The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Rule 5 Monday

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 20 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

The original plan was to crank this out yesterday (on time) but the opportunity presented itself to get my desktop box back in action, and by the time I got home from Frederick it was far too late to do what needed doing. So here we are. As usual, this post contains links to pix that may not be safe for work (although assuredly not pornographic) and reader discretion is advised when making with the clicky-clicky.

First Street Journal leads off with his own brand of Rule 5, this week with the military women of Romania. Also, blondes! Also also, American women! Randy’s Roundtable checks in with Terri Garrn (and Natalia Paris), Goodstuff’s mega metablog is hosted by Lauren Cohan’s cleavage, then by Scarlett Johansson; and Fishersville Mike is looking forward to three more years of Penny now that Big Bang Theory‘s been renewed. Ninety Miles from Tyranny has Morning Mistress (Not Quite Camel Toe), Hot Pick of the Late Night, and Girls With Guns; and this week, more of the same.  Animal Magnetism adds Rule 5 Friday (this week’s version) and Saturday Gingermageddon (ditto). Blackmailers Don’t Shoot has Rule 5 Thursday with Zuleika Silver and You Know I Read It In A Magazine, and Laughing Conservative offers Candice Swanepoel for your consideration. We also heard from IMNSHO and Mocho’s Blog.

EBL explores the mystery of oil pulling, and adds Sarah Palin, First Kiss, Belle Knox, St. Patrick’s Day, Obama Putin And Blondie, Leryn Franco, Vivaldi’s “Spring”, Mad Men, Maura Fussell, DaVinci’s Demons, and Anne Baxter. You were spared Dianne Feinstein.

Soylent Refuge’s torrent of snooch began with Your Sunday Coffee Creamer (Second helping), more whining about the lack of football, after which Monday Motivationer Nicky Whelan, Overnighty, Tuesday Titillation window dressing, She’s Running Hot, Humpday Hawtness Adele, Ah Naiad, Falconsword Fursday Liz, Evening Awesome Eva, Occasional Corsets, T-GIF Friday, Your Evening Auburn Awesome Kimberly, Weekender, and Bath Night Overnighty Jenny. The second wave featured Sunday Sideboob, Nice Necklace, And Sure It’s Soylent St. Patty’s Day, Irish Evening Awesome, Overnighty Getting Medieval, Humpday Classic Karen, Overnighty Hayden, Vernal Vixens Equinox Knockers, Evening Awesome Carlie, Perhaps Corsets, Overnighty Chez Chaise, Weekender Nikky Case, and Bath Night Aria.

A View From The Beach featured Stacy Keibler, Heather Shoots More $#!*, An Excellent Choice, Ukraine Has Talent?, I’d Pay to Watch That, “No Where to Run”, Toronto Cheerleaders?, Tales of the Hood, Cheerleaders Put Germs in Space, Sad, If True; also, Not Your Typical Two-Armed Economist – Yamila Diaz, Arlington Woman Gives Local Authorities a St. Patrick’s Day Thrill, Drone Practice, Time for a Car Wash, “Sinner’s Prayer”, Happy St. Patrick’s Day, SI Rookie of the Year – Sara Sampaio.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babes included Leilani Dowding, and Joanna Nosuchinsky, Sex in Advertising was Made In Bangladesh (also, Guess); his vintage babes were Cynthia Lynn and Maggie Smith. Dustbury celebrated Zooeypalooza 21 and also offered Phyllis Diller (no really!) and Fleur Pellerin. At The Camp of the Saints, it was Tibby Muldoon and the Rule 5 News.

The DaleyGator’s DaleyBabes were Deborah Ayorinde, Julia Louis Dreyfus, Silvan Krispin, Nicole Beharie, Jessica Marie , Juna Oshima, Laura Vandervoort, Yayoi Uehara, Daniele Watts, Yukiho Murase, Rachel Burr, Miyou Suzumura, Miku Ohashi, Allira Cohrs, Lee Purcell, Bella Gonzalez, Djuan Trent, Bernadette Peters, Mami Sakamoto, Rio Ogawa, Emi Itou,  Ana De La Regeura, Harukah Ito, Daniela Tamayo, Vivian Gumaraes, Lorena Orozco, Katarina Pudar, and Women in Black.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery! Submissions for next weekend’s Rule 5 roundup are due to the Rule 5 Wombat mailbox by midnight Saturday, March 29.

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop

Category: Rule 5

“Backin’ The U.S.S.R”, As The Beatles Did Not Quite Sing

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 16 Comments

by Smitty and Chris Cassone

 

Oh, flew in from Hawaii beach on Air Force One
Donors weren’t bad last night
Desperate news the Ukraine has come undone
Man, there’ll be a dreadful fight
I’m backin’ the U.S.S.R.
You don’t know how punky you are boy
Backin’ the U.S.S.R.

Scheming away so long I hardly know my face
With Vlad I’m feeling right at home
Dreaming of tomorrow and still more disgrace
Good thing I lack all backbone
I’m backin’ the U.S.S.R.
You don’t know how skunky you are boy
Blamin’ the U.S.
Blamin’ the U.S.
Backin’ the U.S.S.R.

Well the Crimean girls really got knocked out
When the West left them behind
And Moscow girls make me sing and shout
Ossetia’s always on my m-m-m-m-mind

Aw come on!
Ho yeah!
Ho yeah!
Ho ho yeah!
Yeah yeah!

Yeah I’m backin’ the U.S.S.R.
You don’t know how funky you are boyth
Backin’ the U.S.S.R.

Well the Crimean girls really got knocked out
When the West left them behind
And Moscow girls make me sing and shout
Ossetia’s always on my m-m-m-m-mind

Oh, show me around you Sochi buildings way down south
Take me to your daddy’s dacha
Let me hear the Ukrain’s panicked, dying shout
My policy is full of caca
I’m backin’ the U.S.S.R.
Hey you don’t know how lucky you are boys
I’m backin’ the U.S.S.R.

Oh let me tell you, honey
Hey, I’m back!
I’m back in the U.S.S.R.
Yes, I’m free!
Yeah, back in the U.S.S.R.

Ha ha

Don’t hesitate to support Chris Cassone. If we buy enough of Cassone’s stuff, we can guilt him into recording this. That’s my theory, anyway:

Category: Chris Cassone, humor

#LindsayOnOWN @LindsayLohan: When You Are Your Own Biggest Problem

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 25 Comments

Lots of people are enduring the car-crash fascination with the Lindsay Lohan rehab documentary series on the Oprah Winfrey Network. For some reason, my 11-year-old daughter Reagan has become a fan of the show, so that I end up watching it, too, despite the fact that I hate — absolutely hate — reality TV shows, except for programs like C*O*P*S or The First 48 where the “reality” isn’t a bunch of phony made-for-TV personal drama. In this respect, Lindsay is a strange hybrid.

On the one hand, the director is trying to make a legitimate documentary about the process by which a notorious celebrity trainwreck recovers from her latest toxic meltdown. On the other hand, there’s endless personal drama generated by the narcissistic nutjob at the center of it all.

So it was nice to watch Episode 3 where, after Lindsay had hamstrung production by refusing to allow the camera crew its scheduled access, Oprah showed up in person to chew her out:

“When you change a schedule, you know what happens. You’re a professional woman. . . . And it’s not just for you. You’ve got a whole team of people who are relying on you right now for this particular experience, for creating this documentary.”

Regular readers know I’m a huge fan of Christopher Lasch’s 1979 book, The Culture of Narcissism, which foreshadowed the entitlement mentality typical of the Millennial generation (see, for example, “Narcissism vs. Objectivity,” Feb. 15). A key trait of narcissists is their tendency toward blame-shifting, avoiding responsibility by blaming scapegoats for their problems. You see this over and over watching Lindsay. She has long since demonstrated that she is incapable of managing her own life. Yet when her remarkably patient personal assistant and others around her try to provide guidance, she erupts in tantrums, accusing these well-meaning people of being the source of her unhappiness, as though she hadn’t looked in the mirror recently.

Narcissism involves a concern with superficial image instead of fundamental reality, an obsession with seeming instead of being, and it is never pleasant to watch someone deal with the problems that invariably result. Only a sadist could enjoy seeing Lindsay Lohan spin wildly out of control, and these “starlet meltdown” tabloid dramas are mainly interesting to me as morality tales, e.g.: “And then the promiscuous celebrity coke addict lived unhappily ever after.”

But why bring up Charlie Sheen, eh?

Lindsay Lohan has been blessed with beauty, wealth and fame. It’s no fun to watch her throwing away happiness with both hands. And yet this is the car-crash-by-the-highway that Lindsay presents. Viewers are just rubber-neckers gawking at the carnage.

It’s wrong to say that Lindsay Lohan ever had a drug and alcohol problem. No, Lindsay Lohan had a Lindsay Lohan problem.

Even if she’s sober now, she hasn’t solved that problem yet.

 

Category: Celebrities

The @AmandaMarcotte Birth Control ObamaCare Fear-Mongering Crusade

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 36 Comments

Donald Douglas points out that everyone’s favorite baby-killing enthusiast has found a new focus for her feminist lunatic rage, namely a pending Supreme Court case about the ObamaCare mandate that insurers must provide free contraceptive coverage.

Before addressing Amanda Marcotte’s irrational claims directly, let me ask: Does anyone else remember the Iraq War military draft conspiracy theories spread by the Left during the Bush administration?

One of the dirty little secrets of the Bush-era antiwar movement was how the Left cynically exploited the vast ignorance of American youth to foment antiwar sentiment on college campuses: The 9/11 “Truthers” were the most gaudy example of this, but there was also the claim that the Iraq invasion was a “War for Oil” conspiracy to enrich Halliburton and fatten U.S. oil company profits, and arguably the antiwar Left’s most blatant lie was that neocons in the Bush administration were secretly plotting to reinstitute the military draft. It wasn’t just crackpots at the Daily Kos promoting this, either. Howard Dean said it in a 2004 speech at Brown University: “I think that George Bush is certainly going to have a draft if he goes into a second term, and any young person who doesn’t want to go to Iraq might think twice about voting for him.”

This kind of irresponsible fear-mongering builds on the mythmaking success of the academic Left and the liberal media. Nobody under age 50 remembers that it was a Republican, Richard Nixon, who ended the military draft on the advice of free-market economist Milton Friedman, nor have the young ever been told how Democrats branded Ronald Reagan a warmonger who would lead us to nuclear Armageddon, when in point of fact, it was Reagan who successfully negotiated the elimination of nuclear weapons and ultimately ended the Cold War.

Because young people are not taught about the long and sordid history of Democrat dishonesty, each new liberal lie is enthusiastically embraced by college kids who think it is always the “smart” thing to believe the worst about Republicans.

Thus we return to Amanda Marcotte, who sees the Hobby Lobby case as the first step toward a theocratic “breeder” dystopia:

Well, I have a theory and it’s that this case is about more than just getting the contraception mandate overturned or giving your boss rights to force you to abide by his religious dogma by manipulating your compensation package, though those are also important agenda items for the right. This case is also about manipulating the media, specifically to warm the mainstream media up to the idea that contraception is “controversial” . . . The idea is to get the mainstream media sources to say, “One side says birth control is abortion” over and over and over and over again, until the idea “birth control=abortion” is considered a normal one in American culture. And since abortion is controversial, then, they hope, they can make contraception controversial, too. Once contraception is “controversial” like abortion is, then it’s a hop, skip and a jump away to convincing Republicans it’s politically safe now to start passing laws restricting access to it.

This is one of those ideas that are so crazy only a feminist could possibly believe it. Not even the most devout Catholic or fervent evangelical “Dominionist” can really envision a scenario whereby laws “restricting access” to contraception would be enacted by Republicans or anyone else, even in the most conservative states. Like the deliberately false fearmongering about a return to the military draft 10 years ago, Marcotte and others on the Left are now trying to confuse women, to make them believe that if they vote Republican, the Pill and condoms will soon be outlawed. Witness how Amanda Marcotte begins her discussion of the pending Supreme Court case:

Arguments start this week for Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court case that will determine the fate of the contraception mandate put forth by the Department of Health and Human Services after the Affordable Care Act was passed into law. The contraception mandate is part of a larger mandate by the ACA to classify dozens of medical services, like wellness checks and vaccinations, as “preventive” care, which would then require insurance plans to cover them without a copay. The idea is that this will both make health insurance work better for enrollees and save money overall by encouraging prevention. Contraception was included after the Institute of Medicine recommended it for its well-known effects of preventing unwanted pregnancy, and thereby preventing unplanned child-bearing and abortion.

What this case is actually about (no matter what Amanda Marcotte or anyone else tries to tell you) is the attempt by Democrats to dictate the type of health insurance employers must provide. Everyone who isn’t on the payroll of the White House or the DNC agrees by now that ObamaCare is an unworkable scheme, a policy catastrophe that proves the truth of every criticism of central government planning ever made by Mises, Hayek, Friedman and Sowell.

Marcotte refuses to admit that ObamaCare is actually anti-choice, in the economic sense, as the various mandates limit the options of workers and employers in terms of the health insurance options available to them. ObamaCare requires employers to provide comprehensive coverage of contraception with no copay, that is to say, health insurance must cover 100% of the cost of contraceptives.

Well, why?

Marcotte and other Democrats endeavor to frame the argument in the euphemistic language of “women’s health,” but as always, it’s about the money, specifically about using the force of federal law to fund Planned Parenthood and to expand the influence of the radical population-control movement. It’s not about “health” (some forms of contraception involve serious health risks), and it’s not about “choice” (Hobby Lobby isn’t trying to prohibit contraception), it’s about control.

Amanda Marcotte wants Democrats in control of the federal government, and she wants the government in charge of everything.

Her ridiculous fear-mongering, which presents the Hobby Lobby case as the first stealthy step down a slippery slope to theocracy, is in fact the exact opposite of truth: Amanda Marcotte is an outspoken proponent of taxpayer-funded abortion, and one might more accurately see ObamaCare as moving in the direction of making “free” abortion a matter of compulsory federal law.

“Sex is about reproduction. This is the natural function of sex, biologically speaking, and it’s odd how the same liberal fanatics who enjoy endlessly lecturing us about Darwinism and global warming — ‘The science is settled!’ — are so unscientific about sex.”
— Robert Stacy McCain, Oct. 23, 2013

Neither facts nor logic support Amanda Marcotte’s claims, which are actually rooted in emotional abnormality on her part, representing her bizarre pathological fear and hatred of babies: “I don’t want a baby. . . . Nothing will make me want a baby. . . . This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.”

 

 

Category: Abortion, Contraceptive Culture, Feminism, Planned Parenthood, Supreme Court

Malaysian Prime Minister Gives Press Conference in Perfect English

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 52 Comments

Yes, I know the big headline is about the lost flight — “It is therefore with deep sadness and regret that I must inform you that, according to this new data, flight MH370 ended in the southern Indian Ocean” — but watching it live on TV, what struck me is that Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak delivered his press conference in such wonderfully fluent English. Razak spoke rather slowly, but quite clearly, and with only the slightest hint of an accent.

This was a triumph of the global Anglosphere. Anyone who speaks English worldwide — in Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Canada, Great Britain, South Africa or wherever — could have understood every word by the Prime Minister of Malaysia, as much as if it had been the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom speaking.

Could someone please explain, then, why it is considered xenophobic bigotry for us to expect immigrants to learn English? All over the world, English is recognized as the language of commerce and prosperity. Welcome to America. Now speak English.

 

Category: Uncategorized

In The Mailbox, 03.24.14

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 1 Comment

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
Aewl’s Abode: Lessons From Russia
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical: A WWI Diary
Michelle Malkin: Get To Know The Common Core Marketing Overlords
Twitchy: “You Spelled Obama Wrong” – Donna Brazile Corrected After Claiming Mitt Romney’s “Default Position: Is To Criticize


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: As Soon As Nate Silver Begins Projecting GOP Victories, Progressives Unsheath The Knives On Former Leftist Wonder Boy
American Thinker: The Profound Arrogant, Ignorant Stupidity Of Liberals In Charge
Blackfive: Review – Big Boys Don’t Cry
Blackmailers Don’t Shoot: Breaking – Pacifica Radio Is Still On The Air
Conservatives4Palin: IBD – Another Obamacare Rate Shock On The Way
Don Surber: Daily Scoreboard, March 21
Jammie Wearing Fools: Dem Strategist Claims Obamacare Being “Terrorized” By Hostile Ads
Joe For America: Green Berets’ Open Letter On The Second Amendment
JustOneMinute: Another Faith-Based Initiative From Obama
Pat Dollard: Laura Ingraham – The Government Can Follow Our Every Keystroke, Of Course They Know Obamacare Enrollment Numbers
Protein Wisdom: White House And Leftist Acolytes Attack Matt Drudge For Revealing His First Obamacare Penalty Tax
Shot In The Dark: Chanting Points Memo – The Head Fake
STUMP: Obamacare Watch – Schrodinger’s Deadline
The Jawa Report: Liberals Quote The 2nd Amendment
The Lonely Conservative: Congress Needs To Stop Obama From Giving Away The Internet
This Ain’t Hell: Why We Can’t Get Stolen Valor Prosecuted
Megan McArdle: Pension Funds’ Risky Business


Rule 5 Monday will be posted tonight.


Category: Linkagery

More RadFem Ravings

Posted on | March 24, 2014 | 79 Comments

When last we took notice of feminist blogger Radical Wind (“PIV is always rape, OK?“) it was in context of her praise for Mary Daly, but she has not been idle. On Sunday she published these insightful paragraphs in a message to the sisterhood:

Our task as radical feminists is to undo, unlearn and un-peel the workings of men’s violence — including how men’s patterns are embedded in our psyche — and to reveal them to other women, so to spark our movement towards liberation. . . .
Since all forms of domination such as racism, classism, urban vs. rural domination, adult vs. child, human vs. animal, etc. stem from the same male-rapist root, our attitude to all of them should be the same — in short, only a radical feminist attitude towards male domination can be liberating. It is what we already do: raise awareness, name the workings, lies and reversals of patriarchy and reveal our reality as women in this or that form of patriarchal oppression. Explain how men benefit from this practice and how it’s at the expense of all women. How it deceives and traps women in its net. How it reinforces and is linked to male rapism. Seek to meet, make friends with and listen to as many women across male classes, borders and race, and talk about our respective experiences and lives.
Women will relate to that, it will expand our consciousness, deepen our understanding of how men oppress us. It will give each other the power to see which will spark our ethical rage and rage to be free.

In other feminist empowerment news, Duke University freshman Miriam Weeks, a/k/a teen porn star “Belle Knox,” was interviewed last week on Dr. Drew Pinsky’s Headline News show:

KNOX: I didn’t bring my family into this. The media brought my family into this. The media has been the one who has been harassing my family. I`ve made it crystal clear I did not want my family to be involved.
PINSKY: No, no, but . . .
SEGUN ODUOLOWU: But you can’t hide your anonymity. Once you do a video, people will know who you are. I mean it wouldn’t take Sherlock Holmes to find out who you are.
PINSKY: Let me put it there really. Let me put it there really. If I were your dad I’d be chomping down on a cyanide capsule right now. It’s all I’m saying. (LAUGHTER) So, it affects your family in the deep way. And how about that?
KNOX: I’m so glad you laughed at that because that’s just hilarious. But I mean, my family supports me in what I choose to do. . . . And I’m really sick of this entire culture of outing girls who we believe are sexually promiscuous . . .

Dr. Drew got a lot of blowback from that “cyanide capsule” remark. And speaking of blowback, let’s talk “rape culture”:

Men, It’s Our Moral Responsibility
to Combat Rape Culture
— Huffington Post

The friend zone cultivates rape culture
— Spartan Daily

It’s Time to End ‘Rape Culture’ Hysteria
— Time

Fond du Lac High School student’s ‘rape culture’
article sparks free-speech debate
— Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel

And finally: “Hot-shaming” — some women are so attractive that they “intimidate” other women at the gym.

 

Category: Feminism

GIRL IN CHAINS: ‘Domestic Partners’ Charged in ‘Particularly Heinous Case’

Posted on | March 23, 2014 | 51 Comments

Brutally shocking news from Salinas, California:

Three children were rescued from a Monterey County home last week after deputies discovered that two women — one a former correctional officer — had starved, chained and abused the children, officials said Friday.
Sheriff’s deputies rescued the children from the couples’ residence on Russell Road near Salinas on March 14, citing horrific conditions and an 8-year-old girl who looked “like a concentration camp victim,” said Monterey County Sheriff Scott Miller.
Also in the home were two boys, ages 3 and 5.
Miller said Eraca Dawn Craig, 31, and Christian Jessica Deanda, 44, are accused of felony child cruelty, false imprisonment and other charges. . . .
Officers said they found signs the girl had been chained to the wall about 4 feet above the floor and said she may also have been held in a closet. It appeared she had been shackled at times at the ankle and at other times by a collar around her neck.
Miller said it appeared she had “hardly eaten for months.”
The girl and a 5-year-old boy were adopted, he said, while a 3-year-old boy is the biological son of one of the women, who are domestic partners.
The girl was immediately hospitalized for around five days, he said, and appeared to be “very traumatized.”
“It was a particularly heinous case,” Miller said, adding that it appeared the women were preparing to leave the area before they were discovered.
“It seems that the little girl was the major target of this abuse,” he said. . . .

Read the whole thing at the San Jose Mercury News, via Fox News, with a major hat-tip to Matt Barber at BarbWire.com.

Let me explain — in case anyone is too thick-headed to understand — why this story, including the lesbianism of the “domestic partners,” is newsworthy: Liberal media habitually act as publicity agents for the feminist and gay-rights movements. Both of these movements frame their arguments in the context of victimhood narratives, depicting women and homosexuals as victims of societal prejudice, discrimination and oppression. This one-sided presentation is intended to solicit sympathetic support for the policy agenda of activists, and the liberal bias of media thereby constitutes a deceitful form of political propaganda. What we are told about the lives of women and homosexuals is deliberately selective, a Potemkin village depiction of their inherent wonderfulness and virtue, contrasted against a demonized scapegoating of “society” as guilty of tolerating homophobic and misogynistic victimization. The implicit messages are obvious:

“Expunge your guilt! Help the oppressed! Vote Democrat!”

Yet when anyone attempts to criticize this propaganda (or the policy agenda that the propaganda campaign is intended to advance), this media criticism is then twisted by liberal activists into “evidence” of homophobia and misogyny, thus to smear and delegitimize anyone who calls attention to the dishonesty of the propaganda.

So, when we encounter facts that do not conform to the propaganda narrative of liberal media’s dishonest activism, critics highlight aspects of the story that contradict the Potemkin village portrayal.

Are women and homosexuals victimized by “society”? Here is a story about lesbians who are not victims of abuse, but rather perpetrators of abuse, and it is important in the same way that a university “hate” hoax is important, namely in balancing the otherwise deliberately unbalanced media narrative.

Critics of liberal media bias know what we are doing, although we seldom bother to explain what we’re doing and why. Regular readers of this blog are presumed to be intelligent and informed enough to understand this, but an actual majority of Americans are too ignorant or stupid to recognize what’s actually happening: 65 million (51%) voted to re-elect Obama, a margin of victory that depended in substantial measure on the media’s purposeful promotion of “War on Women” propaganda — Obama won women voters by a 55%-44% margin — and Obama’s gay landslide. The 95% of voters who are heterosexual split evenly between Democrats and Republicans in 2012, according to exit polls, but Obama won gay voters by a nearly 4-to-1 margin, perhaps because they had become convinced by media propaganda that a vote for Mitt Romney was a vote for Taliban-style oppression.

If you are one of the thick-headed ignoramuses who can’t understand this, why? Because you haven’t paid attention, you idiots.

Go purchase and read The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy, by Thomas Sowell (1995). Unless and until you have done this, you are an ignorant fool with no standing to criticize conservatives as “haters.” If you are willing to learn the truth, however, permit me to call attention to Chapter 5 (“The Anointed versus the Benighted”) and Chapter 6 (“Crusades of the Anointed”), in which Sowell details the prejudicial selection of “targets” and “mascots.”

 

 

If you are reflexively sympathetic to “the homeless” and reflexively hostile to religion and the traditional family, but have never wondered why you have these prejudices, you obviously haven’t read The Vision of the Anointed, you ignorant fool.

“In the hands of a skillful indoctrinator, the average student not only thinks what the indoctrinator wants him to think . . . but is altogether positive that he has arrived at his position by independent intellectual exertion. This man is outraged by the suggestion that he is the flesh-and-blood tribute to the success of his indoctrinators.”
– William F. Buckley Jr., Up From Liberalism (1959)

People who have been indoctrinated, and who lack the intelligence or integrity necessary to recognize this indoctrination when it is pointed out to them, are an existential danger to our nation.

“Hate”? If hating ignorance is wrong, I don’t want to be right.

 

Category: Crime, Gays, Media Bias
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin