Commissars Sacrifice Naomi Schaefer Riley to the ‘New Gods of Diversity’
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 31 Comments
You might think that being a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard, an accomplished journalist and published author, would be the kind of impeccable credentials that would offer some protection against the occasional eruptions of intellectual cannibalism on campus.
Alas, no. Naomi Schaefer Riley is a former Wall Street Journal editor, the author of God on the Quad: How Religious Colleges and the Missionary Generation Are Changing America (2006) and The Faculty Lounges: And Other Reasons Why You Won’t Get the College Education You Pay For (2011). Until this week, Riley had also been a contributor to the Chronicle of Higher Education‘s “Brainstorm” blog.
On Monday, April 30, Riley took notice of a Chronicle feature article about “A New Generation of Black-Studies Ph.D.’s.” Riley examined the doctoral dissertations produced by these scholars and pronounced them “a collection of left-wing victimization claptrap”:
The best that can be said of these topics is that they’re so irrelevant no one will ever look at them. . . .
[T]opping the list in terms of sheer political partisanship and liberal hackery is La TaSha B. Levy. According to the Chronicle, “Ms. Levy is interested in examining the long tradition of black Republicanism, especially the rightward ideological shift it took in the 1980s after the election of Ronald Reagan. Ms. Levy’s dissertation argues that conservatives like Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, John McWhorter, and others have ‘played one of the most-significant roles in the assault on the civil-rights legacy that benefited them.’” The assault on civil rights? Because they don’t favor affirmative action they are assaulting civil rights? Because they believe there are some fundamental problems in black culture that cannot be blamed on white people they are assaulting civil rights?
Well, these are the sort of obvious truths that no one in American academic life can ever be permitted to speak aloud, and by publishing them under the aegis of the Chronicle of Higher Education, Riley had broken the silent taboo. Everybody knows that black studies, like women’s studies, is an academic ghetto. These programs owe their existence to political considerations, including the need to provide lucrative sinecures to radical faculty members who might otherwise be unemployable. Anyone who expects intellectual rigor from these programs is a fool.
These are facts universally known, but at the same time, no one within the academic community is permitted to call attention to this phenomenon. Riley is a professional journalist, and was under the impression that the Chronicle of Higher Education was a journalistic enterprise devoted to, y’know, facts and stuff like that.
Instead, as Riley discovered too late, the Chronicle is like 21st-century academia, devoted to rigid ideological dogma which must be fiercely protected against critical scrutiny. You can probably predict what happened next:
In reaction to Riley’s criticism, liberals “flipped out” and “lost their ever-living minds,” as Riley’s friend Mollie Hemingway says.
Her editor at the Chronicle “asked me to respond to the criticisms,” Riley told me. Evidently her response provoked even greater outrage and, Riley says, she got a call from an editor Monday informing her that her contributions to the Chronicle were “no longer welcome.” In an editor’s note, Liz McMillen informed readers of the Chronicle that Riley’s contributions “did not conform to the journalistic standards and civil tone that you expect from us.” Washington Free Beacon managing editor Sonny Bunch remarked on Twitter: “The liberal mob has spoken. The expiation has occurred. The new gods of diversity are satisfied. The sun will rise tomorrow.”
What have we learned from this incident? “The ivory tower is an inflated bubble and they don’t take criticism very well,” Riley told me.
Read the rest. Fortunately, Riley said, this wasn’t her full-time job, just a gig where she collected a “nominal amount” for two blog posts a week. But the principle of the thing — firing a blogger for offending “the new gods of diversity” — is worth fighting about, and I predict you’ll hear a lot more about this in the near future.
UPDATE: More at Memeorandum with commentary by New York Post, National Review, American Thinker and Legal Insurrection.
UPDATE II: Nick Gillespie at Reason magazine calls “the Chronicle’s response absolutely breath-taking and craven in its censoriousness. . . . This is plainly a politically correct response to a thug’s veto and should be owned up to as such.”
American universities have for so long operated on the principle of compulsory consensus that most academics now consider criticism of the consensus to be an illegitimate expression of “hate.”
UPDATE III: Oh. My. God.
Riley’s article is just the latest in an increasing wave of open bigotry from (occasionally conservative) White female political and cultural commentators. Many of these women have come down with an acute case of Privileged White Woman’s Rage, or PWRR for short. The disease has been around for years, but there has been a steady rise of cases since Obama beat Hillary in the primaries four years ago.
The person who wrote that is a Ph.D. professor at an Ohio college.
Gunny Ermey Unavailable, Yale Students Stuck With General McChrystal
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 3 Comments
by Smitty
Ivy League jackwagons hoping for a clue will have to click this image to get at Gunny Ermey’s soundboard app, where they might find one:
“There is almost no antimilitary bias among students,” said John Lewis Gaddis, a Yale history professor and the recipient of the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for biography, who has welcomed General McChrystal to Yale. “I wouldn’t say it’s true among the faculty.”
It’s kind of hard to be among the ilk of those who’d claim 1/32nd Cherokee heritage for a prime spot in academia, and then stand next to a full-on badass like McChrystal, who knows 14 ways to hospitalize you using only his ring finger.
On the other hand, MrChrystal, like most of academia, is an Obama voter. Oh, to be a fly on the wall if Gunny Ermey infiltrates the classroom and asks McChrystal how the bus tires felt when the General went under them after the Rolling Stone interview, while the cretinous Eric Holder still rides tall in the saddle.
Rick James Has What Wisconsin Democrats Need: Unity
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 2 Comments
by Smitty
Insta-Althouse reports big trouble in Troglo-reich, as in what perhaps is a Dick Lugar shout-out, the Dems can’t seem to get their junk together and consolidate their opposition to the common-sense leadership of Scott Walker:
Unity:
Brother, sister,
There’s got to be,
Uuuuuuniiiiiity.
Yeeeeeeahhh.
Unity.
Unity’s what missing in our
Liiiiiiiiiives.
Can’t you see?
Wee need looooooove.
A little word of confidence.
Every now and then.
A little hoooonesty,
And trust among us.
A little love and harmony,
And there’ll surely be,
Some unity,
Unity,
Unity.
(Unity)
The last time I trotted this one out was for the Delaware GOP in 2010. Heh.
Memo From the National Affairs Desk: Time to Quit Whining and Get to Work
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 144 Comments
This will be brief, but expect additions to follow in updates. Rick Santorum is now urging his supporters to get behind Mitt Romney:
Rick Santorum has officially endorsed Mitt Romney, and notified his supporters in an email sent Monday night.
In the email, the former presidential candidate cited his Friday meeting with Romney in his hometown of Pittsburgh as a reason he finally got behind the presumptive GOP nominee.
“On Friday, Governor Romney came to Pittsburgh for an over-hour long one-on-one meeting,” Santorum said in the email. “The conversation was candid, collegial and focused on the issues that you helped me give voice to during our campaign; because I believe they are essential ingredients to not only winning this fall, but turning our country around.” . . .
In the lengthy email, Santorum encouraged Romney to “add more conservative leaders as an integral part of his team.”
“And you can be sure that I will work with the governor to help him in this task to ensure he has a strong team that will support him in his conservative policy initiatives,” Santorum said. . . .
“Above all else, we both agree that President Obama must be defeated,” the letter read. “The task will not be easy. It will require all hands on deck if our nominee is to be victorious. Governor Romney will be that nominee and he has my endorsement and support to win this the most critical election of our lifetime.”
More at Memeorandum. As I say, this initial memo will be brief. If you supported Santorum, you must now respect his judgment that getting on board with the Romney campaign — “all hands on deck,” as Santorum says — is a vital obligation for all conservatives.
UPDATE: Ed Morrissey at Hot Air:
Santorum is scheduled to appear on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno this evening, and ABC’s Shushannah Walshe says that Santorum was expected to make a commitment at that time. Santorum apparently decided to announce the endorsement as soon as he made the decision. That may take a little of the drama out of tonight’s appearance, but it also may draw more interest as people tune in to hear Santorum’s explanation of the endorsement.
Here’s the thing I want to get across to our readers: Whenever Republicans lose a presidential election, the first thing the GOP Establishment does is to focus blame on conservatives. This is why Sarah Palin was scapegoated for the 2008 defeat, because treacherous swine like Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace, who get paid to win elections, don’t want to accept responsibility for their own failures.
It is therefore an urgent necessity — however painfully ironic — that hard-core grassroots conservatives give their maximum effort to help Romney defeat Barack Obama, because if Team Mitt loses this election, you will be blamed. Your honor as a conservative, to say nothing of the future of our Republic, thus requires from you even greater labors than you would have made if Rick Santorum had won the nomination.
Like I said, “painfully ironic.”
UPDATE II: In case you don’t understand how the GOP Establishment’s blame-shifting apparatus works, Tony Lee explains it at Big Journalism. Here’s the thing: When Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace backstabbed Palin and threw her under their RINO careerism bus, they thought their vicious treachery would never be discovered, because they’re so much smarter than everybody in the conservative grassroots.
UPDATE III: As I say, however, this isn’t the time to be nursing old grudges. We’ve got find a way to win, or else expect to be blamed for the defeat. Bridget Johnson at PJM notes that Santorum’s e-mail “stressed his differences with Mitt Romney and therefore gave the need to beat President Obama as the key reason to vote for the former Massachusetts governor.” Well, of course that’s what Santorum did.
If he hadn’t been honest about the differences, his endorsement wouldn’t have persuaded anyone. Here’s the crucial word from Lisa Graas:
Since May [2011], I have been 100% behind Rick Santorum because I trust him to do what is right for America. If Rick Santorum believes that Mitt Romney will defend life and marriage, then that is good enough for me. I also now endorse Mitt Romney for President and look forward to being a part of Rick Santorum’s grassroots volunteer team to continue the fight for conservatism in America.
One of the key topics at the Mitt/Rick meeting? Vanuatu.
UPDATE IV: Readers will recall that yesterday I said it is important to let Team Mitt do their job. That is to say, we shouldn’t be disgruntled, sitting around second-guessing them and bitch, bitch, bitching for the next six months. That ain’t gonna beat Obama, OK?
Our confidence in Team Mitt should prevent us from being distracted by certain people (not on the campaign) whining because they didn’t think Santorum’s endorsement was sufficiently sycophantic.
Hey, whiners: Kissing ass is your job, not Rick’s.
UPDATE V: Robert Costa at National Review talks about Team Mitt’s new hires, including former Santorum campaign director, Mike Biundo.
For the past couple of days, I’ve been biting my tongue about this, which got linked here, and to which I obliquely replied Sunday night. Because we are now in what Ace likes to call “game faces” mode, some insults must be ignored and some injuries suffered in silence.
Our personal interests or narrow ambitions should never be confused with “the conservative movement,” which is larger than any one person. We stand on the shoulders of giants, and owe an obligation to those who suffered and sacrificed to build this movement, and who are no longer here to aid us in our struggle. Humble service is our duty, and the scrupulous fulfillment of that duty is a matter of honor.
Note, please, that this mild acknowledgement has been included in the fifth update, three hours after the original post went online. That is to say, I’ve put it where it will attract little public notice, merely so that it may be known to friends that I am fully aware.
Question To Bush: How Does It Feel To Be Anti-Christ And Savior?
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 2 Comments
by Smitty
See if I’ve got this sorted correctly:
- Obama blames Bush for the crappy economy.
- Bush = Anti-Christ.
- ManBearPig says a crappy economy is needed to trim atmospheric CO2 levels.
- Bush = Savior?
Two wrongs don’t make a right, but two or more wrongs often seem to comprise a day’s work for the Democrats.
So Funny, When Feminism Thinks The Unborn Should Die
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 15 Comments
by Smitty
Funny or Die dives deep into the grave here:
What a creepy, sick, Orwellian world these feminists live in. Remind me again why any mature, masculine male would want to be in the same room as these abattoir-vaginas, much less offering them any essence to destroy? I guess I should say “choose to destroy”.
The sickness of the government-worship implied in this clip is only exceeded by the crypto-incest of talking about their dads and their vaginas at the end, if you can make it that far.
“Ye are the sodium chloride of the Earth,” to paraphrase the Sage. He did not follow up: “And if the chlorine hath lost its mind, and formeth not the good salt of a family with the sodium, then it shall have lost its savor to feminism, and be fit for going under the wheeled conveyance* of history, with the rest of a godless culture.” And why was such an addendum unnecessary? Because a couple thousand years ago, people weren’t post-Modern crack-addled Feminist nitwits, that’s why.
The good news is that these twisted females are unlikely to achieve any reproduction under the sun. Thus, there isn’t much danger of the World’s Youngest Blogger encountering this sort of dementia when he’s old enough to date. I hope these women find sense and these perverted ideas die, die, die.
via Breitbart
Update: linked at WyBlog, who offers more background.
*bus
LIVE AT FIVE – 05.08.12
Posted on | May 8, 2012 | 5 Comments
— compiled by Wombat-socho
TOP NEWS
CIA Busts Undetectable Underwear Bomb Plot
Unclear on whether bomb would have been picked up by new scanners
Future Of Austerity In Europe Doubtful
They don’t have a plan, but they sure don’t like yours
Putin Assumes Power In Russia
Blames US for supporting protesters; chided by Communists for not taking opposition seriously
POLITICS
Soros Hands $2 Million To Liberal Groups
American Bridge, America Votes the beneficiaries as Soros funds “grass roots” organizing
US Campaign Ads Carry Familiar Echo For Brits
Tea Party Flexes Its Muscles Against Lugar
White House Gives Charlie Rangel The Cold Shoulder
Governor Malloy, CT Legislature Reach Deal On Education Reform
Senate Confirms Obama Nominees To FCC
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Crude Oil Prices Close Slightly Higher; NYMEX $97.74, Brent $112.98
Markets Watch Europe Amid Flurry Of Earnings Reports
Spain To Spend Billions On Bank Bailout
Obamanomics: Americans Too Broke To Go Bankrupt
BPI Closes Three Processing Plants, Blames “Pink Slime” Uproar
GAO Claims Taxpayers Could Turn $15.1 Billion Profit On AIG Bailout
Buffett Reassures Berkshire Stockholders On Cancer, Succession
Electronic Arts Shares Fall On Weak Outlook
Mastercard Unveils PayPass Wallet Services
Greece Could Drop Euro, But Tragedy Won’t Follow
Jury Rules Google Infringed Java Copyrights With Android
What Will It Take For Apple TV To Succeed?
Nevada OKs Google Autopilot Car Tests
Disney Technology Turns Everything Into A Touch Device
SPORTS
Rangers Strike Twice On Late Power Play, Stun Caps 3-2
New York takes 3-2 series lead back to Washington
Player Formerly Know As Ron Artest Not Sure He Deserved Lengthy Suspension For Harden Hit
Spurs Sweep Jazz Out Of Playoffs, 87-81
Unlikely Heroes Lead Mets To Victory Over Phillies
Hamels Fined, Suspended Five Games For Deliberately Throwing At Harper
NHL Reaches Tentative Deal To Sell Coyotes To Jamison
Can Jeremy Lin Save The Knicks?
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Matthew Fox Busted For DUI

Pulled over at 3 AM in Oregon
John Travolta Sued For Groping Masseur
Supermodel & Billionaire Settle Child Support Tiff
Jack Osbourne, Fiancee Lisa Welcome Baby Daughter Pearl
Lifetime Renews “The Client List”
Beastie Boys Thank Fans For Outpouring Of Love
Sony Signs Shakira: $60 Million For Six Albums
FOREIGNERS
New Democracy Fails To Form Coalition; No Government Yet For Greece
Kadima Joins Netanyahu; Early Elections Canceled
Hillary Clinton Talks Tough On India And Pakistan
PRC Gives al-Jazeera Correspondent The Boot; First Reporter Expelled In Thirteen Years
US, PRC To Cooperate More On Cyberdefense
BLOGS & STUFF
Viking Pundit: Mark Halperin Beclowns Himself
Bryan Preston: President Who Hired Communists And Hung Out With Terrorists Says Romney Must Rebuke “Extreme Voices”
Jm Geraghty: You Can’t Fight In Here, Gentlemen! This Is A Unity Rally!
Ricochet: Tolerance And Diversity At The Academy
Ace Of Spades: Perfect Gaul – Obama Advises French Not To End Austerity Measures
Weasel Zippers: The Charade Continues – Obama Won’t Say If He Supports Gay Marriage
NewsBusters: Jon Stewart Loses Delta As Sponsor After “Vagina Manger” Sketch
Clayton Cramer: Even Newsweek Is Now Covering The Apparent Corruption Of The Obama Administration
Washington Free Beacon: Administration Drafted CYA Memo For Obama In Case OBL Raid Failed
Hot Air: Shocker! FLOTUS’ Plan To Weed Out “Food Deserts” Failing To Bear Much Fruit
Ramesh Ponnuru: Dead Wrong
You Say That Like It’s a Bad Thing
Posted on | May 7, 2012 | 28 Comments
“François Hollande will strike fear into the hearts of the rich,” is the headline on a column by Nabila Ramdani in the British Independent.
Permit me to suggest two likely results (a) some genuinely rich people will leave France, taking their wealth with them, and (b) a lot of the “rich” people in France won’t be so rich any more.
The point is that “rich” is often used to designate people who, at any given time, have a high annual income. This is not the same as “rich,” as in having a massive net worth, and it is certainly not the same as the cartoonish Thurston Howell III stereotype: People born to ultra-wealthy parents, who grow up in extraordinarily affluent circumstances, with nannies and butlers and chauffeurs, top-flight private schools, winter ski vacations at the family chalet, summers in the Hamptons, etc.
It’s resentment of the Thurston Howell III types that fuels this spiteful rage to make the rich “pay their fair share,” and so if François Hollande tries to jack up taxes on those people, they’ll either find ways to evade the taxes or else they’ll get the hell out of France. One way or another, by driving investment capital out of the private sector, such a soak-the-rich policy will have the effect of stifling economic growth, and reduce the incomes of everybody, including some high-income people — entrepreneurs, high-skill technicians, sales executives — who, earning less money in a weakened economy, will therefore not pay as much taxes at the higher rate as they would had the rates stayed the same.
So all this “strike fear in the hearts of the rich” noise is either just noise, or else it’s a plan to spread the misery around.
BTW, yes, I realize this is my second post in a row about François Hollande, and yes, I realize you probably don’t give a damn about the French. But it’s all over Memeorandum, and the rest of the news seems kinda meh today. So let’s have more fun with Euro-weenies, eh? Here’s Independent columnist Peter Popham:
Rise of far right threatens
to pollute politics across Europe
They may not have claimed ultimate victory, but the biggest winners of the elections in France and Greece were the parties of the extreme right. Fringe parties, some of them routinely labelled “neo-Fascist” until recently, have made stunning inroads into mainstream European politics, to the point that in France, Norway, Finland, Hungary and Austria they either hold or threaten to hold the balance of power. Governments are increasingly faced with the choice of either giving ground on hot-button issues such as immigration and Islam, or ceding power.
Hang on here: France elects a socialist who wants to impose tax rates as high as 75 percent, and it’s the “extreme right” we’re worried about? Speaking of irrational fear, Charles Johnson is hearing jackboots on the cobblestones again, as Diary of Daedalus reports:
The Neo-Nazi Golden Dawn Party has won 7% of the votes in Greece’s recent election. They will get 21 seats in the new parliament. This gave Charles Johnson an orgasm since he is obsessed with Nazis!
Seven percent of voters in Greece, a country with a population (11.3 million) roughly the size of Ohio, vote for this far-right party, and Charles Johnson imagines . . . what? The Greek neo-Hitler building up a mighty war machine? An Aegean Kristallnacht? An invasion of Macedonia? Greek bombers and tanks rampaging across the Mediterranean? Headline from the London Daily Mail:
Sounds scary, except they only got 7% of the vote! Assuming that the other 93% of Greek parliament members aren’t down for this agenda, the wacko plans of these “ultra-right” guys are as much of a genuine danger as the threat of Ron Paul becoming president. (OK, that scenario had some people jittery in December.) We’re talking about a comparative handful of powerless kooks in a weak, impoverished and demographically collapsing country on the far side of the globe.
The same people who want us all to freak out about Greek Nazis, of course, would be the first to accuse of us of irresponsible fear-mongering if we pointed out the dangers of, inter alia, narco-terrorists in Mexico or Mahmoud Ahmahdinejad in Iran.
Hell, I’m more afraid of Canadians than I am of the Greeks, and we could probably wipe out Canada in a week or two without mobilizing much more than the Minnesota National Guard.
You people need to get a grip, or you’ll end up gibbering nonsense on “progressive” talk-radio like Charles Johnson:
« go back — keep looking »

