The Holy Church of St. Pancake
The International Solidarity Movement and the Rachel Corrie Death Cult

Back in 2003, when Charles Johnson was still able to maintain some semblance of sanity, a commenter at Little Green Footballs — no doubt long since banished — responded to the death of Rachel Corrie by dubbing her “St. Pancake.”

A jest both crude and arguably cruel, yet in two words, that LGF commenter captured a reality that has endured, sadly, in the name of a ship that was seized Saturday when it tried to run the Gaza blockade:

The boarding of the Rachel Corrie containing activists and aid for Gaza was described by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Saturday as a quiet operation . . .
IDF navy forces boarded and took control of the MV Rachel Corrie Saturday afternoon. The troops did not meet any resistance from activists attempting to break the Gaza blockade, and the operation was completed without violent incidents.

In case you’ve forgotten, or perhaps never knew, who Rachel Corrie was, she was a 23-year-old middle-class college kid from Olympia, Washington, who got caught up in post-9/11 “peace” activism.

That was, in and of itself, a damned foolish thing to do, but college kids do foolish things all the time, and I suppose marching around with a bunch of smelly International A.N.S.W.E.R. commies shouting senseless slogans is no more foolish than getting a tramp-stamp tattoo during Spring Break in Daytona.

Ah, but Rachel Corrie was not content with peace slogans. She became a fanatic. Every fanatic needs a scapegoat and — like other fanatics before and since — Rachel scapegoated the Jews.

The Road to Rafah

During the Second Intifada, at a time when the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and other terrorists were blasting Jews to smithereens on a regular basis, Rachel Corrie took up the Palestinian cause, joining a radical “direct action” group called the International Solidarity Movement (ISM).

The ISM, it must be noted, was founded in August 2001, a few months after Israel intercepted a ship, the Santorini, which was loaded with millions of dollars of weapons en route to Gaza for delivery to the terrorist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Also, the ISM was founded mere weeks after the June 2001 bombing of an Israeli dance club that killed 21 people, 16 of whom were teenagers.

Such was the murderous cause to which the ISM sought — and still seeks — to demonstrate its “solidarity,” and Rachel Corrie’s decision to join the ISM thus put her on the most extreme fringe of the (arguably misnamed) peace movement.

Her fanaticism led Corrie to travel to Gaza in January 2003. Three weeks later, when activists organized an international protest of the impending U.S. invasion of Iraq, Corrie was photographed burning a hand-drawn fascimile of the U.S. flag, her face distorted by rage, while dozens of Palestinian children watched.

It is impossible to exaggerate the extent to which Corrie’s ideology had blinded her to the larger reality. Remember, this was in the third year of the second Intifada, when Palestinian suicide bombers were a constant threat to Israeli civilians. And yet Rachel Corrie wrote home from the Gaza town of Rafah:

“The vast majority of Palestinians right now, as far as I can tell, are engaged in Gandhian nonviolent resistance.”

Few would argue that the “vast majority” of Gaza’s residents in 2003 were innocent sufferers, trapped helplessly in circumstances beyond their control. However, those circumstances were the result of violence instigated by the Palestinian thugs who, having rejected the peace President Bill Clinton attempted to broker at Camp David in 2000, launched a relentless campaign of terrorism that lasted more than five years and took the lives of hundreds of Israelis as innocent as any resident of Gaza.

Sacred Martyr of the Intifada

Rachel Corrie never seems to have had any concern for dead Israelis, instead writing indignantly to justify the Intifada by “international law and the right of people to legitimate armed struggle in defense of their land and their families.” Dead Jews were utterly invisible to her, as she wrote home accusing Israel of “genocide,” and arguing that U.S. support to Israel implicated all Americans in genocide.

So it was that, on March 16, 2003, Rachel Corrie joined six other ISM activists in a “direct action” against the Israeli military. The Israelis were destroying terrorist bases and smuggling tunnels in Gaza, an operation that ISM attempted to thwart. The circumstances of Corrie’s death have been mired in controversy for years, but there is no argument that she positioned herself in the path of an Israeli bulldozer and was fatally crushed.

An Israeli investigation concluded that her death was an accident, and that the bulldozer operator did not see Corrie, while the ISM has depicted her death as willful murder. Whatever the case, Rachel Corrie’s death served the exact propaganda purpose she had anticipated in one of her final e-mails home:

“Coming here is one of the better things I’ve ever done. So when I sound crazy, or if the Israeli military should break with their racist tendency not to injure white people, please pin the reason squarely on the fact that I am in the midst of a genocide . . . for which my government is largely responsible.”

This, then, was Rachel Corrie, for whom the radical group Free Gaza named its ship. At best, she was a misguided idealist whose youthful folly put her in harm’s way. At worst, she was a willing ally of terrorists, an American who volunteered as a “human shield” to protect the smuggling operations by which these bloodthirsty killers got their deadly weapons.

Flippantly dubbing her “St. Pancake” is admittedly callous, yet the LGF commenter’s mocking attribution of “sainthood” to Rachel Corrie accurately reflects the status of holy martyr that the Left and its media allies immediately bestowed upon her.

Within hours of her death, Corrie was transformed from human being to sacred symbol, an icon revered by the “Blame Israel First” crowd. She was subsequently glorified in a cantata composed by a University of Alaska professor (who has since become a notorious anti-Palin blogger) and in a play that ran for 48 performances on Broadway.

Exploited to advance the anti-Israel cause, this symbolic Rachel Corrie functions in death as the real Rachel Corrie functioned in life, scapegoating Jews and acting as a human shield for terrorists.

Who, therefore, is to blame if her name has become an epithet among Israelis? If we grant to Jews the same right that she demanded for Palestinians — “defense of their land and their families” — Israelis have a right to view Rachel Corrie as an ally of their enemies. She is a weapon in a propaganda war against Israel.

Death Remembered, Death Forgotten

 Those who have promoted the death-cult of Rachel Corrie insist that she must be remembered exactly as they wish her to be remembered, as a victim-hero whose name can only be spoken with hushed reverence for her innocent righteousness. To remember Rachel Corrie that way, you see, requires us to forget the victims of her terrorist allies.

In 1998, when Rachel Corrie was a high school senior, a 19-year-old Israeli girl traveled to America, touring the Grand Canyon and other sites. Later, the Israeli girl spent a year in Latin America, where she learned Spanish, hiked mountains and went scuba diving. She was the daughter of a dentist, third of five children, by all accounts beloved by everyone who knew her, and she signed her e-mails “Shiri Negari, World Traveler.”

“Shiri loved to laugh and made others laugh with her. She loved to dance and knew how to enjoy the little things in life. She had the gift of being able to see goodness and beauty in every person she met, and she kept up many close friendships with a wide variety of people. . . . Always full of life, she loved to sing and make music. A born actress, she often delighted family and friends with her spontaneous improvisations and impressions. She wrote poetry. She loved swimming.”

Shiri loved America so much that, shortly after her 21st birthday, she moved to New York City and got a job in a restaurant. After the 9/11 attacks destroyed the World Trade Center, her family became concerned for her safety, and eventually Shiri returned home to live with her parents near Jerusalem. She got a temporary job in a bank, working to save money for college where she planned to enroll in the fall of 2002.

Shiri Negari was on her way to work at the bank one Tuesday morning — June 18, 2002 — when she boarded Bus No. 32A in Gilo. A few minutes later, a little before 8 a.m., another passenger boarded the bus:

19 people were killed and 74 injured . . . in a suicide bombing at the Patt junction in Jerusalem.  . . .
Hamas claimed responsibility for the attack and identified the bomber as Muhamed al-Ral, an Islamic law student at An-Najah University. . . .
Al-Ral boarded Egged bus no. 32A from Gilo at 7:50 A.M. at the stop in Beit Safafa, an Arab neighborhood opposite Gilo, and almost immediately detonated the large bomb which he carried in a bag stuffed with ball bearings.

Shiri died that day, just two weeks before her 22nd birthday, in a blast that ended the lives of 18 other people ranging in age from 11 to 72. They were all killed on orders of Hamas — the same terrorist organization that rules Gaza, where 23-year-old Rachel Corrie arrived to join the anti-Israeli ISM contigent in January 2003, barely seven months after the blast that destroyed Bus No. 32A.

You’ve probably never heard of Shiri Negari before, and I would never have known her name were it not for a man named David Zucker.

In September 2007, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was invited to speak at Columbia University and Zucker showed up to protest, carrying a sign with Shiri’s photo and a simple message:

“My name is Shiri Negari and I would like to speak at Columbia too, but I was murdered when Iran gave money to Hamas to blow up the bus I was on.”

Zucker explained in an e-mail to Michelle Malkin:

“I did not know Shiri, just happened to come across her memorial site on Sunday when I was trying to figure out what type of sign to make when I got the idea to put a human face on the current debate. I emailed her family to get their permission and they emailed me the picture. I’m sure her family will get great solace from the fact that their daughter’s memory is still alive.”

Her family created a Web site devoted to Shiri’s memory, including this video tribute. Try to watch the whole thing without crying:

And that’s it. No American professor composed a cantata for Shiri Negari, no one produced a Broadway play about her life, and no “humanitarian” ships have been named in her honor. I’d scarcely thought about her since 2007 until Saturday, when Carl in Jerusalem did a post about the blockade-runner Rachel Corrie and invoked the “St. Pancake” nickname. When I re-Tweeted Carl’s post with an “LMAO,” I found myself targeted by a Corrie cultist:


While Shiri Negari’s life and death are nearly unknown, you see, no one can be permitted to defame the memory of that “great person” Rachel Corrie, who was the victim of a “brutal murder.” 

Reverent devotion to the martyrdom of St. Pancake makes it possible — indeed, makes it absolutely necessary — to forget the brutal murders of Shiri Negari and hundreds of other true innocents slain by the death-cult whose “armed struggle” Rachel Corrie died to defend.

* * * * * * *

UPDATE: Carl in Jerusalem:

I doubt many of you have thought of Shiri recently. But every time I drive to my sons’ school or take my car to the mechanic . . . I pass the spot where a suicide bomber blew up Egged Bus 32A and Shiri Negari was murdered. And I think of her.

Linked by Lisa Graas at Genuine GOP Mom — thanks!

UPDATE II: Linked by Yosef in Hebron, who comments below:

What I found painful, but necessary, was that the memory of Shiri Negari, a truly wonderful soul has to share the page with [Rachel Corrie].

The contrast, alas, is necessary. Too many young people have been raised with the same mentality that led Rachel Corrie to her death. It is easy for American liberals to buy into the propaganda depiction of Palestinians as victims of Israeli “racism.” In fact, innocent Palestinians are victims of their death-cult leadership — a pathological legacy of the sadistic butcher Yasser Arafat — who refuse to accept any reasonable terms of peace.

Arafat himself was responsible for the failure of the 2000 Camp David talks, and for the Intifada that followed. Arafat’s bloody legacy has been passed on to the current Palestinian leadership, who have never recanted their vow to continue the “armed struggle” until Israel is destroyed. These “leaders” have brought the Palestinians nothing but misery, and yet ISM insists on showing “solidarity” with the death-cult.

There are today in America many thousands of impressionable young liberals who, like Rachel Corrie, are predisposed to buy into the deadly lies that justify the “armed struggle.” They don’t remember the wars of 1967 and ’73, and they know nothing of the real origins and history of modern Middle Eastern terrorism. They don’t know, for example, that Arafat was allied with Moscow during the Cold War and that the PLO (as well as the Assad regime in Syria) endorsed the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.

Having been propagandized in their schools to accept the twisted Hamas/Fatah version of Middle Eastern history, young liberals swallow the Zionism-is-racism anti-colonial claptrap (another Soviet legacy, by the way) and easily imagine the Palestinian cause as the moral equivalent of the U.S. civil-rights movement. Furthermore, having been indoctrinated to view the 1960s protest movement against the Vietnam War as intrinsically righteous, many young liberals are as viciously anti-American as Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground.

So these young liberals are particulary vulnerable to the recruitment efforts of the ISM and other radical groups. And, just like Rachel Corrie, they never question why the “armed struggle” requires the purposeful murder of innocents like Shiri Negari. It is important that the truth be proclaimed to these young people, to make them understand that their “progressive” commitment to peace has made them accomplices to murder and blinded them to the violent hatefulness of Israel’s enemies. Only truth can persuade them to turn away from the death-cult.

I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life . . .
— Deuteronomy 30:19 (KJV)

UPDATE III: Linked by Melissa Clouthier, VodkaPundit, Cassy Fiano and Moe Lane at Red State. Thanks to commenter Dr. Evil for pointing out that Rachel Corrie’s alma mater, Evergreen State University, is a breeding ground for radicalism, due in part to pro-Hamas professor Steve Niva who “worked with Rachel Corrie before her death.” IYKWIMAITYD.

Thanks also to Noel at Cold Fury for calling attention to Tom Gross’s excellent 2005 essay on “The Forgotten Rachels,” which includes a few often-overlooked facts about the “solidarity” movement to which Professor Niva directed his protege Rachel Corrie:

The International Solidarity Movement (ISM), the group with which Corrie was affiliated, is routinely described as a “peace group” in the media. Few make any mention of the ISM’s meeting with the British suicide bombers Omar Khan Sharif and Asif Muhammad Hanif who, a few days later, blew up Mike’s Place, a Tel Aviv pub, killing three and injuring dozens, including British citizens. Or of the ISM’s sheltering in its office of Shadi Sukiya, a leading member of Islamic Jihad. Or of the fact that in its mission statement the ISM said “armed struggle” is a Palestinian “right”.
According to the “media co-ordinator” of the ISM, Flo Rosovski, “‘Israel’ is an illegal entity that should not exist” – which at any rate clarifies the ISM’s idea of peace.

ISM is part of a genocidal Jew-hating death-cult, and it is scarcely an exaggeration to say that Rachel Corrie is to the ISM what Horst Wessel was to the Brownshirts. Certainly, Yasser Arafat recognized her value as a propaganda weapon.

UPDATE IV: Linked by Professor William Jacobson at Legal Insurrection, who has video of  ISM/Free Gaza flotilla propaganda Greta Berlin, a professional Jew-hater profiled by Solomonia.

UPDATE V: Linked by Daley Gator, Virginia Right and Dyspepsia Generation. Thanks!

Four Megahits of Joy Reliably Anticipated

by Smitty

This weeks FMJRA notes that we will cross the four million hit mark either this weekend, or soon into next week. Woo hoo. It is also a blantant suck-up to Little Miss Attila, from whom we reliably anticipate further outbursts of greatness Real Soon Now.

Will Folks

Tacky Willy, as opposed to The Slick One, has been a reliable source of recent traffic. We thank you from the bottom of our bus, which has a very personal post especially written for a rotten creep like you. Buh-bye.

VIDEO: Is Wes Donehue Evil? Or Is Will Folks Total Scum?

Basil’s Underpants Gnome Theory of the South Carolina GOP Blogger Scandal

Douchebag Blogger Will Folks Claims That He’s a Victim of ‘Smear Campaign’

Will Folks Story Doesn’t Hold Water; Nikki Haley Undamaged by S.C. Rumor

More ‘Inappropriate’ Stuff in S.C. UPDATE: Larry Marchant Claimed 2008 One-Night Stand With Nikki Haley! UPDATE: Video; Bauer ‘Desperate’?

VIDEO: Haley vs. Bauer

Tweet From Nikki’s Husband; UPDATE: Video of Larry ‘Magic’ Marchant

Stand Up for Nikki Haley!

Nikki Haley Update: Jake Knotts and the ‘Raghead’ Heard Round the World

Sarah Palin: ‘All Kinds of Made-Up Nonsense’ About Nikki Haley

“Imagine There’s no Lefties. . .”

The Liberal Faith, in all its sweet nihilism, continues to be something which would probably amuse if the stakes were lower. The AGW (or whatever the Fear Of Weather is called this week) is matched by the Fear of Borders is matched by the Fear of the Great Big Little Israeli State. May the eternal nullity that is the thought of John Lennon absorb their foolishness into its endless well of nothing.

Anthropogenic Global WarmingClimate Change Myth Threatens Noble Savage Myth

‘Indigenous’ Mexicans? La Raza and the Reconquista Myth

Stand With Arizona? Not John McCain

VIDEO: Canadian Blogger Assaulted by Anti-Israel Union Thug at Protest

Flotilla of Fools vs. Israeli Navy

Israel Update: Prime Minister Netanyahu Cancels White House Meeting

It Was Not ‘Violence-Violence’

The Rest of the Story

Harry Reid, Comeback Kid?

Dave Weigel, Joe McGinniss, Jesse Griffin and the Palin-Hater Next Door

New MLB Trend: Obama Batting

Memorial Day: Virginia Third-Graders Sing ‘Thank You, Soldiers’

VIDEO: Chris Cassone ‘Memorial Day’

Siccing the FBI on Little Miss Attila?

Hellfire Missile 1, Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri 0

Tipper Gore — Available!

Associated Press: Bias? What Bias?

Douchebag Coalition Wants FCC to Regulate ‘Hate Speech’ in New Media

Bush? Homewrecker? That’s Just Sick

Barber Makes AL-2 GOP Runoff

Obama-Endorsed Rep. Hank Johnson to Participate in Segregated Forum? UPDATE: Johnson Will Not Attend

AZ Should Rejoin The Union?

Blogging Powerhouse Fishersville Mike To Take On Senator Jim Webb

Whittle Has Some Must-See Viewing

Hmmmmm

Online Career Counseling, Inc.

Video Of The Day: ‘We Con The World’

‘Just One Tweet’: Conservative New Media Get Results in Georgia 4th District Story

Another Ex-Disney Starlet Goes Slutty: Miley Cyrus Fakes Lesbian Kiss on TV

Black Friday?

Pat Condell And The Cordoba Mosque

VIDEO: South Carolina TV Covers Jake Knotts ‘Raghead’ Controversy

Other FMJRA Roundups:

Miscellaneous Shouts:

There is your FMJRA. Tune in tomorrow for another exciting round of Rule 5 Sunday.

Three Minutes Of Righteous Motivation

by Smitty

Lewis in Douglas County offers a solo on the last verse of the Star Spangled Banner.

O! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war’s desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heav’n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.”
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

To all you sad little Leftist haters who just don’t get this country: listen to these words, ponder the exceptional creation that is the United States, and be healed of your abject, nihilistic foolishness.

Oh, and Herman Cain rocks.

Popular Children’s Book Condemned in Belgium for — Wait for It — Raaaaacism!

A new lesson in the bizarre nature of Europe’s “human rights” laws:

Belgium’s courts are investigating whether Tintin’s 1931 Congolese adventures, when the country was a Belgian colony, portrays black Africans in a racist way . . .
Bienvenu Mbutu Mondondo, a Brussels-based Congolese man, has spent the last three years pursuing Tintin’s copyright holders and publisher in the civil and criminals courts.
“This book contains images and dialogue of a manifestly racist and offensive nature not only to blacks but to the whole of humanity,” said Ahmed L’Hedim, Mr Mondondo’s lawyer.
“It is simply unbearable to my client that his children could come across this book and feel insulted.”
In 2007, Britain’s Commission for Racial Equality accused the Tintin book of making black Africans “look like monkeys and talk like imbeciles”.
British editions of Tintin Au Congo have not been banned but are now sold with a band of paper around the cover, warning the content is offensive.

Right. Under the pretzel-logic of “human rights,” Belgium must not only open its borders to Congolese immigrants, but must shield them from possible insult by a children’s book first published 79 years ago.

OK, so what about old Tarzan movies? What about Gone With the Wind? And what other groups will now demand that Belgium suppress publication of anything that might offend them? Will Disney be sued over the depictions of Arabs in Aladdin?

This kind of political correctness run amok is enough to make you understand why Vlaams Belang is so popular in Belgium.

Intellectuals: Smarter Than God?

Robert Knight takes a hard look at the elite punditocracy’s slow slide into moral relativism:

On ABC’s This Week on May 30, [George] Will agreed with colleague Matthew Dowd that apart from a few glitches, homosexuality will soon be a non-issue in the military. . . .
Will: “For people of Matt’s son’s generation, being gay is like being left-handed. … The Supreme Court has a famous phrase it used in some opinion, the evolving standards of decency that mark a maturing society. Clearly these are evolving, and the case is over, basically.” . . .
What we are witnessing among the intelligentsia is a catastrophic case of groupthink: because they all repeat the same thing, it must be true. They ignore biology, morality, history, common sense, and grim health statistics because they are smarter than anyone.
Charles Krauthammer, who has written some of the best critiques of Obamacare and the rest of the Left’s assault on America , is also aboard the gay express. He’s smarter than God. So, too, are Chicago Tribune columnist Steve Chapman, Weekly Standard columnist Stephen Hayes, Fox News analyst Margaret Hoover, and American Spectator columnist Phillip Klein, all of whom have called for repealing the military ban. Klein called it a “no-brainer.” . . .

You should read the whole thing. In the secular world of modern intellectualism, it is too easy to forget that not everyone is secular, worldly or modern. Not everyone is a professor, a journalist or a political operative, and not everyone feels obliged to kowtow to the latest intellectual fads. 

What Knight calls intellectual “groupthink” means that viewpoints unpopular among the elite usually lack articulate advocates, and few things are currently less popular among the intelligentsia than “homophobia.” (Scare-quotes necessitated by the bogus diagnosis implied by that made-up word.) Just as with other issues, like immigration, the views of the articulate elite are opposed mainly by Ordinary Americans — people who live their lives outside the elite “bubble” — and those in political life risk ridicule and ostracism if they disagree too loudly with prevailing elite opinion.

What George Will says is true, in a limited sense: Young people are indeed more “gay-friendly” than their elders, because American youth have swum in a cultural ocean of “gay-friendly” messages for the past three decades. Whether it’s TV sitcoms or “tolerance” curricula in schools, the cumulative cultural effect is such that traditional moral strictures against homosexual behavior are seldom voiced except in the most conservative churches.

Despite the fact that more than 97% of Americans are heterosexual, the interests of the 2% gay minority are so actively advocated — in news media, in entertainment, in academia, in politics — that anyone in public life who says, “Hey, that’s wrong,” is instantly denounced. To invoke 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian moral teaching in a policy dispute is to invite the accusation of “hate” and “prejudice” and, without fail, to be diagnosed as suffering from that dreadfully disabling disorder, “homophobia.”

Well, it is neither hateful nor prejudiced nor psychotic to say that sin is sin. “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23 KJV). Once politics enters into the equation, however, and sin is defined as a “right,” Americans become confused, as I explained in November 2008:

Because Americans are taught to think of “rights” as something sacred in our civic religion, those accused of violating “rights” are easily demonized, while those who advocate “rights” are sanctified. . . .
“Rights talk” allowed liberals a means of preemptively delegitimizing their opponents and thereby to avoid arguing about policy in terms of necessity, utility and efficacy. If all legal and political conflicts are about “rights,” there is no need to argue about the specific consequences of laws and policies. Merely determine which side of the controversy represents “rights” and the debate ends there.

George Will and his intellectual peers have surrendered to the inexorable logic of “rights.” The ultimate consequences of that surrender can only be imagined. (Marines marching hand-in-hand in the San Francisco Gay Pride parade?) To the intellectual elite,  however, such consequences are of less concern than the difficulty of telling George Stephanopoulos, “I disagree.”

UPDATE: There’s a Memeorandum thread, and I’ve addressed the same topic from a somewhat different direction at the American Spectator, pointing out the predictable tendencies of radicalism.

Speaking of predictable, liberal blogger Ron Chusid has denounced me as being a member of the “American Taliban” and “the authoritarian right.”

Hey, I was born at night, but it wasn’t last night.

How is it “authoritarian” to argue for the continuation of a policy (“Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”) instituted in 1993 by President Clinton?

The accusation is absurd, but perfectly illustrative of the intolerance inherent in radicalism. Merely disagree with them on matters of policy, and you are automatically compared to fanatical terrorists, accused of “hate” and “fear,” etc. And once they’ve grossly insulted you and impugned your good faith, they accuse you of “incivility.”

14-Year-Old Anamika Veeramani Wins National Spelling Bee; Sen. Jake Knotts Could Not Be Reached for Comment

Will Folks, on the other hand . . oh, no, let’s don’t go there:

No theatrical flourishes for Anamika Veeramani. She kept her hands behind her back and rattled off the letters of every word she was given — until she was crowned the spelling bee champion.
The 14-year-old girl from North Royalton, Ohio, won the 83rd Scripps National Spelling Bee on Friday, acing the word medical word “stromuhr” to claim the winner’s trophy and more than $40,000 in cash and prizes.
Anamika became the third consecutive Indian-American bee champion, and the eighth the last 12 years. . . .
There was a three-way tie for second. Adrian Gunawan, 14, of Arlington Heights, Ill.; Elizabeth Platz, 13, of Shelbina, Mo.; and Shantanu Srivatsa, 13, of West Fargo, N.D., were all eliminated in the same round.

Congratulations, Anamika. My advice: Avoid South Carolina.

The Woman That Feminists Hate Most

No, it’s not Sarah Palin. I’m talking about “Just Mommy”:

Like everyone else, I learned to think of “mother” as something you become after you’ve proven that you can do grown-up stuff. . . .

Well, she found out different and you might say the story has a happy ending. You might say that, unless you’re a feminist, in which case the ending will almost certainly make your head explode.

For all the talk about “choice,” there is one choice feminists don’t find acceptable, and “Just Mommy” made that choice. Read the whole thing.