‘Notification of Donation Received’

One of the great joys of blogging is when people hit the tip jar and, when I send them a thank-you e-mail, they write back. A certain tip-jar hitter wrote back today to say he would have given me more, except he’s saving up to buy that 7-carat diamond ring from Amazon.

That there’s funny, I don’t care who you are.

As of 2 p.m., Pete Da Tech Guy’s bleg-a-thon was within $200 of his goal, so if you haven’t hit his tip jar yet, go hit it now. Frankly, I feel guilty having a dime in my pocket so long as Pete’s in need.

You’ll excuse my return to meta-blogging — i.e., blogging about blogging — but this goes to the very heart of what our Underpants Gnomes business plan is all about. Continue reading ‘Notification of Donation Received’ →

FMJRA 2.0: Steam

— compiled by Wombat-socho

VIDEO: Herman Cain Talks Mosques, Sharia and the Muslim Brotherhood

BREAKING: Explosions Blast Government Buildings in Norway; Terrorism Suspected UPDATE: Death Toll Now Reported at 17 UPDATE: Shooting Suspect Norwegian, Official Says; No Word Yet on Motive UPDATE: Anders Behring Breivik Named as Suspect Under Arrest — ‘Right Wing’?

A Prediction Comes True?

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Is ‘Vile … Despicable … Coward,’ Says Allen West

Death Toll Now Reported at 91 in Norway ‘Christian Fundamentalist’ Terror Attack UPDATE: Video Added; Gunman Posed as Policeman and Boasted, ‘I’ll Kill You All’

Feminists: Dishonest, Crazy or Both?

EXCLUSIVE: Hollywood Teen Bride’s Mom Blames Jealousy, ‘Insecurities’ for Criticism of Courtney and Doug Hutchison

The Dark Night of Fascism

A Democrat, Re-Assessed

Steyn Sounds Less Than Confident On Debt Talks. Wonder Why.

Why Do These ‘Organized Political Extremist Groups’ Hate Jane Fonda?

Obama Wants ‘Largest Deal Possible’

FMJRA 2.0: Sharp Dressed Man

Rule 5 Sunday: Navigator

It Depends on How You Define ‘Success’

LIVE AT FIVE – 07.18.11

From ‘Not Not Running’, To ‘Not Running Traditional Campaign’, To ‘Not Letting Americans Off The Hook’: Go, Palin!

Afghan Task Of Turning The U.S. Into Land Of Corrupt Warlords: Fruitful

See? B.S.!

Krikorian on Cain, Islam and Immigration

An Eternal Truth: ‘Getting Your Eyebrow Pierced Does Not Make You Any Less Fat’

Why Is Tim Pawlenty Losing?

‘The Undefeated’ Will Be Attacked With The Usual Non-Falsifiable Proposition

You Should Have Listened to Glenn Beck

LIVE AT FIVE – 07.19.11

Why Beautiful Women Read This Blog

GOP Dept. of Media Relations

Obligatory ‘Chris Matthews Says Something Stupid’ Video Post

He Made It to the Third Sentence

Racial Violence in South Carolina

Pregnancy Is Not a Disease and Contraception Is Not ‘Health Care’

LIVE AT FIVE – 07.20.11

Smitty Home On R&R

Talking to Courtney Stodden’s Mom

Jim Moran: Clownish Buffoon, Or Buffoonish Clown?

LIVE AT FIVE – 07.21.11

Q: Contessa Brewer, Do You Have A Degree In Bimbology?
A: Yes, I Do, Highest Honors

When Havidol Is Not Enough: Spenditol

‘What God Hath Joined Together …’

Could Dionne’s 21 July Column Be The Worst Dreck Ever?

The Terrible Legislative Catastrophe No One Will Remember in November 2012

LIVE AT FIVE – 07.22.11

DeMint Decommisions Commissions, Plus Subtle Krauthammer Humor

Dear John Hawkins …

What Happened to ‘No Drama Obama’?

Democrat Sex Scandal: Teen Accuses Oregon Congressman David Wu

A: Have You Considered Tendering Your Resignation, Sir?

FAA Shutdown Goes Mostly Unnoticed; Really Futile And Stupid Gesture Required

Obligatory Hollywood Teen Bride and ‘OMG! Bristol Palin! Scandal!’ Blogging

CAIR Loves ‘Em Some LGF: ‘Glad to See That Chaz Is Now Marketing the Caliphate’

Top linkers for this week:

  1. The Pro From Poca (19)
  2. The Camp of the Saints (10)
  3. (tied) The Lonely Conservative and That Mr. G Guy (9)
  4. Maggie’s Notebook (7)
  5. (tied) Da Tech Guy and Republican Redefined (6)

Thanks to everyone for the links! Want to be included in next week’s FMJRA roundup? Send your links to me at Wombat-socho with “FMJRA” or “Shameless Blogwhoring” in the subject line by July 29.

That Saucy Memeorandum

by Smitty


NTTAWWT, mind you; one is pleased that the political will of New Yorkers has been expressed. Whether or not the Almighty will be impressed remains to be seen, but hey: not my problem.
Sprinklerman and BHO, on the other hand, are a two guys making decisions that affect a large number of people. This debt debate really isn’t about either of them. The question of whether an organization should wallow in debt until it collapses really gets at basic notions of integrity and forthrightness.
Over at Alan Colmes’ joint, Karthiks quotes Paul Starr at The American Prospect, who busily wrecks Hamilton’s Federalist #30 argument, emphasis mine:

During the [Constitution] ratification debate, those fiscal powers were at the heart of the Anti-Federalist case against the Constitution—to which Hamilton responded, in “Federalist No. 30,” that limiting those powers would be unwise because there was no telling what demands the government might face in the future.
Hamilton was right. The nation would never have flourished if the Anti-Federalists had gotten their way. Now the Republicans—true heirs to the Anti-Federalists—are trying to entrench the kind of arbitrary fiscal limitations and requirements for congressional supermajorities that the Founders rejected.

Nice throw-away counter-factual, Starr.
Curiously missing from Starr’s analysis is the ~125 year gap between the Constitution and Woodrow Wilson, when things really started going sideways, as a result of the Federal Reserve Act and 16th Amendment.
Those beating a Constitutional drum today are not necessarily anti-Federalist; those debates were held and concluded in Hamilton’s day. Many are anti-Federal-Over-Reachist, decrying the way the vertical separation of powers between local, state and federal government has been substantially erased in the last century.
Maybe Mr. Starr will get some word of this post and follow up on the question of just how much federal government is too much.

Don’t Mess With the Zilla!

Zilla of the Resistance gives John Hawkins a piece of her angry mind over his “Coming Death of Independent Blogs” article:

John Hawkins at Right Wing News has posted a piece proclaiming that if you’re not a big important blogger like him and are just a smaller, newer, blogger like me, then you should just give up, hang your head in shame and go away.
Hawkins can shove it, because I am not going anywhere and neither are most of my colleagues, big & small, in the right blogosphere, no matter how much he and other elitist snobs wish that we would. It appears the whole point of his post was to demoralize the competition that is not as big and important as he thinks he is, which if you ask me, smells like an ulterior motive. . . .

You can read the whole thing. Personally, I understand that Hawkins was trying to be helpful. The title of his post was intended to call attention to real problems, and what he was really saying was, Hey, people, it’s a competitive environment out there — gotta up your game!

Which is inarguably true. I had a conversation with Jimmie Bise a couple weeks ago where we briefly kicked around the new Google+ thing: Is this a tool I should be using? How does it differ from Facebook and Twitter?

A couple of years ago, Reddit was supposed to be the Big Thing for boosting blog traffic, but I never got into it. There are only so many online tools I can use at any one time — like the trash-crowded hard drive of my 4-year-old laptop, my mind has finite space available for keeping track of passwords and logins — and if my failure to adopt Reddit has cost me any traffic, I haven’t noticed.

So now . . . Google+ is here, and I’m asking myself: Is this going to be as cool and essential as Twitter? Or is this going to be a minor distraction like Reddit? I dunno. But the point is, I’ve got to think about stuff like that, because keeping up with new tools is part of the job description.

You gotta up your game — if that’s what Hawkins is trying to say, he’s right, even if the way he said it made Zilla and a lot of other bloggers angry.

BTW, considering the generous response from my tip-jar hitters — both to me and to Da Tech Guy — I decided to hit Zilla’s tip jar.

Go give her some love, Good People.

Muslims: Don’t Hurt Their Feelings!

For example, it hurts their feelings when an Australian court says they can’t have sex with 8-year-olds.

