Garofalo: My New Raaaaacedar Can Tell That The Herman Cain Enthusiasm Is Like, Totally KKKamouflage

by Smitty (via The Blaze)

There really isn’t a lot to add to the the flogging of this journey into freestyle idiocy. However I should like to introduce the concept of a ‘raaaaacedar’, which is a device that attempts to locate a raaaaacist and point a finger, and manages to have three pointing back. For example:

If I point a finger at you, three point back at me.

The other concept is the notion of the KKKamouflage Fallacy (remember, there are three ‘K’ characters), which says that you can be raaaaacist and just sprinkle a few of the hated out-group in prominent positions as a distractor.

Actual racism simply doesn’t support that level of sophistication. Can I step out of snark mode to admit one time where I, personally, had a racist reaction? Albany, Australia, 1999. I was in a bar, and an Aborigine woman was there. Short, sloping forehead, major super-orbital ridges like a rock shelf, covering wolf-grey eyes that look a few notches shy of human. I experienced a negative, physical reaction, a gnawing angst. This person I was looking at was just. . .wrong. It was a reaction similar to one you might have to open the pantry and have a big rat staring at you at eye level.

Anyway, I got better, and managed both to contain the primitive feedback, and treat the person with a reasonable politeness. I’m sure that I would have overcome that visceral reaction if I spent any time around the Aborigines.

In total contrast to that creeped out feeling, you have Herman Cain, a common-sense American. The kind of man I wouldn’t mind working for, in fact. The kind for whom I could cheerfully vote. Not because of his ethnic heritage. Not despite his ethnic heritage. Because of his purely American heritage. He is the sort of speaker who has both charisma and workable ideas for where the country should go. He really deserves more than this sad toss-off from Garofalo. Could she perhaps take the Akbar Challenge, and show up at a Tea Party, one wonders? Maybe she could bring Morgan Freeman.

Be Careful What You Wish For

Q: “People think you are very hostile to men.”
Andrea Dworkin: “I am.”


This quote from, and picture of, a pioneering feminist leader comes from an excellent essay called “Women on the Left,” by Alex Kurtagic at Alternative Right.

And the reason I’m imposing Ms. Dworkin’s image and ideas on you is because “Guy,” a commenter on an earlier post, accused us of having contributed to “the debasing of western civilization” through our Rule 5 Sunday cheesecake round-ups. As explained in “How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog,” there are four principles of Rule 5:

  • A. Everybody loves a pretty girl
  • B. Mind the MEGO factor
  • C. Sex sells
  • D. Feminism sucks

As I wrote on that February day in 2009: “All politics all the time gets boring after a while. . . . Even a stone political junkie cannot subsist on a 24/7 diet of politics. The occasional joke, the occasional hot babe, the occasional joke about a hot babe — it’s a safety valve to make sure we don’t become humorless right-wing clones of those Democratic Underground moonbats.”

If anyone is “debased” by occasionally seeing a starlet in a bikini — just to break the relentless tedium of 24/7 politics — I apologize.

But I hope readers, including Guy, understand that the alternative to Rule 5 is Andrea Dworkin photos. For all we know, there might be Andrea Dworkin bikini photos or even Andrew Dworkin nude photos out there somewhere on the Internet.

And you wouldn’t want to see that, would you?

So no more cluttering up the comments with anti-Rule 5 complaints, or I might be tempted to post so many pictures of ugly feminists that all the Brain Bleach in the world won’t eradicate the mind-stain.

Feminism has done far more toward “debasing western civilization” than cheesecake ever could, and if you’re offended by beauty, you’d better avert your eyes now. Continue reading Be Careful What You Wish For →

Fund-Raising E-Mail: Obama Campaign ‘Refused to Take Money From D.C. Lobbyists and Corporate Special Interests’

In the wake of the Solyndra scandal, it might seem bizarre that President Obama’s re-election campaign would claim to be free from “special interests,” but that’s exactly what the campaign’s finance director said in a message sent today to the Organizing for America (OFA) e-mail list:

Robert —
I’m the national finance director here at OFA.
I know we’ve been sending you a lot of email lately. That’s because we’re staring down a critical fundraising deadline tomorrow at midnight.
You know what that means for your inbox, but let me give you a sense of what that looks like around here.
The staff and I are working around the clock, powered by too much coffee. It’s been way too long since we called our moms. And we’ve all had more pizza and bad takeout in the past few weeks than anyone should have in a year.
No one’s complaining; that’s what we signed up for. And we’re not doing this just because it’s our job to make sure the campaign has the resources it needs. We’re doing this because it’s part of what defines this movement.
From the beginning, we’ve refused to take money from D.C. lobbyists and corporate special interests. Our operation is fueled by people inspiring each other to take ownership of this campaign.
That’s why we’ve been emailing this week, and that’s why I’m obligated to remind you once more that the deadline is coming up in a matter of hours.
If you’re able to, will you chip in just $3 today?
For all of us here at HQ, and all of the staff and volunteers across the country counting on these resources, I really appreciate your help.

Rufus

Rufus Gifford
National Finance Director
Obama for America

Let’s stipulate that the reason Gifford and other top OFA staffer are “doing this” has a lot less to do with “defining the movement” than it does with justifying their six-figure salaries. And let’s further stipulate that the reason they’re having such a hard time — bombarding their list with a series of increasingly desperate pleas for cash — is that the Democratic Party base is hopelessly demoralized. And this demoralization has a direct effect on Obama’s fundraising:

They were once among President Obama’s most loyal supporters and a potent symbol of his political brand: voters of moderate means who dug deep for the candidate and his message of hope and change, sending him $10 or $25 or $50 every few weeks or months.
But in recent months, the frustration and disillusionment that have dragged down Mr. Obama’s approval ratings have crept into the ranks of his vaunted small-donor army, underscoring the challenges he faces as he seeks to rekindle grass-roots enthusiasm for his re-election bid. . . .
“When I was pro-Obama in 2008, I was thinking of him as a leader who could face the challenges that we were tackling,” said Adnan Alasadi . . . Mr. Alasadi contributed repeatedly to Mr. Obama during his first campaign but says he will not give the president — or anyone else — any more money.
“Now I am seeing him as just an opportunistic politician,” Mr. Alasadi said.

Some of us never saw him as anything else. But what about that claim that Obama doesn’t take money from “special interests”? Let’s consult the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics:

President Barack Obama has relied more on well-connected Wall Street figures to fund his re-election than he did four years ago when he campaigned as an outsider and an underdog.
One-third of the money Obama’s elite fund-raising corps has raised on behalf of his re-election has come from the financial sector, according to a new Center for Responsive Politics analysis.
Individuals who work in the finance, insurance and real estate sector are responsible for raising at least $11.8 million for Obama’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, according to the Center’s research. All of Obama’s bundlers have raised a minimum of $34.95 million, as OpenSecrets Blog previously reported.

Read the whole thing. It’s gotta be hard to fire up the liberal base with class-warfare rhetoric demonizing the “rich” when you’re collecting tens of millions from Wall Street special interests.

And small wonder the people who signed up for Hope and Change in 2008 won’t give you a dime now, no matter how often you e-mail them, or what outrageous lies you tell them.

UPDATE: A couple of related headlines:

More solar companies led by Democratic
donors received federal loan guarantees

— — —

Nancy Pelosi’s brother-in-law is given
$737m of taxpayers’ money to build giant
solar power plant in middle of the desert

See, there’s Rufus Gifford’s problem in a nutshell: The small fry on the OFA e-mail list — who gave $20 or $50 or $100 to Obama four years ago — didn’t get any $737-million federal loans.

Even Democrats aren’t so stupid that they can’t understand what “green jobs” means:  They get the green, you lose your jobs.

Defending the American Dream

by Smitty

I just signed up:

AFP Foundation’s 5th annual Defending the American Dream Summit will be held November 4-5, 2011 at the DC Convention Center in Washington, DC. Radio host Mark Levin has just been confirmed as a keynote speaker.

This is a consolation trip, since I have to be in Philly doing daddy duty instead of Denver for BlogCon on the following weekend.

At any rate, they have some good bus connectivity for folks, and it’s not a huge undertaking. Request readers of this blog advise if you’re attending; we should plan to extend the power of the Axis of Fedora as much as possible.

BREAKING: WH Names ObamaCare Litigator For SCOTUS Challenge

by Smitty

U.S. News reports that the White House is flexing its muscle to bring ObamaCare to the Supreme Court sooner rather than later:

The government could have dragged its feet in appealing to the Supreme Court—the final deadline to file was actually November, and it also could have asked for a full court review from the 11th Circuit since the case was decided by a three-judge panel (though the conservative court was unlikely to return a better verdict)—but experts say filing now displays the administration’s assurance, and any delay tactics might have been exploited by Republicans as cowardly. “If you don’t think you have a winning hand, then sometimes it makes sense to see if the landscape changes,” says Ian Millhiser, a constitutional and judiciary analyst with the left-leaning Center for American Progress. “They clearly think, if they are going to pull the trigger now, that they stand to gain from pulling the trigger.”

This blog, through non-existent sources, has obtained the identity of the lead lawyer on the White House team:

Creeptastic News of the Day

Sitting here in my home office with the cable TV news playing in the background, I occasionally overhear summaries of stories that have nothing to do with politics, but which are nonetheless interesting as news.

The case of Utah mother Susan Powell’s disappearance has been much-discussed today. This would be just another one of those “Perils of Pauline”-type stories — the attractive white female as crime victim — were it not for the bizarre circumstances revealed by the investigation:

Josh’s father Steve was arrested over the weekend after police found evidence that he shot pictures and video of women and children in various states of undress through several acts of voyeurism.
Josh’s wife Susan Cox Powell has been missing since December 6, 2009, when she was last seen in her West Valley City, Utah home.
Susan’s husband Josh took the couple’s two young sons and moved in with his father Steve a month after Susan’s disappearance.
West Valley City Police served a search warrant at Steve Powell’s Puyallup home in August, and gathered evidence that suggests Steve was engaged in several acts of voyeurism in which he video taped or photographed women and children without their knowledge. Among the video collected by investigators was video of Susan that was shot without her knowledge.
Police say some of the video and photos were of neighbor women and girls.

Ick. The missing woman’s father-in-law was engaged in voyeurism and pornography, including child pornography, and secretly recorded video of Susan Powell. And in case that’s not creepy enough for you, take a look at this angle of the story:

Details emerged Wednesday about Steve Powell’s past in a 1992 divorce case from Spokane County. Case documents reviewed by The Associated Press show Steve Powell’s ex-wife accused him of keeping pornography, damaging his children’s respect for marriage and inappropriately discussing sex issues with the kids.
Terri Powell wrote in the divorce papers that Steve Powell talked of teaching his children about birth control methods when they were as young as 9-years-old. Terri’s sister, Becky Mulcahy, wrote in the documents that Steve Powell told her that he had shown his youngest children books about sexual intercourse when they were 6- and 8-years-old.
Terri Powell said her husband viewed people as animals and that they should be able to have sex with anyone at any time. She recalled a conversation in which Josh referred to a girl his brother, Johnny, liked. “All she is good for is her body, right Dad?” Terri recalled Josh saying. “Yeah, that’s right,” Steve Powell replied, according to the declaration.
Terri Powell also said Steve Powell kept hardcore pornography in the home and that he visited pornography shops.
Jennifer Graves, Josh Powell’s sister, said in an interview with The Associated Press that she broke off ties with her father in part because of his problems with sex and pornography. She recalled going on a business trip with her father when she was about 11-years-old and that he viewed a pornographic video while she was with him.
“Looking back, I wonder if he was willing to do that with a 10-12 year girl — his daughter — in the room, what else would he be willing to do?” she said.

Ick.

Whatever happened to Susan Powell, it appears she unwittingly married into a family badly damaged by Steve Powell, who “viewed people as animals” — hello, Darwinism! — and otherwise shared the perspective on human sexuality promoted by the disciples of Alfred Kinsey.

Perhaps “mental health professionals” will have some comment on this case. And if Steve Powell beats the rap, maybe Columbia University will hire him. Otherwise, he might become an anti-Palin blogger.

Of course, if you see this strange case as relevant to larger trends — a high-profile crime as the tip of a massive iceberg of perversion deeply embedded in our hyper-sexualized culture — then you’re probably some kind of right-wing Christian fundamentalist theocrat, and are therefore automatically discredited as a social critic.

When only secular progressive arguments are deemed admissible, when perspectives of faith and tradition are pre-emptively excluded from public discourse, we should not be surprised when the ghastly results show up on the cable TV news.

Yet those of us excluded from participation in the cultural debate must ask, if only among ourselves, how much of the human misery chronicled in the 24/7 news cycle is the product of a society that has lost sight of those once well-known moral maxims beginning, “Thou shalt not …”?

But this has no relevance to politics, of course.

UPDATE: Thanks to Pagan Temple in the comments, discovering that Susan Powell’s father-in-law Steve Powell was a singer/songwriter, using the pseudonym “Steve Chantrey,” whose Web site includes this interesting item:

[A]s an 18-year-old college student I used a campus talent show as a platform for unveiling a song I had written protesting the Vietnam War and the draft.

Also interesting is that the personal narrative on Steve Powell’s “about” page begins by talking about the break-up of his parents’ marriage. So Steve’s parents were divorced, then Steve was divorced, and now Steve’s daughter-in-law is missing and presumed dead. Something about those “Thou shalt nots” is perhaps relevant to understanding this three-generation legacy of dysfunction, now turned deadly.

UPDATE II: An August story from the Salt Lake Tribune provides background on Steve Powell’s obsession with his daughter-in-law. Some readers may have been following this story a while, and I apologize for re-hashing what is, to you, old news. But I hadn’t been paying attention until they started featuring it in the top-of-the-hour headline updates today on Fox.

Re-Integration Continues Apace

by Smitty

Thanks to the legion of well-wishers here on the blog, on Twitter, and via email.

The main message of de-mobilization is “take it slow”. I grew up in the Navy, and dad would just be gone so long that I hardly recognized him whenever the deployment ended. These days, we’re fortunate to have technology keep the information distance small. Physical, not so much.

Mrs. Other Smitty, the father-in-law, the World’s Youngest Blogger and I are doing fine in Norfolk, while I find out about the plethora of services offered to people coming back. My main secret was, of course, blogging. One tries not to confuse oneself with a representative sample of the population.

It is good to see Mrs. Other Smitty again. Below is a Safe For Work re-enactment (by some slightly better looking people than us) of the sort of chilling out we’re currently undertaking.

 

At Least One Florida Republican Party Official Who Is Not Batsh*t Crazy

“Sunshine State Sarah” reprints an e-mail from Republican National Committeeman Paul Senft:

Republicans have always been law abiding people who obey the rules. If we don’t want to go by the rules — if we want to be arrogant and only abide by the rules we like or agree with — then we should consider another party. As long as we are a member of the Republican Party we should go by their rules. If we want to change things, we should do it through the proper channels and procedures, not break the rules because we think we are better than other states. . . .
If we break the rules again (this will be two in a row) we will alienate the remainder of the country.

Please read the whole thing.  You know who you’re going to “alienate”? Me, and every other political journalist in the country. If these crazy [obscene epithets] in the Florida GOP move their primary from March to Jan. 31, then the Iowa caucuses, currently scheduled for Feb. 6, will also have to move up, perhaps as early as Jan. 3.

January Third! Do you know what that means? The final two weeks of the Iowa campaign will stomp all over the Christmas holidays!

New Hampshire will then move up to Jan. 10 — stomping all over the BCS National Championship game Jan. 9! And considering that the undefeated Alabama Crimson Tide are looking very much like they’re ready for another national title, that would piss me off bad.

A Wall Street Journal article lists state House Speaker Dean Cannon and state Senate President Mike Haridopolos as the vicious swine responsible for this crazy idea. So who are these big shots?

What does this look like? In four words: The fix is in.

By moving up their primary, these big-shot Florida GOP power-brokers are in effect protecting the front-runners and preventing any other candidates — including Herman Cain, who stomped Cannon’s boy in Saturday’s straw poll — from gaining traction. Despite all their noise about wanting to make sure Florida is represented in the process, blah, blah, blah, Cannon and Haridopolos are actually pushing a plan that would strip the state of half its delegates to next year’s GOP convention.

Certainly wouldn’t be the first time we’ve seen such shenanigans from Florida GOP bosses, eh? Remember how they wanted to fix the 2010 GOP Senate primary for Charlie Crist? The state party chairman tried to strangle Marco Rubio’s campaign by endorsing Crist 15 months before the primary and got his buddy in Washington, NRSC Chairman John Cornyn, to join in. And that state GOP chairman — now ex-chairman — Jim Greer is awaiting trial on corruption charges.

So forgive me for suspecting that these two GOP big shots are running some kind of hustle. I’m not saying they’ve done anything criminal. But it sure as hell looks shady, and even if they aren’t crooked, they’re planning to ruin Christmas and wreck the college football bowl season.

It’s un-American! They must be stopped!

MIKE HARIDOPOLOS — (850) 487-5628
DEAN CANNON — (850) 488-2742

(Please note that when calling their offices, you should be polite. Avoid profanity, personal insults and accusations of perverse sexual habits. Leave that to us professional journalists, because if Haridopolos and Cannon don’t back off this insane Jan. 31 nonsense, the political press corps will cuss these guys to hell.)