Religiosity In POTUS Candidates

by Smitty

In the midst of the political scrum, one behavior pattern exhibited on the left and the right is the exhuming of religious for use in finger pointing.
For example, even the dead Robert Byrd will always be Senator KKK to conservatives. Also famously, Ronald Reagan was a lefty, and FDR admirer, before uncluttering his head. But nobody would remember him as being a huge Christian. More recently, Ann Althouse posts about Michelle Bachmann’s former church being anti-papist. Bachmann’s case is clearly a variation on the theme of Jeremiah Wright.
A few questions:

  • Is the Bachmann religiosity angle (church, husband’s ministry) merely ‘an eye for an eye’ over Jeremiah Wright in 2008?
  • What are the criteria for figuring out the acceptability of her church involvement? How do we have a standard whereby Wright is unacceptable, but other spiritual forms are OK?
  • If the consensus is that Bachmann is a closet theocrat or something, what guarantees would work to make her an acceptable candidate? Or is it the case that you cannot hold any strong religious views if you’re going to run for POTUS?

Panic at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Steve Bartin at Newsalert tipped me to this Reuters story by economic analyst James Pethokoukis:

Last night in a new report, Democrat-friendly Goldman Sachs dropped an economic bomb on President Obama’s chances for reelection . . .

“Unexpectedly,” I’m sure. Read the whole thing. And it is time once more to remind you that all this was predicted:

Obama’s biggest mistake? He’s been reading the wrong blogs.

UPDATE: The president ought to be reading The Lonely Conservative. She links me and is therefore right, right, right!


Doesn’t Mercede Johnston Reminds You of That Line From ‘Gone With the Wind’?

The one where Scarlett O’Hara says of India Wilkes, “Why, if she thought anybody would take after her, she’d walk down the street naked.”

Mercede Johnston is following in her brother’s footsteps and taking it all off for the cameras.
Two years after Levi Johnston bared his bum for Playgirl, his 18-year-old sister will be featured in a four-page nude pictorial in Playboy’s September issue, a magazine spokesperson confirms to Us Weekly. . . .

Mercede has a blog, which might as well be called “I Really, Really Hate Bristol Palin and You Should, Too.” That’s all she ever writes about.

If Sarah Palin decides to run for president, the biggest downside is that Mercede might get a 16th minute of . . . well, it’s not quite “fame,” is it?

Unless you’re reminded that her brother Levi was Bristol Palin’s ex-boyfriend, your reaction to her name is, “Mercede Johnston? Who’s that? And why didn’t her mama know how to spell ‘Mercedes’?”

Kinda sucks when your name looks like a typo.

Guess we’ll see what the rest of her looks like soon enough.

Those Meddling Neo-Cons Again!

Because I voted for Libertarian Bob Barr in 2008, I can’t use Instapundit’s signature “They told me if I voted for John McCain” riff, but would someone please tell me how the U.S. stance toward the Libyan rebels is less meddlesome than the Bush-Cheney regime-change policy in Iraq?

ISTANBUL — The United States formally recognized the rebel leadership in Libya as the country’s legitimate government on Friday, allowing the rebel government access to $30 billion in Libyan assets held in the United States. It is not yet clear how and when the money would be released.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said at an international gathering held to discuss the Libyan conflict that Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s government no longer had any legitimacy, and that the United States would join more than 30 countries in extending diplomatic recognition to the main opposition group, known as the Transitional National Council.
“We will help the T.N.C. sustain its commitment to the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and national unity of Libya,” Mrs. Clinton said, “and we will look to it to remain steadfast in its commitment to human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

Whatever happened to the “No Blood for Oil” crowd? Where’s Code Pink, Michael Moore and the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition?

Is it now the settled policy of the United States that we are arbiters of the “legitimacy” of governments in other nations? If so, how are such things decided?

Of the multitudinous autocratic governments in the world, which autocracies are on America’s Secret List of Soon-to-Be-Illegitimate Regimes? Because I’m noticing a distinct lack of State Department interest in whether the governments of Cuba, Venezuela or Iran are “legitimate.”

Nobody’s shedding any tears for Moammar Qaddafi, but we just can’t go around the world willy-nilly declaring foreign governments “illegitimate.” Well, actually I guess we can do that — we have done it before and are in fact doing it now — but it doesn’t seem an altogether wise policy, if there is no rhyme or reason why we intervened militarily on behalf of the Libyan rebels, but wouldn’t lift a finger to aid the anti-Ahmadinejad protesters in Iran.

And let me express a fond hope that Republican presidential candidates will speak out about the seemingly random, illogical, unprincipled, opportunistic and thoroughly hypocritical interventionism of the Obama administration. Because otherwise I might have to consider voting Libertarian again in 2008.

Begala On CNN Debating Fleischer

by Smitty

Apparently, Michelle Bachmann or her husband has deviated from Correct Thought in some way. I think it may have to do with whether it’s OK to put the pee-pee in the poo-poo, but I’m not sure. Begala has characterized the Bachmann’s ideas as a “crackpot, bigoted theory” more times than someone manning an airport gate says “at this time”. Begala must get about 10K every time he says “crackpot, bigoted theory”. At least, that’s my crackpot, bigoted theory. But is my crackpot, bigoted theory shiny enough? What is your crackpot, bigoted theory? Can we get bailout money to assuage our crackpot, bigoted theories? Could a sufficient stealthy crackpot, bigoted theory, say, “capitalism is wrong” execute a slow march through our societal institutions?

VIDEO: Teen Bride Courtney Stodden Says, ‘God Blessed Me With My Soulmate’

You are free to criticize the 16-year-old singer for her marriage to 51-year-old Doug Hutchison, but she says you need to take your argument to The Man Upstairs:

‘I was a virgin,’ said Courtney. ‘I knew that if I kept that, I would really be blessed with a beautiful gift. And God did. He blessed me with my soulmate. So I’m really thankful for that.’

Please note that the newlyweds are well aware what people have been saying about their marriage:

‘I’m a pervert, Courtney is a whore, Courtney’s parents are the worst parents in the world – pimps selling their daughter,’ [Hutchison] said.

And once more I remind my Christian conservative readers that, on her Facebook page, Courtney describes herself as a Christian and a Republican. She’s on our side, whether we like it or not.

UPDATE: I suppose I should have previously thanked Amanda Read, who re-Tweeted this to my attention after it was Tweeted by Dana Loesch. Sorry for the belated hat-tips. I did a quick Google search and found this bizarre reaction from Jessica Wakeman:

The segment danced around some of the very real potential psychological issues that it could have raised about a union such as this. Sure it’s legal, but is a 35-year age difference (even if she’s an “old soul”) sexually predatory? Has Courtney Stodden been “groomed” for sexual relationships with older men, despite being a virgin on her wedding night? I’m assuming the show had to skirt around any suggestion of that in order to lock down the interview.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? What kind of perverse bordering-on-libelous insinuation is that? By whom are you saying she was “groomed”?

Look: If you want to do some kind of psychoanalytic trip on this girl, go watch Courtney’s video message about cyber-bullying. Teenage peers in her hometown had, evidently, been talking trash about her online for years, and it really bothered her.

One might suppose that Courtney was a very lonely kid: Dreaming of a life far beyond her small-town roots, with aspirations for a show-business career that set her apart from her peers, and beauty that made them envious. Kids are cruel to oddballs and misfits, and that’s what she was. And if we try to understand and empathize — rather than judge and condemn — it seems rather obvious that from Courtney’s perspective, Doug Hutchison’s support and encouragement for her ambitions was like a lifeline thrown to someone on the verge of drowning.

Whether Hutchison was right to permit this vulnerable teenager to fall in love with him, and whether her parents were right to consent to their marriage, are subjects which will necessarily evoke controversy. But as for why Courtney was so strongly attracted to Hutchison, while it may seem inexplicable to many, to me the answer is right there in that video about cyber-bullying, which I again urge you to watch — and try to put yourself in her shoes.

PREVIOUSLY:

Wrecking-Ball Right Reaches Robert Reich, Frank Schaeffer

by Smitty

Who is the audience for some of the vacuous noise one sees on the Puffington Host? Robert Reich whines almost cutely in The Rise of the Wrecking-Ball Right, but his title demands at least a rubber chicken to the head, if not something more violent.

Recently I debated a conservative Republican who insisted the best way to revive the American economy was to shrink the size of government. When I asked him to explain his logic he said, simply, “government is the source of all our problems.” When I noted government spending had brought the economy out of the previous eight economic downturns, including the Great Depression, he disagreed. “The Depression ended because of World War Two,” he pronounced, as if government had played no part in it.

A few days later I was confronted by another conservative Republican who blamed the nation’s high unemployment rate on the availability of unemployment benefits. “If you pay someone not to work, they won’t,” he said. When I pointed out unemployment benefits couldn’t possibly be the cause of joblessness because there are now about five job seekers for every job opening, he scoffed. “Government always makes things worse.”

Government-haters seem to be everywhere.

Dude, the cart ain’t the horse. The over-reaching federal cart can’t drag the economic horse anywhere. Benighted fools such as yourself that pretend otherwise and write this sort of dreck are part of the problem.

It’s no coincidence that the emergence of the tea party coincided with the Wall Street bailout.

Have I already noted that you’re a fool, Mr. Reich? The bailout was just another brick in the wall of economic doom built by you and your Progressive ilk, crushing liberty.

Add in the relentlessly snide government-hating and baiting of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh and his imitators on rage radio; include more than thirty years of Ronald Reagan’s repeated refrain that government is the problem; pile on hundreds of millions of dollars from the likes of oil tycoons Charles and David Koch intent on convincing the public that government is evil, and you have all the ingredients for the emergence of a wrecking-ball right that’s intent on destroying government as we know it.

See, Reich: Fox, Rush, Reagan, Koch, Stacy, the rest of the blogosphere and I are, to merge you and Buckley, standing athwart history swinging an internet-driven wrecking ball. We’re saying to you and the rest of the Ruling Class Overlords: get stuffed! Your sad little socialist pandering can maybe bring temporary respite to Americans. Back to the horse/cart metaphor, your liberty substitutes are useful so long as the cart has a little momentum in it. Let history demonstrat even a slight positive grade, and your ideas are toast.
We hate your ideas, and hope they fall off the planet, without dragging those who love liberty along for the ride.
Is that enough wrecking, Mr. Reich?
Meanwhile, Frank Schaeffer serves up enough Old Testament-grade drivel to qualify as one of those priests of Baal whom Elijah wrecked: “Debt Ceiling Chaos Is a Born-Again Religion Problem”. Really? Do you actually conflate faith and politics to that degree, Frank, or are you imitating a knob for effect?

To understand why an irrational self-defeating action like destroying the credit of the USA might seem like the right thing to do you have to understand two things: that the Republican Party is now the party of religious fanatics and that these fanatics — people like Michele Bachmann — don’t want to work within our system, they want to bring it down.

In the scorched-earth era of the “health care reform debates” of 2009 and beyond, Evangelicals seemed to believe that Jesus commanded that all hospitals (and everything else) should be run by corporations for profit, just because corporations weren’t the evil government. The right even decided that it was “normal” for the state to hand over its age-old public and patriotic duties to private companies — even for military operations (“contractors”), prisons, health care, public transport, and all the rest.

See, Frank, our government has become a pack of thieves. Are you, yourself among their number, or wearing blinders? Or do you tell yourself some rational lies to rationalize ‘quantitative easing’?

Even the word “infrastructure” lost its respectability when government had a hand in maintaining roads, bridges, and trains. In denial of the West’s civic-minded, government-supporting heritage, Evangelicals (and the rest of the Right) wound up defending private oil companies but not God’s creation, private cars instead of public transport, private insurance conglomerates rather than government care of individuals.

Schaeffer, you paint with a broad brush. I cheerfully vote for parks and other civic improvements, At The Local Level. Yet you seem to be the one setting government up as God with ‘government care of individuals’. Do we need to be frank about your idolatry problem, Frank, or is that cow sacred?
In conclusion:

Theology is — by nature — not about reason but about faith. If God’s will is to be served then so be it if America is plunged into chaos! This debt ceiling fiasco is just another chapter in the “culture” wars.

The extreme language of Evangelical/”pro-life” rebellion has now been repackaged in the debt ceiling showdown. It is the language of religion pitted against facts.

One can nearly agree with your foolishness, if government is become God, in violation of the Establishment Clause, and you are the “culture” warrior foisting a God, call It “Progress”, down the public throat.
How about we go for something rational, secular, and economic like spending less than our tax receipts? How about if We The Caesars don’t overdrive what We The People render?
I’m warming up, but I have to go see about a plane.