Teacher Had Sex With 12-Year-Old Boy

Posted on | September 13, 2016 | Comments Off on Teacher Had Sex With 12-Year-Old Boy

Michelle Sulzicki pleaded guilty.

A former Stratford elementary school teacher is facing up to four years in prison after pleading guilty [Aug. 23] to having a 2-year sexual affair with a 13-year-old boy.
Dressed in a maroon dress, her blond hair pulled back in a ponytail, 29-year-old Michelle Sulzicki showed no emotion as she stood before Superior Court Judge Robert Devlin and pleaded guilty to second-degree sexual assault and risk of injury to a child. . . .
Devlin told Sulzicki he will impose a sentence of no more than four years and no less than six months when he sentences her Oct. 28. . . .
Sulzicki could have faced up to 30 years in prison if convicted of the charges. . . .
Sulzicki, who taught special education at the Chapel Street School in Stratford the past four years, was fired following her arrest. . . .
Police said Sulzicki began having sex with the boy when he was 12 and she was tutoring him at his Stratford home.
They said the boy told them that the first time he did not wear a condom Sulzicki “forced him to have sex with her,” the arrest warrant affidavit states.
Over the next two years the boy said he had sex with Sulzicki up to 20 times, the affidavit states. When confronted, police said Sulzicki admitted she had sex with the boy once when he was 12.
“She said she did not charge the family for tutoring him,” the affidavit adds.

Meanwhile . . .

Michelle Smith White pleaded guilty.

Durham, North Carolina:

A former Durham high school teacher pleaded guilty [Sept. 2] to sex charges involving a student.
Authorities said Michelle Smith White formed a friendship with a female student in 2012, when the girl was 15, and it later evolved into a sexual relationship. White was the dance teacher at Jordan High School at the time.
The girl’s father called White “a practiced predator,” noting that, despite repeated warnings from the family, school officials and police to leave the girl alone, White continued to text her and even got a tattoo with the girl’s name in it.
The family had to move the girl out of Durham following the incident so she could get psychiatric treatment, the father said.
White, 39, of Penrith Drive in Durham, pleaded guilty to sex act with a student, two counts of indecent liberties with student, indecent liberties with a child and second-degree kidnapping. She was sentenced to 45 months to 123 months in prison and was ordered to register as a sex offender. The judge also issued a permanent “no contact” order for White regarding the girl and her family.

Meanwhile . . .

Rebecca Eileen Diebolt pleaded guilty.

Placentia, California:

A former Orange County high school teacher who had a long affair with a 15-year-old student has been sentenced to six months in jail.
Rebecca Eileen Diebolt, 37, of Brea, was sentenced [Aug. 26] and ordered to register as a sex offender for life.
She pleaded guilty in January to sex acts with a minor.
Diebolt, a language arts teacher and swim and water polo coach at Valencia High School in Placentia, had a sexual relationship with the girl from 2004 to 2008, police said. The relationship carried on after the girl graduated from high school and went to college.
The victim reported the acts to police in 2014.
She told police that she and Diebolt had multiple sexual encounters that occurred in Diebolt’s classroom, as well as Diebolt’s home after school and on weekends.

Meanwhile . . .

Dionne Younce pleaded guilty.

St. Augustine, Florida:

A former Allen D. Nease High School teacher will spend a year in the St. Johns County jail for having sex with one of her students.
Dionne Marie Younce, 29, pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual activity with a certain minor before Judge Michael Traynor [Sept. 8]. Traynor sentenced her to 364 days in jail with credit given for two days of time served. Upon her release Younce will be required to register as a sex offender and will spend five years on probation with sex offender conditions.
The St. Johns County School District suspended Younce in January — and formally fired her in February — after the Sheriff’s Office began investigating allegations that she had engaged in inappropriate communications with at least two students.
She was arrested Feb. 25 on two counts of unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.
While Younce’s attorney, Raymond Forbess, and the 7th Circuit State Attorney’s Office were not able to reach a plea agreement in the case, the state did drop one of the charges against Younce after negotiations and agreed to cap the amount of time to be served at 364 days.
Assistant State Attorney Chris Ferebee said he felt Younce’s crime did deserve some time behind bars.
Ferebee told Traynor that Younce’s contact with the student, who was a month shy of turning 18, was “certainly a consensual relationship.”
“The problem is she is a teacher and she is in charge of our children and she can not interact with students this way,” Ferebee said.
“This is a case … that warrants some incarceration,” he added.

Meanwhile . . .

Nicole Wilfinger pleaded guilty.

Las Vegas, Nevada:

Nicole Wilfinger, 37, spoke softly as she told a judge she’s prepared to plead guilty [Aug. 24] to two counts in the case against her.
One count of a teacher having sex with a student and another of statutory seduction.
“You wish to accept those negotiations,” Judge Cynthia Cruz asked. “Yes ma’am,” said Wilfinger.
Wilfinger was originally charged with nine counts stemming from a sexual relationship with a student police say began June of 2015.
Court records show Wilfinger was a teacher at Molasky Middle School and met the student when he was in seventh grade.

Meanwhile . . .

Shelly Jensen pleaded guilty.

Green Bay, Wisconsin:

A former West De Pere High School teacher’s aide faces time in prison for having a sexual relationship with a student.
Shelly L. Jensen, 50, pleaded guilty Monday in Brown County Circuit Court to one count of sexual assault of a student by school staff. Two additional counts of sexually assaulting a student and three counts of child enticement were dismissed as a result of Jensen’s plea.
Jensen was arrested in June after her ex-husband told police their adult daughter and 7-year-old son had found her on separate occasions in bed with a 17-year-old boy at her home in Lawrence.
Court documents state Jensen had worked with the boy as a math and English tutor. The tutoring sessions first began at the school and later moved to Jensen’s home.
The boy told police he and Jensen had sex three times over a three week period.
Jensen initially denied they had sex, telling police she invited the victim to her home because she wanted to get him out of a bad home situation, according to a criminal complaint.
Jensen’s bond will remain at $250,000. She is scheduled for sentencing on Nov. 11.

Just a series of random coincidences . . .

Category: Crime, Education

In The Mailbox: 09.13.16

Posted on | September 13, 2016 | Comments Off on In The Mailbox: 09.13.16

— compiled by Wombat-socho

OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Basket Of Deplorable – Hillary & CNN’s Wicker Trap
Twitchy: Great Timing Or What? Hillary Graces The Pages Of This Magazine’s October Issue
Louder With Crowder: Gun Rights Advocates File Major Defamation Suit Against Katie Couric

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: The Paralympics Are Retarded
American Power: Mike Lofgren – The Deep State
American Thinker: Alien Retreat – The Rise Of The Deplorables
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
BLACKFIVE: God Bless The SAS
Da Tech Guy: Gaming The Disability System
Don Surber: What Happened To Her Landslide?
Dustbury: And It Will Stay Broken
Jammie Wearing Fools: Irony – University Of Houston #BlackLivesMatter Leader Robbed At Gunpoint By Black Man
Joe For America: Redskins Sprint From Sidelines, Do Surprising Thing During National Anthem
JustOneMinute: Stray “People Like Us” Reporting At The NYT
Pamela Geller: John Kerry’s State Department Funneled Millions To His Daughter’s Nonprofit
Power Line: Keith Ellison’s 9/11
Shark Tank: Clinton Leads With Florida Hispanics But May Lose State Anyway
Shot In The Dark: Report Card
STUMP: Actuarial Nuggets – Public Pensions And Financial Economics, Presidential Mortality, And More
The Jawa Report: CankleGate II!
The Political Hat: Queering Segregation
This Ain’t Hell: The Military’s Obesity Problem
Weasel Zippers: University Of South Carolina Bans “9/11: Never Forget” Posters As Offensive To Muslims, Bans College Republicans For Posting Them
Megan McArdle: Clinton Never Learns That The World Sees Every Stumble

Amazon Daily Digital Deals
Deal of The Day: Up To 70% Off Calvin Klein Clothes & Accessories
Shop Amazon – The Handmade Baby Store

Category: Linkagery

Feminism Is Anti-Male Hate Propaganda

Posted on | September 13, 2016 | 2 Comments

So I was scrolling through feminist blogs on Tumblr when I came across a post that began, “We can all easily agree that throughout history women and men were not equal.” To which I would reply:

What do you mean by “equal”?
and
Nobody lives “throughout history.”

Are these points obvious enough, or am I the only one who sees this? All talk about “equality” between men and women, especially in the context of history, should bring immediately to mind the fact that the vast majority of people who have ever lived were quite poor. Especially if you are judging from the standpoint of someone living in a 21st-century industrialized Western democratic society, you are applying to men and women a measurement of “equality” that is absurd. Go back scarcely 100 years, and my own ancestors in rural Alabama were plowing their farms with mules. They had neither electricity nor indoor plumbing. They drew their water from a well and cooked over a wood-burning stove. Do you think my grandfather and grandmother circa 1916 had time and leisure to worry about whether they were “equal”? They were both working from sunup to sundown, and when I say “working,” I mean hard, physical labor, not sitting in front of a computer in an air-conditioned office building.

This Tumblr blogger’s casual invocation of “history” perfectly illustrates how feminism functions as anti-male hate propaganda. Much like other hate movements and totalitarian ideologies, feminism uses the past to provoke an exaggerated sense of collective grievance. Whether or not she has been the victim of any particular form of discrimination, violence, etc., the feminist can always conjure up horrific examples from the past to justify resentment of “male privilege.” No matter how privileged she may be herself, or how long ago a particular atrocity happened, the tale of historic male evil serves to fuel a sense of collective outrage at what women (yes, all women) have suffered at the hands of men (yes, all men). Individual responsibility disappears in this feminist narrative, leaving us to deal only with the categories of male oppressors and female victims.

The Tumblr blogger’s litany of historic male evil continues:

We can all agree women did not have basic human rights, we can all agree they were living as a lower class, servant class, if they wanted to live they were forced to enter a marriage with a man, and then were forced into domestic labor, sexual labor, raising children, producing food and fabric for entire family, their labor was taken for granted, they were not paid, they did not have the rights to vote, to have real, paid jobs, to control their own bodies and decide how many children they give birth to or when. They were massively murdered by men who wanted a new, younger wife, they were commonly beaten and terrified into obeying, marital rape was legal, beating your wife was legal.
This is what men wanted, this was organized through the means of religion and socialization.

Really. Whether all this beating and raping and killing happened yesterday, or the day before yesterday, if it did not happen to you — as an individual — then you are not a victim of it. And if I did not beat, rape or kill you, then you cannot blame these crimes on me.

Bad enough that men have to put up with all the feminists screeching about Brock Turner as if every man on the planet is a scholarship athlete at Stanford. I’ve never been anywhere near Palo Alto, and I sure as heck don’t have $47,940 a year for tuition, so how am I to blame for Brock Turner? Never mind — all men are Brock Turner, according to Feminist Logic™ and no man can be permitted to claim innocence.

For our Tumblr feminist to say that, in the past, “women did not have basic human rights” requires us to ignore the fact that “human rights” are a quite modern concept. People simply didn’t think that way prior to the 19th century, and then only in European cultures, and there are still plenty of places in the world — including Iran and North Korea — where your “basic human rights” are absolutely meaningless.

If you are going to make “history” the basis of your arguments, it might behoove you to study history, and not just recite whatever version of it you picked up from reading Mary Daly or Andrea Dworkin, or from taking a Women’s Studies course. Perhaps you might try reading Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War. There you will learn that, when the Lacedaemonians captured Plataea in 427 B.C., they put to death every man in the city and “the women they sold as slaves.” Later, when the Athenians captured Melos, they killed every adult male “and made slaves of the children and women.” Considering that this was the common practice of war in Greece, one of the most civilized cultures in ancient history, what do you suppose life was like in less civilized cultures? Throughout thousands of years of history, humanity consisted of conquerors and the conquered, rulers and their subjects, and anyone who resisted the conquering power was subject to death or slavery.

It may be easy to take for granted the peace and prosperity we enjoy as Americans, but it is not wise to take it for granted. Rooting around in the past to find an excuse to feel sorry for yourself, to claim a share of collective victimhood in order to demonize others, is not the way to improve “basic human rights.” As I wrote nearly three years ago:

The various “-isms” of left-wing ideology are really just variations of a destructive anti-social nihilism, whose purpose was forever defined more than 150 years ago when, in their Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels declared: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” Once you understand this profound hostility to social order — the misfit’s appetite for anarchy — then you realize that whatever grievance they complain of is really just a pretext. They do not actually wish to reform society. Rather, they seek revenge against society, and don’t care that others are harmed by their acts of destruction, except insofar as they actively desire such harm.

If the Left ever succeeds in destroying America, I suspect our young feminists will painfully discover their “basic human rights” mean even less to the rest of the world than they meant in ancient Greece.

Category: History, Sex Trouble

Never Trust a Bisexual

Posted on | September 13, 2016 | 1 Comment

Has everyone forgotten the AIDS epidemic? It sometimes seems that way. Now that effective treatment means that HIV is not an automatic death sentence, and Obamacare requires insurance coverage for “pre-existing conditions,” some people seem to think sexual promiscuity is now basically risk-free, as if the wake-up call we got during the 1980s never happened. This crossed my mind when I read a column by Joe Kort, a psychologist whose practice focuses on gay men, about bisexuality:

Think about this: If someone identifies as heterosexual, it’s as if they have won the lottery. In the majority culture, they are accepted and celebrated in songs and movies. Anywhere they go they can hold hands or kiss, and no one gives them a second look. They are not at risk of being arrested or harassed. They are not a threat. They are heterosexually privileged. . . .
As a longtime therapist, I know that there are so many shades of sexuality that they defy categorization. I have seen the myriad configurations of bisexuality — how sexual attraction and romantic love can exist for both genders; how someone can be romantically attracted to one gender, and sexually attracted to another, and on and on.
And I have seen in the therapy room the grief of my bisexual clients that comes from the loss of gay or lesbian privilege. In seminars where I have spoken I have asked for a show of hands of women who would marry a bisexual man, and been stunned by seeing not a single hand in the air. I have counseled men who remain secretive about their bisexuality because they don’t want to lose the woman they love to the misinterpretation that they are unable to commit to her. I have known men who unknowingly date and fall in love with bisexual women, then find out and flee from the fear of competition with other women. . . .

Dude. If women don’t want to marry bisexual men, or if men “flee” from bisexual women, who are you to question their preference? Isn’t it possible that this alleged “biphobia” may be entirely rational?

Let me explain to Dr. Kort, in case he doesn’t understand, that women tend to be very possessive about their husbands, requiring absolute loyalty, so that even the most casual acknowledgment of other women’s beauty — e.g., noticing Kate Upton’s breasts — can land him in the doghouse. Never mind that Kate Upton is a world-famous supermodel who is engaged to a major-league baseball star, and that she is therefore not remotely a threat to your relationship. No, the married man is expected to be so completely devoted to his wife that he is blind to the beauty of any other woman in the world.

As I say, Dr. Kort may not understand this because his practice involves gay men, and gay men certainly are not as possessive toward their boyfriends as wives generally are toward their husbands. I say this not out of prejudice, but on the basis of actual evidence:

In 1982, the CDC reported that that the “median number of lifetime male sexual partners” for gay men diagnosed with AIDS was 1,160.
Repeat: One thousand one hundred sixty.
To comprehend what that means, if a man was diagnosed with AIDS at age 30, after having 1,160 partners since becoming sexually active at age 18, he would have had 97 different partners in an average year, i.e., nearly two new partners every week, or eight new partners per month. This was the “at-risk” population among whom the epidemic was incubated in the late 1970s and early 1980s . . .

Of course, not every gay man is so fantastically promiscuous, but in general, gay men are less inclined to monogamy than heterosexuals or lesbians. This is why, since the legalization of same-sex marriage, about two-thirds of such marriages are between women. In other words, lesbians are twice as likely as gay men to seek long-term commitment with their partners. This is one reason why lesbians have very low rates of sexually transmitted disease — and why heterosexual women are understandably averse to getting involved with bisexual men.

Antibiotic-Resistant Gonorrhea Is on the Rise.
Should Gay and Bi Men Be Concerned?

That’s the headline on a Slate article reporting about a CDC report that found rates of antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea (ARG) are about the same in homosexual and bisexual men. The story included this quote:

“A lot of these things that we’re seeing now in increasing rates and also resistance are the warning signs—they’re sort of the clouds that are starting to come together on the horizon, telling us that there is a perfect storm brewing,” [Dr. Robert] Kirkcaldy said. “The question is what can be done and what are people willing to do now to prevent this brewing crisis?”

What’s sad is that people seem to have forgotten so quickly what the AIDS crisis should have taught us. It’s easy to laugh at silly feminists who think it is “empowering” to announce their herpes infections to the world, but their mentality — the belief that getting rid of the “stigma” of sexually transmitted diseases will make everything OK — is really quite dangerous.

There is a “stigma” about herpes for the same reason there is a “stigma” about promiscuity. These are very bad things — harmful and unhealthy — and disapproving of dangerous behavior is not an irrational fear. As for Dr. Kort’s claim that people are unfairly prejudiced against bisexuals, who gets to determine which prejudices are unfair? I mean, obviously gay men are prejudiced against vaginas and lesbians are prejudiced against penises, but does anyone expect them to apologize for their biases? At least homosexuals are not confused about their preferences, whereas the bisexual’s preferences are as ambiguous as a Rorschach test. Do you want to deal with that kind of perpetual confusion? No, you don’t, and it is not your fault that other people have problems you don’t want to deal with.

Category: Gays

The Objective Truth of @fmanjoo and the New York Times’ Partisan Bias

Posted on | September 13, 2016 | 1 Comment

What is the truth about Hillary Clinton’s health and why should Americans trust the media to tell us the truth? This was a question raised last month by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani in an interview on Fox News Sunday with host Shannon Bream:

“She has an entire media empire that…fails to point out several signs of illness by her. All you got to do is go online.”
Bream countered that Clinton’s campaign has vehemently denied the unsubstantiated claims she is in poor health, releasing medical records last year to prove her fitness.
“Go online and put down, ‘Hillary Clinton illness,’ and take a look at the videos yourself,” Giuliani responded. . . .
Giuliani’s comments on Sunday came after a week in which Trump himself questioned Clinton’s “physical and mental stamina.”
The Democratic nominee’s campaign has accused Trump and his team of “peddling deranged conspiracy theories in a desperate attempt to change the subject – this time with absurd and debunked claims about Hillary Clinton’s health.”

In response, Farhad Manjoo of the New York Times took to Twitter to advocate that search results for videos about Hillary’s health should be suppressed: “Google should fix this. It shouldn’t give quarter to conspiracy theorists.” Is it Farhad Manjoo’s job to help elect Democrats?

Well, yes — yes it is. This is why New York Times pays his salary, because electing Democrats is what the New York Times is about. Sure, Farhad Manjoo is supposed to be writing about technology, but if you check his online archive at the New York Times, you find that this is very light work — he published exactly eight bylined articles during the month of August, and writing two articles a week isn’t what I’d call a full-time job. So what does Farhad Manjoo do with all his spare time? Check out his Twitter feed, and you’ll find an incessant barrage of anti-Trump, pro-Hillary messages. Basically, Farhad Manjoo’s actual job these days is to crank out Hillary Clinton campaign propaganda on social media, while occasionally contributing a tech article to the New York Times.

So, three weeks after Farhad Manjoo called for the suppression of “conspiracy theorists” who claimed Hillary Clinton has serious health problems, we now know for a fact that Hillary Clinton has serious health problems. Does anyone expect the New York Times to discipline Farhad Manjoo for this behavior? Of course not. This is his job, you see — everybody employed by the New York Times is expected to do everything they can to elect Hillary Clinton president. Citing Farhad Manjoo’s tweet, former CBS News reporter Cheryl Attkisson wrote:

Rather than reporting the facts, many in the media have taken it upon themselves to shout down the questions and to controversialize those asking them. . . .
[Farhad Manjoo] was advocating that a conspiracy be committed to stop people from researching Clinton’s health, which he labeled a conspiracy. Many others in the media also chimed in using the “conspiracy theory” moniker. It’s designed to convince the public to tune out the discussion, in much the same way as other common astroturf terms such as “debunked,” “bonkers,” “tin-foil hat,” “shoddy,” “discredited,” “quack,” “bogus,” “denier,” and “crank.”
Left-wing apparatus Vox chimed in with an article titled: “The bonkers conspiracy theory about Hillary Clinton’s health.” The pro-Hillary Clinton smear machine, Media Matters, chided NBC News for “mainstreaming conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton’s health.” Vice picked up the theme writing, “How conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton’s health went mainstream.” CNN published an article “Debunking conspiracy theories” about her health. CNN media critic Brian Stelter urged the media: “Do Not Give Oxygen To ‘Conspiracy Theories’ That Hillary Clinton Is ‘Secretly Ill’.” HuffPost wrote, “Let’s call the conspiracy theories about Clinton’s health what they are…” ThinkProgress joined in with, “Trump campaign embraces conspiracy theory…” From MSNBC: “Trump, allies push conspiracy theory about Clinton’s health.” NPR: “Trump adds fuel to conspiracy theory about Clinton’s health.” You get the idea. Everybody’s on the same page.

Whatever the truth about Hillary Clinton’s health may be, the truth about the mainstream media is that they are partisan Democrats, and that their “news” coverage is actually Democrat Party propaganda, so that they are essentially being paid to campaign for Hillary Clinton. Maybe the reason videos by “conspiracy theorists” are popular is because journalists are so blinded by partisan bias that they can’t be trusted to do honest reporting.

This is why journalists get scooped by guys with cell-phone videos:

Video from the 9/11 ceremony, uploaded to Twitter on Sunday morning, appeared to show the Democratic presidential candidate being helped into a black van by aides and US Secret Service agents. The man who filmed the video, New Jersey resident Zdenek Gazda, 50, told BuzzFeed News he was at the memorial when he spotted Clinton being led away.
“I take two pictures before she passed me,” said Gazda, who said he moved to the US 24 years ago from what was then Czechoslovakia and is a Clinton supporter. “She looked like everything was fine and everything was good.”
“I just saw the secretary waiting for the van and the van came and she can’t walk inside and she gets helped,” he said. “She lost her shoe and everything.”
Campaign staff initially refused to tell reporters traveling with the Democratic presidential candidate what had prompted the early departure, after Fox News reported that Clinton had experienced a “medical episode.”
She arrived at the memorial at 8:18 a.m. and left unexpectedly after about an hour and a half, according to pool reports.

Zdenek Gazda has better news judgment than most reporters covering the campaign, who are apparently willing to write whatever Clinton staff tell them to write. If the Clinton campaign staff denounce questions about Hillary’s health as “conspiracy theories,” then we can expect a dozen headlines repeating that label, and no one in the press corps will bother to ask serious questions about Hillary’s health, because to do so would be to join the “conspiracy theorists.” If Hillary was suffering periodic seizures and episodes of delirium, so that she was only able to get through the day with the help of a doctor treating her with ibogaine, the one thing we know is that the New York Times would never report this news.

Find a love that looks at you the way the press looks at Hillary. pic.twitter.com/KxPXNpWl5n

— Razor (@hale_razor) September 6, 2016

(Hat-tip: Ed Driscoll at Instapundit.)

Category: Election, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias, New York Times

Rule 5 Monday

Posted on | September 13, 2016 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

It was one of those weekends when there was too much to do and not enough time to do it in, so you get Rule 5 Sunday on a Monday instead. Since the NFL season kicked off yesterday amid much controversy over players failing to stand for the anthem and Gutless Paul Goodell ignoring it – while threatening to fine Dallas Cowboy players who chose to honor their slain police officers – I’m going to lead off this post with rookie Redskins cheerleader Azusa Hashizume.

Azusa Hashizume in her Redskins cheerleading gear.

This week Goodstuff leads off with a massive Wallpaper Art Dump For Dudes, as well as the usual metablog, this week with Sybil Danning! Next up is Ninety Miles from Tyranny with Hot Pick of the Late Night, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns, followed by Animal Magnetism with Rule Five North Korea Friday and the Saturday Gingermageddon.

EBL’s herd of heifers includes Vintage Labor Day Rule 5, A Slight Chill In The Air, Lauren Lyster, Jean Arthur, Anne Francis, Coal People, and The Basket Of Deplorables.

At Soylent Siberia, it’s your morning coffee creamer, a Monday Motivationer bookworm, Tuesday Titillation Golden Girl, Humpday Hawtness Hardwood, Falconsword Fursday In The Wild, Latent Lingerie With Lace & Lesbians, and a Bath Night Weekender.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Clémence Poésy, his Vintage Babe is Barbara Bouchet, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Victoria’s Secret. At Dustbury, it’s Carly Fiorina and Nana Tanimura.

Thanks to everyone for all the links!

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women

Category: Rule 5

Hillary and the Clinton News Network

Posted on | September 12, 2016 | Comments Off on Hillary and the Clinton News Network

The great thing about having the media as part of your campaign team is that they willingly lend credibility to your most implausible excuses:

Hillary Clinton said Monday night she’s “met a high standard of transparency” about her health and didn’t think the pneumonia was “going to be that big a deal.”
Clinton said she felt dizzy and lost her balance Sunday, but did not lose consciousness, and is now “feeling so much better.”
“I was supposed to rest five days — that’s what they told me on Friday — and I didn’t follow that very wise advice,” Clinton told CNN’s Anderson Cooper in a phone interview.
“So I just want to get this over and done with and get back on the trail as soon as possible,” she said. . . .
“Obviously I should have gotten some rest sooner — I probably would have been better off if I just pulled down my schedule on Friday, but like a lot of people, I thought that I could just keep going forward and power through it. And obviously that didn’t work out so well,” she said.

Let’s face it — as long as Hillary Clinton has a pulse, CNN will consider her a viable candidate and continue acting as her public-relations agency.

Category: CNN, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias