Nikki Haley Leads Big

Rasmussen says she’s looking good:

State Representative Nikki Haley is running stronger than her Republican Primary runoff opponent in the general election for South Carolina’s first open gubernatorial race since 1994 . . .
Haley fell just short of 50% support in last Tuesday’s primary race. She and [U.S. Rep. Gresham] Barrett will face off in a runoff election on June 22.

Haley would romp against the Democrat, Vincent Sheheen, 55%-34%. Meanwhile, she is getting endorsed by one of her previous opponents, state attorney general Henry McMaster.

Who and Why?

The story behind the story of the Bob Etheridge video continues to fascinate Washington. While people in North Carolina are wondering why a seven-term Democratic congressman went nuts when asked whether he supported President Obama, Washington Post gossip columnists Roxeanne Roberts and Amy Argetsinger follow David Weigel’s angle.

Is it as interesting as Miley Cyrus? No.

On the other hand, Miley Cyrus isn’t a member of the House Ways and Means Committee. But at least one Democrat has suggested the possibility of congressional upskirts so . . .

Naked Miley Cyrus Upskirt Photo

No, I would never post such a thing. Not in a million years. But if you’re a creepazoid pervert desperately Googling for “Naked Miley Cyrus Upskirt Photo,” there’s no reason all that traffic should go to Perez Hilton:

Perez Hilton might be in some hot water after posting an uncensored photo of  Miley Cyrus’ private parts to his Twitter account.
Early Monday morning, Hilton posted a picture of the 17-year-old pop star wearing a short white dress and no underwear. In the photo, Cyrus is in the midst of climbing out of an open-topped convertible car with her lady parts exposed.
For his two million plus followers to see, the celebrity blogger posted the picture with the following introduction, “If you are easily offended, do NOT click here. Oh, Miley! Warning: truly not for the easily offended!”
But it’s the celebrity blogger that might need a warning. Cyrus is underage. Police might consider her naked image child pornography.

Perez Hilton should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and his blog should be shut down immediately.

By the way, I’ve decided that conservative political blogging isn’t paying the bills, so instead I’ll be focusing my efforts on despicable Hollywood celebrities and other more lucrative subjects.

Henceforth, you can find me at two new sites, Naked Miley Cyrus Upskirt Photo and Illegal Cheap Bootleg Cigarettes.

UPDATE: We should have seen the warning signs:

Does anyone else remember the infamous Britney Spears naked upskirt? And do you remember how it seemed that the photo wasn’t actually an accident? More like a desperate bid for attention?

Getting out of a car in a short skirt, when you’re a celebrity swarmed by paparazzi, is obviously a hazardous venture. So if Miley decided to attempt such a maneuver while going commando . . .

I dunno. Britney obviously kept trying to out-Madonna Madonna, so am I wrong to suspect that Miley is trying to out-Britney Britney?

The big question: What next for Miley? Dating Joren Van Der Sloot?

UPDATE II: And dibs on the “Dating Joren Van Der Sloot” Google-bomb.

UPDATE III:  Trying-to-Out-Britney-Britney Theory confirmed:

Let me ask the ladies to comment: Would any girl wearing a short skirt get out of a car that way? Especially a very famous girl who knows that every move she makes in public is being photographed by 50 paparazzi? And especially if she was only 17 and not wearing panties?

She’s on the Crazyville Express for a one-way trip to rehab.

UPDATE IV: It is being suggested that the photo Perez Hilton posted was a PhotoShop fake. Which would make him the Jayson Blair of celebrity upskirt journalism.

All-Points Bulletin: Maryland State Police Seeking Incompetent Fugitive Smuggler

Loathsome evil cigarettes:

A bench warrant was issued Tuesday for a New York man who failed to appear in Washington County Circuit Court on charges of smuggling hundreds of packs of untaxed cigarettes.
Chandrakant Petigara, 70, of 212-29 Hillside Ave., Apt. 3JE, Queens Village, was scheduled to be in court to face charges of transporting unstamped cigarettes and possession of untaxed cigarettes . . .
Petigara was arrested March 23 after a traffic stop by Maryland State Police, who were operating radar on northbound Interstate 81 near Halfway Boulevard when they pulled over a Honda Civic that was traveling 67 mph in a 60-mph zone . . . .

(Note: I have never driven 67 mph on that highway. You can ask any of the local troopers. Eighty-seven, yes; 67, never.)

The trooper found 166 cartons of cigarettes inside black plastic trash bags, the statement said.
The cigarettes did not have Maryland tax stamps and Petigara did not have a permit to transport untaxed cigarettes into or through the state . . .
After being taken into custody, Petigara allegedly offered a state police corporal $2,000 to let him go . . .

(Note: This is the wrong way to bribe a Maryland state trooper. Just “accidently” slip him a $20 when you hand over your license. Once he’s found your payload of contraband and put you in cuffs, $2,000 is kind of low-balling.)

The tax owed to Maryland on the cigarettes was $3,320, based on a tax of $2 per pack . . . The retail value of the 1,660 packs of cigarettes was $9,511.80 based on a price of $5.73 a pack . . .
This was at least the third arrest for Mr. Petigara for smuggling untaxed cigarettes.

So that’s three strikes: He’s a foreigner with a funny name who drives too slow and doesn’t understand American bribery customs.

Anyone who knows the whereabouts of Chandrakant Petigara is urged to contact the Maryland State Police immediately.

These incompetent amateur cigarette smugglers are a menace to society, because their failures are driving up the cost of bootleg smokes. If you really want Marlboros at $35 a carton from Virginia or illegal fireworks at Tennessee wholesale prices . . .

Hey, I’m only a blogger. These are just jokes. Hit the tip jar.

Soccer May Be Gay, But
At Least It’s Not Canadian

I don’t think Allahpundit is Canadian, but he does have a suspiciously extensive knowledge of Broadway show tunes hockey.

IYKWIMAITYD.

The other day, I put up a mocking headline:

World Cup Overkill: Associated Press
Writes 1,068 Words About 1-1 Tie

And proceeded to mock soccer, generally, which prompted commenter “gg” (whose IP address is in India) to respond:

“Wake up from your ‘me me me USA me me USA i can’t see ya!’ mentality. Not as if the rest of the world gives a damn about a stereotype Stupid American like you anyway.”

Yeah, pal? Well, obviously you give enough of a damn to argue with me, don’t ya?

So anyway, the Nation and NPR today decided to inform us that conservatives hate soccer because we’re racist, citing Glenn Beck and G. Gordon Liddy as examples. In point of fact, I played youth-league soccer when I was 12. I covered prep soccer as a sports writer in Georgia. My future son-in-law plays soccer and, believe it or not, I like soccer.

Shall I sing “Wilkommen” from Cabaret now? Or how about “I Feel Pretty” from West Side Story?

But affluent elite American soccer fandom of the type celebrated by the Nation/NPR piece has roughly the same relationship to merely liking soccer that knowing show-tune lyrics has to sodomy  — which is to say, none at all.

When I was in London in 2008, I spent a couple hours hanging out at a pub with a couple of blokes who were drinking away the afternoon in preparation for going to that evening’s Arsenal game/riot. Take away their Cockney accents, and these working-class guys might as well have been a couple of Bubbas gearing up for the Alabama-Auburn game.

They were, in a phrase, British rednecks.

And this is who soccer fans are, everywhere in the world except among the college-educated American elite.

In Rio or Rome, the soccer fan is a Regular José or a Regular Giuseppe. It is a low-brow, blue-collar sport, beloved by rowdy hooligans the way ghetto kids in America love the NBA or hillibillies in east Tennessee love NASCAR.

Out there, in the rest of the world crammed full of foreigners, amongst limeys and wogs, krauts and dagos and chinks — and especially beaners — futbol es muy macho.

By contrast, if an American is that kind of Regular Joe, he doesn’t watch soccer. He watches the NFL or bass fishing tournaments or Ultimate Fighting. In an American context, avid soccer fandom is almost exclusively located among two groups of people (a) foreigners — God bless ’em — and (b) pretentious yuppie snobs.

Which is to say, conservatives don’t hate soccer because we hate brown people. We hate soccer because we hate liberals.

American liberals love soccer not merely because it allows them to engage in displays of their imagined superiority — “Look at me! I’m a sophisticated cosmopolitan!” — but also because it’s usually the only sport they’ve ever actually played.

“Mom Wouldn’t Let Me Play Football” is a convenient shorthand that I’ve used to describe a category of person typified by, inter alia, David Brooks.

Another convenient shorthand: “Never Won a Fistfight.”

They’re pussies, in other words, and they grew up in those vanilla cul-de-sac suburban cocoon communities with “good schools” (hint, hint) where their neurotic mommies and wimpy dads never let them have a moment of leisure that wasn’t safe and supervised and reinforcing to their self-esteem.

Nerf World.

So they grew up sheltered and bookish and prone to whining about their allergies, part of a social group where this kind of childhood seemed perfectly normal, i.e., their fellow wienies with whom they associated in “gifted” classes and band and, above all, youth soccer league.

Soccer is a great sport for sheltered wienie kids, so long as they are in a league where all the other kids are sheltered wienies, too — as is the case in the vanilla cul-de-sac suburban cocoon community where these kids grow up. Why? Because youth soccer requires no athletic ability.

Neither size nor speed, neither strength nor agility — and certainly not eye-hand coordination —  is necessary to participate in the kind of soccer played by elementary-school kids in suburban U.S.A. All the really athletic kids are playing football, baseball or basketball.

Suburban youth soccer is a game for neurasthenic dorks.

Go watch 7- or 8-year-olds play youth-league soccer somewhere in an upscale American suburb and what do you see? Twenty dorky white kids running around willy-nilly while the two kids with anything approaching genuine athletic aptitude score all the goals.

In America, if you’re too clumsy for baseball, too short for basketball and too weak for football, soccer is your game.

Like I said, I spent one spring/summer playing in a YMCA soccer league when I was 12. The explanation is this: Robbie Brown played linebacker on my youth football team, the Sweetwater Valley Red Raiders, for which Robbie’s dad was an assistant coach. Robbie’s dad got the idea that soccer would be good conditioning for football — lots more running than baseball — and so Robbie was going to be on this team, and the word went around to the other parents of the Red Raiders: Hey, if your kid isn’t playing baseball this year, put ’em on this soccer team.

So there were about four of five of us football kids who played on this team in the Marietta YMCA league, and our coach was a German guy named Hans or Karl or something like that.

We sucked.

The coach’s kid was the only member of the team who had ever played soccer before. Me and my handful of football buddies began the season clueless and ended it only slightly less so, while the rest of the kids on the team were of the “Mom Wouldn’t Let Me Play Football” variety.

I can’t remember if we lost every game, but we sure didn’t win more than one or two. We sucked bad.

We did run a lot that summer, though. We ran and ran and ran some more. Hans or Karl was a firm believer in running and so, after soccer ended in July, those of us who played football were in fine condition when the Red Raiders started practice in August. That having been the real purpose of our soccer season, it was a success.

Playing YMCA soccer against those Marietta kids could never be mistaken for the kind of futbol es muy macho experience that produces World Cup champions. While I am unfamiliar with the U.S. team roster, I would hazard a blind guess that a majority of them are immigrants or the sons of immigrants, and not the products of suburban Everybody-Gets-A-Trophy youth-league soccer.

So that’s my soccer story. I’ve got one good friend, the son of Scottish immigrants, who loves soccer in a Regular Joe kind of way. And my daughter’s fiancé — the Romeo of the Pampas, the Latin Lothario — is all ¡Va La Argentina! about the World Cup.

That kind of sincere fandom is one thing. But the affectations of pretentious liberals . . . well, let’s let Ace of Spades explain:

I think I know the reason, and this is the political reason — the real political reason — the right rejects soccer. . . .
Because many conservatives suspect that progressives elevate soccer above other sports for culture war-type reasons, we dig in our heels and say silly things about soccer just to repudiate the left’s own attempt to fight the culture war via a silly pastime.

Read the whole thing.

Like Ronald Reagan Said

Remember this guy from the Doug Hoffman NY-23 campaign?

Yates Walker? Sound familiar? Perhaps you remember him from an article in the The American Spectator:

Yates Walker ate breakfast in the Blue Moon Café on Main Street in Saranac Lake, New York, on the morning of November 4, and delivered an after-action report on the battle that had just been fought in the upstate 23rd District.
“We took a CPA from 9 percent to 46 percent in two and a half weeks,” said Walker, a young veteran of the 82nd Airborne Division who had been hired 18 days earlier to work on Doug Hoffman’s congressional campaign staff. “I couldn’t be prouder.”
He fell 5,000 votes short of defeating Democrat Bill Owens, but Hoffman’s surprising surge in the closing weeks of the three-way special election in upstate New York had, in Walker’s words, turned the bespectacled accountant into “an electric symbol of conservatism.” . . .

Not bad for a last-minute deadline blitz in the Buffalo airport. And maybe if you remember Yates Walker, you also remember the first time you ever heard of filmmaker Ladd Ehlinger Jr.:

I laughed, I cried, it was better than Cats

In which case you may also remember when I was a guest on Ladd’s radio show during my April visit to Huntsville, Alabama.

Perhaps, then, you may be asking yourself, whatever happened to those guys? Yates Walker became campaign manager for Rick Barber — whose campaign I covered during a February trip to Alabama — and it just so happens that Ladd Ehlinger recently produced an ad for the Barber campaign:

Which I posted Sunday night in the Hot Air Green Room, and which became an overnight viral YouTube sensation and so, when Allahpundit blogged about it today maybe you’d think . . .

Well, certainly there would be no basis for inferring that there were anything other than coincidental associations involved. These things just happen, y’know?

“You can accomplish much if you don’t care who gets the credit.”
— Ronald Reagan

Credit? Nah. Some cash might be nice, but I don’t need any credit. However, if you don’t want to give me cash, maybe you should give some to . . .

RICK BARBER FOR U.S. CONGRESS

Hope and Change (and Hateful Stereotypes) Liberals Can Believe In

Obama Oddly Unpopular
in Former Slave States

— Josh Marshall, Talking Points Memo

Yeah, thanks Josh. I live in Maryland, a “former slave state” where Obama got 62% of the vote. But never mind that. What does affluent Ivy League a–hole Josh Marshall have to say about Alvin Greene winning the Democrat primary in the “former slave state” of South Carolina?

C’mon, Josh, tell me: Is it OK for white Democrat Vic Rawl to assert that the election of a black Army veteran in a “former slave state” is somehow illegitimate?

What if a Republican in a “former slave state” had questioned Alvin Greene’s “mental status,” Josh? What would you say then?

And while we’re at it, Josh, what about the recent outbreak of political violence from that “former slave state” of North Carolina?

“It’s wrong to accuse liberals of not having standards. They have exactly two — one for them, and one for everybody else.”
— Robert Stacy McCain

Remember: There are 5 A’s in “raaaaacism.”

Rep. Bob Etheridge: ‘Who Are You?’

A Democrat in a Republican-leaning North Carolina District, Etheridge was leaving a fundraiser with Nancy Pelosi when two college kids with a video camera asked him a simple question: “Do you fully support the Obama agenda?” Madcap hijinks ensued:

A “macaca” moment for the Democrat. His Republican challenger is Renee Ellmers.

UPDATE: Department of Unflattering Headlines:

Congressman caught on camera in physical confrontation
— WRAL-TV, Raleigh, N.C.

N.C. Congressman Under Fire for Physical Confrontation With Man in Washington
— Fox News

Video shows Rep. Etheridge grabbing videographer
— Charlotte (N.C.) Observer

Rep. Etheridge assaults a person on the street
— The Hill

Congressman loses his cool, acts like a fool
— Greensboro (N.C.) News Record

When Democrats Attack!
— Ed Driscoll

Who TMZ’d Rep. Bob Etheridge?
— Washington Post

That last headline is from Dave Weigel, who writes:

“So who are the students? I don’t know. The National Republican Congressional Committee tells me they didn’t send them, and ‘DCCameraGuy’ has yet to respond to my e-mail. But without any name or organizational support, just by riling up a member of Congress, the students have created the first conservative meme of the week.”

Just a blind guess: These kids are probably from the Leadership Institute, which trains conservative students in political strategy and tactics. Campaign video “trackers” have been standard operating procedure for Democrats since 2006, at least. What’s strange is Etheridge’s assertion: “I have a right to know who you are.”

Well, does he?

UPDATE II: Instapundit has background, and Dan Riehl highlights Etheridge’s “F” grades on 2nd Amendment rights.

Checking Etheridge’s Wiki, there doesn’t seem to be anything particularly controversial in his past. He’s just a Blue Dog dinosaur, a fossil of the Clinton era elected to Congress in 1996. It’s amazing he’s survived this long, given how he flipped out the first time he was confronted by opposition video trackers.

Wonder how many other Blue Dog Democrats would react the same way to a simple question, e.g., “Rep. John Barrow, why are you trying to keep a progressive black Democrat out of Congress?”

UPDATE III: Etheridge has apologized and the DCCC is “out for blood.”

UPDATE IV: Comment from Renee Ellmers:

“If a teacher or principal treated a student this way it would raise serious questions and he would be suspended. This kind of behavior is equally unacceptable in a Congressman.”

Read the whole thing at Right Wing News.

UPDATE V: Ann Althouse highlights Dave Weigel’s commenter “Bob”:

What [Etheridge] has is the dangerous notion that he’s exempt from the laws of the District of Columbia and from the dictates of a civil society.

Weigel is intrigued by the unwillingness of the students to identify themselves. Dave’s getting a lot of flak from conservatives for his coverage of the incident, although in his defense I’d say that the questions he’s asking — Who are these kids, who are they working for and why was Etheridge their target? — are legitimately newsworthy.

No one is likely to discover the answer to those questions any time soon. Mike Flynn hasn’t returned my calls today, but if Flynn knows the identity of these kids, he’d be a fool to burn his source. I just got off the phone with my source, the “black ops” guy — who was not involved in this operation — who pointed out that (a) by maintaining their anonymity, the kids preserve their ability to do future operati0ns, and (b) on the video, Etheridge appears to have had a few cocktails, so he probably won’t be able to ID the kids.

UPDATE VI: Wow, this is the second time in three weeks I’ve been mentioned by Allahpundit:

Not a single word is devoted to the idea that asking a question of a congressman shouldn’t mean walking away with his palm print on your neck. . . .
Breitbart and Michael Flynn say they have no idea who shot the video; assuming that the students were indeed Republican “trackers,” paid to shadow Democrats in hopes of capturing a gaffe on film, I wait with bated breath for an explanation as to why these guys are illegitimate but the guy who caught George Allen’s “macaca” line on tape is A-OK. As for why they’re anonymous, R.S. McCain offers a persuasive theory: Given the viciousness of the DNC in trying to make this a story about them, wouldn’t you want to stay anonymous too in order to avoid reprisals?

Hmmm. Staying anonymous “in order to avoid reprisals”?