‘All Is Proceeding as I Have Foreseen’
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 6 Comments
So says Vodkapundit, observing that “RCP moved MI and PA into the tossups this morning,” which I hadn’t noticed, but it’s one of the necessary preconditions for a full-blown liberal freakout.
Disaster is now coming at Democrats from multiple unexpected directions. Yesterday, Bob Belvedere observed that “James O’Keefe and his Mission: Impossible crew have done it again,” and what they did is what I call impact reporting: News that results in action, in this case the firing of DNC official Stephanie Caballero:
The Democratic National Committee has terminated the employment of Houston, Texas, Organizing For America Regional Field Director Stephanie Caballero after she was caught on camera calling voter fraud “cool” and “so funny” while advising a presumably-liberal voter how to vote twice.
In a comment to the liberal Talking Points Memo, DNC spokeswoman Melanie Roussell accused James O’Keefe and Project Veritas of selectively editing their videos – but admitted that what Caballero did on his tape was wrong and she’s now been fired.
“There is obviously a history here of making selective use of taped material, and we will certainly not vouch for the completeness of what was released,” Roussell said. “However, what we saw was enough for us to take the action that we did.”
Once again, as with the ACORN sting, O’Keefe is accused of “selectively editing” video, without anyone expecting Democrats to produce evidence to support the accusation: What did O’Keefe allegedly edit out? Never mind — the DNC simply makes the accusation to provide an ironclad excuse for any reporter at a mainstream news organization who wants to ignore the story: “Oh, this isn’t really news because, selective editing!”
Hey, Scoop: If this is all a ginned-up nothingburger — if the unsubstantiated charge of “selective editing” automatically disqualifies it as newsworthy — why did Caballero get fired?
Unanswered (and usually, unasked) questions like that were what used to annoy the hell out of Andrew Breitbart, and rightly so. Leave aside entirely the question of a professional journalist’s obligations. Just normal human curiosity would make ordinary people ask questions: What’s going on with Democrats and voter registration? Is it true that many hundreds of people have been documented as voting illegally in two states during the same election year? What, if anything, are Democrats doing to prevent this? Or is it all just a bunch of ginned-up phony outrage? Like I say, this is the kind of stuff that ordinary people find interesting, and which you might think an editor at the Washington Post or the New York Times or CBS News would therefore find worthy of further reporting: “Hey, this is kind of weird and it might make for an interesting story, let’s assign somebody to poke around and see what they can dig up.”
But . . . no.
It’s frustrating, because you have the sneaking suspicion that if the mainstream media ever devoted serious effort to such stories, the result would be a lot more interesting than the dreck they usually produce. And it used to make Andrew Breitbart very angry:
Toward the end of the new movie Hating Breitbart, there is a scene that captures the essence of what the late New Media entrepreneur Andrew Breitbart did — and how he did it. The camera follows Breitbart as he makes his way up Capitol Hill, past the crowd at a 2010 Tea Party rally where the founder of Breitbart.com was about to give a speech. “Hey, Andrew, remember me?” says a man amid the throng on the opposite side of the crowd-control barricade. “I’m the one who sent you that video … the nine-second clip.”
Breitbart knew exactly which clip the man was talking about, and remembered the online moniker of the amateur cameraman who sent it: “Marooned in Marin, right?”
The significance of that moment isn’t explained in the movie, as director Andrew Marcus is content to let viewers connect the dots for themselves when Breitbart takes the stage to give one of his many impassioned speeches. While he was at times credited with singlehandedly destroying the mainstream media’s suffocating liberal stranglehold on news, Breitbart always understood that his work depended on people like Marooned in Marin who sent him e-mail tips, including videos and photos, that exposed the untold truths that too many professional journalists were willing to ignore. And so when he stood on the stage in front of the Capitol that September afternoon in 2010, Breitbart pointed to the audience and told them, “You are the army!”
Marcus’s camera then captures Breitbart’s reaction, after he leaves the stage to cheers and applause, telling a friend that he didn’t have any idea what he was going to say until he started talking. That’s how it was with Breitbart — a master of improvisation, an impulsive personality who learned to turn his attention deficit disorder into an asset. The astute viewer of Hating Breitbart recognizes that the chance encounter with Marooned in Marin (whose name Breitbart had stored in his amazing memory) triggered the thought that led to the inspirational words he spoke on stage that day at the Tea Party rally. And every new day brings fresh reminders of how the inspiration has outlived the man who died in March at age 43. . . .
Please read the rest at The American Spectator. You’re sure as hell never going to read anything like it in the New York Times.
Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World!
Benghazi Breakdown: Team Obama, Liberals Now in Full Freak-Out Mode
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 20 Comments
First, the headline:
Mother of Slain State Dept. Official Tired of Being
Lied To and Stonewalled by Obama Administration
Next, the video, which got the AOSHQ Flaming Skull Alert:
Now, we point out that Stephanie Cutter has doubled down on her outrageous claim that the terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi is only the subject of controvery because — wait for it — Republicans “politicized” the issue. This is the kind of harmonic convergence of self-serving bullshit unprecedented since the days when LBJ lied America into a shooting war in Southeast Asia.
And it reminds me of something else:
@michellemalkin Have you noticed, w Romney gaining in polls, liberals seem to be returning to 2002-05 Golden Age of Unhinged Moonbattery?
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) October 11, 2012
Let anyone who watched the moonbat brigades in action during that era testify to their own memories, but I recall it this way: It started with the 2002 mid-terms. Democrats had been expecting to make the usual congressional gains that the party out of power makes in the next election after losing the White House and, instead, the Republicans actually gained seats. This completely demoralized the Left and within a few months, we invaded Iraq.
OK, so the Left then mounted its typical anti-war movement, with the Netroots latching onto Howard Dean as their Gene McCarthy/George McGovern peacenik presidential candidate. Dean melted down in Iowa, and instead the nomination went to Vietnam-era peacenik hero John Kerry who got “Swiftboated” (a term that means “unfairly telling the truth about a Democrat”) and Bush got re-elected in 2004.
The absolute nadir for the Left was when the exit polls showed that Bush had won Ohio because of so-called “values voters” who had turned out in droves to vote for a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. This was a horrid shock to the Left to learn that their two favorite issues — treason and sodomy — had been rejected by the American people, and so they vowed revenge against those damned flag-waving homophobic heartland Republicans.
As I say, this was the Golden Age, with the Left so completely discredited, disempowered and disconsolate that their pitiful crusades — “Indict Karl Rove!” — were fodder for endless mockery by conservative bloggers, who could laugh at the madcap antics of the Kossacks back then.
That era ended when Democrats won the 2006 mid-terms (thank you, Jack Abramoff, and thank you, Mark Foley) and the painful shoe of despair was on the other foot after Obama got elected in 2008. But it seems the karmic wheel is now beginning to turn.
Notice Nate Silver’s slo-mo walkback, his Forecasting Model™ now giving Romney a 32.1% chance of victory, and Nate compelled to pretend there are “a couple of rays of hope” for Democrats.
Whistling past the graveyard much, Nate?
They’re trying to stave off complete panic, and if Paul Ryan does well in tonight’s debate with Joe Biden — my prediction is that Ryan will stomp Joe the way Godzilla stomped Tokyo — we’re likely to see one of the most memorable freak-outs in the history of liberal freak-outs.
Sully’s liable to be on suicide watch if the polls keep trending this way another week, and if analysts ever start moving states like Pennsylvania and Michigan into the “toss-up” category . . .
Oh, it will be epic.
UPDATE: Top thread at Memeorandum, with reaction by Gateway Pundit, Phil Klein, Da Tech Guy, The Lonely Conservative and this memorable response by Jeff Goldstein at Protein Wisdom:
Good lord. It’s long past time to vote these scumbags out: it’s time to tar and feather them and put them in stocks so that we can all take turns throwing rotten vegetables at their ugly treasonous faces.
Once these things start going sideways — with mainstream outfits like CNN sniffing the scent of Fear and Loathing — it’s gonna be hard for the White House to put Humpty-Dumpty together again. Yet we must maintain momentum to maximize the impact.
OK, everybody start praying for a @paulryanvp win in tonight’s debate. PRAY HARD!
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) October 11, 2012
How Do You Spell ‘LOL’? Idiotic Error by Former New Yorker Fact-Checker
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 22 Comments
When Bob Tyrrell told me about this on the phone, I was astonished: Evidently, James Pogue is a person with literary pretensions who once worked as a fact-checker for the New Yorker. In order to support his literary pretensions — he’s “writing a novel,” as are, inter alia, about nine thousand unpublished lawyers who dream of becoming the next John Grisham — Pogue managed to con somebody at Vice magazine into an assignment to cover the presidential campaign.
Pogue showed up a couple of weeks ago at a Romney-Ryan rally at the Dayton Airport in Vandalia, Ohio, an event I also covered (see the Sept. 25 blog posts “ROMNEY-RYAN AT DAYTON AIRPORT” and “SCENES FROM ROMNEY-RYAN RALLY,” as well as my Sept. 26 American Spectator column, “Spiking the Ball Early?“). While awaiting the start of the rally, I was inside the “press filing” pen and wandered over to the edge of the pen to smoke a cigarette, talking briefly with Byron York of the Washington Examiner, who was standing outside the pen.
This utterly routine encounter — Byron is ubiquitous on the campaign trail, and I’m always standing around smoking outside campaign events — got “reported” by Pogue at Vice, thus:
In the crowd section, leaning on the fence of the press corral, was a man in a Filson jacket who looked in person so much like Jonathan Franzen that I had visions of a scoop:
“NOVELIST TRAILS ROMNEY CAMPAIGN: MOTIVES UNCLEAR”
But this man was actually Byron York, the conservative writer, occasional Fox News talker, and sort of multi-purpose representative of those post-Buckley elitist conservatives who still exist in America. Smoking and speaking quietly with York from inside the corral was a man wearing an outback hat and jeans so long he’d had to roll them up to avoid walking on the hems. This man was Robert Emmett Tyrell, the founder and editor-in-chief of the American Spectator, a magazine whose diminished state might be taken as representative of the fates of those Yorkite conservatives. I came over and offered to buy a cigarette from him. York looked disgusted. Tyrell looked amused. He introduced himself and said he didn’t need my money. I said hello to York and he refused my handshake and walked away. . . .
York wandered away. Tyrell took down my name and said he’d google me.
Writers who don’t do this sort of thing for a living, who go out and lark it for a while as political journalists, tend to come to events like this and focus on the mechanics of the event, to touch a bit on the crowd, and to write a great deal about the other journalists. Everyone does it, from Hunter Thompson to David Foster Wallace, and it’s always seemed to me to be a bit of a cheap trick, on the reasoning that a smart guy with the freedom of a big word count ought to be able to come and draw political lessons from the same material the newspaper writers work with. Now I get it. There’s nearly nothing else to talk about. . . .
And who are these reporters who produce the optics? They’re an astonishingly slovenly group. Tyrell turned out to have been one of three men, out of maybe 15 of us, whose pants were so ill-fitting that he had to roll up the legs to avoid the mud. There were uncountable pairs of square-toed loafers; cheap pinstripe suits. We could be on a used car lot in Bucharest. The Romney aids dress the same way. It wasn’t that they’d been on the trail and their wardrobes were bare and dirty, that much seemed pretty clear. They just didn’t know how to dress. . . .
And then we had Romney. Tyrell leapt up on the fence to get a view, and the iPhones went up, and the women behind us began a chant again, “Rom-ney, Rom-ney” and this time the crowd joined in. . . .
Well, how much more wrong could you possibly get it? To begin with, R. Emmett Tyrrell spells his surname with two R’s, and I’m not him, and Tyrrell doesn’t smoke. Exactly how on earth Pogue made this ridiculous mistake, I don’t know. Tyrrell is a dashingly handsome fellow who I am certain is grateful he looks nothing like me.
Furthermore, to classify Byron York among “post-Buckley elitist conservatives” is absurd: He’s a splendidly down-to-earth guy, and no self-respecting “elitist” would ever talk to me. Nor, I think, do post-Buckley elitists spend much time hanging out with Bob Tyrrell. I vaguely recall giving Pogue a cigarette and refusing his offer to pay for it, a courtesy from a fellow nicotine addict who has more than once had to bum a smoke after forgetting to bring along a spare pack. (For some reason, campaign events are almost never held in the vicinity of convenience stores, and once you get inside the security perimeter, you want to stay there, or else you’ll be forced to go through the metal detectors again when you come back.)
Incidentally, when Tyrrell first told me about this Pogue article and mentioned Byron York, I was confused as to which Romney-Ryan event he was referring to: At a Ryan event in Lima the day before, I’d run out of batteries for my camera and been forced to bum a couple of AAs from York, for exactly the reasons I’d described in reference to the cigarettes: If you go outside the perimeter once the candidate is on the scene, the Secret Service probably won’t let you back inside, media credential or no media credential — “Just following orders, mein herr.”
As to the length of my jeans: My thrifty wife bought me a new pair of jeans a few months back — found them on clearance somewhere and couldn’t resist the bargain — and it was also she who packed my suitcase for the Ohio trip. My wardrobe was chosen hastily at the Dayton hotel where I was staying, as I hurried to get ready to go to the airport rally. Frankly, I don’t give much thought to fashion when I’m on the campaign trail, or anywhere else for that matter. Back when I was young and single, I was quite stylish, with a wardrobe that included shirts by Yves St. Laurent and Pierre Cardin, and ties by Alexander Julian, but no longer give a damn about impressing anybody with my fashion sense, even if I could afford to be such a fop.
Well, what the hell, huh? Rolled-up jeans are the New Black!
Also: The “leapt up on a fence” is wrong. What I did was climb the steps to the camera riser, and the reason was not just “to get a view,” but rather to get photographs, like this one giving the readers some sense of the size of the crowd. See, the polls had Romney down by 10 points in Ohio, and all the pundits were writing him off as doomed, which made the turnout at the Dayton airport on a drizzly day — 4,000 people — kind of newsworthy, certainly more newsworthy than whatever fashion statement I was making with my rolled-up jeans.
This is what makes James Pogue’s reference to Hunter S. Thompson so stupidly offensive: Yes, if you “don’t do this sort of thing for a living,” it is perfectly natural to report on the mechanics of the campaign, including the habits of the press corps — and I do that, too. Why? Because so many of the reporters are caught up in the Daily Horse-Race Narrative of the campaign that they almost never report the size of the crowd, the weather, or the other interesting little details of the carnival-like atmosphere that surrounds a presidential campaign.
Understand that I’m not competing with Jeff Zeleny of the New York Times to provide the Page One inverted-pyramid Definitive Account of the campaign. No, my coveraage here and at the American Spectator is a sort of colorful “news feature” version of the story, and even though I sometimes actually break news in the process, there’s no point chasing the Drudge link because, frankly, we don’t have enough server capacity to handle that kind of traffic.
The day after “Super Tuesday,” I attempted to explain my concept of what I’m doing in a post: “Memo From the National Affairs Desk: ‘Committing Acts of Journalism’.”
Does it make sense as a business model? Is there a market demand for this product? I do OK. I don’t usually run too late on deadline, and I at least try to get basic facts right, whereas literary pretender James Pogue makes a complete fool of himself.
With more than a week to write his account of the Sept. 25 Vandalia rally, which didn’t appear on the Vice.com site until Oct. 5, Pogue got the facts hilariously wrong and, in doing so, destroyed whatever flimsy claim to journalistic integrity he might have thrown behind his assertion that, at this rally, “there was a fat little man in a windbreaker” selling anti-Obama stickers with a racist theme.
Damn you to hell, James Pogue.
Go find some other some other profession to disgrace.
UPDATE: Ladd Ehlinger spots an error by Pogue that should have been obvious to anyone who’s ever been within range of my voice, which is usually about a quarter-mile:
I knew there was something wrong when I read “speaking quietly…” @rsmccain theothermccain.com/2012/10/11/how…
— Film Ladd (@FilmLadd) October 11, 2012
“Speaking quietly,” me? LOL.
BTW, I just saw that Paul Ryan will be heading back to Ohio on Saturday. Whether I make that trip or not, I’ve got to get back on the campaign trail pretty soon, so please hit the freaking tip jar.
@AmbassadorRice: The Shameful Stain That Is Susan Rice, Now on Twitter
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 7 Comments
So proud to defend #humanrights and ensure #LGBT voices are heard at the #UN. @global_equality
— Susan Rice (@AmbassadorRice) October 11, 2012
“Four dead Americans, and she’s doing a happy dance because she thinks the UN is gay-friendly now? What delusional fantasy world is she living in?”
— Sunshine State Sarah
What part of “misplaced priorities” is so hard to understand here? Does Ambassador Rice think gay people are too stupid to understand that they’re being dragooned into service as human shields to protect the (suddenly) endangered employment of herself and her boss?
That is to say, what she’s doing here is attempting to drape herself in the mantle of “human rights” and “equality,” to suggest to gays that if she gets thrown under the administration’s bus — of if President Obama doesn’t get re-elected — somehow these values as they pertain to “LGBT voices” will be jeopardized, not by bigoted foreigners, but rather by those evil homophobic Republicans.
“Defend me, you faggots — I’m on your side!”
If Andrew Sullivan had any shred of integrity remaining, he’d see through this shameless pander for what it is, and denounce it as an insult.
Related: “How dare you call our entirely discredited cover story on Benghazi false, or something.”
Also: “Our country is being run by liberal college students.”
That Winning Combination
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 16 Comments
by Smitty
Update: welcome, Instapundit readers!
LIVE AT FIVE: 10.11.12
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 3 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
LTC Wood Testifies Benghazi Consulate Never Had Adequate Security
Former head of security for Libya undercuts Deputy Assistant Secretary Lamb’s testimony
Terrorist attack was “a matter of time”
Can the White House be believed? What’s the truth? (Ambassador Bolton interview)
NBC/WSJ/Marist Poll: Romney Gains In Key States
48-47 Romney in Virginia, 48-47 Obama in Florida; Ohio 51-45 Obama – With 11-point Voting Edge To Dems
Joe Biden Bids To Stem GOP Charge
Can “Joltin’ Joe” revive Democrats’ sagging morale?
POLITICS
Federal Court Approves SC Voter ID Law, Delays Implementation Until 2013
Panel finds law doesn’t discriminate against minorities, but not enough time remains to educate voters
Joe Biden’s Swipe At The Middle Class
Supremes Divided Over Affirmative Action In College Admissions
Brown, Warren Tangle Over Jobs, Health Care In Third Debate
Obama Tries To Revive War On Women Charge Against Romney
Dying Cancer Patient Gets TSA Escort On Return Trip After Intrusive Search On Flight Out
Flake, Carmona Trade Accusations In AZ Senate Debate
Oakland Sues Feds Over Pot Dispensary
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Oil Rises As Syro-Turkish Tensions Escalate; NYMEX $91.25, Brent $113.75
Asian Stocks, Euro Drop As S&P Cuts Spain’s Rating
Toyota Recall Derails Automaker’s Recovery Efforts
Drop In Job Openings Signals Limited US Job Growth
ROK Matches Brazil Rate Cut As World Economy Stumbles
IMF Chief Says Greece Needs Two More Years For Budget
Huawei Corruption Allegations Turned Over To FBI
RockMelt Browser Launches For iPad
HP Calls Out Gartner On PC Sales, Says IDC Is Right
Meet The “New eBay”
FCC Okays Amazon To Sell Kindle Fire HD 4G
PC Sales To Decline In 2012 For First Time In 11 Years
Samsung To Launch “Mini” Galaxy S III With Four-Inch Screen
SPORTS
No Joy In Natsville As Cardinals Rout Washington 8-0

St. Louis Cardinals’ Chris Carpenter reacts after hitting a doubleduring the fifth inning in Game 3 of the NLDS
Cardinals now up 2-1 in NLDS, predictable whining about Strasburg ensues
A’s Rally In Ninth, Force Game 5 Against Tigers
O’s Once-Flawless Bullpen Opens Door For Yankees
Lincecum Stars As Giants Blast Reds 8-3
Longtime Detroit Lion, Actor Alex Karras Dies, 77
US Anti-Doping Agency Releases Small Mountain Of Evidence Against Lance Armstrong
Roger Goodell Keeps Fumbling Away The Bounty Ball
Six Cricket Umpires Implicated In Fixing Sting Suspended
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Beyonce Out Of Eastwood’s “A Star Is Born” Remake
Not politics; schedules didn’t sync and the singer hopes to work with Eastwood in the future
Miley Cyrus Flees Bonnie & Clyde Mini-series
THR Cover: Confessions Of Ben Affleck
Neve Campbell Joins “Grey’s Anatomy” Season 9 Cast
Shailene Woodley In Talks For “Spiderman 2”
Taylor Swift Denies Kidnapping Conor Kennedy From School
Justin Bieber Latest Victim Of SWATting
FOREIGNERS
Turks Force Syrian Plane To Land, Confiscate “Objectionable Cargo”
Malala Yousafzai’s Taliban Attackers Identified
One Member Of Pussy Riot Freed, Remaining Two Off To Siberia
Ten Years On, Bali Bombing Victims Seek Closure
Amnesty Internationals Says Violent Forced Evictions Increasing In PRC
Israelis Hit Gaza With Air Strike After Taking Rocket Fire
US Special Ops Forces, Planners Deploy To Jordan With Eyes On Syrian Chemical Weapons
Aussie Liberal Front-Bencher Bronwyn Bishop Calls Gillard’s Speech “Pathetic”
Canadian Naval Intel Officer Pleads Guilty To Spying For Russia
PM Cameron Bids To Reboot “Caring Conservatism”
BLOGS & STUFF
The Looking Spoon: Big Bird Is In The Eye Of The Beholder
Michelle Malkin: James O’Keefe Strikes Again, Exposes Obama Campaign/DNC Vote Fraud Enablers
WyBlog: I Guess They Don’t Call ABC The “All Barack Channel” For Nothing
Weekly standard Blog: Sean Smith’s Mother Tired Of Being Stonewalled, Lied To By Administration
Weasel Zippers: Widow Of Army Sniper Killed In Afghanistan Overjoyed To Hear Romney Talk About Her Husband – “One Of The Last Things He Said Was ‘I Need A New President'”
Paul Bedard: Biden’s Favorables Worse Than Ryan’s – Or Palin’s
Moe Lane: President Obama Promises To Be Incompetently Nasty At Next Debate
AmSpecBlog: Obama Thinks He Was Just Too Polite With Romney
Power Line: ABC News’ Version of A Proper Debate Moderator
Ed Morrissey: WaPo Wonders, Where’s Hillary?
NewsBusters: Martin Bashir Whines That Press Not Buying WH Spin On Libya
Babalu: Shattered Lies – “You’d Have To Be Helen Keller Not To See This Was A Full-Fledged Coverup”
Maggie’s Farm: Affirmative Action, Politics, And The Supremes
Pirate’s Cove: Scumsucker Elijah Woods (D) Can’t Remember Name Of Murdered Ambassador
Riehl World News: Aww, Randy Andy’s Bad Week Gets Worse
Protein Wisdom: Nine Things The MSM Will Rediscover Should Romney Win The Presidency
Mass hysteria. But in a GOOD way.
Sex and Sammiches
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 22 Comments
These are the two great arguments for marriage, but young folks don’t seem to understand what it’s all about:
Anyhow, if a woman is unwilling to commit to having sex on some sort of regular basis, then how on Earth can any man be reasonably expected to commit to never having sex with anyone else? If 104 times per year is too much and justifies a refusal to commit to it, then how much is a reasonable average expectation?
Son, you start talking like that, you’re displaying a fatal weakness. And if there’s anything a woman hates in a man, it’s weakness.
This is why I strongly support abstinence education: If a fellow doesn’t learn to do without sex before he gets married . . . Read more
Administration ‘Completely Wrong’ About Libya, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Admits, But ‘That Doesn’t Mean It Was False’
Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 20 Comments
Ladies and gentlemen, The Queen of Unintentional Comedy:
PIERS MORGAN: “It is pretty un-American to be putting out completely false statements before you know the facts. Isn’t it?”
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: “Piers, it is not okay for you to be saying that the administration was putting out completely false statements. They put out information that they had at the time based on the intelligence they were given…”
MORGAN: “That turned out to be completely wrong–”
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: “Well, that doesn’t mean it was false.”
MORGAN: “What?”
Hat-tip: Marooned in Marin on Twitter.




