The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

#FreeStacy Quoting My Favorite Source

Posted on | December 2, 2016 | 2 Comments

Did you know that there is an online list of quotes by me? Who started compiling my aphorisms at AZ Quotes, I don’t know, but here are a few of my favorites, with links to the original sources:

“Writing is a skill, not a talent, and this difference is important because a skill can be improved by practice.”

(Source: “Memo From the National Affairs Desk:
Eight Days in a Mustang Later …”
Jan. 5, 2012)

 

“When I said that the mentally ill should be in institutions, public universities weren’t the kind of institutions I had in mind.”

(Source: “‘Candyass Blogger’ Update: Free Speech
Absolutists Who Banned Mr. Althouse,”
Dec. 02, 2012)

 

“One of the most annoying habits of liberals is their tendency to confuse their political agenda with moral virtue.”

(Source: “Gasp! ‘Nerdgasm’ Spoiled by Discovery of
Homophobia Behind ‘Ender’s Game’?”
Nov. 2, 2013)

 

“Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for your salvation. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to murder you.”

(From my @rsmccain Twitter account, Jan. 9, 2015,
about a year before my account was suspended.)

By the way, wouldn’t this be a good time to use the #FreeStacy hashtag and ask @Twitter @Support to restore @rsmccain? It’s rather annoying to be an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years in the news business, and to know that some whiny complainer’s bogus claim that I was “participating in targeted abuse” should have caused the suspension of an account I’d been using for seven years. Twitter’s project of silencing Hillary Clinton’s critics failed to get her elected, and they should repeal their transparently partisan policy of preventing free speech.

 

‘Hashtag He’s Your President’

Posted on | December 2, 2016 | 3 Comments

 

Inside their liberal echo chamber, hermetically sealed by epistemic closure, Democrats never have to consider the possibility that they’re wrong. Their friends at the New York Times and CNN all agree with them, as does every professor at Columbia, Yale and other major universities, and every celebrity in Hollywood. Democrats never talk to anyone who disagrees with them, because people who disagree with Democrats are not merely wrong, but also ignorant and evil.

How, then, do Democrats explain the fact that 62 million Americans voted for Donald Trump? There are five A’s in “RAAAAACISM,” which was the topic Democrats wanted to discuss yesterday at Harvard University:

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The raw, lingering emotion of the 2016 presidential campaign erupted into a shouting match here Thursday as top strategists of Hillary Clinton’s campaign accused their Republican counterparts of fueling and legitimizing racism to elect Donald Trump.
The extraordinary exchange came at a postmortem session sponsored by Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, where top operatives from both campaigns sat across a conference table from each other.
As Trump’s team basked in the glow of its victory and singled out for praise its campaign’s chief executive, Stephen K. Bannon, who was absent, the row of grim-faced Clinton aides who sat opposite them bristled.
Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri condemned Bannon, who previously ran Breitbart, a news site popular with the alt-right, a small movement known for espousing racist views.
“If providing a platform for white supremacists makes me a brilliant tactician, I am proud to have lost,” she said. “I would rather lose than win the way you guys did.”
Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s campaign manager, fumed: “Do you think I ran a campaign where white supremacists had a platform?”
“You did, Kellyanne. You did,” interjected Palmieri, who choked up at various points of the session.
“Do you think you could have just had a decent message for white, working-class voters?” Conway asked. “How about, it’s Hillary Clinton, she doesn’t connect with people? How about, they have nothing in common with her? How about, she doesn’t have an economic message?”
Joel Benenson, Clinton’s chief strategist, piled on: “There were dog whistles sent out to people. . . . Look at your rallies. He delivered it.”
At which point, Conway accused Clinton’s team of being sore losers. “Guys, I can tell you are angry, but wow,” she said. “Hashtag he’s your president. How’s that? Will you ever accept the election results? Will you tell your protesters that he’s their president, too?”

The Alt-Right Dog-Whistle Theory, as we may call it, serves a valuable psychological function for Democrats. If the people who voted for Trump were racist — “RAAAAACIST!” — then (a) Trump’s election can be dismissed as morally illegitimate, and (b) the Democrats can avoid the question of whether their policies are wrong. Inside their echo chamber, Democrats cling desperately to this kind of rationalization, because the only alternative would be an embarrassing admission of failure.