And it especially hurts their feelings when you suspect them of involvement with terrorism:

Right-wing websites quickly pointed the finger at “jihadis,” and Pamela Geller, publisher of the website Atlas Shrugs and executive director of Stop Islamization of America, wrote on her site: “You can ignore jihad, but you cannot avoid the consequences of ignoring jihad.”
Counter-terrorism experts soon weighed in, implicating Al Qaeda.

Pamela Geller gives it right back at ’em. Why do none of these oh-so-sensitive liberals ever worry about  hurting Pamela’s feelings?

Possible T-Shirt Slogan?

When I Tweeted that out this afternoon, I’d just done a minor rattle of the tip jar in my Oslo update, which brought responses from three readers: Mike in Ardmore, Stephen in Texas and Richard in Missouri.

That’s three Good People, out of more than 9,000 visits Saturday. Of course, many others have hit the tip jar at least once over the past three years, thereby permanently exempting themselves from the category of Ungrateful Sons of Bitches Who Never Hit a Blogger’s Tip Jar.

This little experiment in reader-supported journalism has been remarkably successful, but there are occasional moments of frustration: Nine hours of aggregation Friday, with more than 14,000 visits and — counting Richard in Cohocton who hit the tip jar yesterday — that makes exactly four readers who’ve hit the tip jar, out of some 23,000 visits in two days.

Lots of Ungrateful Sons of Bitches out there, y’see.

But here’s their chance to redeem themselves: Our buddy Pete Da Tech Guy finds himself about $1,800 short this month. He’s raised more than $600 in two days, and still $1,200 to go.

I gave Pete $10 myself — he wouldn’t be asking if he didn’t need it — so thanks in advance to the Good People who I know are going to help Pete in his hour of need, and to hell with the Ungrateful Sons of Bitches.

UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds is not an Ungrateful Son of a Bitch.

UPDATE II: Joel in Nebraska is a Good Person who hit my tip jar while I was writing this post, and so I went and hit Da Tech Guy’s tip jar for another $10. C’mon, Good People!

UPDATE III: The list of Good People grows longer: Pete reports he got another $600+ overnight and has been busy writing thank-you e-mails. Just another $500 to go.

UPDATE IV: Now, thanking my own tip-jar hitters: Peter in Wisconsin, John in Annapolis, Philip in Englewood, Krista in North Carolina, Ross in Lakeland, Peter in Tennessee, Chris in Texas, William in Iowa and — as always — Jeff in Walla Walla.

Special message for Kevin in New Hampshire: I’d love to take you up on the offer to let me crash on your sofa when I come up to cover the primary campaign, but when I replied to the e-mail address on your donation, it bounced back. Please send me an e-mail!

Ask any blogger: Revenue from other sources — and we’re still seeking an Amazon buyer for that $120,000 7-carat diamond ring  — is deeply appreciated, but nothing in the world is so encouraging as that “Notification of Donation Received” e-mail from PayPal. Every $10 or $20 helps and some of the Good People send much more than that. (You know who you are.)

Some of y’all saw my response Friday to John Hawkins’s “Death of Blogging” post. As I said, my previous attempts to reply had been interrupted by the need to report breaking news, and I just took a moment out of my nine hours of aggregation on the Oslo bombing to dash off a quick reply Friday.

What I said to John was that, despite all discouragement — e.g., the idiocy of the GOP Establishment — the main problem isn’t a failure to attract readers (we’re doing OK in that regard), but rather “the damnable and eternal problem of monetization.” And then, just about the time I’d rattled my own tip-jar Saturday, I learned to my horror that Pete Da Tech Guy was $1,800 short.

How can I expect readers to encourage a wretched sinner like me, when a nice guy like Pete’s hurting so bad?

Here’s the really galling fact: During the 2010 election cycle, the major Republican Party national committees (RNC, NRSC, NRCC) raised $589.6 million. Averaged over the 24 months of the two-year election cycle, that’s more than $24 million per month.

A mere 1% of that total would be $245,667. And with a quarter-million bucks a month, you could pay $1,800 monthly to 136 bloggers.

Now, $1,800 a month is only $21,600 a year — scarcely a lucrative income — but what would that kind of money mean to a lot of those who are blogging part-time?

Don’t get me wrong: I’m not suggesting that the GOP put conservative bloggers on their payroll. (That would tend to impede our ability to call them idiots when they screw up, which they so often do.) Rather, what I am expressing is my frustration that Republican donors — people who are giving more than $24 millon a month to the official GOP — can’t see the value of providing a small measure of support to the conservative blogosphere. That’s just shameful.

OK, so much for griping. Last time I grumbled like this, it gave James Wolcott a reason to gloat, and we wouldn’t want that to happen again.

Go hit Da Tech Guy’s tip jar!

CAIR Loves ‘Em Some LGF: ‘Glad to See That Chaz Is Now Marketing the Caliphate’

Doug Ross: “It’s come to this: CAIR now tweeting links to LGF.”

“Breivik was deeply involved in the ‘counter-jihad’ blogosphere and UK far right groups . . . Breivik boasted online of his discussions with the English Defence League (the anti-Muslim group praised and supported by US bloggers Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller), and with ‘Stop the Islamisation of Europe’ — the European branch of Pamela Geller’s ‘Stop the Islamization of America’ (listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center).”

Johnson’s dhimmi-fication could not be more complete if he joined the Gaza flotilla and composed a jazz-guitar anthem, “Ode to St. Pancake.” The fact that he’s citing the SPLC and getting re-Tweeted by CAIR pretty much says it all, doesn’t it?

Of course, tu quoque: “Norway Shooter a Charles Johnson Fan,” Pamela Geller says, and she also notes that Oslo massacre suspect Anders Behring Breivk had been rejected from Stop Islamicization of Europe, as SIOE’s founder told Reuters.

Pamela further notes — and screen-caps, in case CJ tries to put it down the memory hole — Johnson’s own comment (about 11:30 a.m. PT/2:30 p.m. ET Friday):

“The simultaneous attacks sound like Al Qaeda to me, as does the scale of the bombing.”

And that was after some witnesses had already been quoted in the press saying the Utoya shooter was blond. Continue reading CAIR Loves ‘Em Some LGF: ‘Glad to See That Chaz Is Now Marketing the Caliphate’ →

Obligatory Hollywood Teen Bride and ‘OMG! Bristol Palin! Scandal!’ Blogging

Don’t know about you, but two days of blogging about Norwegian terror attacks exceeds my recommended dosage. It’s time to get get back to blogging about real news.

And by “real news,” of course I mean teen sex scandals.

You might have thought this morning’s post about Rep. David Wu (D-Oregon) would have filled the teen sex scandal news quota. However, as everyone knows, it’s not an actual scandal for a teenager to be sexually assaulted by a congressman if (a) he’s a Democrat and (b) she’s the daughter of a major campaign contributor.

So that’s not exactly what we call “news.” Dog bites man.

Sex is always scandalous, however, when it involves a Republican, which is why Bristol Palin went on the “Dr. Drew” show to talk about losing her virginity to Levi Johnston while drunk on wine coolers:

“Instead of waking up in his arms, I awakened in the cold tent, alone. . . . That was the first of many bad decisions to come.”

Where I come from, the only reason any young fellow ever buys wine coolers is if he’s trying to have sex with a teenage girl. It’s almost like a redneck cultural tradition, a rite of passage or something.

So, once again: Dog bites man. Not exactly “news.”

Moving on, then, we find Hollywood teen bride Courtney Stodden and her 51-year-old husband appearing on the “Father Albert Show,” and the host asks her about her future plans:

Father Albert: “College? Continuing education?”
Courtney: “He’s my college! He’s my acting coach! I have this built-in acting coach right here. How many girls . . . that’s their dream, y’know? And I fell in love with my dream!”

Maybe Glenn Reynolds would consider this as Courtney helping fight the “higher education bubble.” Or maybe not.

Finally, we find famed “momblogger” Danielle Smith addressing the Courtney Stodden scandal:

“So we’re going to go ahead and file this into the ‘Are You Kidding Me?’ category. . . . I’m not one for objecting, generally speaking, to age gaps in marriage. You could fall in love with someone who’s 15 or 20 years younger than you. My objection comes with the age of one of the parties: Sixteen years old — 16!”

OK, ma’am. Objection registered. But let’s ask a hypothetical question: Suppose that your daughter was determined to have sex at age 16. Given the choice, would you rather her first time be . . .

A. Drunk on wine coolers in a pup tent with Levi Johnston, or
B. On her wedding night, in a luxury hotel suite, with her movie star husband.

Just a hypothetical, but if you want my advice, I’d say if you don’t want your 16-year-old daughters having sex, keep them away from movie stars, Democratic congressmen and teenage boys with wine coolers.

Movie stars and Democratic congressmen are kind of rare.

But those teenage boys with wine coolers? They’re everywhere.