Rule 5 Sunday: Pistolero

I’m inclined to begin this week’s roundup of Rule 5 posts a bit differently, with a link to the gallery of Oleg Volk, who does a lot of good work in the RKBA field and shoots some outstanding photographs besides. Like this one, for example, which combines a beautiful woman with good-quality weapons – a common theme in much of Oleg’s work. Check out the gallery, but be aware some of the pix are NSFW.

Moving on to our folder of Rule 5 posts, once again the leadoff spot belongs to Soylent Green, who brings the Humpday Hawtness (some pix NSFW), follows it with the obligatory corset cromulence, adds Anine Bing as a palate cleanser, and finally celebrates his 1000th post with some lush (NSFW) young ladies.

Joe The CPA is right: there aren’t many Rule 5 opportunities in the tax business, so we have to grab one when it comes along. No revealing pix of the defendant in this case, unfortunately, but there is a pic of Laurie Dhue showing off her legs. Mmmm.

Fishersville Mike notes the addition of Mayim Bialik to “Big Bang Theory”. Looks like she’ll fit right in! All this and brains too, as the T-shirt says. While we’re talking about TV shows, The Rio Norte Line brings us some “Glee”-related Rule 5.

Elsewhere, the Eye of Polyphemus lights on Angelina Jolie, and Three Beers Later offers a video of Pole Dancing Instructors Unleashed.

In the Camp of the Saints, the Rule 5 week started with Sabrina Ferrelli, continued with a comparison of Tennesse State Rep Julia Hurley (R-Awesome) to Qaddhafi’s amazonian guards, greeted Thursday with an impressive collection of Rule 5 lovelies, and closed the week with the unsmiling Janice Raymond.

Maggie’s Notebook presents  Kiwi conservative Rachel Hunter and some Rule 5 linkagery of her own; Dustbury brings us the actress who could have been Tarzan’s Jane and Rashida Jones.

That’s it for this week. Send your links for next week’s roundup to me at Rule 5 Wombat.

FMJRA 2.0: Dream Induction

VIDEO: Chicago Commies in Wisconsin

Thugs for Social Justice: Union Goon Gets Rough With Tabitha Hale on Video

Mike Capuano: Thug 4 Life

I Guess The Real Question Is: ‘Can An Amphibian Like Troglopundit Be Elected’?

The Real Deal in Madison

Everybody at CPAC Likes to Have Their Photos Taken With Celebrities …

Rule 5 Sunday: Getting To First Base

LIVE AT FIVE – 2.21.11

You May Be Surprised by This

Syracuse Post-Standard Portrays Buerkle as Supporting ‘Massive Budget Cuts’

Sock-Puppet Software

LIVE AT FIVE – 2.22.11

The Blog Genie Is Out of the Bottle

Michael Moore: Own a Gun? Racist!

Cashing In

Mitch Daniels Boomlet Ends

Mutiny

‘Incredibly Sexist Assertion’

‘Bad Jew!’

Koch Brothers: Inside the Left’s Head

Ace on ‘Context’

Texas Terrorist Romeo, Khalid, Recounts Love for His American Juliet, Sarah

LIVE AT FIVE – 2.25.11

On Mr. Rumsfeld

Greetings From Ohio!
UPDATE: Klanville, USA?

Bloggers vs. Academic Freedom?

The Other Shoe Drops: ‘Sexy, Classy Guy’ Chris Lee Was Looking for Trannies

This week’s top linkers:

The Lonely Conservative and Maggie’s Notebook tied at 5 links this week; nobody else had as many. Not getting picked up by WordPress when you link?  (also known as the Bob Belvedere Effect after its most famous victim) Send your trackbacks to Wombat-socho, and surely the linky-love reach-around will follow.

K-Lo Slams Contraceptive Culture

Too many conservatives nowadays are unwilling to take on the cultural issues that underly much of the debate over public policy, so kudos to Kathryn Jean Lopez for directly addressing the accusation that Republicans, by seeking to defund Planned Parenthood, are “waging war on contraception”:

The debate in Congress was given momentum by the Live Action investigatory videos, which raised significant questions about what exactly Planned Parenthood is doing; but the rest of us need to discuss why we’ve let Planned Parenthood step in as a mainstream Band-Aid, throwing contraception and even abortion at problems that have much more fundamental solutions.

Lopez concludes:

As evidence of the reckless and dangerous callousness at institutions supposedly dedicated to women’s health — failure to report the sex trafficking of minors, failure to report child abuse — continues to emerge, we can’t afford to lose sight of another, more fundamental conversation that we’ve got to have, among friends, in our homes and churches — a talk about what it means to be human.

The “Republican war on contraception” rhetoric — recently employed by Amanda Marcotte at Slate and Amanda Terkel at HuffPo  — gets translated by the New York Times into a “Republican war on women”:

Republicans in the House of Representatives are mounting an assault on women’s health and freedom that would deny millions of women access to affordable contraception and life-saving cancer screenings and cut nutritional support for millions of newborn babies in struggling families.

Understand the fundamental premise being expressed by this rhetoric: Access to contraception is such a sacred right that access must be subsidized by taxpayers, and any opposition to such a policy is contrued as inherently hostile to women. This worldview makes contraception the essence of womanhood, a belief that is not merely unnatural, but is in fact anti-nature, because from the standpoint of human biology, reproduction is the entire purpose of sex.  Continue reading K-Lo Slams Contraceptive Culture →

Texas Terror Update

I was getting ready to leave for my Ohio trip when Eric Dondero of Libertarian Republican called Thursday to tell me about his scoop about Texas terrorism suspect Khalid Aldawsari, who wrote in 2009 that he was “falling in love” with his English-language tutor, Sarah Rice Stender. I took an hour to put up a quick post, and was on the road when Eric called with an update — a Chattanooga TV station had confirmed that Aldawsari “previously studied at an English language center at Vanderbilt University” — so I called Wombat and asked him to add an update.

There wasn’t time, however, to try to put this scoop into context. Who is Sarah Stender and what (if anything) was the significance of Aldawsari’s infatuation with her?

Bryan Preston of PJM was the first to identify Aldawsari’s online profile, including the Saudi student’s Facebook account and blog, From Far Away. Dondero went through the blog to locate the post in which Aldawsari wrote about Stender:

I am falling in love of her…..
She is goregeous that I cann’t forget her just right away…
I am asking Allah the great to covert her to Islam and marry me.

What was at first confusing was that Stender’s Facebook profile (she was Facebook “friends” Aldawsari) listed her affiliation with Vanderbilt University. Initial news accounts reported that Aldawsari had attended Texas Tech, and later transferred to Southern Plains College near Lubbock, but it was not until later that his English-language studies at Vanderbilt were reported.

Subsequent reporting has actually confused the situation somewhat, because it appears there was more than one Sarah Stender at Vanderbilt. The New York Post identified Stender as “a 58-year-old former professor of medicine” at Vanderbilt. But that doesn’t match the Facebook profile of Aldawsari’s Sarah (which has recently been taken offline) and it seems unlikely that an 18-year-old would have been lovestruck by a middle-aged professor, calling her “gorgeous.”

Online records show another Sarah Stender, from Memphis, who received her bachelor of arts in political science and religious studies in May 2010, and it is almost certainly this Sarah Stender — perhaps the daughter or niece of the professor? — with whom Aldawsari was infatuated. Note that in his blog post about Sarah, Aldawsari describes her as being interested in talking about religion, so this makes sense.

The British Daily Mail mentions Stender in a long feature about Aldawsari, but so far no one has interviewed Stender to learn her impressions of the Saudi student who expressed such ardent interest in her. Was this just a transient crush? Did Aldawsari ever make overt advances toward Stender? If so, how did she respond? And if she rejected him, did this affect his attitude toward the U.S.?

These questions remain unanswered. Meanwhile, the New York Post reports today:

A powerful Saudi chemical company aligned with the oil-rich kingdom’s royal family were the financial bakers of the Texas student who plotted a host of brutal bomb attacks on targets in New York and around the country.
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation, a huge conglomerate that is largely controlled by the Arab state’s ruling family and run by Prince Saud bin Thunayan Al-Saud, paid for a scholarship that allowed terrorist Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari to go to Nashville to learn English.

And in a Saturday article that mentioned Aldawsari’s infatuation with Stender (but did not name her), the New York Times reported:

According to Mr. Aldawsari’s journal, he had planned to carry out attacks for years, long before he came to the United States on a student visa in September 2008. He wrote that he viewed his scholarship and his enrollment in Texas Tech University as a means to put him in place and give him the resources to attack targets. “And now, after mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives, and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for Jihad,” he wrote.

If true, then Aldawsari’s entire three-year “student” sojourn in America — including his English lessons with Sarah Stender — was merely a ruse, a means to a deadly end.

The Other Shoe Drops: ‘Sexy, Classy Guy’ Chris Lee Was Looking for Trannies

Two transsexual hookers contacted Gawker to tell about responding to this Craigslist ad:

Sexy Classy guy for passable TS/CD – m4t – 39 (Cap Hill)
Date: 2011-01-14, 8:55PM EST
New to area. Very fit classy, successful guy. 39, 6ft 190lbs, blond/blue. smooth hard body. Looking for a sexy ts/cd that i can spoil. I promise not to disappoint
.

This revelation would help make sense of things that might have otherwise been inexplicable:

Chris Lee’s resignation from the House on Feb. 9 may be the quickest political downfall in history. . . .
Lee’s sudden exit took many people by surprise. Hadn’t other members of Congress admitted to worse than an unconsummated, PG-13 flirtation and managed to stay in office? . . .
But if Lee was using the Internet to meet up with transgender women, it now makes a lot more sense why he would have decided to resign so quickly: Lee may have thought if he quit the House immediately, he’d be able to avoid having his “secret” exposed and spare himself any further embarrassment. No such luck.

Now that Kathleen Parker is leaving “Parker Spitzer,” perhaps CNN will hire Chris Lee to co-host.

‘Parker-Spitzer’ to Become ‘Spitzer’?

The logical consequence of one of the worst programming decisions in the history of television news:

“Parker Spitzer,” CNN’s troubled prime-time talking-head program, is losing its Parker.
Kathleen Parker, a Pulitzer Prize-winning opinion writer, will leave the ratings-deficient show after just four months, the network said Friday.
The program, which airs at 8 p.m. weeknights, will be replaced starting Monday by “In the Arena,” which CNN described as an “ensemble” program that will feature Eliot Spitzer, Parker’s co-host on “Parker Spitzer.” . . .
Parker writes an op-ed column for The Washington Post that is syndicated nationally and will leave to “focus on her writing,” CNN Executive Vice President Ken Jautz said in a face-saving staff memo released to the media. . . . .
“Parker Spitzer” has occasionally finished fourth in its timeslot behind Nancy Grace’s program on CNN’s HLN . . .
Perhaps worse, the program’s audience spiked during a week earlier this month when Parker was off the air. The program had its best weekly ratings in early February, fueled by interest in the crisis in Egypt, with Spitzer as solo host.

So CNN keeps Spitzer, but dumps Parker, evidently deciding that she was the problem, rather than the disgraced former New York governor.

And notice who isn’t getting fired: The CNN executives who came up with this retarded idea for a show.

Category: CNN

Malkin Pimp-Slaps Weigel

MARION, Ohio — My buddy Dave Weigel has got arrogance like Rosie O’Donnell’s got double chins.

His smart-ass attitude already cost Dave a job at the Washington Post (as he has admitted), but his excessive arrogance still gets the best of him, and so today Dave decided to do something extraordinarily stupid: Point his snark at Michelle Malkin.

Dave, Dave, Dave — will you never learn?

I’d take time to explain Dave’s mistake here, but I’m on deadline for an offline project, so I’ll summarize what Dave did wrong in a single word: Everything.

And just FYI to Garance Franke-Ruta: Prank phone calls are not “gonzo journalism.”

UPDATE: Oh, what the hell? If I’m going to get sidelined and procrastinate, I might as well go whole-hog with it. Here’s Weigel’s lede:

MADISON, Wisc. — Michelle Malkin promises to do “the reporting the Tea Party-bashing national media won’t do on the rabid outbreak of progressive incivility and violence at Big Labor protests across the country.” Sounds promising! But here’s what she delivers. . . .

Weigel then goes on to bullet-point the contents of Malkin’s latest column, “Hate-a-rama: The vulgar, racist, sexist, homophobic rage of the Left.” He then wrote, “This isn’t really reporting. This is googling,” a sneer he retracted after Malkin pimp-slapped him and pointed out that she had done follow-up interviews with various victims of left-wing protest thuggery.

But you see that Dave was, once again, doing the arrogant show-off thing, as he made sure to rub that Madison dateline in Malkin’s face: “I just spent four days in Madison and the state Capitol, reporting, and saw absolutely no violence.”

For the purposes of this discussion, it doesn’t matter whether you think the Left or the Right is more guilty of over-the-top behavior at protests. Nor does it matter whether you think the mainstream media exaggerates right-wing misconduct while ignoring left-wing misconduct. Malkin has been the target of about as much leftist thuggery as anyone, so she is an authority on the subject, and as to the media’s bias, I’ve certainly discussed that recently (see here and here).

No, the issue here is Dave’s arrogance, his “Look at Me, I Just Spent Four Days in Madison, Reporting” show-off stunt.

And I blame myself.

After he got canned from the WaPo in July 2010, I talked to Dave by phone about his situation, and he said that several news organizations had expressed an interest in hiring him. So I told Dave, basically: “Make sure you get a travel budget.” Given the choice between two jobs with roughly equal salary, I advised him, take the one that offers you more travel money.

One of the sad realities of modern journalism is that there’s less and less money for reporters to travel and do on-the-scene reporting. Whatever Dave’s grievous faults — and grievously hath Dave answered them — he’s a good reporter, so one way he could really distinguish himself from those blogging-from-Starbucks pundit types was to become Dateline Dave, the Man on the Scene.

I haven’t had time to follow Dave’s reporting from Madison, but I reckon my advice might have had a little something to do with his Wisconsin sojourn — and now look what it has led to!

Well, let’s hope Malkin’s Pimp-Slap Heard Round the World knocks some sense into the boy’s head. As for Malkin, she doesn’t do as much on-the-scene reporting as she used to do, but she is still a reporter by habit and training, and she works very hard at what she does. She sure as hell didn’t deserve that sneering condescension from Weigel.

“Experience keeps a dear school, but a fool will learn in no other.”

UPDATE II: Any of my conservative friends tempted to derogate Weigel’s reporting skills should check out this article in which he goes behind the scenes with the protesters who turned the Wisconsin Capitol into a radical commune, which includes this interesting sentence:

The “War Room” of the Teaching Assistants Association is tucked away on the third floor.

Hmmmm. So the  University of Wisconsin Teaching Assistants Association — i.e., a bunch of left-wing grad students — played a leadership role in the sit-in.

And “War Room”? #NewTone!