(Via Memeorandum.)

UPDATE: Jennifer Palmieri is a pro-abortion anti-Christian bigot:

Palmeiri is famous for her WikiLeaks emails where she trashed Catholics and knocked Bill Clinton for not being someone she wants to spend time with. . . .
Another WikiLeaks email showed Palmeiri was involved in and confirmed that the Clinton camp conspired to withhold emails from State Department investigators during their recent investigation.

In case you forgot about this October revelation:

In a new Wikileaks disclosure, key figures in the Clinton campaign reveal a visceral anti-Catholicism, attacking Rupert Murdoch for raising his children Catholic and calling conservative Catholicism “an amazing bastardization of the faith.” . . .
In an email message to [Clinton campaign chairman John] Podesta and Palmieri, [Center for American Progress operative] Halpin cites a New Yorker article on media mogul Rupert Murdoch and the fact that he and then-managing editor for the Wall Street Journal, Robert Thompson, were raising their kids Catholic.
“Friggin’ Murdoch baptized his kids in the Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus,” he lamented. . . .
In her response, Jennifer Palmieri wrote, “I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals.”

Democrats are liars, and Jennifer Palmieri is an expert at dishonest euphemism, referring to women’s “right to access the full range of reproductive health care” to mask the Democrats’ pro-abortion agenda. You can read here about how Podesta boasted of creating a bogus “Catholic” group to promote abortion and homosexuality.

Democrats hate babies. Democrats hate Catholics. Democrats hate Jesus.

Democrats used to love Catholics, when Catholics helped elect Democrats like John F. Kennedy who, among other things, supported Vietnamese Catholics fighting against Communism. By 1972, however, Democrats hated Catholics and supported Communists in Vietnam. Of course, I’m old enough to remember when Democrats were the party of the working class, whereas now Democrats are the party of Hollywood, George Soros and every whiny liberal arts major at Oberlin College.




 

 

RELATED:

 


In The Mailbox: 12.01.16

Posted on | December 1, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: #WAR – Boycott Kellogg’s & Buzzfeed Advertisers
Michelle Malkin: Narrative-Buster – Look Who Committed A “Racist” “Pro-Trump” “Hate Crime”
Twitchy: Chelsea Handler Hopes This Document Will Trump The Constitution On Hillary’s Behalf, also, Sally Kohn Suddenly Super-Concerned About Wasted Taxpayer Funds
Louder With Crowder: Shaq Tells Anti-Trump Protesters It’s Time To Move On, also, Mike Rowe Wants To Know Why Tax Dollars Are Funding Colleges That Burn The Flag


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Far-Left Protesters Accuse Jews Of Being Fascists
American Power: Perpetual Leftist Victims
American Thinker: Election 2016 – The Day The Music Died For American Jews
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily News
Da Tech Guy: JD Rucker – If Any Cabinet Position Can Use New Blood, It’s Secretary of State
Don Surber: President Trump and Mitt Romney Game The Media, also, Liberals Whine About Trump’s Success With Carrier
Dustbury: The One-Time Minister Of Munitions, also, Amid All The Gloom
Fred On Everything: Gun Control – Hawglegs And Hawgwash
Jammie Wearing Fools: Buzzfeed’s Hit Piece On Chip And Joanna Gaines Is Dangerous
Joe For America: Roger Stone Says Hillary’s Pushing A Recount Increases Her Chances Of Landing In Jail
JustOneMinute:
Power Line: Illegal Voting And What To Do About It, also, Professor Watching
Shark Tank: Rick Scott Calls Repealing Obamacare “Only Sane Path”
Shot In The Dark: Mark My Words
The Geller Report: Slovakia Passes Law To Ban Recognition of Islam As A Religion
The Political Hat: The New Acceptability – Treading, Raping, And Pedophilia
This Ain’t Hell: Colonel Daniel Wilson, Field Grade Tickle Monster, also, William Grobes IV – $4.5 Million GI Bill Fraud
Weasel Zippers: Was Buzzfeed Writer Trying To Punish Fixer Upper Couple For Voting Trump?, also, UC President Napolitano Tells Campus Cops Not To Enforce Immigration Law
Megan McArdle: Trump Tax Cuts – A Bad Idea With A Bright Future
Mark Steyn: The Donaldganger


Today’s Digital Deals
Cyber Monday Deals Of The Day
Up To 40% Off Classic Toys & Games

In The Mailbox: 11.30.16

Posted on | November 30, 2016 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


Thanks to everyone who bought stuff through the Amazon links on my posts. Fees from those posts help keep your favorite wombat supplied with protein bars and fresh SF!


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: REPUBLICANS WIN BIG – Pelosi Stays On As House Minority Leader
Michelle Malkin: Justin Trudeau – Baby-Faced Commie Apologist Unmasked
Twitchy: “Tariq Wasn’t Expecting An Informed Interviewer!” – Tucker Carlson Invites Tariq Nasheed To His Show
Louder With Crowder: Even Jill Stein’s Own Running Mate Denounces Recount Scam


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Take Your White Ribbon Pledge And Shove It
American Power: Dakota Access Pipeline Protests Just Another Chance For Idiot Leftist Hijacking And Exploitation
American Thinker: Why The Democrats Can’t Stop Calling The GOP Racists
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Hump Day News
Da Tech Guy: They Want A Recount? Let’s Give Them One In NH. NY, IL, CA And MN Too!
Don Surber: President Trump Will End Payoffs To Planned Parenthood
Dustbury: Presumably On Channel 15
Jammie Wearing Fools: Hillary Clinton Emerges From Woods To Attend Snowflake Ball
Joe For America: As Democrats Caught In Massive Voter Fraud, Hillary’s Campaign Imploded
JustOneMinute: Climate Change Alert!
Power Line: Dayton’s Stormy Tuesday
Shark Tank: Trump Announces He’ll Be Stepping Down As CEO Of His Businesses
Shot In The Dark: Good News, Bad News
STUMP: CALPERS – What Exactly Is an “Average Pension”?
The Geller Report: Mosque Near Ohio State Campus has Multiple Terror Ties
The Jawa Report: #PizzaGate
The Political Hat: Calling A Girl A Girl Is Now Considered Emotional Abuse And Homophobia
This Ain’t Hell: Congress Won’t Draft Women, also, Coast Guard Won’t Change Ratings
Weasel Zippers: Obama Blames Fox News For Dems’ Inability To Reach Voters, also, Fixer Upper Star Couple Are Christians, So They Must Be Destroyed
Megan McArdle: Don’t Get Your Hopes Up About Home Prices
Mark Steyn: All Berned Out And Doubling Down


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Shop Amazon – Hot New Releases – Updated Every Hour

War on Women: Democrats Ready to Throw Nancy Pelosi Under the Bus?

Posted on | November 30, 2016 | 3 Comments

 

The irony here is rather delicious:

In the aftermath of Democrats’ demoralizing election defeat, Representative Nancy Pelosi’s bid to return as minority leader has been transformed into a larger debate about what has gone wrong with a party that eight years ago controlled Congress and the White House.
Ms. Pelosi, a 76-year-old San Francisco progressive, is expected to easily win re-election when her colleagues vote on Wednesday. But she has become a stand-in for complaints that Democrats have failed to offer a compelling, broad-based economic message to the working-class voters in the Midwest and South who helped them capture the House 10 years ago and made Ms. Pelosi the first woman speaker.
Representative Tim Ryan, who represents a blue-collar district in northeastern Ohio, has mounted an unexpected challenge to Ms. Pelosi and given voice to the message that House Democrats must broaden their appeal beyond the three liberal states — California, Massachusetts and New York — that now account for a third of their members.
Mr. Ryan argues that his party can only rebuild if it re-establishes itself as the party of the working class.
“We’ve lost that brand, and that’s the brand that gets you elected,” said Mr. Ryan, who is also thought by colleagues to be considering running for governor of Ohio in 2018.

Democrats talking about the popular vote — which Clinton won by a margin of more than 2 million votes — fail to acknowledge that this reflects lopsided majorities in a handful of ultra-liberal states. Clinton carried California by 3.4 million votes, New York by 2.5 million votes, Massachusetts by 900,000 votes, and Illinois by 800,000 votes. Pandering to liberal elites, Clinton ran up her totals in urban areas to gain a margin of more than 6 million votes in four states with 115 Electoral College votes. Meanwhile, Trump appealed to those who have spent the past eight years bitterly clinging to their guns and Bibles, to paraphrase a certain Harvard Law graduate’s putdown of Americans who have to work for a living. This “basket of deplorables,” to quote a certain Yale Law graduate’s description, turned out to include a surprising number of voters in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa.

Democrats have become a party for decadent elitists who cannot hide their contempt for the opinions and values of anyone who can’t afford to send their kids to Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Oberlin, Occidental, etc. Donald Trump got the votes of every ordinary American smart enough to understand that limousine liberals like Nancy Pelosi (who “is among the richest members of Congress, with an estimated net worth of approximately $58 million”) don’t give a damn about them.

 

“What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Noting quite so perfectly demonstrated Hillary Clinton’s absolute disdain for ordinary Americans than her willingness to lie to them about what happened to the four Americans killed in Benghazi. These “little old liberal white ladies,” as Kevin Williamson called them, get plenty of support from commies who burn the American flag, from college kids who love Fidel Castro, and from wealthy celebrity feminists like Gloria Steinem. Democrats are then shocked to discover that this does not endear them to patriotic Americans who work for a living.

“The American flag has represented this imperialist, white supremacist, hegemonic masculinity.”
— Isaiah Young, American University

Exit polls show Trump beat Clinton by a 26-point margin among voters who had served in the U.S. military, and his margin was 14 points among voters who attend church on a weekly basis. Nancy Pelosi received the Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood, in recognition of her work to ensure that American taxpayers continue funding America’s largest abortion provider. Do you think that might have something to do with Democrats losing support among Catholic working-class voters in the industrial Midwest? I think maybe it does.

A picture is worth a thousand words, they say. Democrats kill babies. Democrats burn the American flag. Democrats hate Jesus.

Democrats still don’t understand why they keep losing:

“I think a lot of people are unsure if we want the faces of the party to be Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi: liberals from New York and California. It was different with a Democratic president — he was the face of the party, but now they will be,” the Democrat said.
One Democratic member said that while they like and admire Pelosi, they thought the election results meant it was time for her to step aside: “I just don’t think you can look at the election and say we should keep doing what we’ve been doing.”

Fifty-eight million dead babies could not be reached for comment.



 

 


Notoriously Crazy Felon Barrett Brown Has Been Released From Federal Prison

Posted on | November 29, 2016 | 3 Comments

September 2012: Barrett Brown calmly explains his intent to ‘destroy’ an FBI agent

“You don’t need a lawyer, Barrett. You need a psychiatrist, or perhaps a priest to exorcise your demons. You are traveling a road to destruction, as harmful to yourself as to any of your chosen enemies. Get help.”
— me, to Barrett Brown, Sept. 4, 2012

“I got to find out, thanks to a hack — thanks to another f–king stroke of luck, thank God — that HB Gary, since mid-February, had hired an FBI informant . . . making up reasons to raid Barrett Brown and get his information.”
— Barrett Brown, “Why I’m Going to Destroy FBI Agent Robert Smith Part Three,” YouTube.com, Sept. 12, 2012

In January 2015, former “Anonymous” spokesman Barrett Brown was sentenced to five years and three months in federal prison after pleading guilty to “threatening an FBI agent, attempting to hide two laptops during the execution of a search warrant and offering to help another hacker.” Because he had been in custody for more than two years since his September 2012 arrest, I calculated at the time that Barrett would be out by 2017, but it looks like he got out a little early:

Dallas-born investigative journalist Barrett Brown was released from federal prison Tuesday morning after spending more than four years behind bars.
The 35-year-old was sentenced to prison for threatening an FBI agent and helping share stolen data, marking the end of a criminal case criticized by free-speech advocates. He originally faced charges that carried more than 100 years in prison, but Brown pleaded guilty to greatly reduced charges: transmitting threats, aiding hackers and obstructing authorities from carrying out a search warrant. Supporters say Brown, was targeted by the federal government after sharing data hacked from the Austin-based defense contractor Stratfor.

This “investigative journalist” bullshit is the hero-martyr narrative Barrett’s paranoid anarchist fanboys want to believe, in the same way some people want to believe Jim Garrison’s crackpot conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination, but it simply is not true.

Brown was an opportunistic famewhore who got in over his head trying to cash in on the “Anonymous” criminal hacking spree of 2010-2011. He appointed himself the unofficial spokesman for Anonymous, fooled quite a few clueless mainstream journalists into taking him seriously, hustled a book deal for himself and a co-author and then . . .

Oh, it’s a long, sad story. In March 2012, the FBI raided Barrett with a search warrant, but did not arrest him. Some of the Anonymous hackers had, by that time, already begun to distrust Brown. His publicity-seeking made him a target, and it did not escape notice that the FBI started busting hackers not long after Barrett began his “spokesman” duties. The logical deduction was that Barrett’s “opsec” was sloppy, that the feds had been scrutinizing his communications, identified his contacts within the hacker community, and thereby busted the perpetrators of various criminal escapades. Whether that was what actually happened or not, after the FBI raided Barrett in March 2012, he became radioactive, so to speak, and some suspected he had turned informant, ratting out his erstwhile Anonymous comrades in exchange for leniency.

Anyway, while all this was going on with Barrett, I was busy covering the 2012 presidential campaign, and only occasionally noticing the unraveling of Barrett’s “Anonymous” career. He had first crossed my radar screen back in the fall of 2009, when he belatedly tried to dogpile onto Charles Johnson’s ill-considered “white supremacist” smear against me. At that time, I had no idea of who Barrett was except that he’d once been involved in an atheist organization, so I sort of thumped him lightly and moved on. When he subsequently emerged as a the public face of “Anonymous,” I regarded him as a joke, but he evidently held a grudge against me. Then, after the Brett Kimberlin episode of May 2012, it seems that Kimberlin’s associate Neal Rauhauser decided to try to use Barrett in an attack against me and Kimberlin enemy Patrick “Patterico” Frey. This involved the fabrication of “evidence” that a former Anonymous supporter named Jennifer Emick had snitched on Barrett Brown, and a bogus theory that I was part of some conspiracy involving Emick and HBGary.

If this thumbnail version of the story sounds crazy and confusing, it’s because it was crazy and confusing, but Barrett was in such a state of paranoia (and also heroin addiction) that he took it seriously. So right after I returned from the 2012 Republican convention in Tampa, Barrett pops up on Twitter, insulting and threatening me, demanding that I call him within a certain time period — or else!

Certain as I was of my own rectitude — I had not “defamed” him or otherwise done him any wrong — I replied with a long email informing Barrett that he was insane, and that he was headed for serious trouble. Then I packed up and headed to the Democrat convention in Charlotte, forgetting all about the matter until a friend told me about Barrett’s YouTube meltdown, which I described as “13 minutes of absolute 100% bugfucking nuts,” and sufficient to get him arrested.

While in prison (and off heroin) Barrett actually did some excellent writing. He has a fine prose style, when he puts his mind to it, and if he were working with a good editor — someone to supervise his assignments and hassle him to produce actual reporting on a regular deadline — I don’t doubt Barrett could do good work. Of course, this would require him to recognize his shortcomings (e.g., laziness and arrogance), and I’m not sure he could handle that. Barrett Brown is a victim of his own grandiosity, as I have explained:

Once you understand paranoia as a narcissistic disorder, you see that Barrett’s fantasy of becoming a latter-day Sy Hersh involves a vast chasm between his grandiose ambition and his actual abilities.
Barrett Brown is not as smart as he thinks he is. More to the point, Stephen Hawking is not as smart as Barrett Brown thinks he is.

We shall see what becomes of him henceforth.

UPDATE: Forgot to hat-tip Donald Douglas at American Power.

Barrett Brown hasn’t had an Egg McMuffin since September 2012. Freedom is a trip to McDonald’s. There’s a metaphor there, I’m sure.

