The Department of Homeland Security warned America about these crazy right-wingers who were a threat to civil rights . . . Oh, wait.
SATURDAY: Help Celebrate National ‘Denounce Lisa Murkowski Day’
Let’s face it: Lisa the Loser’s pathetic write-in campaign is such a disgusting RINO backstabber move that even Charlie Crist would be ashamed to try anything so transparently desperate.
To call Murkowski foul scum would be an insult to scum.
The editors of National Review have taken Senate Republicans to task for failing to strip Murkowski of her position on the Energy Committee. Were there any justice in the world, she’d get it a lot worse than that.
Where is the Spencer Ackerman of the Right, who will urge us to smash Murkowski’s name through a plate-glass window, take a snapshot of the bleeding mess and send it out in a Christmas card to let Senate Republicans know that they need to live in a state of constant fear?
Go give money to Joe Miller to help him stomp Murkowski into RINO smithereens, and then tell the world what an awful monster she is.
VIDEO: If This Doesn’t Give You Goosebumps All Over, You’re a Commie
Research Proves Christine O’Donnell Is Correct Again (With a Cherry on Top!)
An Australian researcher crunches the numbers and determines that the number of premarital sexual partners is directly correlated with the incidence of divorce. Which is to say, the more you screw around before marriage, the greater likelihood your marriage will end in divorce. And in terms of marital stability, the ideal number of pre-marital partners is . . . uh, zero.
Wintery Knight has lots more research with charts and stuff. And Steven Crowder makes a startling admission:
Yes, I admit it, I’m in a long-term relationship and I’m abstinent.
Wow. If you’ve ever seen Steven Crowder’s girlfriend, she’s smokin’ hot. I’m talking crawl-through-broken-glass-just-to-get-downwind-of-her hot.
So if Crowder can resist gettin’ busy with that kind of spectacular hotness, what’s your excuse?
Liberals who think they can score points by making a big deal of Christine O’Donnell’s career as an abstinence advocate? Just a bunch of wankers.
CHRISTINE O’DONNELL for U.S. SENATE
UPDATE: Liberals think this video from 2003 is supposed to be the silver bullet that kills Christine the Teenage Witch:
O’Donnell argues that teenagers are “not dogs in heat,” but are rational creatures who are capable of acting intelligently in their own best interests. Scandalous!
Please note that the author of this WaPo item about O’Donnell’s 2003 video, Greg Sargent, is a Journolist alumnus who said this about the Daily Caller revelations: “The real media conspiracy here is on the right. It’s a conspiracy to pretend that there’s a story here when there isn’t one.”
Of the O’Donnell video, Sargent predicts it’s going to be all over TV because it “reveals rather clearly how ambitious and zealous her abstinence crusade really was.” And this is relevant to O’Donnell’s Delaware Senate campaign . . . how?
Never mind: There are right-wingers ginning up fake stories, Sargent warns, while he is using his WaPo blog to . . . gin up stories.
Said it before, and I’ll say it again: You can’t accuse liberals of having no standards. They’ve got exactly two — one for them and one for everybody else.
Unicorns, Rainbows and Scapegoats
Christina Bellantoni’s headline sums it up:
Axelrod To TPM: It’s The GOP’s Fault
Dems Punted On Tax Cuts Vote
Let’s face it: When it comes to externalizing blame for their own failures, even Susie Madrak can’t top Axelrod.
‘Palling Around With Terrorists’ Update
“The University of Illinois on Thursday denied 1960s radical William Ayers emeritus faculty status after trustees Chairman Christopher Kennedy noted Ayers dedicated a book to, among others, the man who killed Kennedy’s father, Robert F. Kennedy.”
— Associated Press
As I’ve said, today’s liberals represent the Sirhan Sirhan wing of the Democratic Party.
Via Memeorandum. Further commentary at Michelle Malkin, Weasel Zippers, Betsy’s Page and Founding Bloggers.
VIDEO: Ray Griggs On Cavuto Show Flogging ‘I Want Your Money’
by Smitty (h/t BlogProf)
Griggs graciously takes the Michael Moore comparison:
Will it throw more gasoline on the Democrat political pyre in, as someone reminded me Thursday night, less than 1,000 hours?
It may. It may very well.
‘Same Old Place, Sweet Home Chicago’
Remember the bikini bombshell? Lots of laughs. Good times. But is it possible that a Democrat like Jesse Jackson Jr. could actually lose in Chicago? Never say never, as I point out in my latest American Spectator column:
Isaac Hayes wasn’t always happy to share the same name as a singer famed for “Shaft” and other 1970s soul classics.
“All of my life, I’ve had to deal with that,” say Hayes. “I didn’t appreciate it as a kid, but now, I think my Mom and Dad were geniuses.… It helps break the ice.”
Breaking the ice is important for Hayes in his campaign in the 2nd District of Illinois, where he is perhaps the GOP’s longest of long-shot candidates for Congress this year. Encompassing the southside suburbs of Chicago near the border with Indiana, the district’s electorate is so heavily Democratic that two years ago, 90 percent voted for President Obama. The 2nd District hasn’t elected a Republican to Congress in 60 years.
Why, then, did the Republican challenger find himself with a crowded schedule of media interviews this week? The explanation involves the incumbent Democrat, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. . . .
Please read the whole thing. The famously crooked governor of Louisiana, Edwin Edwards, once boasted he was such a shoo-in for re-election, the only way he could lose was if he got caught with “a live boy or a dead girl.” In Jackson’s case, you might make that a blonde girl.
UPDATE: Wow, Isaac Hayes just got endorsed by National Right to Life PAC.