The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Muslim Fanatic Defends Savage Murders by Fanatical Murderous Muslim Savages

Posted on | January 8, 2015 | 150 Comments

Muhammad was a bloodthirsty polygamous warlord and also the prophet of a religion that commands the murder of non-believers:

USA Today caused a stir [Wednesday] night when they published a column from Anjem Choudary, whom they describe as “a radical Muslim cleric” from London specializing in shari’a law. . . . Choudary blames France for not protecting “the sanctity of a Prophet,” and says we should not expect anything else other than murder from Muslims when that doesn’t happen . . .

Most people don’t know what Islam actually teaches, and those who tell the truth about Islam are often denounced as warmongers, bigots and even “racists.” Islam is a religion not a race, of course, and Muslims of every race murder non-believers of every race. Some of the most dreadful savagery committed in the name of Islam has been perpetrated against Africans. The claim that critics of Islam are “warmongers” is even more absurd: Islam is at war with us, whether we fight back or not.

The most influential Muslim leaders are determined to annihilate every Jew in Israel and, because the United States is Israel’s strongest ally, America has been branded “The Great Satan.”

Nothing we say or do as Americans — no policy of our government — can ever appease our Islamic enemies. Even if we were to abandon our alliance with Israel, the resulting slaughter of every Jew in Israel would only be the prelude to our own slaughter. Islam commands this, it requires this, and we should be grateful to the editors of USA Today for allowing Anjem Choudary to tell us the truth:

Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people’s desires.
Although Muslims may not agree about the idea of freedom of expression, even non-Muslims who espouse it say it comes with responsibilities. In an increasingly unstable and insecure world, the potential consequences of insulting the Messenger Muhammad are known to Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
Muslims consider the honor of the Prophet Muhammad to be dearer to them than that of their parents or even themselves. To defend it is considered to be an obligation upon them. The strict punishment if found guilty of this crime under sharia (Islamic law) is capital punishment implementable by an Islamic State. This is because the Messenger Muhammad said, “Whoever insults a Prophet kill him.”
However, because the honor of the Prophet is something which all Muslims want to defend, many will take the law into their own hands, as we often see.
Within liberal democracies, freedom of expression has curtailments, such as laws against incitement and hatred.
The truth is that Western governments are content to sacrifice liberties and freedoms when being complicit to torture and rendition — or when restricting the freedom of movement of Muslims, under the guise of protecting national security.
So why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims, thereby placing the sanctity of its citizens at risk?
It is time that the sanctity of a Prophet revered by up to one-quarter of the world’s population was protected.

Damn your honor and damn your Prophet, you murderous savages.

“Truth is great and will prevail if left to herself . . . she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.”
— Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, 1786





 

Category: Islam, Terrorism

LIVE AT FIVE: 01.08.15

Posted on | January 8, 2015 | 5 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
AFP: Hamid Murad Turns Himself In

Police still on the hunt for Kouachi brothers

Turned himself in after seeing name mentioned in social media
Kouachi brothers known to French intel services
Major manhunt underway for remaining two suspects




Chancellor Merkel: Greece Should Stay In Eurozone
Also wants UK to stay in

Di Blasio Claims He Hasn’t Toked Up In Gracie Mansion
Says he hasn’t smoked pot since his NYU days



POLITICS
Senators Join In Bipartisan Slam Of Obama Over Workweek Tweak Veto Threat

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): “He initially said, ‘Bring me your ideas,’” she said. “Why he’s shutting it down is beyond me.”

Proposal to change Obamacare definition of full-time back to 40 hours/week has support from both parties in Congress

Federal Judge Strikes Down California Foie Gras Ban



Report Likely To Reignite Fight Over Military Pay, Benefits

House Institutes Dynamic Scoring For Budget Analysis

Fauxcahontas: Economic Recovery Only Benefiting The Wealthy

Obama’s Executive Amnesty Trips Up AG Nominee Lynch

Appeals Court Hears Challenge To Texas Abortion Law



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Halts Skid On Surprise US Stockpile Drop: WTI $49.22, Brent $51.60
Yen Weakens For Second Day As Stocks, Oil Rally; Aussie Advances
ADP Says Private Sector Added 241,000 Jobs In December
Study: Workers Squeezed By Health Insurance
Samsung Predicts First Drop In Profits In Three Years
Wet Seal To Close 338 Stores
CES 2015: The Gadgets Catching The Eye In Vegas
FCC Chair Hints At Public Utility-Style Rules For Internet
AT&T: Unused Data Now Rolls To Next Month
Chicom Cops Inadvertently Admit To Buying Spyware To Snoop On Citizens
Nintendo Surges On Alliance With GungHo For Puzzles & Dragons Game



SPORTS
Knicks Sink To New Low With Thirteenth Straight Loss

John Wall scores on a fast break in the first half

Nene scores 20 to lead Wizards to 101-91 win against hapless Knicks


Jameis LoseWinston To Enter NFL Draft

Bruins Edge Pens In OT



Hawks Rip Grizzlies For Sixth Straight Win

Caps Ruin Leafs’ Coach Debut With 6-2 Romp

Did Curt Schilling’s Republican Opinions Cost Him A Cooperstown Slot?

Flames Snuffed By Red Wings, 3-2

Updating The Nats/Orioles MASN Fee Dispute



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Jessica Chastain Calls Out Russell Crowe For Comments On Older Actresses

“I think he’s getting his foot stuck in his mouth.”

“…for someone to say there are plenty of roles for women that age – they’re not going to the movies enough.”

Jennifer Love Hewitt Pregnant

Giada: I Never Cheated With Matt Lauer Or Bobby Flay!

Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie To Meet Pope Francis At The Vatican

“60 Minutes” Host Steve Kroft’s Nasty Affair Exposed


“Fifty Shades Of Grey” Gets R For “Unusual Behavior”

Miles Teller Going “Full Gene Kelly” In Upcoming Flick

Blake Shelton To Host, Perform On SNL

Protesters Swarm Cosby’s Return To The Stage

John Travolta Lands Lead Role In FX’s “American Crime Story”

Three More Women Accuse Cosby Of Sexual Assault



FOREIGNERS
Divers Hunting For Black Boxes From Crashed AirAsia Plane
Sri Lankan President’s Bid For Third Term Uncertain As Election Opens
FBI Director Reveals New Evidence Linking Norks To Sony Hack
Mexican Authorities Find Ten Bodies, Eleven Severed Heads In Guerrero
Canada Pledges To Accept 13,000 Refugees From Iraq, Syria
Ugandan Army Confirms Rebel LRA Commander In Custody
EU Releases Trade Deal Papers With US
Dissidents Free But Questions Remain Over US-Cuba Deal
Nepal To Issue Passports With Third Gender For Sexual Minorities
Modi Dedicates Salt Mountain Memorial To Mahatma Gandhi



BLOGS & STUFF
Louder With Crowder: Kim Jong Un v. Hollywood
Michelle Malkin: The Black Brunch Brats
Doug Powers: Boehner Uses Gavel On Rebels After Re-Election As Speaker
Twitchy: MSNBC Guest Relates Paris Terrorist Attack To WHAT?
American Power: Democrat Party “Muslim Youth Activist” Cheers #CharlieHebdo Terrorists For “Getting The Job Done”
American Thinker: A Guide To The Guide To Israeli Elections
BLACKFIVE: Islamists Slaughter Cartoonists In Paris
Conservatives4Palin: Mary Katherine Ham – Can We Talk About Biden’s Inappropriate Behavior?
Don Surber: Oil Hypocrisy Of Fauxcahontas – EVIL.
Jammie Wearing Fool: This Should Go Over Well – Lebanese Porn Star Performs Wearing Hijab
Joe For America: Mia Love Dashes Conservative Hopes On First Day In Office
JustOneMinute: Shooting In Paris
Pamela Geller: NY Daily News Sanctions Paris Jihad, Censors Cartoon, Points Finger At Free Speech Magazine
Protein Wisdom: According To One of Boehner’s Party Uber Alles Lackeys…
Shot In The Dark: Boehned
STUMP: 80% Funding Hall Of Shame – Oh, THOSE Experts Say
The Gateway Pundit: Pathetic – Administration Calls Paris Attack “Act Of Violence”, Uses “If” Before Terror Attack
The Jawa Report: Pictures Of Naked Muhammad, Because Some People Deserve To Be Offended
The Lonely Conservative: How The Democrats Lost The Working Class
This Ain’t Hell: The Army’s New MOS-Specific PT Test
Weasel Zippers: Terrorism Be Damned, Here Are All The Charlie Hebdo Covers That Offend Terrorists
Megan McArdle: Admit It, You’re Rich
Mark Steyn: “I’d Rather Die Standing Than Live On My Knees”


Shop Amazon Home & Kitchen – New Year, New You – Healthy Cooking

Category: Live at Five

OFFICIALS IDENTIFY THREE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS IN FRENCH ATTACK

Posted on | January 7, 2015 | 25 Comments

Three French-born Muslims — Said Kouachi, 34, Cherif Kouachi, 32, and Hamyd Mourad, 18 — have been identified as the terrorists whose rampage in Paris killed 12 and wounded 11 others:

After a long day of rapidly changing information, U.S. counterterrorism officials said Wednesday night that they cannot be certain of the status of the three suspects in the Paris attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine. Information from French sources has been contradictory, they said.
Earlier Wednesday, two senior U.S. counterterrorism officials told NBC News that one of the suspects in the attack had been killed and that two others were in custody. However, the officials later said the information that was the basis of that account could not be confirmed.
Authorities earlier identified the three men as Said Kouachi, 34, and Cherif Kouachi, 32, French nationals who are brothers, and Hamyd Mourad, 18. Late Wednesday, French police released photos of the brothers and asked for public help in finding them, and French authorities said the youngest of the three suspects had surrendered to police.
An official who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the investigation told The Associated Press that the men were linked to a Yemeni terrorist network. Cherif Kouachi was convicted in 2008 of terrorism charges for helping funnel fighters to Iraq’s insurgency and sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Twelve people were killed in the attack by gunmen, armed with AK-47s, who attacked the offices of Charlie Hebdo, a publication that has enraged Muslims for publishing cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.
A source familiar with the investigation told NBC News on Wednesday night that two officers who had been assigned to protect Charbonnier for the past several years came down from an upper floor and intercepted the gunmen. Both officers were shot, however, and one died at the scene. The other was wounded and is expected to survive.
The men targeted those magazine employees who had created or published cartoons showing Muhammad — asking for their victims by name, the source said. They executed editor and cartoonist Stephane Charbonnier, popularly known as Charb; Bernard Maris, a Bank of France economist who was a columnist for the magazine; and three cartoonists.

Uncertainty about the status of these suspects — which of them are in custody, whether one has been killed — should be cleared up within a few hours. It is astonishing that one of these monsters was previously convicted on a terror-related charge, yet served only 18 months in prison.




 

Category: France, Islam, Terrorism

UPDATED: MUSLIM TERRORISTS ATTACK MAGAZINE OFFICE IN PARIS, KILL 12; AL-QAEDA IN YEMEN?

Posted on | January 7, 2015 | 124 Comments

At least 12 people were reportedly killed when Islamic terrorists with AK-47 assault rifles attacked the Paris offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo today:

One of the men was captured on video shouting “Allah!” as four shots rang out. . . .
“This is a terrorist attack, there is no doubt about it,” President Francois Hollande told reporters after rushing to the scene of the attack. . . .
Sirens could be heard across Paris as Prime Minister Manuel Valls said security would be ramped up at transport hubs, religious sites, media offices and department stores. . . .
Late last year, a man shouting “Allahu Akbar” (“God is greatest”) injured 13 by ramming a vehicle into a crowd in the eastern city of Dijon. French officials say several attacks were prevented in recent weeks and Valls has said France had “never before faced such a high threat linked to terrorism.”

This is the same magazine whose offices were fire-bombed in 2011 for publishing cartoons about the Prophet Mohammad. The terrorist gunmen are reportedly still at large.

UPDATE: “We are all Charlie now.”

If only the National Rifle Association hadn’t stopped France from closing the “gun show loophole” . . .

UPDATE II: An interesting claim:

Two terrorists shouted that they were from al Qaeda in the Yemen before they launched the brutal attack on Charlie Hebdo in Paris.
Cédric Le Béchec, a 33-year-old estate agent who witnessed the attack on the satirical magazine, said the men told bystanders to inform the media that they were from the terror group.
He said that the men arrived in a black car, stopping in the middle of the street. One of them was carrying a rocket-propelled grenade. They were dressed in black military-style clothing.
Mr Le Béchec said that before launching the assault, the attackers approached another man in the street saying, “Tell the media that this is al-Qaeda in the Yemen.”

It is never wise to jump to conclusions based on early reports in a breaking news situation like this. But if this report is accurate, why do Yemeni Muslims hate French journalists?

That is to say, of all the places in the world where these terrorists could have struck, why Paris? Was this simply a target of convenience, some place nearby where these Muslims lived? I have no idea what the French policy is vis-a-vis Yemen, but this attack would seem to invite the question of whether Islamic terrorists give a damn about any nation’s policy. Muslims want to kill us all and destroy our civilization, and we should never make the mistake of thinking that our government policy is to blame for Islam’s murderous hostility toward us.

UPDATE III: OFFICIALS IDENTIFY THREE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS IN FRENCH ATTACK




 

Category: France, Islam, Terrorism

LIVE AT FIVE: 01.07.15

Posted on | January 7, 2015 | 3 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


TOP NEWS
House Re-elects Boehner As Speaker Despite Conservative Opposition

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R) at a December 10 press conference

216 GOP for, 25 against or present
As GOP takes charge, a swift veto threat from Obama
BBC: Five things to watch in the new Congress

Two Dead Including Shooter at Fort Bliss VA Clinic
Doctor killed by patient


Three Arrested In Shooting Of NYPD Officers
Officers shot while responding to armed robbery at shift change; weren’t wearing body armor



POLITICS
Mexican President Offers Obama Help With Amnesty Documents

Presidents Nieto and Obama

Mexico will supply documents to prove that illegals have been in the US since before 2010


Former Virginia Governor McDonnell Gets Two Years For Corruption



GOP To Take Aim At Obamacare’s 30-Hour Work Week

FBI Seeks Suspect After Bombing Of Colorado Springs NAACP

GOP Senate Disinclined To Dump “Nuclear Option”

Navy Commander Pleads Guilty In Massive Bribery Case

Report: New Regulations Cost $181.5 Billion In 2014

Homeland Security IG Slams Border Drones As “Dubious Achievers”



THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Asian Crude Remains Near Five-Year Lows: WTI $47.97, Brent $50.95
US Steel Idles Tube Plants As Oil Prices Drop
Wall Street Sell-Off: Dow Falls Below 2000
US Retail Mall Vacancies Rise In Fourth Quarter
JC Penney Shares Jump On Holiday Sales Report
Nikkei Set To Snap Four-Day Slump
Intel Sets Goal For Employee Diversity
Sony Unveils $1100 Walkman At CES
Zuckerberg Brings National Book Club To The Internet
AllJoyn IoT Platform Reaches Out To The Internet For Remote Control
Internet Archive Brings Over 2000 Classic DOS Games To Your Browser



SPORTS
Pedro Martinez elected To Baseball Hall Of Fame

Pedro Martinez at Fenway Park following his election

Randy Johnson, John Smoltz, Craig Biggio also elected

Wall’s Double-Double Helps Wizards Snap Skid

Leafs Fire Coach Carlyle

Pistons Edge Spurs 105-104

Blue Jackets 4, Stars 2

Knicks Trade Smith, Shumpert To Cavs

Is Joe Ross The Hidden Gem In The Padres/Rays/Nats Trade?



FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Jennifer Aniston Writes Her Own Tabloid Headline

InStyle’s February cover girl

“When I’m Pregnant And Married, I’ll Let You Know”

Charlie Sheen Grovels To Unspeakable Armenian After Profane Twitter Rant

Nicolas Sparks, Wife Separate

Sam Smith Disses Fellow Musicians: “Some Of These Pop Stars Are Just Awful”

Phylicia Rashad Speaks Out, Defends Bill Cosby

Jamie Dornan: I Think Planespotting Is Weirder Than S&M

Blake Lively, It’s A Girl!