 

In The Mailbox: 11.29.16

Posted on | November 29, 2016 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
EBL: Tom Price For HHS
Twitchy: Senator Kaine Shows Newfound Interest In War Powers Act
Louder With Crowder: Baltimore Cop Rushes To Save Life Of Anti-Cop Protester’s Baby


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
Adam Piggott: Trust
American Power: Justin Trudeau, Canada’s Laughing Stock
American Thinker: The States’ Trump Card Against The Fed
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Japan Arrival News
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Terminal Impact by Charles Henderson
Da Tech Guy: Baldilocks – The Hell Below
Don Surber: Recount Was A Great Gift To President Trump
Dustbury: Call Her Ramya
Jammie Wearing Fools: How Old is The “18-Year-Old” Ohio State Terrorist Who Spent Seven Years In Pakistan?
Joe For America: On Day One, Say Goodbye To These Cities
JustOneMinute: Cabinet Picks, Terror, And More
Power Line: Politico Asks, What If Trump Enforces The Law?
Shark Tank: Sentir Cubano Sells “Bigly” With “Viva Cuba Libre” Party Kit
Shot In The Dark: What’s The Matter With Paul Krugman?
STUMP: Around The World In Pensions – South Korean Scandal, German Pandering, And More
The Geller Report: CNN’s Alisyn Camerota Says We Should Wear Headscarves In Solidarity With Muslims
The Jawa Report: Somali Immigrant Killed In Attack On Ohio State University
The Political Hat: The Coming Confrontation In Venezuela
This Ain’t Hell: Ohio Spree – Anti-Gun Narrative Too Good To Ignore, also, NYT Says Obama Should Pardon Bergdahl Because “Trump!”
Weasel Zippers: KSM Says If Not For Ferocity Of W’s Response To 9/11, Al Qaeda Would Have Made More Attacks
Megan McArdle: Disputes Over The Election Don’t Serve Either Side
Mark Steyn: Don’t Say I’m Violent, Or I’ll Kill You


Today’s Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Save 25% On Select Gillette Bundles

The Intifada at Ohio State Proves the Immigration-Terrorism Connection

Posted on | November 29, 2016 | 2 Comments

 

William Jacobson describes Monday’s Islamic terrorist attack in Columbus in which a “Somali legal immigrant rammed his car into pedestrians on the sidewalk, then attacked with what is variously described as a butcher knife or machete.” NBC News reports:

An Ohio State University student posted a rant shortly before he plowed a car into a campus crowd and stabbed people with a butcher knife in an ambush that ended when a police officer shot him dead, a law enforcement official said.
Abdul Razak Ali Artan, 18, wrote on what appears to be his Facebook page that he had reached a “boiling point,” made a reference to “lone wolf attacks” and cited radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.
“America! Stop interfering with other countries, especially Muslim Ummah [community]. We are not weak. We are not weak, remember that,” the post said. . . .
A police officer was on the scene within a minute and killed the assailant, likely saving lives, university officials said. “He engaged the suspect and eliminated the threat,” OSU Police Chief Craig Stone said.
Law enforcement officials told NBC News that Artan was a Somali refugee who left his homeland with his family in 2007, lived in Pakistan and then came to the United States in 2014 as a legal permanent resident.

Further analysis from Professor Jacobson:

When I heard the story of the car ramming and knife attack, my mind immediately went back to the recent so-called Knife Intifada in Israel, in which car rammings played a prominent role . . .
The Ohio State attacked reminded me in particular of [an October 2015] attack where a Palestinian terrorist in Jerusalem rammed a bus stop with his car then got out with a meat cleaver and started slashing a man. It took several shots from a passerby to stop the attack . . . .

(Hat-tip: Memeorandum.) President-elect Trump repeatedly during the campaign referenced the connection between immigration and the threat of Islamic terrorism. For this willingness to speak the unpleasant truth, our President-elect was condemned as a bigot by Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself). Let the record show that President-elect Trump was right, and his critics were wrong. And don’t forget:

Women’s Studies Professor Accuses
Trump Supporters of ‘Terrorism’

Would anyone care to remind Professor Siobhan Senier of her words?



 

« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin