobel Prize Committee could not be reached for comment. Sissypuss the Blog Kitty, however, has it on good authority that them Norwegians are sure-a pissed-a off, you betcha. Ole Danbolt Mjøs, Nobel Committee chair, purportedly expressed outrage:
Norway will not permit the Peace Prize brand to be diluted by this ‘Made in China’ frippery! This means war!
Putin is said to have interrupted #OccupyResoluteDesk on the links with the news:
Bow to this, Barack! I’ve got the Confucian Peace Prize. Also, no trouble getting re-elected. Ask me nicely, and I’ll offer you some advice on campaign videos. Later, sucker.
via Memeorandum
Update: more at Troglopundit.
Remembering Newt’s Awfulness
Posted on | November 15, 2011 | 100 Comments
Just now, I called Dan Collins to talk about the grim prospect that threatens to destroy all hope of carrying forward the Tea Party momentum of the 2010 midterms: Mitt vs. Newt as the final showdown for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination. Dan was saying that this has provided him an occasion to remember all the reasons he can’t stand Newt Gingrich.
The idea that Newt could fill the role of a champion of grassroots conservatism against the Republican Establishment is so absurd as to be laughable, if the situation were not so tragic.
“The limits of Newt Gingrich’s staying power” is the Washington Post headline expressing what is perhaps the only hopeful aspect of the most recent polls: The Newt Bubble can’t possibly last, and eventually some other Not Romney will emerge as the leading alternative. However, viewing the situation as it stands now — seven weeks before the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses — by the time the Newt Bubble ends, there will be little time for any other Not Romney to raise the big money needed to fund a campaign against Romney in Florida.
Gingrich Said Paid by Freddie Mac to Win Allies
— Bloomberg News
Gingrich needs to explain what
he did for Freddie and Fannie
— Jennifer Rubin
Yeah, a bit more attention to that kind of stuff would be helpful. This whole “Second look at Gingrich” nonsense — I’m looking at you, Ed Morrissey — is almost as much a waste of time as the Jon Huntsman campaign, and the sooner people wake up and realize it, the better.
Da Tech Guy has excoriated me for my anti-Gingrich attitude, but I’m serious and will repeat what I said yesterday: To support Newt is tantamount to advocating the re-election of Barack Obama.
Anyone who thinks Newt can beat Obama is delusional. As bad as Romney is, he’s not worse than Gingrich, and if this Newt Bubble isn’t deflated PDQ, I fear that I might be stuck making that argument next February, a profoundly depressing prospect.
UPDATE: My friend Jeffrey Lord has taken leave of his senses. Comparing Gingrich to Winston Churchill? The most obvious difference is that the latter was a man of action, who understood that deeds counted more than words.
Churchill’s disrepute among his political rivals can be attributed chiefly to their envy of his superior qualities. The way Churchill, as First Lord of the Admiralty, became the scapegoat for the failure of the Gallipoli campaign is one episode that must be studied to see how Churchill was damaged by this resentment. He had won early fame in the Boer War and self-interested rivals, concerned mainly with their own status, viewed Churchill’s success as likely to result in their own eclipse — as of course it ultimately did, but only after their had kept him in the wilderness during the years of appeasement in the 1930s.
Maybe The Cleanup Crew Can Work On Julian Pecquet’s Head After Zuccotti Park
Posted on | November 15, 2011 | 25 Comments
by Smitty
What a nauseating bucket of drool at The Hill:
| Pecquet | Smitty |
|---|---|
| Democrats on Capitol Hill are worried that the Supreme Court will rule against President Obama’s healthcare reform law. | The SCOTUS will rule in favor of the Constitution and liberty. Liberty, Mike Foxtrot: do you speak it? |
| Over the last couple weeks, congressional Democrats have told The Hill that the law faces danger in the hands of the Supreme Court, which The New York Times editorial page recently labeled the most conservative high court since the 1950s. | No the SCOTUS is supposed to protect the Constitution. Also, you seem to have conflated Appeal to Authority with Appeal to Clowns. You see, nobody that gives the likes of Krugman or Brooks the space to peddle idiocy has any credibility. |
| While the lawmakers are not second-guessing the administration’s legal strategy, some are clearly bracing for defeat. | Why should the administration, which peddles policies of failure, of which ObamaCare is just a particularly egregious example, expect to do anything but fail here? Does the administration actually want to succeed, and have the ObamaCare albatross perch upon #OccupyResoluteDesk? BHO, admittedly, whitewashes everything, but I’m not sure this was the whitewash which he sought. |
| “Of course I’m concerned,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). The justices “decide for insurance companies, they decide for oil companies, they decide for the wealthy too often.” | What is that supposed to mean? If the Justices are deciding cases based upon anything other than law, in the service of justice, then, by all means: let the Justices be impeached. Or did you read such drivel in the New York Times, Brown? Sure, Kelo, but does anybody doubt that the main beneficiaries of ObamaCare are the crony capitalists friends of the Administration? |
The Daily Pundit piles on as well.
A less idiotic take over at the WSJ, emphasis mine:
The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether ObamaCare is constitutional, granting certiorari in a case brought by 26 states shortly after that law was enacted in March of last year. In so doing, it will be ruling upon the very nature of our federal union.
One might be tempted to think that our leadership would agree. Yes, ObamaCare is a Big Biden Deal. So why did the Democrat-controlled Congress trie to back-door the legislation, and not offer an Article V convention? I sort of know the answer, but that is a rhetorical club with which these Progressive hacks should be flogged on a more or less endless basis.
Still more at Hot Air, which notes the following about Elena Kagan, whom I’ll dub #OccupySCOTUS:
Kagan has been exceedingly conscientious about recusals, perhaps more so than necessary. It’s safe to say that such scrupulous adherence to the judicial canon will work in her favor when she argues — or more likely her defenders, as Kagan is unlikely to directly address these calls — that she has no need to recuse herself in this case.
Ah, yes: play scrupulously by the rules, so that you have something at which to point when it’s time to cheat. The Lefty evil can at least be elegant upon occasion.
When the history of this administration is written, ObamaCare shall have proven the Battle of the Bulge. 2012 will be anything but boring.
via Instapundit
Fertility Facts: ‘It’s Not That We’re Stupid. It’s That We’ve Been Misinformed.’
Posted on | November 15, 2011 | 26 Comments
At last, intelligent women are starting to speak out about how they’ve been misled about basic facts of reproductive science:
From the outside, Holly Finn certainly looks fertile.
With shoulder-length dark hair, smooth skin and a slim but curvaceous figure, the San Francisco-area writer could be any young mom with a baby on her hip.
But at 43, Finn says, her ovaries know better — and she would have, too, if not for what she believes is society’s widespread ignorance about infertility.
“I really feel that there are important pieces of information that don’t get passed along,” says Finn, who has now tried for four years to conceive through in-vitro fertilization. “I actually think it’s quite a brutal dishonesty.”
Most women aren’t taught — and don’t learn — basic facts about fertility and aging, says Finn, author of the e-book “The Baby Chase.” Instead, celeb moms the likes of Salma Hayek (a baby girl at 41), Marcia Cross (twins at 44) and Mariah Carey (twins at 41) make being an older mom look easy — and glamorous.
“It’s not that we’re stupid,” she says. “It’s that we’ve been misinformed.”
Whenever I write about this topic, I get outraged reactions from feminists who seem to think that explaining procreative biology is an insult to women. Postponing childbearing past age 30 involves a significant risk of infertility. And because the risks of birth defects (especially Down’s Syndrome) are much greater for pregnancies after age 35, delayed motherhood reduces a woman’s chances of having healthy children.
When a man says this, however, he will immediately be attacked as if he were advocating the kind of patriarchal dystopia described in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. It is therefore encouraging to see women like Finn calling attention to this kind of survey data:
Most women simply don’t realize that at 30, a healthy woman has about a 20 percent chance of conceiving per month and by the time she reaches 40, her odds drop to about 5 percent . . .
Instead, many of those surveyed thought that a 30-year-old woman would have a 70 percent chance of conceiving and that a 40-year-old’s chances could approach 60 percent.
They also believed that a 20-year-old woman might get pregnant in less than two months of unprotected sex, rather than the five months that is the average.
“It’s basic biology and basic knowledge of how age impacts your fertility if you’re a woman,” says Collura.
But most women aren’t getting those basics until it’s too late, said Dr. William Schoolcraft, medical director of the Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine in Denver and two other locations.
“They don’t even come in for fertility treatment until they’re literally in their 40s,” he said. “Some come in and they have run out of time.”
Finn’s 50-page Kindle booklet, The Baby Chase, is available from Amazon for $1.99. I wish that all those otherwise smart young women who think, “Well, that won’t happen to me,” would wake up and realize: It just might. And I also wish people would realize that nightmare dystopias come in many flavors:
PREVIOUSLY:
- Oct. 27: He’s 36, She’s 33
- Sept. 26: More Sex, Less Babies?
- July 24: VIDEO: ‘Demographic Winter’
- Feb. 27: K-Lo Slams Contraceptive Culture
VIDEO: Cain Family on Fox News
Posted on | November 15, 2011 | 17 Comments
« go back — keep looking »