Rosamund Pike Gives Vanity Fair That Gone Girl Scene By The Numbers

Benedict And Sophie Expecting A Cumber-Baby

Matt LeBlanc Splits With Girlfriend After Eight Years Together

USA’s “Covert Affairs” Cancelled After Five Seasons

Cameron Diaz’ Wedding Details



FOREIGNERS
ROK Bond Yields Near Record Lows After Treasuries Rally
Tail Section of Missing AirAsia Plane Found In Java Sea
Suicide Bomber Kills At Least 15 In Yemen Capital Explosion
UN: Syrians Largest Refugee Group After Palestinians
Egyptian President Al-Sisi Makes Surprise Visit To Coptic Church For Christmas Celebration
Kurdish Troops Kill 24 Jihadis In Kobane
Pakistani Parliament Gives Thumbs-up To Military Courts For Terrorism
UN Chief Says Palestinians Will Join ICC April 1
Germany’s Anti-Islamic Protests Spark Fierce Right-Wing Power Struggle
Cameron, Merkel Set For EU Talks



BLOGS & STUFF
First Street Journal: I Is Smarter Than A Harvard Professor!
Doug Powers: Obama To Flex His Job Creation Muscle At Auto Plant – Just One Problem
Twitchy: “The Delautering” – The Internet Takedown Of Kirby DeLauter Continues
American Power: Movement To Stop “Manspreading” Reaches San Francisco
American Thinker: The Obama Economic Record Is Even Worse Than You Realize
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – Tom Clancy’s FULL FORCE AND EFFECT By Mark Greaney
Conservatives4Palin: Gov. Palin Accuses GOP Leadership Of Partnering With Obama
Don Surber: AP Lies
Jammie Wearing Fools: NYPD Officer Wounded In Shootout Not Happy To See Loathed Mayor Paying Visit To Hospital
Joe For America: Kid Rock’s Brutally Honest, Politically Incorrect Message Making Liberals Furious (Again)
JustOneMinute: Keystone, Veto Threats, And Constititional Headscratching
Pamela Geller: Greek Orthodox Priests, Monks Protest Islamic Studies Department
Protein Wisdom: The Revolution Will Be Ignored
Shot In The Dark: Marching Orders
STUMP: Obamacare Tax Watch – H&R Block Survey Bolsters My Prediction
The Gateway Pundit: California To Subsidize Car Insurance For Illegal Immigrants
The Jawa Report: Attention Mujahid CyberCaliphate Ad-Virtuali
The Lonely Conservative: Left-Wing Credit Union Exec Gets Help From Feds In Shutting Down Competition
This Ain’t Hell: Air Force Claims Drone Force At Breaking Point
Weasel Zippers: Vox’s Ezra Klein Hallucinates That “Strong Economy” Would Carry 42 States For Hillary
Megan McArdle: Whining Harvard Professors Discover Obamacare
Mark Steyn: The Nays Had It


Shop Amazon Fashion – Up to 50% Off Contemporary Clothing

Category: Live at Five

In The Mailbox, 01.06.15

Posted on | January 6, 2015 | 7 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho


OVER THE TRANSOM
Anamika: Dear Coffeeyogi…
Louder With Crowder: You Can’t Just #FireBoehner! Here’s What You Can Do
Doug Powers: Boehner Watch
Twitchy: So NOW Rahm Emanuel Is Getting Tough On Crime?


RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES
American Power: Hamas Cancels Online Order After Misunderstanding “Blow-Up Dolls”
American Thinker: The Many Memes Of Sarah Palin
BLACKFIVE: Book Review – “No Fortunate Son”
Conservatives4Palin: Robert Reich Claims Supply Side Economics Has “Notoriously Failed”
Don Surber: The Immature President. EVIL.
Jammie Wearing Fools: Scumbag Protesters Shut Down Sen. Wyden Town Hall Honoring 100-Year-Old Vet
Joe For America: Al Sharpton’s Money Train
JustOneMinute: Holiday Cheer We Overlooked
Pamela Geller: Action Alert – Gohmert For Speaker
Protein Wisdom: Gohmert, Yoho To Challenge Boehner For Speaker
Shot In The Dark: New Year’s Resolutions From A Silly Place
STUMP: Obamacare Tax Watch – What To Watch For
The Gateway Pundit: Ferguson Arsonist Was Top Speaker At Sharpton’s National Action Network Rally In DC
The Jawa Report: I Humbly And Graciously Accept This Award On Behalf Of All Jawas Everywhere
The Lonely Conservative: NYT – Blue States Suck For Most People But They’re Still Awesome
This Ain’t Hell: Every Time I’m Out…
Weasel Zippers: Today #BlackLivesMatter Imploded
Megan McArdle: Fear The Grexit
Mark Steyn: It Was A Very Good Year


Shop Amazon Fashion – Up to 50% Off Contemporary Clothing

Category: Linkagery

Feminism’s Campaign of Sexual Terror

Posted on | January 6, 2015 | 68 Comments

“Sexuality is to feminism what work is to Marxism: that which is most one’s own, yet most taken away. . . .
“Implicit in feminist theory is a parallel argument: the molding, direction, and expression of sexuality organizes society into two sexes — women and men — which division underlies the totality of social relations. Sexuality is that social process which creates, organizes, expresses, and directs desire, creating the social beings we know as women and men, as their relations create society. . . . The organized expropriation of the sexuality of some for the use of others defines the sex, woman. Heterosexuality is its structure, gender and family its congealed forms, sex roles its qualities generalized to social persona, reproduction a consequence, and control its issue.
“Marxism and feminism are theories of power and its distribution: inequality. They provide accounts of how social arrangements of patterned disparity can be internally rational yet unjust. . . .
“Socially, femaleness means femininity, which means attractiveness to men, which means sexual attractiveness, which means sexual availability on male terms. What defines woman as such is what turns men on. Good girls are ‘attractive,’ bad girls ‘provocative.’ Gender socialization is the process through which women come to identify themselves as sexual beings, as beings that exist for men. It is that process through which women internalize (make their own) a male image of their sexuality as their identity as women. . . . Feminist inquiry into women’s own experience of sexuality revises prior comprehensions of sexual issues and transforms the concept of sexuality itself — its determinants and its role in society and politics. . . . Sex as gender and sex as sexuality are thus defined in terms of each other, but it is sexuality that determines gender, not the other way around.”
— Catharine MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory” (1982)

Please call the excerpted passage to the attention of Jessica Valenti, Amanda Marcotte, or any other prominent 21st-century feminist spokeswoman in politics, journalism or academia.

Ask them: Was Professor MacKinnon wrong, and if so, how?

It’s very simple, you see. Anyone with a college education can read Professor MacKinnon’s words and see what she means. You can read the entire article and judge whether these excerpts are in any way “taken out of context.” You can read Professor MacKinnon’s online biography and see if anyone can dismiss her as a “fringe” figure, obscure and irrelevant to so-called “mainstream” feminism.

The rhetorical habits of feminists are familiar to anyone who has ever attempted to oppose them. You ask them a simple question, a matter of plain fact that can be answered “yes” or “no,” and they will not answer. They will deny your authority to ask them questions, implying that to disagree with them is proof of your bad faith (mala fides), so that their critics are always either accused of defending some heinous abuse (e.g., rape) or else characterized as a misogynist, a deliberate insult for which no evidence is required beyond a skeptical stance vis-à-vis feminism.

Misogynist is a word that has a definition. The etymology of misogynist gives it a literal definition as “woman-hater,” but in America nowadays, it means: Republican, especially a male Republican.

It is would difficult to find evidence that Mitt Romney hates women, but he is a Republican and therefore, all feminists agreed in 2012, he was responsible for a “War on Women.”

Feminists began by blaming the “War on Women” on Rush Limbaugh, who said mean things about Sandra Fluke. The word for someone who says mean things about a feminist is “misogynist.” The word for someone who says mean things about a Republican woman is . . . Democrat.

The terms of the dominant discourse are controlled by the media and academia, both institutions overwhelmingly staffed by Democrats, and so it is nearly impossible to get anyone to notice (much less to admit) the extent to which feminism is simply a partisan propaganda operation through which Democrats exploit the partisan “gender gap” by convincing women that the Republican Party hates women.

Well, what about Catharine McKinnon?

Is she a feminist? Do other feminists agree with her analysis of sexuality? If officials of the Republican Party are expected to answer for everything Rush Limbaugh says — as was the case in the Sandra Fluke imbroglio — why can’t Democrats be asked about the views of eminent feminist ideologues? Of course, I doubt any TV interviewer would ever dream of asking Hillary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren whether they agree with Catharine MacKinnon, couldn’t we at least ask such a question of Jessica Valenti, Amanda Marcotte and other such persons whose status as Official Feminist Spokeswomen is their journalistic raison d’etre?

Heterosexuality is the “structure,” according to Professor MacKinnon, by which males engage in the “organized expropriation” of women’s sexuality. That is to say, all males are sexual predators — parasites who wrongfully exploit females as their sexual victims and thereby produce an “inequality” that is “unjust.” Heterosexuality is a social injustice, a means of oppression that males impose on females.

Perhaps there are feminists who wish to say that I have mischaracterized or oversimplified Professor MacKinnon’s argument.

Then, please, Ms. Valenti and Ms. Marcotte, feel free to explain how I am too stupid to comprehend Professor MacKinnon’s meaning. Let any other feminist — professional or amateur — explain either (a) how I have misinterpreted Professor MacKinnon’s argument, or (b) how Professor MacKinnon’s argument is wrong.

“Well,” the feminist huffs, “this is irrelevant. It’s 2015. What’s the point of bringing up this article from 1982?”

“The issue in rape has been whether the intercourse was provoked/mutually desired, or whether it was forced: was it sex or violence? . . .
“[W]omen notice that sexual harassment looks a great deal like ordinary heterosexual initiation under conditions of gender inequality. Few women are in a position to refuse unwanted sexual initiatives. That consent rather than nonmutuality is the line between rape and intercourse further exposes the inequality in normal social expectations. So does the substantial amount of male force allowed in the focus on the woman’s resistance, which tends to be disabled by socialization to passivity. If sex is ordinarily accepted as something men do to women, the better question would be whether consent is a meaningful concept. Penetration (often by a penis) is also substantially more central to both the legal definition of rape and the male definition of sexual intercourse than it is to women’s sexual violation or sexual pleasure. . . . Although most women are raped by men they know, the closer the relation, the less women are allowed to claim it was rape. . . .
“Sexuality, then, is a form of power. Gender, as socially constructed, embodies it, not the reverse. Women and men are divided by gender, made into the sexes as we know them, by the social requirements of heterosexuality, which institutionalizes male sexual dominance and female sexual submission.”
— Catharine MacKinnon, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory” (1982)

Honest readers see the immediate relevance of this. Professor MacKinnon was both prominent and influential in developing the theories of sexuality upon which much of current feminist discourse about “rape culture” is based. And the reader who is intelligent perceives that feminist theory interprets rape not as something separate and distinct from normal sexual interactions between men and women, but rather as something quite difficult to distinguish from normal interactions between men and women under “the social requirements of heterosexuality” within the system of “male sexual dominance and female sexual submission” by which women are oppressed.

If we recognize how feminist theory applies to the current “rape culture” discourse focused on college and university campuses, we also recognize this: Feminists are attempting to criminalize male sexuality, so that every sexual interaction between men and women occurs under the threat of prosecution if at any point, for any reason, the woman becomes unhappy with the interaction. Feminists now vehemently insist that males must be presumed guilty of rape if any woman ever accuses them of rape. No evidence is necessary beyond the accusation, and anyone who does not accept this no-evidence-needed standard is angrily condemned by feminists as a “rape apologist.”

This is anti-male terrorism, creating on university campuses a climate of fear in which “ordinary heterosexual initiation,” to borrow Professor MacKinnon’s phrase, becomes extraordinarily difficult due to the pervasive danger to males that their female partners might accuse them of a felony sex offense, the mere accusation being a de facto conviction.

Feminists are attempting to outlaw heterosexuality on college campuses. And when heterosexuality is outlawed, only outlaws will be heterosexual. Therefore, bad boys win, and nice guys . . .

Well, they say “nice guys finish last,” but nice guys will never finish at all. Certainly there will be no happy endings for the shy, scrupulously law-abiding nerd. Under the feminist regime of anti-male terror, a college boy would need a sense of reckless daring just to smile at a girl, much less speak to her. To attempt a kiss — are you crazy? Attempted kissing is sexual assault. No male who is smart enough to get into Harvard or Yale would dare risk the consequences of trying to kiss a girl.

Perhaps feminists can explain that I’ve misunderstood all this.

Perhaps there are Women’s Studies majors at elite universities who are eagerly willing to consent to sex with the kind of males who are interested in dating Women’s Studies majors at elite universities.

The existence of such males, however, is strictly hypothetical.





 

 

Category: Feminism, Sex Trouble

REVEALED: Colonel Jessup’s Bean Jones

Posted on | January 5, 2015 | 26 Comments

by Smitty

Category: Hollywood, humor
« go back — keep looking »

    About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

    Subscribe to our feed

    Search

    Admin